Page Content | Events
Other IMCs
Leeds Bradford IMC | UK IMC | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

(((i))) Leeds Bradford

Read It. Write It. DO IT!


Campaign Against Prison Slavery | 11.08.2004 13:49 | Repression | World

Fighting against prison slavery and for prison abolition.



It’s difficult to walk down any English high street without passing a branch of Wilkinson, or ‘Wilko’ as they like to be known, the ubiquitous chain of hardware stores. Since the company’s first shop opened in 1930, more than 200 have appeared, and as in 1930 Wilkinson is still family-owned, mainly by its Chairman Tony Wilkinson who sits on a personal fortune of around £300 million.

Like their egocentric owner the company strive to present themselves as philanthropic and caring, acting as “partners in the community”, and providing a “rewarding place to work” for their employees.

Along with many other capitalist companies Wilkinson engage in what they present as charitable acts, a clever and tax-deductible form of marketing, which can also prove inexpensive when it involves little more than giving away store vouchers. The Wilko website boasts of a number of charities supported by the company, but at least one of these, Students in Free Enterprise, is worth a second look. SIFE is a kind of capitalist missionary organisation which includes in its “Dream Team” (Board of Directors) senior representatives of such philanthropic organisations as Coca-Cola, Wal-Mart, Johnson & Johnson, Nestle, Pfizer, Philip Morris, Shell, and Aramark.

If you’ve not heard of Aramark [see article pasted at the end of this e-mail] they’re an American company reaping rich profits from the misery of human incarceration, both in America and in the UK, where they act as the Prison Service’s ‘company store’, with an almost total monopoly of the lucrative prison ‘canteen’ system. This perhaps tenuous link between Aramark and Wilkinson though is something of a coincidence, because Wilko’s are currently the No1 company being targeted by the Campaign Against Prison Slavery (CAPS).

British prisoners are forced to work, it’s compulsory. If they don’t they’re punished, being placed in segregation, losing family visits, even having their sentences extended. With no pension rights, no trade union rights, no minimum wage, no holidays, and no sick pay they represent the ideal workforce for greedy and ruthless companies like Wilkinson, who use prisoners in England and Wales to do packing work for them, paying them around £1 per day, and sometimes less.

CAPS was established 18 months ago to fight this 21st century slavery which is being exploited as never before, and which as the TUC [Trade Union Congress] recognise, undermines the pay and conditions of workers generally. Since then there have been over 100 pickets of Wilkinson stores around the country, as well as other actions aimed at the company. Wilkinson’s initial response was to deny that they in any way made use of prison labour, but in light of the obvious evidence that this is untrue they were forced to change their position (though that’s not stopped them occasionally reverting to their original story when dealing with the Press.)

Wilkinson now claim that they are helping to “rehabilitate prisoners and increase their employability”, a line parroted directly from the Prison Service. Like their first position this claim does not hold up to the slightest scrutiny. A recent internal Prison Service report on prison industries admits as much, characterising the “noddy shop” work as “mundane and repetitive” and with “little value apart from keeping prisoners occupied”. Nor have Wilkinson’s shown any enthusiasm for re-employing prisoners after their release, when of course they’d then be entitled to proper wages and employment conditions. The use of prison labour by private companies has soared in direct proportion to savage cuts in prison education and training during the past 10 years, and perversely as the Prison Service report admits, the profits being wrung from the incarcerated by these greedy companies are actually being subsidised by the taxpayer to the tune of at least £7 million per year.

Along with a number of other leading British capitalists, Tony Wilkinson recently wrote to the Financial Times in order to express his support for the EU Constitutional Treaty. One of his co-signatories was Sir Richard Needham, Deputy Chairman of Dyson Appliances, which is another coincidence. There was a lot of fuss a few years ago when Dyson made their British workers redundant and moved their operation to Malaysia to take advantage of cheap non-unionised labour there (Dyson’s lawyers claim that their workers are paid more than the average wage – of Malaysia.) Less known though was the fact that Dyson had been taking advantage of cheap non-unionised labour for some time prior to this, by using the slave labour of British prisoners at Full Sutton prison near York.

Rather than moving to the Third World though, at least one smaller company, Industrial Rubber, preferred to sack all it’s workers when faced with paying them the minimum wage, telling the subsequent employment tribunal that work had dried up. In fact they had moved their operation into several British prisons, where of course there is no minimum wage.

The private companies exploiting prison slave labour are often extremely ruthless, indeed as the Prison Service admit some are even ripping them off, with firms systematically failing to pay for work and “playing one establishment off against another”. Bearing in mind the blatant incompetence of the Prison Service it’s hardly surprising that they’re being taken advantage of, an audit of the PS central stores highlighted in the Prison Industries report showed that while not a single toothbrush was in stock there was enough stationery to last for the next 450,000 years!

Tony ‘Whiplash Wilkinson, as CAPS has dubbed him, may present himself as a benevolent employer doling out jobs and cheap goods to a grateful public, but the reality is of course quite different. No capitalist gets to be worth £300 million without being willing to tread on people. While the company prefer not to mention their prison slaves, they present their 18.000 non-prison employees as “team members”. Meanwhile the workers themselves talk of a ruthless anti-union company that underpays and underemploys. There is every reason to boycott Wilkinson, and to support the Campaign Against Prison Slavery.

Mark Barnsley

July 2004

Campaign Against Prison Slavery:

Aramark - The Prison Service’s Company Store

In the 19th century, Irish immigrants in Argentina, who fled there to escape poverty and starvation, were lured to huge and remote estancias [ranches] with the promise of work. Here, isolated and vulnerable, they were rapidly forced into debt by the over-inflated prices of the company store, and many were compelled to sign away their very freedom and become company slaves. A “lucky” few escaped, but still far from home they were forced to live a desperate life, searching for discarded food in the bins of Buenos Aires or selling their bodies for a crust of bread, many eventually succumbing to starvation, and dying in gutters far away from their native land. Similar scenarios were played out elsewhere. The company store is a cornerstone of freebooting capitalism, earning it a special place in the pantheon of working-class hatred. It features in literature and song. With this and the workhouse there’s little wonder that to this day most working class people still have an all-pervading fear of debt.

Company stores undoubtedly still exist to exploit workers on the wild frontiers of capitalism, and it’s not all that long ago that British pit-villages were subject to this enforced monopoly. When it comes to actual enslavement though, modern first-world capitalism is generally more subtle, seducing us into a lifetime of wage slavery by the creation and manipulation of desires for an ever-growing range of commodities. However, there’s one place in the world where slavery is still regarded as entirely acceptable, indeed where it is flourishing as never before, led like so many things by the ubiquitous forces of American capital. Having plundered the third world with impunity for so long, first-world capitalism has now turned its attention to the incarcerated working class in its own prisons, potentially a rich source of exploitable labour.

For all the talk of the liberties supposedly enshrined in the European Convention of Human Rights and the domestic Human Rights Act, many of them evaporate in the fine print, and prisoners are given few rights at all. Even forced labour is considered entirely acceptable.

As in prisons elsewhere, compulsory work has long been an intrinsic part of the British penal experience, but the prisoncrats have rarely had the audacity to imagine they could turn a profit from a belligerent workforce. All that has changed with the establishment of a Prison Industrial Complex based upon the American blueprint, a model of repression being taken up across Europe and beyond. For much of the past decade, British prisoners have been subdued and manipulated, coerced and tricked into a compliant state, not least through the Incentives and Earned Privileges (IEP) Scheme, one of the state’s more subtle and ingenious methods of subjugation. Prisoners are now ripe for exploitation by private capital.

The private prison companies are making profits as never before; they have a big investment in New Labour’s Draconian penal policies in every sense, initially subsidising a massive prison building programme, while reaping enormous profits in return. Group 4’s Altcourse Prison, for example, has paid for itself in only 3 years, with the next 22 years of its contract being pure profit for the company.

Increasingly, these companies are also able to make a fast buck from forced prison labour, doubly exploiting those they incarcerate. Last year prison labour made £52.9 million for private companies and for the State.

The token remuneration prisoners receive for their labour is still remarkably small, with prisoners earning pennies rather than pounds for an hour’s work, but even these pitifully small wages are seen as fair game by capitalism.

Intrinsic to the IEP scheme is the restriction of incoming property and commodities; in some gaols prisoners cannot even have so much as a postage stamp sent in. At the same time prisoners are required to purchase more and more things than ever before, because of cutbacks in prison spending, subsidising their own incarceration. Though sometimes the “needs” created are false ones, in many prisons it is even necessary for prisoners to buy their own toilet cleaner, and they are increasingly having to feed themselves.

So-called “special orders”, which allowed prisoners to purchase goods from other sources, were outlawed some years ago (when the IEP scheme was introduced) so everything has to be purchased from the prison canteen, the penal equivalent of the company store. Even remand prisoners are being prevented from having the most basic items sent in, and with prisoners in England and Wales spending £500,000 per week on canteen goods this monopoly is another attractive proposition for the ever-greedy forces of capitalism.

The private prison companies are in an ideal position; they own the prisons, they own the workshops, and they own the company store. Prisoners not only spend their pitiful wages at the company store, but their own money, or money sent to them by friends and family (which the IEP scheme rations so as to encourage greater work productivity and overall compliance.)

Currently, however, the vast majority of British prisons are still in the hands of the State, with private companies being increasingly reluctant to take on crumbling Victorian gaols rather than build their own (which offers far greater long-term profits.) But even here, the company store monopoly is an attractive proposition for a greedy company, and over the past few years one outfit has become ubiquitous, running prison canteens up and down the country - a company called Aramark.

Aramark are yet another US import grown fat on the misery of incarceration. In the States they are contracted to do prison catering and cleaning, just as they are here in addition to running prison canteens (Aramark also operates in detention centres.) Exploiting prison labour directly and indirectly, Aramark has an annual turnover of $7.3 billion, making a profit of $1.6 billion, over the past 6 years. The company boasts that it treats its customers as “long-term partners” and claims to be a “company where the best people want to work.” Unfortunately the prisoners who are forced to pack prison ration packs for Aramark have little choice in the matter, and by the look of their canteen workers they don’t have a great deal of choice either.

Aramark has been assured of a total monopoly over their captive clientele, and consequently insist that individual prisons enforce the strictest possible rules so that they profit from absolutely everything a prisoner purchases. Aramark has been handed (or rather sold) a captive hold over prison policy.

When Aramark takes control of a prison canteen, prices go up (sometimes doubling) and the quality and range of goods comes down. The high mark-up “Happy Shopper” brand (and to a lesser extent their own house brand) is Aramark’s stock-in-trade, but in some cases they are even selling prison-issue items.

Prisoners’ spending is predictable, particularly as it is being limited to a smaller and smaller range of products, and orders have to be placed anything up to a week in advance. Goods are brought in to the prisons pre-bagged for distribution, reducing costs to an absolute minimum. No need for advertising, no need to have stock sitting around for months, no need for friendly sales staff. Prisoners are offered a stark choice- buy here at these prices or you go without. We’re not even allowed to choose birthday cards ourselves. Consumer legislation is routinely ignored by Aramark, and prisoners are prevented from complaining directly to the company about the poor service and blatant exploitation they are forced to contend with.

Like the other parasites who exploit the slave labour of prisoners, Aramark represents capitalism in its crudest form. Such companies have us where they’d like everybody- forbidden trade unions, denied all employment rights, punished for not working hard enough, locked in a cell at night, ready to work again the next day, with profit sucked out of us in every possible way.

Following their re-election, New Labour quickly made bold claims to take a tougher line on the abuse of monopolies, yet they have encouraged one to be created within the prison system, just as they have encouraged the exploitation of prisoners in every other sense. What a coincidence that Aramark’s head office is situated in the Millbank Tower [Site of New Labour HQ]..

For those of us behind bars, nothing’s changed since the earliest days of capitalism, but that’s not to say that we can’t fight back. The exploitation of prison labour for profit has only become viable because of the compliance of prisoners. Work strikes, go-slows, and sabotage are some of the best weapons we have, and solidarity action against our exploiters by supporters outside could make a massive difference, as with the recent occupation of Hepworth Plumbing.* When combined, these things and others make a captive work force look less attractive to greedy companies. While prisoners have previously tried to organise petitions and boycotts against Aramark canteens, the company is considerably less vulnerable to action by prisoners than they are to activists outside prison. We need to be able to attack every aspect of the Prison Industrial Complex, and challenge all those who seek to profit from the misery of imprisonment. Contrary to the song, we don’t owe our souls to the company store.

Mark Barnsley

September 2001. Segregation Unit, Armley Prison, Leeds. .

Campaign Against Prison Slavery
- Homepage:


Hide the following 6 comments

More support...

11.08.2004 14:49

I'm sure that this campaign would receive more support if any extra income received by the prisoners was to be donated to their victims, particularly as nearly two-thirds of crimes involve violence, sexual offences, burglary and robbery. Furthermore, I'm sure that the prisoners and the organisers themselves would welcome this chance. Is there any chance of this approach being confirmed?

I believe that the last statistics that were produced regarding the prison population are from November 2003:

Paul Edwards

you dont get it

11.08.2004 15:53

Its not about the victims getting the pay etc... Its about people like Tony Wilkinson being able to amass a fortune of 300 million quid on the backs of prisoners. These prisoners are effectively employees of WIlkinsons but they are outside of employment law. If Wilkinsons are really the caring company they say they are they will stop using prison labour and provide decent unionised jobs for people living in the communities they are putting their stores - especially in the light of the increase in unemployment (see bbc web site).

I dont have any problem with people in prison working I think this can beneficial to both society and prisoners. I do have a problem with people like Tony Wilkinson profiting from people in prison and a system that is so corrupt it allows this to happen.




11.08.2004 16:12

Surely the objective should be that there should be no difference in pay between prisoners and ordinary workers, which would then remove the opportunity for exploitation. The prisoners themselves could work at getting public support for this idea by offering a percantage of their income to their victims. If this was the case, this would immediately remove the opportunity for exploitation as there is no wage differential (one of your main points), and assuage those who would accuse prisoners from profiting from their incarceration (the first response of Daily Mail readers).

Paul Edwards

We'll make an anarchist of you yet Paul Edwards . . .

11.08.2004 16:32

what with all this emphasis on restorative justice and all!

The point is definitely one of exploitation - working per se is not a problem and as (A) poins out it can be usefull all round - even having restorative/compensatory functions as Paul Edwards points out. Equal rights for workers should apply even if they are incarcerated.

a different (A)

But surely...

11.08.2004 19:23

there is a huge link between unemployment and crime (and therefore a percentage will go on to prison), may we end up with a situation where the only decent chance of full time employment is to go into nick?

If you are suggesting paying full wages then why not just employ people before they end up in nick, less go to prison etc etc


Prison Slavery

26.06.2008 19:29

I was interested in your article on Wilkinsons employing prisoners as it brought to mind something I heard recently, that may interest you. Timpsons the giant key cutters and shoe repairers are currently in negotiation with HMP Liverpool with the intention of seting up a workshop in the prison to undertake shoe repairs. Wages will be somewhere in the region of £12.00 per week. (I suppose its beeter than £1 per day!)

Dennis Hillditch

Write It
Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?


The Common Place - Leeds The 1 in 12 club - Bradford The Trades Club - Hebden Bridge


South Coast

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
Northern Indymedia


satellite tv


estrecho / madiaq
la plana
northern england
nottingham imc
united kingdom

Latin America
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
puerto rico


South Asia

United States
hudson mohawk
kansas city
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
tampa bay
united states
western mass

West Asia


fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs