Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Response to Counter-Terrorism Act 2008: Section 67

Rooster | 18.02.2009 00:21 | Culture | Other Press | Repression

Read below

Today (16.02.09) section 76 of the Counter Terrorism Act 2008 is to be passed as law by the Labour government.

Section 76 updates section 58 of the Terrorism Act 2000, which states that a person commits an offence if ‘he collects or makes a record of information of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism.' A 'record' includes a 'photographic or electronic record.'

The amendment expands the previous legislation by making it an arrestable act to elicit, publish or communicate information about a member of the armed forces, intelligence services or a police officer which is ‘ likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism.’ The offence carries a maximum jail sentence of 10 years and a fine.

Around 150 photographers met outside Scotland Yard to exercise their right to photograph in public and question the new law today.

The new law will restrict the practice of the UK media to effectively document news- particularly at protests and public order situations. This is dangerous for democracy as it inhibits the ability of the media to hold the police to account, limits people's capacity to make informed choices on the basis of quality journalism, and curtails everyone's civil liberties.

I say this in relation to the current treatment of the press by police, and increased surveillance on political campaigners. Working as a photojournalist for the last few years I have been exposed to the misuse of previous counter-terrorism laws by police on demonstrations. I have been, and seen others, stopped and searched under section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000, despite presenting a press card as proof of being a bonefied news gatherer.

At the end of 2008 a colleague of mine was handcuffed and removed from a public order scene despite being behind the police cordon. The MET have since apologized, and it was openly stated that the police receive lack-lustre training on dealing with the media. This is shown on innumerable occasions when it is demanded of photographers to delete pictures. This of course is an illegal act as photography is permitted of anyone and anything in the public sphere... not anymore.

Intimidation of photographers by police seems to have increased in the last year, with the cameras of the police Forward Information Team turning on journalists at political demonstrations for example ( http://current.com/items/89284474/press_freedom_collateral_damage.htm). This intimidation takes many forms from physical aggression ( http://www.bjp-online.com/public/showPage.html?page=836437) to smaller incidents such as the full name, address and date of birth being demanded of a photographer despite having a press card. Why should a journalist have to give their personal details because they are doing their job and covering a story? The police are supposed to be acting in the interest of the public, but in these instances they are preventing the media from reporting the news- news that is surely in the interest of the public to have access to.

Other examples of misuse of counter-terrorism laws include;

> a conservative mp being stopped and searched for photographing a cycle path in Croydon.

 http://www.yourlocalguardian.co.uk/news/local/croydonnews/4024703.Croydon_MP_searched_by_cops_under_terror_laws/

> an artist being jailed for five hours for photographing a building in Elephant & Castle and having a stanley knife to sharpen pencils in his bag. He was being paid by developers to document the changes in the area.

 http://www.southlondonpress.co.uk/tn/news.cfm?id=818

In this context it does not seem appropriate to give police these powers; as previous events and a lack of training strongly suggest that section 76 will be misused.

Interestingly enough the Metropolitan Police Federation's chairman Peter Smyth says in a press release, "that poorly-drafted anti-terrorist legislation could be used to justify unwarranted interference in their (press photographer's) lawful activities.”

He then goes on to say that the law, "is open to wide interpretation or, rather, misinterpretation." I cannot agree more. The wording of the law is vague- it would be a productive exercise to list situations section 67 cannot be applied to in terms of photography. This is highlighted when Mr Smyth goes onto say, “does the law mean tourists are going to be rounded up and arrested en masse for taking suspicious photos of iconic scenes around the capital?"

The real possibility is that the rule will be applied when the police want it to be applied. It is not productive for a photographer documenting a protest to be arrested, and with the new string on the legal bow of the police in the form of section 67 the power certainly lies with them in their control of the media's movements at such events.

Section 67 is entirely undemocratic. A state where the actions of law enforcers can be hidden by the law itself does not make for a free society. By turning away the lenses of the press the police cannot be held to account for their actions by the people they are meant to be acting on behalf of, and limits our understanding of events that effect us all.

Rooster

Comments

Display the following 2 comments

  1. Is CCTV illegal now? — CCTV
  2. A citizen's petition — CCTV #2
Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech