WHO'S TALKING ABOUT TASERS ?
THESE ARE NOT TASERS !!!
ELECTRONIC AND ELECTROMAGNETIC DEVICES
DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS
-------------------------------
MAINE LAW
CHAPTER 264
H.P. 868 - L.D. 1271
http://janus.state.me.us/legis/ros/lom/lom122nd/7pub251%2D300/pu b251%2D300%2D22.htm
2. As used in this section, "electronic weapon" means a portable device or weapon from which an electrical current, impulse, wave or beam may be directed, which current, impulse, wave or beam is designed to have a disabling effect upon human beings.
"CURRENT" is "TASER"
What is "IMPULSE, WAVE or BEAM" ???
------------------------------
MASSACHUSETTS LAW
Chapter 170 Of The Acts of 2004
http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/seslaw04/sl040170.htm
Section 131J. No person shall possess a portable
device or weapon from which an electrical current,
impulse, wave or beam may be directed, which current,
impulse, wave or beam is designed to incapacitate
temporarily, injure or kill.
"CURRENT" is "TASER".
What is "IMPULSE, WAVE or BEAM" ????
-----------------------------
MICHIGAN STATE LAW / 2003-0256
http://www.michiganlegislature.org/mileg.asp?page=PublicActs
(k) "Harmful electronic or electromagnetic device"
means a device designed to emit or radiate or that, as
a result of its design, emits or radiates an
electronic or electromagnetic pulse, current, beam,
signal, or microwave that is intended to cause harm to
others or cause damage to, destroy, or disrupt any
electronic or telecommunications system or device,
including, but not limited to, a computer, computer
network, or computer system.
"CURRENT" is "TASER".
What is "EMIT, RADIATE, ELECTRONIC, ELECTROMAGNETIC,
PULSE, BEAM, SIGNAL or MICROWAVE" ????
------------------------------
That's 3 states, Michigan, Massachusetts and Maine in the United States that acknowledge the existence of "Deadly Electronic Weapons"
I am now trying to find laws for Canada
These exsist on the steet ???
Scary stuff !!!
Gerry Duffett
http://www.goliathboards.com/users5/gerryduffett/index.cgi
TORONTO / ONTARIO / CANADA
THESE ARE NOT TASERS !!!
ELECTRONIC AND ELECTROMAGNETIC DEVICES
DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS
-------------------------------
MAINE LAW
CHAPTER 264
H.P. 868 - L.D. 1271
http://janus.state.me.us/legis/ros/lom/lom122nd/7pub251%2D300/pu b251%2D300%2D22.htm 2. As used in this section, "electronic weapon" means a portable device or weapon from which an electrical current, impulse, wave or beam may be directed, which current, impulse, wave or beam is designed to have a disabling effect upon human beings.
"CURRENT" is "TASER"
What is "IMPULSE, WAVE or BEAM" ???
------------------------------
MASSACHUSETTS LAW
Chapter 170 Of The Acts of 2004
http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/seslaw04/sl040170.htm Section 131J. No person shall possess a portable
device or weapon from which an electrical current,
impulse, wave or beam may be directed, which current,
impulse, wave or beam is designed to incapacitate
temporarily, injure or kill.
"CURRENT" is "TASER".
What is "IMPULSE, WAVE or BEAM" ????
-----------------------------
MICHIGAN STATE LAW / 2003-0256
http://www.michiganlegislature.org/mileg.asp?page=PublicActs (k) "Harmful electronic or electromagnetic device"
means a device designed to emit or radiate or that, as
a result of its design, emits or radiates an
electronic or electromagnetic pulse, current, beam,
signal, or microwave that is intended to cause harm to
others or cause damage to, destroy, or disrupt any
electronic or telecommunications system or device,
including, but not limited to, a computer, computer
network, or computer system.
"CURRENT" is "TASER".
What is "EMIT, RADIATE, ELECTRONIC, ELECTROMAGNETIC,
PULSE, BEAM, SIGNAL or MICROWAVE" ????
------------------------------
That's 3 states, Michigan, Massachusetts and Maine in the United States that acknowledge the existence of "Deadly Electronic Weapons"
I am now trying to find laws for Canada
These exsist on the steet ???
Scary stuff !!!
Gerry Duffett
http://www.goliathboards.com/users5/gerryduffett/index.cgi TORONTO / ONTARIO / CANADA
e-mail:
Homepage:
Comments
Display the following 4 comments