Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Wikipedia Brighton page embroiled in controversy

Keith Parkins | 05.08.2006 13:22 | Analysis | Free Spaces | Social Struggles | South Coast

The Wikipedia page on Brighton has become embroiled in controversy following a link to a page on Brighton.

'As you should be aware, all editors are free to be bold in making changes to articles. Specialist knowledge of a subject is not essential, though obviously beneficial' – comment found on Wikipedia

Little did I realise when I wrote a web page for a friend on Brighton that it would become embroiled in controversy.

A friend spent a very happy summer on the South Coast near Brighton. So that she had something to remind her of those happy days, I wrote for her a web page on Brighton and the surrounding areas. Little did I realise then that this web page on Brighton would become embroiled in a controversy on Wikipedia.

 http://www.heureka.clara.net/sussex/brighton.htm

A link was made to my web page from the Wikipedia Brighton page, to be promptly removed, to be reinstated, to be removed, almost ad infinitum.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brighton

What appears to have happened, is that a couple of somewhat childish individuals (one describes himself as an environmentalist who enjoys driving a gas-guzzling 4x4!) have claimed the Wikipedia Brighton page as their own personal space. Anything that appears that has not been put there by them, or has their approval, is promptly removed.

A discussion on the Talk page (click link top of Wikipedia Page) gives an insight to their somewhat perverted rationale for removing the link. A rationale that is convoluted and internally contradictory.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Brighton

The linked page is a reproduction of what is on the Wikipedia page, is original research, has not been verified etc etc.

There appears to be a lack of any understanding of or training in local history research. For example, the need to reference primary original source documents, first hand eye witness accounts etc etc. But even then, as any historian worth their salts will tell you, you have to exercise extreme caution, know how to interpret, understand the context etc etc.

This has not been done for the Wikipedia page (apart from reference to government statistics). To a lesser extent has not been done on my page either, but at least my page is mainly a contemporary account, lots of pictures, and wherever possible, without becoming tedious, I have expanded on the points made, provided links etc. I have though, I hasten to add, not provided links to Wikipedia, as I regard it as a flawed source. And even if I had checked Wikipedia, and was happy with what I had found, there is no guarantee it would be correct the next day or the following day.

Interestingly, no comment that my page was inaccurate.

Unlike a published paper in a journal, or a widely recognised encyclopedia, Wikipedia is not peer reviewed. Unless you consider a million monkeys pecking away at a keyboard can produce something worthwhile, other than by random chance.

One of the individuals, speaks of Wikipedia being a self-healing database. It is nothing of the kind, and simply demonstrates ignorance of the subject.

I have created original Wikipedia pages, corrected and added to existing pages, but I would only do so where I knew the subject matter.

It is not only Brighton.

Similar problems have arisen on a page on Aldershot. It claimed that a shopping centre generated employment and there were now fewer empty shops. Neither statement was true. When this was corrected, the correction was referred to as vandalism and expressing a negative point of view, and promptly removed. The person who did so was not a resident or someone who was familiar with Aldershot. He then made the extraordinary statement that 'accuracy' was not important.

 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/05/340273.html

I am sure others can give many more examples.

Brighton-based SchNEWS was at one time removed from the Brighton Wikipedia page, but does, at least for the moment, appear to have been reinstated.

The Brighton controversy has now been referred to 'mediation'. Another example of giving Wikipedia a veneer of legitimacy.
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-08-04_Brighton_%28external_link%29

Does the 'mediator' know Brighton? Will he/she be visiting Brighton? Will they be checking out the 'facts', citing reliable sources?

I doubt it.

The impartiality of the 'mediator' was brought into question when comments by the mediator were found on the personal page of one of those who had repeatedly removed the link

'Hi Kieran, It looks like the other participant BrightonKid is either not interested in participating, or simply, the account was only made to vandalise the page. I've had a look at the link, and i would say myself that the link should be omittedSee below If he decides to come back within 7 days, we will mediate, otherwise: Case closed. Thanks --Deon555|talk|e 00:07, 4 August 2006 (UTC)'

Minds would appear to have already been made up.

Following exposure of the lack of impartiality by the 'mediator', the case was promptly closed, re-opened, and a new mediator to be appointed!

Watch this space!

There is also a straw poll on the Talk page, but how many visit to participate? But please do.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Brighton

The best judge are those who know Brighton.

Please visit the linked page. Is is a worthwhile page on Brighton?

 http://www.heureka.clara.net/sussex/brighton.htm

If yes, please restore the link, and add you view on the Talk page.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brighton
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Brighton

A superb example of the puerile behaviour, was shown when the link was (temporary) left in place but labelled 'controversial' and demoted down the list of external links.

Logic would suggest a page on Brighton, rather than a specific aspect of Brighton, would appear at or near the top.

Similarly, a criticism that the link was called 'Brighton'. As the link is to a page on Brighton, the linked page is entitled 'Brighton', what else would one call the link? Skidrow-on-Sea as Brighton is always referred to by Private Eye maybe!

Wikipedia gives a false impression of structured knowledge. Wikipedia appears to have everyone involved to comprehensively build a corpus of knowledge in an organized fashion. But its claimed strength, is also its weakness, anyone and everyone can change anything and everything. Only some seem to be more equal than others when it comes to effecting changes.

How many monkeys does it take to edit an encyclopedia?

The Wikipedia page on Brighton or Wikipedia should not be confused with Brighton wiki, which is a collection of articles on Brighton, produced by local people or people who know Brighton to try and build a core of knowledge on Brighton. Brighton wiki makes no claim to be an encyclopedia.

 http://wiki.brightoncore.com/index.php/Main_Page

Keith Parkins

Comments

Display the following 2 comments

  1. Very useful comments — Brightoner
  2. Communists complot takes over Wikipedia — povry
Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech