Your testimony might have some credibility if you didn't link to the website of Maryam Namazie, a well known Islamophobe and supporter of US imperialism.

Hitler needed the jews demonised for many many years before he could execute his worst plans.

Blair, and his agents in command and control positions within Indymedia UK, attack muslims with exactly the same intent.

The vile racist dribblings of 'pirate' (pushing Outrage! pro-Iran-war propaganda of behalf of pro-war factions within the marxist-zionist movement) used to be promoted on the newswire as well, until others and myself illustrated how clearly evil these articles were. Even so, 'pirate' has never lost one of its BNP-style rants to censorship here.

On the other hand, when the Israelis (to the applause of people working to the same agenda as the author of the above article) wiped out families enjoying a holiday on the beach, for the crime of being 'sub-human', comments from people like myself detailing the Israeli methodology were deleted by the same censors that promoted the above pro-Iran-war article. These racist censors, acting on behalf of their zionism-marxist cult, were then able to enjoy the fruits of their labour, when shortly afterwards, Israel executed a long planned operation to unleash a holocaust in Lebanon.

Of course, pointing out the reason for the promotion of the above article, and pointing out the purpose of 'pirate's posts, and the censorhip of anti-crimes-against-humanity comments on this site does nothing to stop the effectiveness of such tactics.

THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE IN THE WEST, REGARDLESS OF THE LOW REGARD THEY HOLD THEIR POLITICIANS IN, ARE BEING DRIVEN EVER FASTER TO FEAR AND/OR HATE MUSLIMS.

Big wars are driven by racism. You accept commands to kill 'them' because 'they' are different from you. Getting this meme pounded into the thoughts of people, for whom big war will be the most destructive thing possible in their lives, takes persistence and power. Blair's people riddle organisations like Indymedia UK. Usually they attempt to work with a degree of sophistication. Sometimes (like now) their mission priorities are too urgent to worry too much about potential blow-back.

Imagine an Indymedia UK in the 1930's. Imagine protests against Hitler. Imagine those protests being sabotaged by agents of Hitler (and god only knows, the UK establishment was a mass of pro-Hitler individuals). How? By telling the 'liberals' that they should focus on the policies of extremist fundamentalist jews (who certainly existed back then, and exist today) attending these protests. Imagine a poster named 'pirate' (a co-incidence I'm sure) who posted almost daily articles attacking the regime in Poland (Hitler's agents throughout the West were very good at doing this in reality).

A few months back, Blair's agents here were telling you that Straw was an enemy of Blair, that Straw had been 'demoted', and that Straw should lead the anti-Iran-war movement (attached to articles pushing a British Intelligence run mock Iran-solidarity organisation). When that kite didn't fly, are you REALLY suprised to see the architect of Israel's genocide in Palestine and Lebanon (as Foreign Secretary, Straw worked to have all muslim resistance groups declared 'terrorist' in the EU, in contradiction to UN law) playing such a major part in the demonisation of muslims?

And talking of Straw, I hope you noticed that it was Blair's agents within the leadership of the so-called anti-war movement that CANCELLED protests in Straw's consituency. DID YOU NOT WONDER WHY THE BBC GAVE BLAIR'S MAN GALLOWAY SUCH SIGNIFICANCE ON THE NEWS BROADCASTS WHEN HE VERBALLY ATTACKED STRAW? The reason? Simple, because you FAIL to wonder where the protests went, if you hear what appears to be a pleasing rant from Galloway. WHAT YOU FAIL TO REALISE IS THAT A REAL PROTEST AGAINST STRAW COULD HAVE SNOWBALLED INTO A DEVASTATING SERIES OF SPONTANEOUS PUBLIC ACTIONS AGAINST BLAIR, WHEREAS A GALLOWAY RANT, WHILE THRILLING THE NAIVE LEFTIES, HELPS STIR UP ANTI-MUSLIM FEELING AMONGST THE GENERAL PUBLIC EVEN MORE.

You see, Galloway is so effective for Blair since he NEVER wins converts, but he plays to near total approval to those who already 'believe' (helping entrench his leadership position). On the other hand, Galloway ACTIVELY angers otherwise neutral people, pushing them frmly into the anti-muslim camp. Therefore, when you cheer Galloway's rant on Sky, or the BBC yesterday, you fail to comprehend that he is broadcast because he helps build Blair's powerbase, NOT yours.

An anti-Straw public protest would have hurt Blair.
An anti-Straw rant from Galloway on the BBC helps Blair.

You can guess how un-suprised I was when the latter happened (and then Blair's agents go around telling people how the BBC must be 'secretly' anti-Blair for broadcasting Galloway's words- because they think you are that stupid).

Blair's genocide of Iran draws ever closer. When the time is right, you will see Blair's agents in command and control positions at sites like this discard the mask, and attempt to crudely push pro-genocide propaganda as hard as they can. This action will trigger a fight for the 'soul' of pro-Human activism, but it will be too late then.

If Indymedia UK was under the control of real pro-Human activists, the debate would be focused on the sickening racism used to punish North Korea, and reward Israel, a Blair tactic used to create the conditions under which the plan to genocide Iran is progressed. Admittedly, North Korea acted in an attempt to work against the Iran War by diverting attention to itself, but Blair's experts simply take the manoeuvers of N Korea, and use then to 'spin' against Iran by suggestiong that 'do-able' action against Iran serves as a proxy for 'too dangerous' action agains N Korea.

Whether or not the 'Korea ploy' works for Blair, merely persuing it continues with the 'momentum of history' master plan that guarantees war with Iran sooner or later regardless.

Twilight,

once again your ranting leads to some very intersting questions being raised with regards to your motives and your ethics.

Firstly, do you disagree with the remarks made in the article about the severe repression carried out by the Iranian regime?
Do you think that people who have suffered under this regime should be silenced? Your fascist views with regards to silencing debate and condemnation of the Iranian regime mirrors the very same activities that you state the the british government takes with regards to silencing critisisms of its policy.

there is nothing of any value in the Iranian regime that should be praised. If i am wrong then please correct me. Again, if the reporting of the supression carried out by the Iranian government is wrong then please enlighten us.
do you find it so hard to be a critic of opression wherever if occurs (in this instance in both the actions of the UK/US and Iran)?

Your simplistic logic of "my enemies enemy is my friend" is just that - simplistic.
While your condemnation of any critisism of the Iranian government mirrors the bush/blair doctrine of "your are either with us or against us". nice that you adhere to the same fascist logic as these two, eh?

so twilight, do you oppose all forms of opression and all those who have been opressed or just those that fit neatly into your ideological box?

Who cares if its pro or anit war, or pro or anti anything else for that matter.
What was written is what was written.

I feel the sentiment that anything put on Indymedia sites must comply with pro-gay, pro-choice, anti-israel, anti-america and anti-whatever the powers that be [Indymedian] want. There is nothing but a constant push to one side of the fence; any debate or consideration or disagreement is frowned upon.

The Stop The War Coalition and Respect will never seriously criticize Islamic fascism because they fear alienating the Muslim community they depend on (hopefully) for support. Secularist principles have been completely sacrificed in the rush to get into bed with Islamists.

And who wins out of this alliance of supposed Leftists and Islamist radicals? Only the so-called community leaders (imams) who push the misogynist, anti-democratic and reactionary policies of Islamism.

All religion is submission. Whatever happened to that old anarchist slogan of 'Neither God Nor Master'?