Skip navigation

Indymedia UK is a network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues

BBC bans appeal for Gaza relief effort

hildy johnson | 22.01.2009 20:05 | Other Press | Birmingham | South Coast

Not a fan of charity myself but the Times has just broke the news that the Disasters Emergency Committe advert to raise funds for Gaza has just been banned by the BBC as it did not fit their "impartiality" agenda.

from the times
 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article5568735.ece

The BBC and other major broadcasters have broken a 45 year-old agreement with overseas aid charities by refusing to broadcast their fundraising appeal for Gaza.

The Disasters Emergency Committee launched its national appeal for Gaza today saying the devastation was so great the 12 leading British aid charities felt "compelled to act".

The DEC co-ordinates fundraising during international crises to try and maximise the impact.

But by far the biggest advantage of a DEC appeal is the free air-time given to it by the major broadcasters, usually after their main news bulletin in the evening. The agreement to grant free air time dates back to 1963, the year the big aid charities first came together for a joint appeal, and it has been sanctioned by broadcasting regulators.

However talks broke down on Wednesday evening when the broadcasters could not reach an agreement. By convention, if all broadcasters do not carry the appeal then none do.

It is understood that nervousness at the BBC that the appeal could result in the corporation having to compromise its coverage of the Gaza story was largely behind the failure to reach agreement.

In a statement the corporation admitted it did not want to risk compromising confidence in BBC impartiality.

"Along with other broadcasters, the BBC has decided not to broadcast the DEC’s public appeal to raise funds for Gaza. The BBC decision was made because of question marks about the delivery of aid in a volatile situation and also to avoid any risk of compromising public confidence in the BBC’s impartiality in the context of an ongoing news story. However the BBC will, of course, continue to report the humanitarian story in Gaza," it said.

Like other broadcasters, the BBC was prevented by Israel from sending in correspondents to cover the bombing, although it did manage to send out on-the-ground reports using one of its local producers who was there.

Speaking to The Times, Brendan Gormley, chief executive of the DEC, said he was saddened that the appeal would not be broadcast as it meant thousands of potential donors would not now be reached.

"We deeply regret this decision if it means our message doesn’t reach those who may want to give to a DEC appeal. We will soldier on but we recognise it will be much more of a struggle now to reach donors," he said.

He also questioned the BBC’s suggestion that it may not be possible to deliver much aid because the situation remained volatile. British charities were already on the ground and delivering aid. "Agencies are already providing food, drugs and blankets as well as delivering clean water. But we will soon reach the limit of what we can do, without more money," he said.

Several aid charities launched their own appeal as soon as the conflict began, although those will now cease now that the national DEC appeal is underway. Islamic Relief, a DEC member, has managed to raise £2 million, although other charities including Save the Children and the British Red Cross have struggled to get beyond tens of thousands of pounds. A national appeal from the DEC would normally raise about £10 million, but without the broadcasts the total is certain to be lower.

A spokesman for ITV confirmed an agreement could not be reached by broadcasters.

"The DEC did ask broadcasters if they could support the appeal. We assessed the DEC's request carefully against agreed criteria and were unable to reach the consensus which is necessary for an appeal," he said.

hildy johnson


Comments

Hide the following 14 comments

Thanks for bringing this up...

22.01.2009 20:28

But "Not a fan of charity myself but..." what a cold mean-spirited sentiment, hope the arse falls out your life some time and teaches you some compassion!

Tiny Tim


I'll second that Tim

22.01.2009 21:25

It never ceases to amaze me when people say things like "I don't agree with charity", or when you're collecting people look down at you, like you're worthless.

More compassion = a better world

"If you want others to be happy, practice compassion. If you want to be happy, practice compassion." - The Dalai Lama

Sparky The Clown


Too right

22.01.2009 21:54

The BBC can hardly be seen to be agreeing that these people need help, that would be far too partial. It's an ongoing new story (ongoing for more than 60 years now), so the charities will have to create their own publicity until it is no longer deemed newsworthy.

It's not like anyone could say the BBC's reporting on Israel's right to defend themselves from rockets fired by nasty Islamic fundamentalist terrorist group Hamas, which cause daily suffering to the peace loving, democratic state of Israel has been in any way shape or form biased.

It's not like there's any truth in this ->  http://www.inminds.co.uk/case-study-of-bias.html
Or this ->  http://www.ukwatch.net/article/bbc039s_proisraeli_bias

F*** the BBC, they're nothing more than a mouthpiece for our mealy mouthed government, it's been a long time since they were anything but. It's like news for the uneducated, ill informed or illiterate. If you believe half of the crap they pump out at you, then you probably deserve no better.

What is quite worrying is that the government have realised that we aren't watching their propaganda anymore and want to get stuck in to censoring the internet, see ->  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/technology/technologynews/3965051/Internet-sites-could-be-given-cinema-style-age-ratings-Culture-Secretary-says.html

I love the way Andy Burnham uses children to try and popularise censorship of the internet. There's plenty of software that blocks harmful content on PC's (I run a really good free one on my Kids PC, but we surf together anyway). This has more to do with reining in the empowerment and freedom of information, than Andy Burnham being able to let his kids loose on the interweb. How stupid do they think we are? I can't remember who said it but I thought it very poignant when it was said to Ed Milliband: - '1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual!'

Hasbara Barbera


Sparky

22.01.2009 22:40

Some of the bleakest feelings in my adult life have been trying to persuade businesses to take on collection tins for charity...

Thankfully it is usually offset by the fact that the compassionate minority always exceed my expectations.

Capitalism does a great job at turning humans into greedy, jealous and aggressive shits.

Bring on the economic collapse is what I say!

@ HB: The sickening thing is that the BBC is regarded to be a reliable professional alternative to private corporate media. As we know, it's never been to great a source, but truly fucking laughable since Hutton. I hear that the editors a Pravda blush at the obvious propaganda pieces straight from the Cabinet Office.

So if you control the BBC you control a large amount of opinion on the section of the population that considers itself to be semi-literate/Middle Class. The good thing is that the BBC is becoming a total farce now, that surely even Middle England must tire of 45 minutes of sport, celebrities and weather??? Oh and I forgot the 15 minutes of biased lies.

Seems like a lifetime ago that Radio 4 stuck its boot up Blair's arse with David Kelly.

Tiny Tim


well blow me down

23.01.2009 03:19

It doesn't fit the pro-Zionist propaganda sentiment of the BBC and its editorial managers, the UK Government. Big Surprise!

Krop


complain

23.01.2009 12:01

It's always worth complaining to the BBC so if folk want to the complaints line is
03700 100 222 and the text phone number is 03700 100 212

miserablist
- Homepage: http://miserablist.info


on charity

23.01.2009 12:08

to elaborate for what its worth

there was a time when i solemnly believed that by giving money to various charities that i was helping to save the world
this perspective was altered somewhat following involvement in world development movement and a course on development studies. there have been numerous circumstances in which aid efforts have created more problems than they have solved. i respect the work that certain charities do but in some cases such as that of world vision they are akin to the missionaries that assisted the colonial powers to maintain order by force. charity work is an industry like any other and it can be argued that they have an interest in the prolongation of suffering the alleviation of which is their raison d´etre
whilst recognising the need for development assistance i am in favour of a more political settlement to problems of poverty etc. In this particular instance the issue of aid to gaza is controversial since it has been stated that the relief effort must be micro managed in such a way that not a penny goes to anything associated with Hamas- yet Hamas is the ruling power.
Charles Dickens for example was very critical of the education projects, basically rote learning of catechisms, supported by the church in 19th century england and he argued for the need for a more comprehensive approach since no charity could ever raise enough money to achieve this

hildy


Against Charity

23.01.2009 12:26

Anti-Nationalist Freddy Pearlman wrote the brilliant pamphlet "against civilisation"; he wasn't arguing for barbarity but for equality. This argument against charity will not be so well written.
Charity is a process whereby the "haves" give something to the "have nots" in order to remedy economic inequality. Working people produce everything (we bake the whole loaf) but the ruling class expect us to thank them when they give us the crusts. Charity maintains and strengthens the power relations in society.
Financial solidarity and mutual aid can come without strings attached and can occur on the basis of equality. Some organisations who practice these are regulated by the Charity Commission.
The Charity Commission is institutionally racist; it supports the Jewish National Fund; who financially support ethnic cleansing; and the Charities Advisory Trust; a front for the JNF.

Anti Capitalist


Bah humbug!

23.01.2009 13:03

"Charity is a process whereby the "haves" give something to the "have nots" in order to remedy economic inequality. "

In my experience, it is mostly the have nots that donate to charity... and if we don't do it out of 'higher principle' then others who cannot fend for themselves suffer... but hey any old excuse not to put your hand in your pocket.


"charity work is an industry like any other and it can be argued that they have an interest in the prolongation of suffering the alleviation of which is their raison d´etre
whilst recognising the need for development assistance i am in favour of a more political settlement to problems of poverty etc."

And until that day the poor, defenceless and needy just have to go fuck themselves?

Both points have a grain of truth, but the reality is you have to deal with the world as it is now, and not you want it to be, and will hopefully be.

I personally won't be holding breath nor my purse strings, and no matter how poor I have been, I have never been so poor I couldn't spare even a few coins.

You get what you invest in this world- even if it is only spiritually.

I guess some people just don't see that their income is theft to start with... notleast from the 3rd world. So, I guess the pair of you will be boycotting the global economy too, for fear of raping Africa.

Tiny Tim


Fredy Perlman

23.01.2009 13:24

"Anti-Nationalist Freddy Pearlman wrote the brilliant pamphlet "against civilisation"; he wasn't arguing for barbarity but for equality."

No he didn't, what are you on about. Perlman wasn't a primitivist at all. Primmo types are inspired by one of his books. That does not make him a primmo.

miserablist
- Homepage: http://miserablist.info/


AK list Perlman as a contributor

23.01.2009 14:05

Against Civilization: Readings And Reflections

Theodor Adorno (Contributor), David Watson (Contributor), Chellis Glendinning (Contributor), Derrick Jensen (Contributor), William Morris (Contributor), Fredy Perlman (Contributor), Fredric Jameson (Contributor), and John Zerzan (Editor)

Not Andy
- Homepage: http://www.akpress.org/2005/items/againstcivilizationreadingsandreflections


NotDanny

23.01.2009 16:27

you see how Fredy Perlman died twenty years before that book(not pamphlet) was published. Also the way that William Morris is listed as a contributer and I have it on pretty good authority that he died slightly earlier than Perlman. This leads me to believe that perhaps the anti-humanist scum bag Zerzan is mis-using his writings to back up his hateful, genocidal ideology.

miserablist
- Homepage: http://miserablist.info


Not anarchist or rational

23.01.2009 18:02

There is also a Thoreau text in the Against Civilization anthology. Perhaps Anti Capitalist meant to refer to Perlmans 'Against His-Story, Against Leviathan' instead of the Perlman extract in Against Civilization.
Either way Perlman is an odd hero for any anti-primitivist.

"The exodus of Israel from Egypt is not a major withdrawal, but it is a well-documented one, so that we can get an inside view of some of the actions and even some of the thoughts of the participants." - Perlman

This is Torah mythology recast as relevant political philosophy. There is no archaelogical evidence that the Jews were ever held in Egyptian capitivity, no historical evidence for the 'exodus' at all except in Jewish religious texts. So for Perlman to make this bold claim that there is so much evidence that we can sense the thoughts of the participants is a simple appeal to Judiac scripture as relevant political documentation, and as such is not a credible claim Boney M's 'By The Rivers of Babylon' (Melodians) about the Jewish exile in Babylon is at least as anarchistic with far more supporting evidence. For the Boney M critique of crime in a capitalist society may I recommend 'Ma Baker'

Ma Baker


Not...

23.01.2009 20:05

I'm afraid Boney M could never be taken seriously in the academic world at all. Their output is fraught with inaccuracy, misquoting sources and making bold baseless statements.

Their 'Mary's Boy child' typifies the syndrome:

"Long time ago in Bethlehem, so the Holy Bible say,
Mary's boy child Jesus Christ, was born on Christmas Day."

1. Jesus's name was not Christ and there is only a 365:1 chance he was born on the pagan winter solstice.

2. The gender specific reference infers that he had a sister, however in the Bible there is no reference to any siblings.

3. They couldn't even be bothered to work out, or are perhaps too stupid to work out that Jesus was born around 2000 years before their song was written.

"Hark, now hear the angels sing, a king was born today,
And man will live for evermore, because of Christmas Day."

4. Man quite obviously isn't going to live forever, and the longevity of the species is more likely to be determined by environmental factors than some ancient cult's ceremonies.

"For a moment the world was aglow, all the bells rang out
there were tears of joy and laughter, people shouted
"Let everyone know, there is hope for all to find peace.""

5. And this bears more resemblance to a particular New Year's Eve on some rather strong Ecstasy I once experienced.


And that is overlooking the obvious dramatic embellishments that litter their work.

Tiny Tim
- Homepage: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qv8byFE_LKs


Links