Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

FAIRFORD 5 NEWSFLASH - "Don't Rule On Iraq' - Foreign Office Spokesman Warns

IRAQ WAR ON TRIAL - BRISTOL | 01.07.2004 21:42 | Anti-militarism

THE STATE IS NERVOUS:

The Fairford 5 trials have once more exploded onto the international stage, as the Foreign Office intervenes in the court proceedings against the 'Fairford 5' - who all attempted to disable U.S B52 Bombers stationed at Fairford (Gloucestershire, U.K) in the days leading up to the illegal bombing of Iraq during March 2003.
Related Link:  http://www.fairfordpeacewatch.com/

Press Release – for immediate use

July 1, 2004

Iraq War on Trial

“DON’T RULE ON IRAQ”

FOREIGN OFFICE SPOKESMAN WARNS COURT

A senior Foreign Office official issued a dramatic warning this week, about possible consequences of a British court ruling on the legality of the Iraq war.

In a tone best described as one of feverish consternation, Sir Michael Hastings Jay, Permanent Under- Secretary of State at the Foreign Office and Head of the Diplomatic Service, warned that any court ruling on the Iraq war critical of UK government policy could damage relations with other governments, destabilise the new administration in Iraq, give aid and comfort to terrorists, and put the lives of British citizens in danger.

Sir Michael’s four-page signed statement was handed to a hearing of the Court of Appeal at the Royal Courts of Justice on Tuesday, ten minutes before the hearing was due to start.

In the event, Sir Michael’s statement was never cited in evidence, which is why it can be quoted here. But it offers an indication of the present British Establishment’s extreme touchiness where any possible court ruling relating to the Iraq war is concerned.

The hearing concerned the cases of the Fairford Five - a group of peace protesters charged with conspiracy and criminal damage for their actions at a Gloucestershire air base against the war on Iraq last year.

After a preparatory hearing in Bristol Crown Court in May, Mr. Justice Grigson ruled that the matter of the legality of the Iraq war was “non-justiciable,” and that the Fairford Five were not entitled to argue in their defence that they had acted to resist an unlawful war. Lawyers for the five peace activists argue that for their clients to have a fair trial, it will be necessary for them to speak of their “sincere belief” that the war was unlawful.

Sir Michael writes, “In the judgment of the Secretary of State and the Foreign & Commonwealth Office, and in my own opinion, it would be prejudicial to the national interest and to the conduct of the Government’s foreign policy if the English courts were to express opinions on questions of international law concerning the use of force by the United Kingdom and the United States which might differ from those expressed by the Government and advanced by it in the conduct of international relations.”

The situation “in and relating to” Iraq remains, in Sir Michael’s view, “one of the most sensitive in international relations at the present time.” Sir Michael believes that, “If the opinion of an English court, expressed in a formal judgment, differed from that of the Government, this would inevitably weaken the Government’s hand in its negotiations with other States.”

Allied governments “which have agreed with and supported the United Kingdom’s views on the legality of the use of force, could regard such a step as tending to undermine their own position.” Governments less friendly to UK policy on the war, “could seize upon such a judgment and use it to question the Government’s position in the course of diplomatic negotiations concerning Iraq and more widely.”

“Serious risks” could arise for the United Kingdom, Jay claims, from a court ruling on the war that went against the Government:

“It is likely that such a decision would provide encouragement to those in Iraq who are using violence to destabilise the situation, including insurgents, terrorists, former regime loyalists and those in Middle Eastern Countries who are supporting them. It would tend to undermine the new Iraqi Interim Government which took office on 29 June 2004. It would weaken the United Kingdom’s standing in Iraq, and could thus increase the
vulnerability of UK forces and personnel.

At the diplomatic level it would risk weakening the international consensus in support of the Iraqi Interim Government’s actions to increase stability, security and the protection of human rights in Iraq. In particular, it would undermine the consensus re-established within the Security Council, in which the international community has agreed to put past controversies behind it and to come together to assist Iraq [to] move forward.” [Italics added]

Sir Michael adds that, in his view, a ruling from the court critical of UK government policy on Iraq could “undermine the Government’s standing with Arab and Islamic countries, and could give comfort and encouragement to terrorist organisations.”

The UK’s “efforts to negotiate and secure effective measures against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction ( and in particular to prevent them becoming available to terrorist organisations) could be hampered” - also “the United Kingdom’s efforts to secure co-operation of States in measures against terrorists based in other countries, and measures to secure co-operation in the exchange of information vital to security matters.”

Meanwhile, the Fairford defendants continue to battle for their right to “mention the war.”

A ruling by the Court of Appeal is expected within the next few weeks.

More information: Related Link:  http://www.fairfordpeacewatch.com/

FOR PRESS CONTACTS, EMAIL:
nicefella (@) tesco.net

IRAQ WAR ON TRIAL - BRISTOL
- Homepage: http://www.fairfordpeacewatch.com/

Comments

Hide the following 6 comments

Crap

01.07.2004 21:49

This must be the worst, most innacurate posting ever placed on this board. I hope it will be removed asap.

watcher


in what way?

01.07.2004 22:22

Please be specific. In what way is it crap?

troll watcher


FOREIGN OFFICE SPOKESMAN WARNS COURT

01.07.2004 22:48

Surely that is a declaration that either the government have broke international law or they have no faith in the British legal system - under which the Fairford Five activists are being tried...

.


Above the law

02.07.2004 00:02

This is a simple case of the Government asserting that they are above the law. Since when does our Government have a mandate to carry out operations which could lead a competant court in this country to make judgements that could "damage relations with other governments, destabilise the new administration in Iraq, give aid and comfort to terrorists, and put the lives of British citizens in danger."?

If the British Government is responsible for actions of such dubious legality that the above could be true then their actions (rather than the court's judgement) are almost certainly criminal. To then forbid any court to rule on the legality of their decisions indicates 1: that they themselves doubt the legality of their actions, and 2: that they have no respect for the law (as '.' has already pointed out). If the Government acknowledges that they have no respect for the law then they can hardly expect any of their citizens to respect the law. Cease your struggle for Anarchy, folks, it is already a fact in this country - once the government is above the law we are all above the law.

Chief Justice Jackson - the Chief presecutor at Nuremberg - certainly considered such an unprovoked atack on a soveriegn country to be 'justicable'; indeed, he considered it to be the 'supreme crime'.

Prajña
 http://www.DeclarePeace.org.uk/
 http://www.p10k.net/

Prajña
- Homepage: http://www.p10k.net/


I am confused

02.07.2004 12:40

Are the 'Fairford five' the same as the 'B52 two' because the case in the court this week was the B52 two

 http://www.b52two.org.uk/

this has latest news whereas the above mentioned site on the first post has not been updated since April.

There is also an account on CND site

sis


The Same Thing

02.07.2004 16:40

The B52 2 make up 40% of the Fairford 5.

There were 3 separate actions, one was by the B52 2 (who tried & failed to do damage), another was by Margaret Jones & Paul Milling (who successfuly disabled £80,000 of support vehicles) and another was by Josh Richards (who also tried & failed).

james


Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech