Page Content | Events
Features
Newswire
Publish
Links
Regions
Other IMCs
Search
Leeds Bradford IMC | UK IMC | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

(((i))) Leeds Bradford

Read It. Write It. DO IT!

Protesters want moor car park plan inquiry

reposter - PETER Lazenby | 08.05.2006 19:12 | Ecology | Free Spaces | Social Struggles

Today's Yokshire Evening Post has a story about Leeds City Council's latest 'con-sultation' fraud - this time on the totally bonkers idea of building a car park on Woodhouse Moor using a 'Parks Renaissance fund'.

8 May

CAMPAIGNERS are calling for a Government investigation into Leeds City Council's handling of plans for a car park on one of Leeds's most popular inner-city moors.

The campaigners have obtained council documents which they claim declare local community groups to be in support of the plan for part of Woodhouse Moor - whereas six local groups have actually joined forces in opposition.

The documents also say that a public consultation exercise was completed by early January - but the opponents say that the first local people knew of the plan was when an article appeared in the Yorkshire Evening Post on Tuesday March 14.

Now the campaigners are calling on the Local Government Ombudsman to investigate.

The council wants to build the car park on part of Woodhouse Moor known as Monument Moor at a cost of £170,000.
Six community organisations from Headingley, Little Woodhouse and Hyde Park have united to form "The Friends of Woodhouse Moor" to oppose the plan.

They have obtained a council document dated January 9, 2006, which states: "Partners in the project include the local ward Councillors and community/ friends groups."

It also states: "Consultation with local residents and ward members is complete."

The document is a report from the council's Director of Learning and Leisure, Denise Preston, to the Director of Corporate Services, Alan Gay, requesting funding of £170,341 for the project. The request was granted.

Ombudsman
Sue Buckle, of South Headingley Community Association, one of the groups opposing the plan, said: "When we saw this report, we were gobsmacked. It is dated January 9 and says not only that local consultations have been completed, but that local groups are actual partners in the project. This is blatantly not true.

"The first we knew about the plan was when we read about it in the Yorkshire Evening Post on March 14. We are certainly not partners in the project - in fact when we found out, our group became one of the local community groups who formed the Friends of Woodhouse Moor group to oppose it."

By the time the community groups learned of the proposal, planning permission for the car park had already been granted, and the council had drawn up a proposed timetable to seek tenders for the work on April 6, accept one by May 6, start work on the site on August 6 and complete the car park by December 6.

The "Friends" group is referring the case to the Local Government Ombudsman through Kirkstall Labour Councillor Bernard Atha, who offered to help.

The Ombudsman independently investigates complaints against councils to ensure proper procedure has been followed.

Following protests from local community groups, the council organised two consultation exercises. One was held on April 27 and the second takes place at Woodhouse Community Centre from 5pm to 8pm tomorrow.

Community groups opposing the car park are Belle View Road Action Group, South Headingley Community Association, North Hyde Park Neighbourhood Association, Woodhouse Tenants' Association and Marlborough Residents' Association.

A spokesman for Leeds City Council said: "No decision has been made about a car park at Woodhouse Moor and the council is currently holding a consultation exercise to find out local people's opinions about the idea.

"One public meeting has already taken place and the next will be held on May 9 at Woodhouse Community Centre from 5pm to 8pm, to which all local people are invited to attend and make their views known.

"The report in question was intended to make funding available for any such project, not to say that it is taking place.

Grievances
"The consultation it refers to is a city-wide survey carried out last year that showed large support for more parking in the local area.

"We would stress that no decision has been made and we are ensuring that everyone's opinion is heard."

Councillor John Proctor, executive board member for Leisure, said: "I am more than happy to meet with this community group and hear their grievances in this matter."

 http://www.leedstoday.net/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=39&ArticleID=1489036

reposter - PETER Lazenby

Comments

Display the following comment

  1. Public meeting Tuesday night! — commoner

Write It
Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

Search

The Common Place - Leeds The 1 in 12 club - Bradford The Trades Club - Hebden Bridge

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech