Page Content | Events
Features
Newswire
Publish
Links
Regions
Other IMCs
Search
Leeds Bradford IMC | UK IMC | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

(((i))) Leeds Bradford

Read It. Write It. DO IT!

Police unlawfully arrest teen then refuse to take witness statements

Dave | 18.04.2009 10:08 | Animal Liberation | Repression | Birmingham

During a regular demo outside Barclays Birmingham (due to their support for Huntingdon Life Sciences) a group of teenagers came to find out what the demo was about. The police were called, they arrested one teenager for alleged criminal damage (kicking the door of Barclays) which he didn't do, then refused to take details of bystanders who were witnesses to the non-crime.

This was a blatant attempt by the police to harass the teenagers who were eager to find out more about Barclays links to HLS (which has been exposed countless times for routine cruelty to animals) and yet another attempt to stop the campaign against HLS.

After the teenager was arrested, the police refused to take details or statements from the many bystanders who had witnessed the demo and the non-crime.

The police then seized the videotape of the action in an attempt to stop the truth being shown.

The video link below shows the police refusing to take witness details/statements and then telling the demonstrators lies - ie that the use of a megaphone on a demo is illegal under the Public Order Act.

Two complaints have been sent to the IPCC - one for the non-taking of witness details and the other for lying about the use of a megaphone being illegal under the Public Order Act.

The video of the arrest and illegal acts by the police can be seen here :

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mhkWmRrgO4

SHAC report of the demo available here :

 http://www.shac.net/news/2009/april/17.html

Dave

Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

various bits of legislation.

18.04.2009 11:36

It is an offence to use a loudhailer/megaphone for 'political canvassing' other that at specifically authorised times... and also to use it to advertise any 'entertainment, trade or business' without obtaining a licence from the local authority. Its also an offence to use one between 9pm and 8am. (control of pollution act 1974) and also one of the later environmental pollution acts.

It is also an offence to use a loudhailer/megaphone on a public highway (which the road and pavement is included) if it can be heard by someone over 50feet away and there is a person 'annoyed' by the noise.. (highways act)...

SOCPA 2005 has a specific prohibition on the use of loud speakers at protests (specifically defined areas)...

S14 Public order act is used to prohibit certain things at protests, such as megaphone use, banging drums, blowing whisles etc if it causes ANNOYANCE to other people.

If you have lots of shoppers complaining to the police about the noise, then expect s14 to be used.







André1


Megaphones

18.04.2009 12:20

Most of the stuff in the above comment (whilst clearly well meant) is incorrect, or misrepresented. It is all the kind of stuff that you would find in the NETCU handbook, and has all been discredited by lawyers, judges and even other police forces.

Protests are not political canvasing, and that act specifically does not mention protests.

The highways act does not cover peaceful protest. SOCPA does not ban megaphone use on protests. Section 14 can only limit: a) the numbers of people who may take part, b) the location of the assembly, and c) its maximum duration; not megaphone use. To use a s.14 for this would be unlwaful.

So in short, the use of a megaphone is not unlawful, although how it is used may be. For example, sticking it in someone's face could be called harassment. Politely talking towards a company premises is NOT unlawful.

Dave


Barclays: An Analysis

18.04.2009 15:12

SHAC Brum are sorted then. Seems like the police wanted them wrapped around their corrupt policies - shame it didn't work for shit!

Keep up the great resistance! Barclays are clearly feeling the heat across the globe at the moment by SHAC particularly in England, Ireland, USA, Italy, amongst other countries.

//////////////////////////////////////////

Barclays: An Analysis

I'm getting the distinct impression that Barclays thought SHAC would tone it done after 8 months of campaigning, instead of increasing the pressure and are living to regret the initial investment. They are experimenting with a small dose of repression, but will soon realise it has the opposite effects, as at first they didn't act like they cared - now it seems they're livid!

Furthermore I think it's because HLS, the state and their lackies conned them into it, to a degree. Deluding them into believing "it'll all be sorted when 7 shactivists get 50 years in January" - as - "nobody would bother risking time in jail after the convictions" - they conjured up quite a hilarious lie, managed to fool executives, and/or encouraged them to gamble.

Their desire to 'protect' HLS is understandable, as it's to indirectly defend themselves, nothing more, nothing less. Barclays are also major NYSE Euronext investors (HLS' only listed stock exchange) so they knew they would be next. Just a shame they invested in HLS and are paying the price for it! When they dump them it'll be the largest result for sometime though, definitely further reigniting the campaign and putting capital back in its place.

I predict another 1-3 months - and they'll be gone, maybe less with even more ALF direct action*. These corps rarely last a year, normally cutting themselves loose after 9-11 months if they get round to lasting over 6 months that is. Unless they don't get round to calculating the losses on being a HLS associate like Marsh Inc. did - fools!!

These targets traditionally sustain a 1-3 month campaign**, sometimes 6 month (ish), or more rarely just short of a year (due to using risk assessments instead of basic intelligence). Barclays must be doing these (unless they're as stupid as Marsh Inc.) but are doing so with optimism and a heavy dose of unrealistic patience. It's also more difficult to accurately estimate financial risk when dealing with more than one country. Do they average it for all countries, or correlate results to those affected - its all about perception. A perception they are going to regret in the near future as they must be loosing big profit over it by now.

In summary, they are living on corporate hopes and dreams, AKA : free market capitalism.

* http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=%22barclays%22+site%3Adirectaction.info&meta=&aq=f&oq=

** http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2009/02/422852.html

"In this list you will find some of the world's largest companies including all four main high street banks in the UK, the world's largest financial institution, the world's second largest bank and the world's largest insurance broker. All these companies have made clear and unequivocal statements to SHAC stating that they will never deal with Huntingdon ever again. Incredible isn't it? But there again with Huntingdon $89 million dollars in debt and with NO commercial bank and insurance company anywhere in the world prepared to deal with them it's hardly surprising." -  http://www.shac.net/SHAC/victories.html

the future


Barclays selling investment arm.

19.04.2009 13:50

Barclays are looking to offload their investment arm. Its the investment arm that has the shares in HLS. The rumours in the city are that it'll be sold off before the end of June. What mug can they find to sell their failing investment arm to?

InvestWatch


It is an offence.

20.04.2009 21:22

The police wrote this obviously. They have become parroting robots where morality about things is replaced by the words "It is an offence".

I once reported a pedo and while I was telling the copper how disgutsing this monster was and that I wouldn't normall speak to the police but I had to this time, he replied : "It's an offence". [child abuse].

This is how they speak and is evidence of how they have become robots.

anon


Write It
Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

Search

The Common Place - Leeds The 1 in 12 club - Bradford The Trades Club - Hebden Bridge

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech