Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Israel kills 10+ on Free Gaza Flotilla taking aid to Gaza

IMCista | 08.06.2010 21:00 | Flotilla to Gaza | Palestine

At 4.30am local time, armed Israeli troops boarded one of the boats in the Free Gaza Flotilla which was carrying construction supplies, medical equipment and schoolbooks to Gaza, in an attempt to break the siege which Israel imposed on Gaza over 1080 days ago.

35 UK citizens were aboard the boats, which carried activists from over 50 countries. The boats were reportedly 80 miles off the coast of Gaza, and many on the boats were said to be asleep when Israeli troops opened fire with machine guns. Many wounded have reportedly been taken to Israeli hospitals. Israel is on a media offensive claiming that its troops were attacked first. Even if it were true, they would need to explain why they were boarding a ship flying a Turkish flag in International waters.

A demo was held outside Downing Street yesterday afternoon and Stop the War had already called a demo for this afternoon at 2pm outside Downing Street.

ISM London stated that they were "horrified" by the incident but also stated that "We’re not surprised that the attacks took place in International waters, or that they were a reckless, murderous over-reaction to unarmed ships carrying medical supplies and building materials. Israel routinely meets non violent Palestinian protest with lethal violence."

On the 31st May protests were held across the country with reports coming in from London, Cambridge, Bristol, Birmingham, Sheffield, Manchester, and Galway. In London the protest moved on from Downing Street to the Israeli Embassy, whilst in Bristol a protest was held in solidarity with Palestinians and the two Bristolians aboard the attacked convoy. In Galway a protest was held inside Marks & Spencer in protest of their support of the occupation, and in Manchester protesters attempted to storm the BBC building in protest of biased reporting.

There is also news that Israel vows to attack next Flotilla boat - possibly tomorrow

Video: Call for action from activist Caoimhe Butterly (Gaza TV News)

31st May Protests: London: 1 | 2 | 3 Cambridge: 1 | 2 | 3 Bristol: 1 Birmingham: 1 Sheffield: 1 Galway: 1 | Manchester protesters try to storm BBC

UPDATE: On Tuesday 15th June two survivors of the attack, Alex Phillips and Osama Qashoo who were on board the Mavi Marmara spoke at a public meeting in Sheffield organised by the Sheffield Palestine Solidarity Campaign.



IMCista

Comments

Hide the following 49 comments

Also protest 11am Foreign Office, 5pm Manchester BBC

31.05.2010 09:16

From many users on twitter: LONDON :11am, The Foreign Office, Whitehall, London and 2pm Downing Street, London. Manchester 5pm at BBC HQ, Oxford Road #Flotilla

Andrew


Demo Bristol hippodrome 3pm

31.05.2010 10:14

Also a demo outside bristol hippodrome at 3pm. There are many nearby relevant places. Please distribute.

.


Oxford demo - Tuesday, 1pm, Cornmarket Street

31.05.2010 12:32

Demo tomorrow at 1pm by Barclays, Spread ze word!

Kit
mail e-mail: munilooney@gmail.com


Vigil in Oxford this evening

31.05.2010 14:50

VIGIL TO MOURN DEAD ON GAZA PEACE FLOTILLA, THIS EVENING AT 6pm
AT CARFAX

Come if you can - I know many are away today. Bring a candle if you can.

I've made a leaflet and am making a banner.

We'll also have a bigger action (a line down Cornmarket?) on Saturday,
and aim to focus attention on the continuing seige of Gaza, as well as
protest today's murderous piracy by Israel.

[Passed on from Oxford Ramallah]

Kit


Resistance

31.05.2010 17:35

If a group of Israeli commandos, highly trained professional killers, boarded my ship, in international waters, in the middle of the night, I would feel shit scared they were going to kill us, and I would resist. The media is all like 'poor commandos being attacked by sticks'. This is a commando squad. They only know how to kill, they don´t do crowd control. What the hell sort of operation involved dropping a small squad of heavily armed commandos onto a boat, at night, to control a crowd of 600 people!!! It was bound to lead to violence like this. So there are only two conclusions. 1) That the Israeli army is completely stupid and incompetent or 2) That they did exactly what they wanted to do, kill some activists, like Tom Hurndall and Rachel Corrie, to discourage anyone else from coming.
I think it's probably a mixture of the two, incompetence and evil.

Hermes


War crime, piracy, murder, kidnapping

31.05.2010 19:37

Israel has committed another monstrosity against the civilians. How long the USA and EU will protect this criminal state?

Israel has committed various crimes tonight. This time cannot hide, behind the war against the "terrorists of Gaza", this time is against citizens of 50 different countries. Let me tell you:
Its first crime was: Waving war against Turkey for attacking ships under Turkey's flag (Crime against the Humanity)
Second: Piracy for the assault of ship in international waters
Third: Murder 14 civilians
Fourth: Attend of Murder in the account of every single person in the ship
Fifth: Kidnapping for transporting the people of the ships to military bases

The UN MUST start procedures against the President of Israel and all his cabinet for these crimes. Interpol MUST arrest these criminals. USA and EU MUST start a blockade against Israel.

Tonight; Israel killed for bricks and mortar so Gaza cannot repair its infrastructures. Gaza needs our help so does not depend of Israel for food, medicines and jobs. The bricks in the ships were the foundations of a better future for Gaza. Israel has proved once more its lack of respect for international laws and carried out the last episode of the "Palestinian Holocaust". The Uniforms are different, the ideas are different but the tactics are the same:
Warsaw ghetto (blockade, isolation, hunger, poverty,lack of medicines, etc...)

How long the USA and Europe will protect this criminal state?

Karlos Xardel

karlos Xardel
mail e-mail: karloxardel@gmail.com


Ignore comment advertising demo 1pm Oxford

31.05.2010 20:02

Ignore the call for a demo on Cornmarket Street on Tuesday.

There'll be a demo on Thursday at 6pm on Cornmarket Street instead. Better to have a big'un than split the effort.

Kit


Like a microcosm of the whole conflict

01.06.2010 02:37

I was just thinking how the whole situation and the propoganda around it is like the whole middle-east conflict in microcosm. The Israel's try to take the boat (or the land of Palestine) by force. The people there resist,as is there right to do so when boarded by pirates in INTERNATIONAL WATERS against international law, and with what little means they have against superior weaponry. The Israelis kill them all, all the while claiming that they are being attacked and persecuted. Like, those commandos were coming on board to hug and kiss the passengers or what? I especially love the lines I read in the media of the saying 'Our soldiers climbed on board and were welcomed with violence'. What did they expect, dropping heavily armed, masked soldiers on board in the middle of the night. To be welcomed with flowers?

Israel acts like 'You should let us kill anyone we like, anywhere we like, and if you don't, you're an anti-semite'. You are so far removed from reality. It has nothing to do with anti-semitism. It's about basic humanity and common sense. When are you going to stop painting yourself as the victim and using it to justify every sort of atrocity?

Hermes


US activist loses eye in West Bank

01.06.2010 09:44

American activist loses eye after being shot in face with tear gas canister

31 May 2010: An American solidarity activist was shot in the face with a tear gas canister during a demonstration in Qalandiya, today. Emily Henochowicz is currently in Hadassah Hospital in Jerusalem undergoing surgery to remove her left eye, following the demonstration that was held in protest to Israel’s murder of at least 10 civilians aboard the Gaza Freedom Flotilla in international waters this morning.

21-year old Emily Henochowicz was hit in the face with a tear gas projectile fired directly at her by an Israeli soldier during the demonstration at Qalandiya checkpoint today. Israeli occupation forces fired volleys of tear gas at unarmed Palestinian and international protesters, causing mass panic amongst the demonstrators and those queuing at the largest checkpoint separating the West Bank and Israel.

 http://palsolidarity.org/2010/05/12604/

Hermes


Israel admits previous sabotage

01.06.2010 10:34

This video of Ewa Jasiewicz describes failures on their boat that caused them to swap ships.

"We have to transfer because this boat is in bad shape. Even though it's been certificated and tested, everythings been checked on this boat, it's been road tested, suddenly the steering is failing, the pumps are failing, it is actually taking water so we have no alternative but to pull into a port and make repairs. There is a lot of people who view this as sabotage, it could be the case, but we aren't going to know until we examine the boat"

The sabotage theory was today confirmed by the Israeli government.

'Vilna'i hinted on sabotaged ships'
 http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=177108

“Every possibility was considered. The fact is that there were ten less ships in the flotilla than were originally planned.” - Deputy Defense Minister Manan Vilna'i

-


More confirmation of sabotage

01.06.2010 12:34

During his briefing on the operation to the Knesset's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, Colonel Itzik Turgeman hinted that the IDF had sabotaged the engines of the other five ships, saying that "they took care of them."

 http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/mossad-chief-israel-is-gradually-becoming-a-burden-on-the-u-s-1.293540

-


Help break the Pro-Israel censorhip on de.indymedia.org!!!

01.06.2010 15:32

Since yesterday heavy censorhip on indymedia Deutschland is taking place. Comments are not published, reports about upcomming demonstrations against the Gaza-flotilla massacre are erased after some time. Organising resistance among the left in Germany is made difficult.

Please send articles about Gaza to de.indymedia.org

f


Why 600 passengers?

01.06.2010 16:01

Why the need for 600 passengers which if this was a supply ship it mean that you would need to feed 600 people three meals a day for a three day trip surely 30 people could do the delivery and find helper on land to pick up the goods from the ship.

loppy


Why 600 passengers?

01.06.2010 22:59

This is only my opinion but I think it is obvious why there were six hundred passengers. These six hundred represent many hundreds of thousands of donators and supporters, they will have earned the right to be an eye-witness, and to risk their lives their seeing the aid get through.

A more obvious clue is in the name, WitnessGaza.com , as if you were witnessing a murder you would want more than one witness. The real question is 'Why aren't more than 600 witnesses sailing to Gaza with aid?'

-


30 odd people are more than enough witnesses

02.06.2010 10:22

I figured the trip might had more success if there weren't 600 odd people I doubt all of them are Doctors I sure many of them are on a free ride and a trip for no propose. I just think it would had been more a success if a true explanation was given. No wonder the Israeli got a little jumpy who know who was travelling on the ship. It's bad enough trying to get to Israeli via air. You can hardy expect them to give the ship a welcoming committee.

loppy


@ loppy

02.06.2010 10:32

loppy - you're attempt at trying to sound like a impartial observer is shit. the boats weren't going to israel. they were going to Gaza. now fuck off

freeGAZA


I am sorry to sound contrive my English isn't that good

02.06.2010 15:39

I didn't know Gaza was any independent country, I am sorry to sound contrive my English isn't that good but I wondering why it worth nine people lives for what was nothing more than an aid trip. To be called as Fuck Off by organisers of Free Gaza confirm my precedes ideas. I am sorry that you weren't more circulate for put forward your ideas behind this ill advised trip. I am also surprised that you allow a mother with a one year old child abroad this vestal and yet back here at old blightly we all jumped in horror about a mother leaving a one year old child sun burned on a beach.

loppy


FreedomFlotilla, IDF-Pirates and International Law

02.06.2010 17:46

I hate discussing wether IDF-actions were "legal" or "illegal" - what happened would be disgusting and sad either way! But for all you fans of bourgeois international law:

The San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea seems to show that Israel has complied with international law to the letter.

Paragraph 47 lists ships that are exempt from attack. Presuambly, the flotilla organizers consider themselves to fit under sub-paragraph (c)(ii):

(c) vessels granted safe conduct by agreement between the belligerent parties including:

(ii) vessels engaged in humanitarian missions, including vessels carrying supplies indispensable to the survival of the civilian population, and vessels engaged in relief actions and rescue operations;

The next paragraph mentions a major exception:

48. Vessels listed in paragraph 47 are exempt from attack only if they: (a) are innocently employed in their normal role;
(b) submit to identification and inspection when required; and
(c) do not intentionally hamper the movement of combatants and obey orders to stop or move out of the way when required.


In addition, such sea-blockades in international waters are legal:

96. "The force maintaining the blockade may be stationed at a distance determined by military requirements."

More relevant sections:

98. "Merchant vessels believed on reasonable grounds to be breaching a blockade may be captured. Merchant vessels which, after prior warning, clearly resist capture may be attacked."


103. "If the civilian population of the blockaded territory is inadequately provided with food and other objects essential for its survival, the blockading party must provide for free passage of such foodstuffs and other essential supplies, subject to: (a) the right to prescribe the technical arrangements, including search, under which such passage is permitted; and (b) the condition that the distribution of such supplies shall be made under the local supervision of a Protecting Power or a humanitarian organization which offers guarantees of impartiality, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross."

Israel does all of these things. Last week, Israel delivered more cement to Gaza than the flotilla wanted to provide - but Israel gave the cement to UNRWA under strict conditions and ensuring that they are used only for the purposes they are earmarked for.

BTW according to Xinhua, at the moment Hamas is refusing to recieve parts of the Flotilla-Aid, which is now being delivered through Israel.

Another BTW: The U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, Article 101 explains the following:

Piracy consists of any of the following acts:

(a) any illegal acts of violence or detention, or any act of depredation, committed for private ends by the crew or the passengers of a private ship or a private aircraft, and directed:

(i) on the high seas, against another ship or aircraft, or against persons or property on board such ship or aircraft;

(ii) against a ship, aircraft, persons or property in a place outside the jurisdiction of any State;

(b) any act of voluntary participation in the operation of a ship or of an aircraft with knowledge of facts making it a pirate ship or aircraft;

I don’t think even the Gaza flotilla defenders claim that the IDF raid was “committed for private ends.” (Just the opposite, actually). And, in general, piracy cannot be committed by a national ship, only by private ships or by national ships that have been taken over by their crews.

So can we drop the stupid piracy meme? The very hard legal issue left is:
Did the IDF use disproportionate force? (I have no idea). This last question is really the key issue here, and it is also the one that is never going to be resolved with any certainty given that it is dependent on neutral factual determinations that will never happen here.

(A)


*owch*

02.06.2010 18:11

And the reality is:

...is that a group of full on type protesters on board the ship that wouldn't kowtow, resisted the boarding by Isreali military, who were, bizarrely, totally unprepared for such a type of resistance, and started using guns to fight off the raging militants. I think its true to say that the Isreali military were expecting the NVDA (non violent direct action) type resistance. What they got was a serious beating until they took control with guns. However by pushing the case like this, and basically martyring themselves, these protestors, plus whoever else was shot, have created a propaganda implosion for the Isreali state...and HOWEVER the Isreali state does not have the right to enact genocide/ethic cleansing of the indigenous people of Palestine, a reality that is neccessary in order to make room for the ever explanionist Isreali state. It is this crux reality that needs to be fundimentally acknoledged by the Isrealis, and peace made with neighbours, before true peace can be achieved. Who can do this? Yah perhaps :)

Worth saying also that Hamas are a nasty bunch of scum that no one should support. Headcases lead by mad mullahs that are directing the fucking stupid suicide bombing type trip. Militarily insane. It has been proven many many time over in military campaigns, that targeting of infrastructure is the most effective way to attack a country/enemy. I.e. Expressway systems/bridges etc. But will these egoising wankers learn? Like fuck. Instead ''you will go to heaven if you blow yourself up in a crowd of civilians.'' I think it also needs to be said that both christian, jewish and Mulsim religious books bear NO REALITY WHAT-SO-EVER to the original teachings/channelling religious telepathy thought of the relevant saints/entities, and have been highly modified by associated patriarchal filth that think they control societies. (enforced bonnet wearing etc etc etc etc etc)

I do think that individuals like Jesus and Mohammed were also egoising pricks...as well as being religious channels in the magical/pyscik/telepathic sense. The fact that modern nonsensical religious dogma is being enforced in their name by extreme violence would be truely horrifically screamingly upsettingly weepingly nightmare for these saints. That, by the way is part of the reason why its important not to egoise and become a individually identifiable community wide effect consciousness transcending saint. These days by the way, a Jesus type saint (with the community wide effect) operating in western society would more than likely be fitted up as a paedophile, rather than cruxified on the cross, by the ritual abuse masonic state. It MIGHT be possible to work within the Islamic or Hindu paradigm...perhaps with certain constraints...but Mason manor - ooo deary deary me. A definite no no.


...Know this knoledge from the sadu trip in India by the way, where this stuff is mainstream, even in the modern age.

Fucking annoying idiocy all round.

Sort yerselves out please.

Blessings

Creation Dream Becomes Manifest With Extasy


Sloppy Loppy

02.06.2010 20:25

"Why the need for 600 passengers which if this was a supply ship"

It wasn't just a supply ship. The supplies carried were a tiny part of what Gaza needs, the aim of the flotilla is to break the inhumane seige of Gaza by opening sea channels that were open until 2007, as called for in last years UN resolution on Gaza which "Welcomes the initiatives aimed at creating and opening humanitarian corridors and other mechanisms for the sustained delivery of humanitarian aid"

"I doubt all of them are Doctors I sure many of them are on a free ride and a trip for no propose. I just think it would had been more a success if a true explanation was given"

A true explanation has been given, you've just not bothered to read it and instead embarrass yourself here by asking stupid questions. If you had bothered to read the Free Gaza website, instead of criticising a movement you haven't taken taken five minutes to investigate, you would have read:

"We want to break the siege of Gaza. We want to raise international awareness about the prison-like closure of the Gaza Strip and pressure the international community to review its sanctions policy and end its support for continued Israeli occupation. We want to uphold Palestine's right to welcome internationals as visitors, human rights observers, humanitarian aid workers, journalists, or otherwise"

-


Zionist Violation of International Maritime Law Concerning the Gaza Relief Ships

02.06.2010 22:53

Would dispute the assessment that the zionists did not violate international maritime law. Think a good case could be made, in light of the fact that one of their major aims was their attempted assassination of certain individuals on the lead ship (which is most definitelya violation of international maritime law) . Although their actions were technically not acts of piracy they were certainly illegal.

In light of the fact the United States turned over a goodly number of nuclear warheads to them, the people of the World should be extremely concerned that such an unstable rogue state is in possession of such weapons.

Hopefully such a case will be the becoming of the process whereby the zionist regime will be compelled to turn over their nuclear stockpile to the United Nations.

Owen Chase


(A)

03.06.2010 00:17

It takes two countries to be at war. Israel cannot be at war with Gaza as it part of itself and none of the flotilla boats were sailing under the flag of a country that is at war with Israel so none of your war time laws do apply, it is peace time international maritime laws, etc, that must be considered exclusively IMO. Israel had absolutely zero right to attack those boats which sailed in international waters.

What the fuck do I know?


propanganda, rogue states and international law

03.06.2010 03:11

@ Owen Chase

since you've given no source for your claim that "one of their [the IDF's] major aims was their attempted assassination of certain individuals on the lead ship" i'll take it unproven and just another peace of common islamistic propaganda picked up somewhere in the internet. So-called journalists from Pakistan and Syria claimed for example that the IDF had executed 4 palestinean TV-journalists on Marva Marmara with headshots right in front of them. Another one: the IDF kidnapped a palestinean baby-child and threatened to kill him if the captain of Marva Marmara didn't stop the ship. no proof whatsoever.

also your condemnation of Israel as an "unstable rogue state" is IMO a bit harsh. Consider the situation over there: Israel is in fact surrounded by enemie states and organisations. Now just recall how british government reacted on the IRA, the spanish government's reaction on ETA, the german governments reaction on the RAF.... (could go on). Compared to Hamas and Hizbullah these were all minor threats. In the end you'll see Israel is in good company with any modern bourgeois state in Europe and elsewhere. Doesn't make it any better, but will reveal that cruelty and state-terrorism are not especially Israelian traits.

@ what the fuck do i know

it sure needs two parties for a good war, but the paper i quote referrs to armed conflict at sea in general. further the paragraphs i quoted are applicable to neutral ships.


redfront!

(A)


Someone Seems Nervous

03.06.2010 04:35

Have we hit a raw nerve?

Patience. The inquests have not yet begun.

In the meantime, is there is any good reason why a state the size of New Jersey should hold one of the five largest repositories of nuclear weapons in the World?

Owen Chase


patience and nuclear wepons

03.06.2010 11:24

@ Owen Chase

no raw nerves hit, yet ;-) Just as you said: let's all keep hysteria down and wait patiently for serious inquest results. that's what I'm trying to say. thank you.

"is there is [sic] any good reason why a state the size of New Jersey should hold one of the five largest repositories of nuclear weapons in the World?"

(though i'm not sure wether that was ever proven or admitted by israel in public)
No, i think there's absolutely no good reason for any state to maintain larger arsenals of nuclear weaponry - but there's explanations. As I tried to point out before israel is one of the (if not the!) most endangered state(s) in the world. For a (modern) state it's only "natural" to accumulate any kind of leathal devices to defend (this includes aggression) against its enemies. Yet israel has never used her nuclear weapons against any of her numerous enemies nor shown serious intention to do so.
Again we see israel in good company with any modern bourgeois state in Europe and elsewhere.

BTW Ever wondered why france, great britain, the usa or russia still hold enourmous amounts of nuclear weapons? Ever been anxious about nuclear weapons in pakistan, india or north-corea?

redfront!

(A)


(A)

03.06.2010 11:52

Well if if Israel wants to invoke the laws governing war for what they did, then they've got to be formally at war with the countries whose ships they attacked belong to I guess. And this is the US and Turkey AFAIK, both members of the NATO alliance. Is Israel formally claiming to be at war with NATO with all the nasty consequences this will mean for them?

If they don't then the peacetime rules apply and this is an act of murderous piracy, and consequently Gaby Ashkenazi, Ehud Barak and Benyamin Netanyahu should all be the object of international arrest warrants for ordering it.


wtf


War and peace, allies and foes

03.06.2010 13:11

@ wtf

as I said before, the papers i quoted such as
- the Helsinki Principles on the Law of Maritime Neutrality
- the San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea
- the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea
are fully applicable to neutral ships, i.e. ships flying the flag of a neutral state such as Turkey or the USA. Their application is also not subject to formal declaration of war or s.th. - these paragraphs may be applied to any kind of armed conflict or conflict with involvement of armed forces at sea.
(do also read my other comments)

And if you look at the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, article 101 you'll find that piracy qua definitionem cannot be committed by states or state ships. So what happenend was certainly not "piracy" and whether it was "murderous" (i.e. "murder") or "self defense" (possibly with disproportionate use of force) is still to be investigated.
(do also read my other comments)

Redfront!

(A)


Its time to call zionists for what they are, racist savages

03.06.2010 13:44

They respect no one (besides themselves), no law, no altruistic benign higher principle. To them it is the law of the jungle, period. That the United States provided them with a stockpile of several nuclear warheads only exposes the true nature of US intentions, globally.

It is long overdue that this stockpile is turned over to the United Nations and nuclear whistle blower Mordechai Vanunu be allowed, finally, to leave the clutches of his captors.

Winston Churchill


Swedish Port Workers Blockade Israeli Goods

03.06.2010 14:58

The Swedish Port Workers Union is blockading all Israeli ships and cargo to and from Israel.

Solidarity Forever


Unfortunately

03.06.2010 21:04

Every day Zionism appears more and more like German National Socialism, although right now they are more like Apartheid South Africa. They've built the Palestinian ghettoes. They have a policy of racial seperation. The foreign minister is calling for the expulsion of Israeli Arabs, and Arab members of the Knesset were heckled and forceably evicted from the premises while trying to talk about the flottila. Peace activists are shot dead on boats, and shot in the face with tear gas canisters on the land. Debate is becoming more and more censured. For Israel to be the Nazis, well, they would have to start a holocaust, but seriously, is that the standard against which all Israel's actions are to be measured. That everything short of the extermination of millions of people is alright, because the Nazis were worse. And I bet if Israel did bring about a holocaust, they would claim they were acting in self-defence. Perhaps someone threatened one of their soldiers with a toothbrush or something, so they had to kill everybody, just in case.

Hermes


Zionism Is Racist and Wrong

04.06.2010 00:27

Like racist Jim Crow and racist Apartheid racist Zionism must end.

The Zionists, the active and willing collaborators of Adolf Hitler, attempt to defile Judaism by using it as a pretext and justification for their horrendous crimes. They are despicable.

Fortunately long after Zionism ends, Judaism will live. It was here long before Herzl and his racist criminal gang and will be here long after them.

No Justice, No Peace
We Shall Overcome

Paul Robeson


(A)tomic (A)pologist

04.06.2010 09:17

The comments by (A) are subtle yet highly inaccurate propaganda. Perhaps the most important half-truth / lie is :
"Yet israel has never used her nuclear weapons against any of her numerous enemies nor shown serious intention to do so"

In the 1973 Yom Kippur / Ramadan War Israel deployed thirteen 20 kiloton nuclear weapons and was seriously intending on using them. This was confirmed in 2003 by Naftali Lavie, who was Defence Minister Moshe Dayan's spokesman during the war. This is generally regarded as the closest we have come to nuclear war since the Cuban misile crisis.

Israel agreed to sell nuclear weapons to Apartheid South Africa, hardly the act of a responsible state.

Israel has currently briefed that it has deployed three nuclear armed submarines of the coast of Iran.

-


Sabotage delays the MV Rachel Corrie

04.06.2010 09:40

From FreeGaza.org -

(Cyprus, June 4, 2010) On Tuesday,, Colonel Itzik Tourgeman told the Knesset Defense and Foreign Affairs Committee on Tuesday that two more ships are on their way to try and break the naval blockade of Gaza. The head of research in the operations division said, "The ships have not reached their target as of today because covert action was taken against them."  http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/Flash.aspx/187299

We had suspicions about our two boats, Challenger 1 and 2 and their mechanical problems as they sailed toward the flotilla, but we were not going to say anything unless we could prove it. Turns out we didn't have to prove it. Israeli mouthpieces did.

The Guardian ran a piece the same day, saying,

Israel gave strong indications today that its forces had secretly sabotaged some of the ships bound for Gaza as part of the freedom flotilla.

Matan Vilnai, the deputy defence minister, was asked on Israel Radio whether there had not been a smarter alternative to direct assault. He answered that "all possibilities had been considered," adding: "The fact is that there were less than the 10 ships that were due to participate in the flotilla."

An unnamed Israeli Defence Force source who briefed the Knesset's foreign affairs and defence committee on the widely criticised armed interception of the flotilla at sea, also spoke of "grey operations" being mounted against the flotilla."

We were lucky that our two captains were supurbly trained and able to offload the passengers safely.

So we are going to make sure the Rachel Corrie is well protected and that Israel is put on notice that anything that happens to her, the passengers and the crew will rest with Israel. As a result of these threats, we're going to pull Rachel Corrie into a port, add more high-profile people on board, and insist that journalists from around the world also come with us.

And sabotage happens with more than deeds. It also happens with words. In today's Haaretz, Barak Ravid reported,

"A diplomatic solution seems imminent to allow the humanitarian aid vessel the Rachel Corrie to dock without incident at the Ashdod Port. According to European diplomats and senior Foreign Ministry officials in Jerusalem, quiet messages have been exchanged over the past few days between Israel and the group operating the ship, to allow it to dock."

This, too, is sabotage in writing. We called Haaretz and the reporter. He did not return our call.

We have no intention nor would we ever have any intention of ever docking in Ashdod.

Contact: Greta Berlin 00 357 99 18 72 75

Mary Hughes, 00 357 96 38 38 09

-


Oh come off it!

04.06.2010 14:50

"In the 1973 Yom Kippur / Ramadan War Israel deployed thirteen 20 kiloton nuclear weapons and was seriously intending on using them. This was confirmed in 2003 by Naftali Lavie, who was Defence Minister Moshe Dayan's spokesman during the war. This is generally regarded as the closest we have come to nuclear war since the Cuban misile crisis.

Israel agreed to sell nuclear weapons to Apartheid South Africa, hardly the act of a responsible state.

Israel has currently briefed that it has deployed three nuclear armed submarines of the coast of Iran."

The only people who really believe any of that, are living in Israel!

Realist


Israeli nuclear PRopoganda

04.06.2010 15:40

"The only people who really believe any of that, are living in Israel! "

Obvious nonsense. The NYT reported this, as did every major international news media including right wing media inside Israel.

"Ever been anxious about nuclear weapons in pakistan, india or north-corea?"

Pakistan, India and North Korea combined have less nukes than Israel. All their nukes are pointed across a single border, where as Israel claims to be surrounded by enemies so will be targetting more people and inherently more dangerous. If the Israeli submarines near Iran fire their nuclear missiles at Iranian nuclear sites then there would be war with Iran and Syria, but the US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan would bear the brunt of that. If Israel is threatening to nuke an islamic country just because it could develop a bomb, is it not also capable of nuking an Islamic country that already has nuclear missiles? If an Israeli nuclear armed cruise missle hit a Pakistan nuclear site, it would be likely that Pakistan and India would fire all their missiles at each oither. Israel could justify that to its own deluded and fearful people as punishment for AQ Khan leaking Pakistani know-how.



Nuclear Arsenals

Russia (former Soviet Union) 4,650 / 12,000
United States 2,468 / 9,600
France ~300
United Kingdom 225
China 180-240
Pakistan 70-90
India 60-80
North Korea <10

Israel is estimated to have between 200 to 400 nukes. At 200 Israel would have the fitth or 6th largest nuclear arsenal, but if they have 400, they would be the third largest nuclear arsenal.

-


Egypt fails to block Gaza tunnels

04.06.2010 21:49

Egypt fails to block Gaza tunnels, VIDEO >>

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0M1s5m1LYQ

gar
- Homepage: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0M1s5m1LYQ


Oh come on, again!

05.06.2010 08:12

"Israel is estimated to have between 200 to 400 nukes. At 200 Israel would have the fitth or 6th largest nuclear arsenal, but if they have 400, they would be the third largest nuclear arsenal. "

Do you have ANY idea how much it costs to maintain an arsenal that size? And are you aware how much effort Israel puts into perpetuating the notion that it is armed with nuclear weapons? Or why?

And the NYT and other media report what it is told. Not one of those stories can be verified as being reports based on fact. Israel has always denied having weapons like this.

You don't understand just how small Israel is? We are a nation of almost 70 million people and cannot afford our own ballistic missile program, we buy off the shelf from the US and even so, the cost is horrendously high. How do you work out the sums for a nation of 7 Million?

Exactly how does a nation with a population the size of London afford to maintain a nuclear arsenal of submarine, aerial and ground-based ballistic systems delivery of 400 nuclear warheads?

To talk about Israel being on par with super-powers does nothing but inflate Israel's reputation around the world and it is that that allows it to behave in the way that it does!

See Israel for what it is, not what it wants you to think it is.

Realist


Nukes - a head up

05.06.2010 08:18

... to complete your understanding of the nuclear issue and zionism, do a search for 'the samson option' and Martin van creeval ...

...

jackslucid


How does Israel maintain its arsenal?

05.06.2010 13:24

Because the US gives it a whole load of money every year, which it uses to buy those weapons and beat up on its neighbours, like a spoiled child.

Hermes


Israel too poor to own nukes?

05.06.2010 14:30

Poor Israel
Poor Israel

"We are a nation of almost 70 million people and cannot afford our own ballistic missile program, we buy off the shelf from the US and even so, the cost is horrendously high"

You claim to be an Israeli and yet every Israeli knows about Israels Jerico missiles. The Jerico 3 can hit the Europe and most of North America so we know about them too. To claim Israel is too poor to possess the weaponary it clearly possesses is obfuscation.

"How do you work out the sums for a nation of 7 Million?"

If you divide the 101 Billion dollars in US aid between 7 million people, thats about 15 million dollars per person. Poor Israel.

-


Fear, pain and propaganda: an activist’s story

06.06.2010 05:56

when the Israeli soldiers came to the press room on the half deck of the Marmara, they walked straight up to the Turkish man whose job it was to coordinate facilities for the journalists, put a gun to his head and shot the man dead at point-blank range

 http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/world-news/fear-pain-and-propaganda-an-activist-s-story-1.1033113

-


contradicting witnesses

06.06.2010 11:57

This Lebanese journo says different:

 http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSLDE6521UG

anon


Witness reports are complimetary, not contradictory

06.06.2010 14:05

Actually, that Lebanese account isn't contradictory to Theresa McDermots account, although obviously different witnesses will witness different details due to their own location during the massacre.

The Lebanese account makes clear in the following quote that the live ammo shooting started before the boarding, when the activists were still trying to prevent a boarding from Zodiac boats, which is more damning than McDermots trstimony. It says:

The standoff lasted about 10 minutes until the Israelis opened fire, he said: "One man got a direct hit to the head and another one was shot in the neck."

Whereas McDermot witnessed a passive media organiser being executed, in the quote I already provided. McDermot also witnessed Israeli commandos being captured. However, to say that the Israeli cover-up is simply to hide their incompetence is to ignore the fact the Lebanese witness saw one murder before the ship was even boarded, and McDermot witnessed another murder when the ship was secured. Two blatant murders by the IDF, added to the autopsy evidence that five of the dead were shot in the back, is reason enough to explain the cover-up.

In a typical Israeli 'fuck you' to the rest of the world, one Israeli commando who claims to have shot the six of the victims is to be awarded a medal of valour.

-


(A)pologist - your stock 'San Remo defence' demolished

06.06.2010 14:43

(A) posted the comment "FreedomFlotilla, IDF-Pirates and International Law", all dressed up in anarchist platitudes. I ignored it at the time because there was more obvious Hasbara nonsense on this thread, but I did recognise and say that(A) was an Israeli apologist from his other half-truths. However I just found this excellent rebuttal from Craig Murray, which explains where (A) is getting their source material from:


"Every comments thread on every internet site on the world which has discussed the Israeli naval murders, has been inundated by organised ZIonist commenters stating that the Israeli action was legal under the San Remo Manual of International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea.

They ignore those parts of San Remo that specifically state that it is illegal to enforce a general blockade on an entire population. But even apart from that, San Remo simply does not apply.

The manual relates specifically to legal practice in time of war. With whom is Israel at war?

There is no war.

Israeli apologists have gone on to say they are in a state of armed conflict with Gaza.

Really? In that case, why do we continually hear Israeli complaints about rockets fired from Gaza into Israel? If it is the formal Israeli position that it is in a state of armed conflict with Gaza, then Gaza has every right to attack Israel with rockets.

But in fact, plainly to the whole world, the nature and frequency of Israeli complaints about rocket attacks gives evidence that Israel does not in fact believe that a situation of armed conflict exists.

Secondly, if Israel wishes to claim it is in a state of armed conflict with Gaza, then it must treat all of its Gazan prisoners as prisoners of war entitled to the protections of the Geneva Convention. If you are in a formal state of armed conflict, you cannot categorise your opponents as terrorists.

But again, it is plain for the world to see from its treatment and description of Gazan prisoners that it does not consider itself to be in a formal position of armed conflict.

Israel is seeking to pick and choose which bits of law applicable to armed conflict it applies, by accepting or not accepting it is in armed conflcit depending on the expediency of the moment".

-


Bradford demo

07.06.2010 01:09

There was a huge demo in bradford on saturday with over 1000 gathering in the city centre.
There is a feature on protests in the north on northern indymedia at the moment with photos, audio and video;
www.northern-indymedia.org

jen
- Homepage: http://www.northern-indymedia.org


Demolishing that stock 'San Remo defence'? - Failure.

10.06.2010 16:51

@ - :

QUOTE "San Remo simply does not apply.
The manual relates specifically to legal practice in time of war." UNQUOTE

Simply WRONG! And you'd just 've had to read few sections of "San Remo" to find out.
(if anyone think I missed sth - sry, please help me with some quotes or sources)


QUOTE "With whom is Israel at war? [...] Israeli apologists have gone on to say they are in a state of armed conflict with Gaza." UNQUOTE

Replace "Gaza" by "Hamas, who are the leading racket in Gaza" and you've got your answer.


QUOTE "They [Israeli apologists] ignore those parts of San Remo that specifically state that it is illegal to enforce a general blockade on an entire population." UNQUOTE

First: What you and Mr Craig Murray do ignore is the simple fact that there is NO GENERAL BLOCKADE enforced on the population of Gaza.
Second: Since you and Mr Murray apparently were not able to find just one paragraph from "San Remo" to support your bold claims, I'll help you out a little:

"102. The declaration or establishment of a blockade is prohibited if:

(a) it has the sole purpose of starving the civilian population or denying it other objects essential for its survival; or
(b) the damage to the civilian population is, or may be expected to be, excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated from the blockade."

The naval blockade was installed to prevent (illegal) weapon-deliveries to Hamas (or other "terrorist organisations") coming from states like Iran or Turkey, which had frequently taken place before. And it serves this purpose just great.
In addition I would not by any means consider the damage inflicted on the civilian population of Gaza by the Isreali naval-blockade "exzessive". Israel and Egypt (and other states) help provide sufficient supply of essential goods and services and also support the commitment of NGOs such as the Red Cross, Red Crescent, UN(-RWA) etc.

And if you wanna take another look at "San Remo":

"103. If the civilian population of the blockaded territory is inadequately provided with food and other objects essential for its survival, the blockading party must provide for free passage of such foodstuffs and other essential supplies, subject to:
(a) the right to prescribe the technical arrangements, including search, under which such passage is permitted; and
(b) the condition that the distribution of such supplies shall be made under the local supervision of a Protecting Power or a humanitarian organization which offers guarantees of impartiality, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross."

you'll find that Israel does ALL(!) of these things. For example: just the week before the"flotilla incident", Israel delivered more cement to Gaza than the whole flotilla wanted to provide - but Israel gave the cement to UNRWA under strict conditions and ensuring that it's used only for the purposes it's earmarked for."

so far. Redfront!

(A)


PS

10.06.2010 17:05

I think that as a radical left I shouldn't make compliance with bourgeois law/ legislation (such as "San Remo") the measure of my criticism. But since indymedia (and the real world, too) seems to be crowded with antisemitic individuals who can't wait to express their hatred of the state of Israel and its jewish inhabitants, trying to attack and delegitimise Israel incessantly and by all available means, I won't just stay quiet but feed them their own shit.

(A)


(a)pologist pseud

12.06.2010 09:56

"I hate discussing wether IDF-actions were "legal" or "illegal" - what happened would be disgusting and sad either way! But for all you fans of bourgeois international law....I think that as a radical left I shouldn't make compliance with bourgeois law/ legislation (such as "San Remo") the measure of my criticism"

Yet that is exactly the measure of your criticism, a Israeli state press release to it's hasbara employees which you quoted instantly and repetively. Despite you portraying youtrself as an anarchist, your regurgitated arguments show your true fascist colours.

It's a bit offensive that you can cheerlead your states murder of activists, using the very non-arguments that those war-criminals use, and yet expect to be taken seriously as a left-wing anarchist. You are not an anarchist and you are not left-wing, you are a sick fake employed by a foreign, murderous state as their hasbara apologist here.
Irregradless of legality, the Israeli state has proven yet again that it is too immoral to deserve the right to govern, and the apartheid Israeli state should be consigned to the dustbin of history alongside it's ally, the apartheid state of South Africa and alongside Nazi Germany who's tactics you ape.

So (A)srseLicker, keep up with your paid propaganda if you want, keep cheerleading the murder of innocents, it reminds everyone here what sort of scum infiltrate our movements in disguise.

As to the legality, read this:
 http://usa.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/75318

Part V Section II (95) of the San Remo Manual states that a blockade must be effective and cannot let certain vessels in while rejecting others. Israel has, since the start of the blockade, permitted certain ships to enter while not permitting others. Of the numerous trips staged by the Free Gaza Movement, several earlier trips have been permitted to reach Gaza through the blockade, where as others were not. All of these ships were carrying flags of “neutral states.” This inconsistency is contrary to Part V Section II (100 & 101) which states that the blockading party must treat ships of neutrally flagged states equally, and is a clear indication that the nature of the blockade is not legal.

The blockade is also in violation of Part V Section II (102) which prohibits blockades that:

"

a.) have the sole purpose of starving the civilian population or denying it other objects essential to its survival; or

b.) the damage to the civilian population is, or may be expected to be, excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated from the blockade.
"

Dov Wiesglass, the Israeli official and aid to Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert stated the intention of the blockade was “to put the Palestinians on a diet, but not to make them die of hunger.” Numerous international aid agencies and non-government organizations have made it clear that the deleterious effects on the civilian population are severe. (Arabic) A growing chorus of NGOs and officials, not excluding Israelis, has questioned the blockade's strategic value to Israel and many have concluded it is instead counterproductive in nature.

Further, the Israel blockade is also in violation of Part V Section II 106 (c) which states that the zone of the blockade shall not exceed the area “strictly required by military necessity and the principles of proportionality.” Israel has enforced a blockade around the 20 nautical mile mark for incoming ships, like those which are part of the Freedom Flotilla, but it has also enforced it at the three nautical mile mark against Gaza’s fishermen, devastating their livelihoods out of no military necessity whatsoever.

Clearly, a number of arguments can be made regarding the nature of the blockade and its failure to meet the standards required by the San Remo Manual. However, all of the above violations are predicated on the assumption that the San Remo Manual even applies to the territorial entities involved, in this case, Gaza and Israel.

The Manual only applies to “belligerent states” and “neutral states” as clearly indicated in Section IV. Gaza, which is part of the Palestinian Occupied Territories along with the West Bank, is not a state, due in large part, ironically, to Israeli intransigence. Gaza was occupied by Israel in 1967 and, under customary international law, Israel has been the belligerent occupier of the strip since. Despite ending their colonization of the Gaza Strip in 2005 when they withdrew the colonies they had developed and populated with their civilians, Israel still maintains “effective control” over the Gaza Strip through control of its borders, air space and of course, sea lanes.

Israel has had a love/hate relationship with its occupation of the Gaza Strip. It has loved the security advantage of effective control which it has exercised through incursions, the creation of buffer zones within the strip, routine aerial attacks and so on. But it has simultaneously hated (and denied) the obligations which come along with belligerent occupation; prime among which is upholding the well-being of the civilian population.

The international legal framework which is most appropriate for assessing Israel’s obligations is the Fourth Geneva Convention, to which Israel is a party to. Part 1 Article 55 of the IV Geneva Convention clearly states:

"

To the fullest extent of the means available to it, the Occupying Power has the duty of ensuring the food and medical supplies of the population; it should, in particular, bring in the necessary foodstuffs, medical stores and other articles if the resources of the occupied territory are inadequate.
"

And Article 56:

"

To the fullest extent of the means available to it, the Occupying Power has the duty of ensuring and maintaining, with the cooperation of national and local authorities, the medical and hospital establishments and services, public health and hygiene in the occupied territory, with particular reference to the adoption and application of the prophylactic and preventive measures necessary to combat the spread of contagious diseases and epidemics. Medical personnel of all categories shall be allowed to carry out their duties.
"

Clearly, not only does the San Remo Manual not apply to this blockade since Gaza is occupied territory and not a state, even if Gaza was a state, the nature of the blockade is contrary to the stated requirements in the Manual. Further, since the Geneva Conventions do apply to this situation, the blockade and siege of Gaza are intentional efforts on Israel’s behalf that leave it in default of its primary obligation as a belligerent occupier: the protection of the Palestinian civilian population.

-


Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech