Page Content | Events
Features
Newswire
Publish
Links
Regions
Other IMCs
Search
Leeds Bradford IMC | UK IMC | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

(((i))) Leeds Bradford

Read It. Write It. DO IT!

Responses to the BNP victory. Hypocritical?

Dylan James | 11.11.2006 21:18 | Anti-racism

What are the true implications of the BNP's recent legal victory.

I would like to first point out my ignorance of much of the details and context regarding the recent trial of Nick Griffin head of the BNP and a party activist. I will refrain from talking about the case in much detail other than to point out a number of interesting themes with particular relevance to the struggle for an equal and fair society.

I see the various passionate and aggressive anti-fascist and anti-racist comments here and elsewhere and am aware they come from a real place within most people. When I become aware of agents using underhand tactics to incite racism; building up a contingent body of people who believe that within this country their needs come above the needs of others, I’m disgusted. When I hear of those same agents covertly using violence and physical aggression, I too feel my fist clench and violent thoughts pass through my mind.

I feel we must remember, though, that anger is an easy and destructive emotion. I believe we can see the effects of angry and unsympathetic thoughts at the heart of so many of the terrible conflicts throughout the world. So to attempt to understand the meaning and significance of the trail of BNP leader and activist, I feel we must attempt to understand what members of the BNP feel.

We see that the rhetoric of the victory resembled much of the rhetoric on websites such as these. Calls to battle the oppressive forces of government and passionate, deeply felt cries of freedom. Are we to dismiss these people as racist scum that deserve to burn in hell or men and women with a deeply misunderstood vision of how to make society better? I truly believe these people would make tuff, yet potential, converts to a true understanding of the destructive workings of capitalist society.

What is the response of the political activist, holding close to their heart the, in my opinion, best picture of the future? Is it to call the government to try harder to oppress the racist voices calling people to join them? Is it to take upon themselves the role of oppressor and coercer and hound these people into oblivion with aggression and violence? Are these not hypocritical responses to the situation?

I believe in freedom of speech. In a true atmosphere of freedom of speech where all people can express themselves totally many people would express things that would disgust and upset me and others. Is that necessarily a price too expensive for true freedom of speech? I agree there must be balance. I just believe the balance should be much more towards freedom. Is the call for freedom of speech from a person who says “Islam in England should be eradicated” different from a similar call from someone who says “government in England and the world should be eradicated”? Are these not true strains of thought present in society? Do we not have the ability to manage these debates within ourselves without violence? If that is true then my ideal of a society without hierarchy is unobtainable.

The real victors of the scenario are, of course, the ruling class. At best, individually, they speak with shared disgust at the result of the recent BNP trail. Essentially the significance of the case and the general mood it has been received has added an extra element to their argument that we must be governed and governed with increasing centralised power. “You must be protected by the black and white fanatics who lurk everywhere.” is, in my opinion, the resounding message underneath the words of the media and government.

Dylan James

Comments

Display the following 7 comments

  1. well put — agree
  2. who decides the balance — unnecessary
  3. Well put Dylan — D. Cheshire
  4. you're all missing the point — carol laidlaw
  5. Ignorance — simon
  6. Who is the ignoramus? — Chris Waits
  7. ASBO the BNP — Former BNP Sympathiser

Write It
Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

Search

The Common Place - Leeds The 1 in 12 club - Bradford The Trades Club - Hebden Bridge

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech