Skip navigation

Indymedia UK is a network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues

'No Democracy Wall' Memorial to Ian Tomlinson, Royal Exchange, Bank, London

Stalingrad O'Neill | 10.04.2009 01:50 | G20 London Summit | Climate Chaos | Globalisation | Repression | Birmingham

These are a number of Photos taken on the 2nd April around the Royal Exchange at the Bank Station junction of Threadneedle St and Cornhill Except for the first three which were taken on London Bridge the previous night, for it’s adjacent tube station happened to be the nearest open to make for, after being released from the kettle at Bank



8.50pm 1st April - London Bridge Riot Police still blocking entry to City
8.50pm 1st April - London Bridge Riot Police still blocking entry to City

11am 2nd April - Royal Exchange, Workman removing graffiti with high pressure
11am 2nd April - Royal Exchange, Workman removing graffiti with high pressure

11.10 am Threadneedle Street, citizens held by COL Police for Stop and Search
11.10 am Threadneedle Street, citizens held by COL Police for Stop and Search

11.10 am Threadneedle Street, COL Police body search citizen
11.10 am Threadneedle Street, COL Police body search citizen

11.31 am COL Cops writing up their notes
11.31 am COL Cops writing up their notes

12.03 am RBS Building Bartholomew La Glazing contractors in attendance
12.03 am RBS Building Bartholomew La Glazing contractors in attendance

5.59 pm Adding comments and tributes to the Wall
5.59 pm Adding comments and tributes to the Wall


"No Democracy Wall" - Ian Tomlinson Memorial
"No Democracy Wall" - Ian Tomlinson Memorial

Wall close-up Threadneedle St side
Wall close-up Threadneedle St side

Wall facing Bank Tube (Exchange Entrance)
Wall facing Bank Tube (Exchange Entrance)


People reading tributes and messages
People reading tributes and messages


6.45 pm Protester by Exchange Tube (Bank) Entrance
6.45 pm Protester by Exchange Tube (Bank) Entrance

Group of protesters sitting on the Exchange steps
Group of protesters sitting on the Exchange steps

Tog - Agency 'stringer' filing copy
Tog - Agency 'stringer' filing copy

Stubborn Graffiti (was still there after 6.00pm)
Stubborn Graffiti (was still there after 6.00pm)


I was at the Exchange junction from about 10.00am on morn of the 2nd April
I didn't actually witness the police prevention of the protest against Ian Tomlinson's death nor did I know much about it till the evening of the 2nd April, for as I have already documented at about 12.30 pm I followed the passing "The Young Peoples March For Jobs" to the ExCel and did not return to Bank till around 5.30pm.
It was then there I discovered that the hoarding put up to protect some monument outside the exchange had been turned into a 'No Democracy Wall' and memorial to Ian Tomlinson

The circumstances leading to the death of Mr. Tomlinson remained sketchy in my mind, for some days helped in part by media reports only too willing to accept police concocted versions of the events, and dismiss eye witness’ accounts as mistaken or misguided, However the flood of footage of the event has prompted even the most diehard blue surge media defender to backtrack and howl for an inquiry! Independent and above reproach...some hope!

Three videos that are now in the public domain prove eye witness’ accounts given just after the sickening unprovoked attack by a TSG police officer on passer-by Ian Tomlinson as accurate and that the Met as usual engaged in an attempt to cover up the truth
Both of the assault and their prevention and interference in the subsequent first aid offered by bystanders

A woman attending to Mr Tomlinson and giving him first aid, is seen to be manhandled and removed, whilst officers refuse to speak to ambulance personnel a man on a phone has contacted

clip link of police assault (1st Video):

 http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/video/2009/apr/07/g20-police-assault-video

clip link fresh angle on attack:

 http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/video/2009/apr/08/g20-police-assault-ian-tomlinson-video

clip link backs witnesses' claims and contradicts police account:

 http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/09/g20-video-ian-tomlinson-death


Do you think that timid toothless excuse for a watchdog the IPCC will come up with more than the usual whitewash in their independent criminal inquiry?
But I can bet you this it will be even more reason why the Bill will want to restrict the use of cameras by the public and press


Copyright Stalingrad O'Neill - permission is required for third party usage

Stalingrad O'Neill
- e-mail: robograd@tiscali.co.uk


Comments

Hide the following 6 comments

Use of cameras?

10.04.2009 06:36

Surely the police assault on Ian Tomlinson is a complete vindication of the use of video cameras at events. For those worried about being caught on camera use a face mask like the police, instead of trying to censor photographers.

Videographer


don't know about vindication

10.04.2009 13:42

I don't think it's a vindication so much as a concideration to take into account when coming to a judgement on the relative merits of cameras/surveilance in general. There are also a great many drawbacks, some less tangible perhaps but quite powerful in affecting the flow of events none the less. Some conciderations to take into account might be:
- who has access to and influence over the cameras, the 'content' they record, the distribution channels that selectively promote particular images/recordings above others to suit particular discourses, and so on.
- the potential for reduction of events in some respects to 'spectacles' or other 'symbolic' representations

Don't get me wrong, I think it's very useful that some things get recorded, however to believe that it represents a 'vindication' of the general use of it is not taking into conicderation some of the above points and using a pattern of reasoning that could also validate a good deal of other things I'd not be so happy about....

(one crude example that springs to mind is the Wall in Israel - a great many people I've talked about it with who come from Israel put the "fact that there have been less Israeli casualties as a result of the wall and various controls over Arab movements within Israel" forward as a 'vindication' of the wall....)

cost-benefit


not vindicated at all.

10.04.2009 19:01

Sounds like the same arguments put forth by the state for CCTV.

"Look, we caught a shoplifter with our cctv - they work and your civil liberties don't matter!"


Cameras have their places. Getting in the way of people trying to affect change and involved in direct action isn't one of those places.

Anti-Camera


Small contribution to the debate

11.04.2009 11:22

The photographer justifying the use of CCTV conveniently forgets that the few times CCTV footage has been used as evidence against the actions of 'legal' authority (most recently the De Menezes case) It has always failed to serve as a tool of justice for the very simple reason that authority controls CCTV and will therefore always use it selectively to pursue their own interests, Don't expect any coppers to serve any prison time over this latest incident of State sponsored murder.

CCCP


CCTV evidence use reference

12.04.2009 20:44




I don’t read into this debate that any one justified the use of CCTV
What was suggested was Ian Tomlinson's case, vindicated of the use of video cameras at events!

It is also incorrect to site the de Menezes case as a reference regarding CCTV evidence use! Miraculously for the police, the cameras were not working (and by an amazing coincidence we are told, CCTV footage of Tomlinson is unavailable due to camera malfunction)

That’s not to say your final statement "Don't expect any coppers to serve any prison time over this latest incident of State sponsored murder" is at fault

Drip drip drip of information:

 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/birmingham/2009/04/427245.html

de Menezes wiki

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Charles_de_Menezes#Missing_CCTV_footage

or google: de Menezes CCTV footage

Mr. McLeavy


In Memory of Ian Tomlinson - Peter Marshall

15.04.2009 12:48

Peter Marshall's closing comments on his Re:PHOTO blog


 http://re-photo.co.uk/?p=627

"The media of course don’t come out of this at all well. The BBC in particular I think let us down; they simply do not have enough first-hand reporters and far too many people with their seats firmly on office chairs. Like the press they compete in the stoking of public fear and the stigmatising of democratic protest. Of course it isn’t largely the journalists who are responsible - with a few exceptions (mainly among ‘columnists’) they do their job as best they can, often, particularly for photographers and videographers, at some personal risk. But it isn’t the guys on the job who produce the programmes and papers, who decide on what has “news value” and dictate the values behind that decision.

To find the real stories behind the news you need to look elsewhere, to blogs and web sites, where you see eye-witness reports, pictures and video. The media are too busy resenting the presence of such things to have worked out how to make effective use of these sources - and of course like any other sources you need to read them with a critical and often cynical eye on where they come from. But it certainly isn’t a coincidence that the two stories which have dominated British news over the past week came from the mobile phone of a “citizen journalist” and blogs.

And if you want to know the real story behind the arrests of over a hundred activists suspected of conspiring to commit aggravated trespass at the Ratcliffe-on-Soar Power Station you won’t be looking at the press but to the blogs."

S O'Neill
mail e-mail: robograd@tiscali.co.uk


Links