The Army has replied to the warnings of Ghost Troop that the Bush Administration is planning a 5th anniversary 9/11 attack, coded as 9/11-V. The trouble is, they acknowledge the danger and dodge their job of doing anything to protect the American People. Are we being set up for a new Pearl Harbor?
FW: RED ALERT: CHICAGO 9/11
(Unclassified, Mission 9/11-V)
Prologue from the Pentagon
SAIG-ASSISTU-IGNET Mailbox wrote:
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Captain May,
Perhaps you have the wrong agency. The Department of the Army is not responsible for addressing criminal matters. I recommend you revaluate your concerns and submit them to one of the agencies responsible for handling issues of this magnitude. I am certain you know who they are. I am sorry we could not be more helpful regarding your efforts.
ASSISTU
Attn: US Army Inspector General
Dear General Green,
Above you see the reply I received from the Department of the Army about the red alert we have issued in the last week to Chicago, Detroit and Houston. In it Army supports my charge that the Bush Administration is preparing to stage another 9/11 around the 5th 9/11 (9/11-V) since the original attack, and encourages me to report it. Having said so much, though, Army says no more, and fails utterly to defend the American People. To complete the proof of a conspiracy of silence, the Army has placed a warning statement, written in red for emphasis, ordering that I am NOT to spread the alert that it has just ordered me to spread:
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO
INSPECTOR GENERAL SENSITIVE INFORMATION
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachments may contain Inspector General sensitive information, which is protected from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 USC §552. Matters within IG records are often predecisional in nature and do not represent final approved DA policy. Dissemination is prohibited except as authorized under Army Regulation 20-1. Do not release outside of DA channels without prior authorization from The Inspector General. If you are not the intended recipient of this information, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on this information is prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail.
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
[Back to Army Inspector General...]
General Green, what's happening as a 9/11-V attack is being arranged is quite like what happened before the Pearl Harbor attack. Then, as now, the military command shut down, closed its eyes, and allowed the attack to occur. For the full text of the Army reply from which I have extracted above, please refer to:
http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/ghosttroop/message/9175
NASA Treason and Discovery: 7/28/05
NASA's delay in launching the space shuttle Atlantis indicates a delay in the 9/11-V attack. We have been involved in two Houston-area warnings of petrochemical events that coincided with the only two shuttle launches in the last two years. On 7/26/05, NASA launched Discovery, then on 7/28/05 British Petroleum, Texas City, blew up, sending oil prices (and profits) to the highest levels in history before Katrina. This mission coincided with the use of an air-burst nuclear weapon, or a similar weapon, being deployed south of Houston, and is the content of the most listened-to of my interviews as Ghost Troop Commander: http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/Captain%20May/capt1.htm.
Teknosis created an ongoing article from our mission files that showed how the shuttle mission was used to set up a Texas City attack, which would have been the much-promised Al Qaeda nuke attack the media was setting up last summer: http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2005/week30/index.html. In that article you'll find that we were suppressed by the FBI and Secret Service as we tried to alert the American People, much as we are countered by the Signal Corps now.
NASA Treason and New Horizons: 1/31/06
NASA's launch of the New Horizons Mission was heavily coded, with a 1/19 launch (9/11 backwards). It is a 9-year mission to the 9th planet, Pluto, named after the Roman god of death: http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/. After this event we put Texas City under red alert again for another attempt at a false-flag nuke by the Bush Administration, predicting the attempt would be 1/31/06 (1/31 is an anagram of the Madrid 3/11 attack code).
The result of our mission was another success -- and mainstream media reported that secret Dept. of Defense nuclear assets were present in the Texas City area. I conducted an interview after we confirmed the nuke attempt, which contains links to the confirmation article in Galveston County Daily News: http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/Captain%20May/FEB_2%20BRIEFING.htm
NASA Treason and Discovery: 7/2/06
Ghost Troop figured that the next NASA launch of Discovery would also be in concert with an attempt at an attack, and again we were right. The original date for the launch was 7/1. The Exxon Mobil refinery in Baytown, like Texas City, a Houston petro-suburb exploded on 7/2, again resulting in the highest oil prices in history when the markets reopened after the July 4th holiday. In a 6/29/06 interview, I was explicit about the danger ahead, and my prediction was validated by the event: http://gmpodcasting.net/podcast/siw/index.php?id=66
We note that there is another NASA shuttle launch, Atlantis, set for tomorrow, and believe that it will be used to signal, and possibly assist, with the 9/11-V attack. This is high treason.
Coded Messages for 9/11-V Attack
In the last two weeks, there have been several coded stories that show the Bush Administration is preparing for the 9/11-V attack
8/27: Flight 5191:
http://news.airwise.com/story/view/1156697179.html
In this story, from the Sunday before last, an aviation disaster (staged) was reported as a way of conveying code. The flight number says it all: 5191, which is the 5th 9/11, once you unscramble it (5/9/11). This was immediately after both Bush 41 and Bush 43 met in Kennebunkport, and was the "go code" for the 9/11-V attack.
9/3: Iraq War KIA = 9/11 WTC KIA (2749)
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/09/03/death.toll/
In this story, the Pentagon releases the numeric code number that is identical to the 9/11 WTC death count of 2749. The body counts equal, a freak occurrence. Please note the confirmation of the WTC body count via a 2005 article:
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/DDC36FFE-43A3-4E24-B7BC-D93F45B0ED24.htm This was a Pentagon "go code" for the 9/11-V attack.
I note here for those who read the Al Qaeda code that the number 2749 has a two-step increase of even numbers as the 1st and 3rd numbers: 2 ... 4; and has a two-step increase of odd numbers as the 2nd and 4th numbers: ... 7 ... 9. This is code.
Signal Corps Treason and RTO Trainer
the pending 9/11-V attack. It has continued to the present, after a week of constant harassment of our cyber-communications.
The Signal Corps magazine Signaleer, led by "RTO Trainer" is attempting to undermine the very code analysis that the Army just recommended I report to other agencies, and we thereby infer that the Signal Corps has the responsibility for enabling the false-flag 9/11-V attack by attacking anyone trying to impede the attack. This is the same code analysis I've just done above on the code numbers of Flight 5191 and the Iraq War / 9/11 WTC body count of 2749.
RTO Trainer has dedicated a week now to attacking our code analysis. Why bother -- unless he's protecting the codes being used to set up the 9/11-V attack?
He show knowledge of several code types, and uses codes in his own writing intended to argue against our decoding. "RTO Trainer" itself is a code name, an anagram for "ANTI-TERROR," when the letters are rearranged. Far from working in an anti-terror capacity to stop harm from befalling the American People, RTO Trainer is working in a pro-terror capacity to set up the 9/11-V attack.
In order to make it clear that I thought this conduct treasonous, I sent a warning to RTO Trainer and his Signal Corps superiors on 9/1/06, which is also part of Ghost Troop archives: http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/ghosttroop/message/9037.
You'll find that the message quite specifically warns RTO Trainer, the Signaleer and the Signal Corps that conducting a psyops mission against us as we warned the American People of a coded terror event was treason. In an effort to counterattack the psyops, our Ghost Troop correspondent, GT Kent, has begun to publish articles describing what RTO Trainer and the Signaleer are up to: http://kentroversypapers.blogspot.com/2006/09/ghost-troop-and-treason-of-rto-trainer.html.
Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld and Treason
I request that you report my findings of a Bush Administration attempt to stage the 9/11-V attack to the Joint Chiefs, and to all other echelons and services. There could not be a greater danger to the American People than that which we now face, with a 9/11 Conspiracy now falling apart as more and more people ask questions and the 9/11 commissioners admit that they didn't get straight answers in their investigation.
I have already written and published on the Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld decision, stating that I believe it is a salutary attempt to uphold the constitution. It says that neither the president nor his agents -- or officers in the Armed Services -- are authorized to break the law, whether that means torture in Gitmo or setting up false-flag attacks on the American People. I request that you remind the Pentagon that it serves the Constitution, not the 9/11 Conspiracy, and advise them to read my article explaining how I believe the near future will judge present actions:
Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld: Geneva Conventions now; Nuremberg Principles later
http://www.aljazeerah.info/Opinion%20editorials/2006%20Opinion%20Editorials/July/3%20o/Hamdan%20vs%20Rumsfeld%20Geneva%20Conventions%20now,%20Nuremberg%20Principles%20later%20By%20Captain%20Eric%20H.%20May.htm
Respectfully,
Captain Eric H. May, MI/PAO, USA
CO, Ghost Troop, 3/7 Cybercav+
Mission of Conscience / Patriots in Action
FW: RED ALERT: CHICAGO 9/11
(Unclassified, Mission 9/11-V)
Prologue from the Pentagon
SAIG-ASSISTU-IGNET Mailbox wrote:
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Captain May,
Perhaps you have the wrong agency. The Department of the Army is not responsible for addressing criminal matters. I recommend you revaluate your concerns and submit them to one of the agencies responsible for handling issues of this magnitude. I am certain you know who they are. I am sorry we could not be more helpful regarding your efforts.
ASSISTU
Attn: US Army Inspector General
Dear General Green,
Above you see the reply I received from the Department of the Army about the red alert we have issued in the last week to Chicago, Detroit and Houston. In it Army supports my charge that the Bush Administration is preparing to stage another 9/11 around the 5th 9/11 (9/11-V) since the original attack, and encourages me to report it. Having said so much, though, Army says no more, and fails utterly to defend the American People. To complete the proof of a conspiracy of silence, the Army has placed a warning statement, written in red for emphasis, ordering that I am NOT to spread the alert that it has just ordered me to spread:
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO
INSPECTOR GENERAL SENSITIVE INFORMATION
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachments may contain Inspector General sensitive information, which is protected from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 USC §552. Matters within IG records are often predecisional in nature and do not represent final approved DA policy. Dissemination is prohibited except as authorized under Army Regulation 20-1. Do not release outside of DA channels without prior authorization from The Inspector General. If you are not the intended recipient of this information, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on this information is prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail.
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
[Back to Army Inspector General...]
General Green, what's happening as a 9/11-V attack is being arranged is quite like what happened before the Pearl Harbor attack. Then, as now, the military command shut down, closed its eyes, and allowed the attack to occur. For the full text of the Army reply from which I have extracted above, please refer to: http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/ghosttroop/message/9175
NASA Treason and Discovery: 7/28/05
NASA's delay in launching the space shuttle Atlantis indicates a delay in the 9/11-V attack. We have been involved in two Houston-area warnings of petrochemical events that coincided with the only two shuttle launches in the last two years. On 7/26/05, NASA launched Discovery, then on 7/28/05 British Petroleum, Texas City, blew up, sending oil prices (and profits) to the highest levels in history before Katrina. This mission coincided with the use of an air-burst nuclear weapon, or a similar weapon, being deployed south of Houston, and is the content of the most listened-to of my interviews as Ghost Troop Commander: http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/Captain%20May/capt1.htm.
Teknosis created an ongoing article from our mission files that showed how the shuttle mission was used to set up a Texas City attack, which would have been the much-promised Al Qaeda nuke attack the media was setting up last summer: http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2005/week30/index.html. In that article you'll find that we were suppressed by the FBI and Secret Service as we tried to alert the American People, much as we are countered by the Signal Corps now.
NASA Treason and New Horizons: 1/31/06
NASA's launch of the New Horizons Mission was heavily coded, with a 1/19 launch (9/11 backwards). It is a 9-year mission to the 9th planet, Pluto, named after the Roman god of death: http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/. After this event we put Texas City under red alert again for another attempt at a false-flag nuke by the Bush Administration, predicting the attempt would be 1/31/06 (1/31 is an anagram of the Madrid 3/11 attack code).
The result of our mission was another success -- and mainstream media reported that secret Dept. of Defense nuclear assets were present in the Texas City area. I conducted an interview after we confirmed the nuke attempt, which contains links to the confirmation article in Galveston County Daily News: http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/Captain%20May/FEB_2%20BRIEFING.htm
NASA Treason and Discovery: 7/2/06
Ghost Troop figured that the next NASA launch of Discovery would also be in concert with an attempt at an attack, and again we were right. The original date for the launch was 7/1. The Exxon Mobil refinery in Baytown, like Texas City, a Houston petro-suburb exploded on 7/2, again resulting in the highest oil prices in history when the markets reopened after the July 4th holiday. In a 6/29/06 interview, I was explicit about the danger ahead, and my prediction was validated by the event: http://gmpodcasting.net/podcast/siw/index.php?id=66
We note that there is another NASA shuttle launch, Atlantis, set for tomorrow, and believe that it will be used to signal, and possibly assist, with the 9/11-V attack. This is high treason.
Coded Messages for 9/11-V Attack
In the last two weeks, there have been several coded stories that show the Bush Administration is preparing for the 9/11-V attack
8/27: Flight 5191:
http://news.airwise.com/story/view/1156697179.html
In this story, from the Sunday before last, an aviation disaster (staged) was reported as a way of conveying code. The flight number says it all: 5191, which is the 5th 9/11, once you unscramble it (5/9/11). This was immediately after both Bush 41 and Bush 43 met in Kennebunkport, and was the "go code" for the 9/11-V attack.
9/3: Iraq War KIA = 9/11 WTC KIA (2749)
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/09/03/death.toll/
In this story, the Pentagon releases the numeric code number that is identical to the 9/11 WTC death count of 2749. The body counts equal, a freak occurrence. Please note the confirmation of the WTC body count via a 2005 article:
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/DDC36FFE-43A3-4E24-B7BC-D93F45B0ED24.htm This was a Pentagon "go code" for the 9/11-V attack.
I note here for those who read the Al Qaeda code that the number 2749 has a two-step increase of even numbers as the 1st and 3rd numbers: 2 ... 4; and has a two-step increase of odd numbers as the 2nd and 4th numbers: ... 7 ... 9. This is code.
Signal Corps Treason and RTO Trainer
the pending 9/11-V attack. It has continued to the present, after a week of constant harassment of our cyber-communications.
The Signal Corps magazine Signaleer, led by "RTO Trainer" is attempting to undermine the very code analysis that the Army just recommended I report to other agencies, and we thereby infer that the Signal Corps has the responsibility for enabling the false-flag 9/11-V attack by attacking anyone trying to impede the attack. This is the same code analysis I've just done above on the code numbers of Flight 5191 and the Iraq War / 9/11 WTC body count of 2749.
RTO Trainer has dedicated a week now to attacking our code analysis. Why bother -- unless he's protecting the codes being used to set up the 9/11-V attack?
He show knowledge of several code types, and uses codes in his own writing intended to argue against our decoding. "RTO Trainer" itself is a code name, an anagram for "ANTI-TERROR," when the letters are rearranged. Far from working in an anti-terror capacity to stop harm from befalling the American People, RTO Trainer is working in a pro-terror capacity to set up the 9/11-V attack.
In order to make it clear that I thought this conduct treasonous, I sent a warning to RTO Trainer and his Signal Corps superiors on 9/1/06, which is also part of Ghost Troop archives: http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/ghosttroop/message/9037.
You'll find that the message quite specifically warns RTO Trainer, the Signaleer and the Signal Corps that conducting a psyops mission against us as we warned the American People of a coded terror event was treason. In an effort to counterattack the psyops, our Ghost Troop correspondent, GT Kent, has begun to publish articles describing what RTO Trainer and the Signaleer are up to: http://kentroversypapers.blogspot.com/2006/09/ghost-troop-and-treason-of-rto-trainer.html.
Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld and Treason
I request that you report my findings of a Bush Administration attempt to stage the 9/11-V attack to the Joint Chiefs, and to all other echelons and services. There could not be a greater danger to the American People than that which we now face, with a 9/11 Conspiracy now falling apart as more and more people ask questions and the 9/11 commissioners admit that they didn't get straight answers in their investigation.
I have already written and published on the Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld decision, stating that I believe it is a salutary attempt to uphold the constitution. It says that neither the president nor his agents -- or officers in the Armed Services -- are authorized to break the law, whether that means torture in Gitmo or setting up false-flag attacks on the American People. I request that you remind the Pentagon that it serves the Constitution, not the 9/11 Conspiracy, and advise them to read my article explaining how I believe the near future will judge present actions:
Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld: Geneva Conventions now; Nuremberg Principles later
http://www.aljazeerah.info/Opinion%20editorials/2006%20Opinion%20Editorials/July/3%20o/Hamdan%20vs%20Rumsfeld%20Geneva%20Conventions%20now,%20Nuremberg%20Principles%20later%20By%20Captain%20Eric%20H.%20May.htm
Respectfully,
Captain Eric H. May, MI/PAO, USA
CO, Ghost Troop, 3/7 Cybercav+
Mission of Conscience / Patriots in Action
Captain Eric H. May
captainmay@prodigy.net
www.ghosttroop.net
Houston, Texas
(Unclassified, Mission 9/11-V)
Prologue from the Pentagon
SAIG-ASSISTU-IGNET Mailbox wrote:
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Captain May,
Perhaps you have the wrong agency. The Department of the Army is not responsible for addressing criminal matters. I recommend you revaluate your concerns and submit them to one of the agencies responsible for handling issues of this magnitude. I am certain you know who they are. I am sorry we could not be more helpful regarding your efforts.
ASSISTU
Attn: US Army Inspector General
Dear General Green,
Above you see the reply I received from the Department of the Army about the red alert we have issued in the last week to Chicago, Detroit and Houston. In it Army supports my charge that the Bush Administration is preparing to stage another 9/11 around the 5th 9/11 (9/11-V) since the original attack, and encourages me to report it. Having said so much, though, Army says no more, and fails utterly to defend the American People. To complete the proof of a conspiracy of silence, the Army has placed a warning statement, written in red for emphasis, ordering that I am NOT to spread the alert that it has just ordered me to spread:
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO
INSPECTOR GENERAL SENSITIVE INFORMATION
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachments may contain Inspector General sensitive information, which is protected from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 USC §552. Matters within IG records are often predecisional in nature and do not represent final approved DA policy. Dissemination is prohibited except as authorized under Army Regulation 20-1. Do not release outside of DA channels without prior authorization from The Inspector General. If you are not the intended recipient of this information, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on this information is prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail.
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
[Back to Army Inspector General...]
General Green, what's happening as a 9/11-V attack is being arranged is quite like what happened before the Pearl Harbor attack. Then, as now, the military command shut down, closed its eyes, and allowed the attack to occur. For the full text of the Army reply from which I have extracted above, please refer to:
http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/ghosttroop/message/9175 NASA Treason and Discovery: 7/28/05
NASA's delay in launching the space shuttle Atlantis indicates a delay in the 9/11-V attack. We have been involved in two Houston-area warnings of petrochemical events that coincided with the only two shuttle launches in the last two years. On 7/26/05, NASA launched Discovery, then on 7/28/05 British Petroleum, Texas City, blew up, sending oil prices (and profits) to the highest levels in history before Katrina. This mission coincided with the use of an air-burst nuclear weapon, or a similar weapon, being deployed south of Houston, and is the content of the most listened-to of my interviews as Ghost Troop Commander:
http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/Captain%20May/capt1.htm. Teknosis created an ongoing article from our mission files that showed how the shuttle mission was used to set up a Texas City attack, which would have been the much-promised Al Qaeda nuke attack the media was setting up last summer:
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2005/week30/index.html. In that article you'll find that we were suppressed by the FBI and Secret Service as we tried to alert the American People, much as we are countered by the Signal Corps now. NASA Treason and New Horizons: 1/31/06
NASA's launch of the New Horizons Mission was heavily coded, with a 1/19 launch (9/11 backwards). It is a 9-year mission to the 9th planet, Pluto, named after the Roman god of death:
http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/. After this event we put Texas City under red alert again for another attempt at a false-flag nuke by the Bush Administration, predicting the attempt would be 1/31/06 (1/31 is an anagram of the Madrid 3/11 attack code). The result of our mission was another success -- and mainstream media reported that secret Dept. of Defense nuclear assets were present in the Texas City area. I conducted an interview after we confirmed the nuke attempt, which contains links to the confirmation article in Galveston County Daily News:
http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/Captain%20May/FEB_2%20BRIEFING.htm NASA Treason and Discovery: 7/2/06
Ghost Troop figured that the next NASA launch of Discovery would also be in concert with an attempt at an attack, and again we were right. The original date for the launch was 7/1. The Exxon Mobil refinery in Baytown, like Texas City, a Houston petro-suburb exploded on 7/2, again resulting in the highest oil prices in history when the markets reopened after the July 4th holiday. In a 6/29/06 interview, I was explicit about the danger ahead, and my prediction was validated by the event:
http://gmpodcasting.net/podcast/siw/index.php?id=66 We note that there is another NASA shuttle launch, Atlantis, set for tomorrow, and believe that it will be used to signal, and possibly assist, with the 9/11-V attack. This is high treason.
Coded Messages for 9/11-V Attack
In the last two weeks, there have been several coded stories that show the Bush Administration is preparing for the 9/11-V attack
8/27: Flight 5191:
http://news.airwise.com/story/view/1156697179.html In this story, from the Sunday before last, an aviation disaster (staged) was reported as a way of conveying code. The flight number says it all: 5191, which is the 5th 9/11, once you unscramble it (5/9/11). This was immediately after both Bush 41 and Bush 43 met in Kennebunkport, and was the "go code" for the 9/11-V attack.
9/3: Iraq War KIA = 9/11 WTC KIA (2749)
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/09/03/death.toll/ In this story, the Pentagon releases the numeric code number that is identical to the 9/11 WTC death count of 2749. The body counts equal, a freak occurrence. Please note the confirmation of the WTC body count via a 2005 article:
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/DDC36FFE-43A3-4E24-B7BC-D93F45B0ED24.htm This was a Pentagon "go code" for the 9/11-V attack. I note here for those who read the Al Qaeda code that the number 2749 has a two-step increase of even numbers as the 1st and 3rd numbers: 2 ... 4; and has a two-step increase of odd numbers as the 2nd and 4th numbers: ... 7 ... 9. This is code.
Signal Corps Treason and RTO Trainer
the pending 9/11-V attack. It has continued to the present, after a week of constant harassment of our cyber-communications.
The Signal Corps magazine Signaleer, led by "RTO Trainer" is attempting to undermine the very code analysis that the Army just recommended I report to other agencies, and we thereby infer that the Signal Corps has the responsibility for enabling the false-flag 9/11-V attack by attacking anyone trying to impede the attack. This is the same code analysis I've just done above on the code numbers of Flight 5191 and the Iraq War / 9/11 WTC body count of 2749.
RTO Trainer has dedicated a week now to attacking our code analysis. Why bother -- unless he's protecting the codes being used to set up the 9/11-V attack?
He show knowledge of several code types, and uses codes in his own writing intended to argue against our decoding. "RTO Trainer" itself is a code name, an anagram for "ANTI-TERROR," when the letters are rearranged. Far from working in an anti-terror capacity to stop harm from befalling the American People, RTO Trainer is working in a pro-terror capacity to set up the 9/11-V attack.
In order to make it clear that I thought this conduct treasonous, I sent a warning to RTO Trainer and his Signal Corps superiors on 9/1/06, which is also part of Ghost Troop archives:
http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/ghosttroop/message/9037. You'll find that the message quite specifically warns RTO Trainer, the Signaleer and the Signal Corps that conducting a psyops mission against us as we warned the American People of a coded terror event was treason. In an effort to counterattack the psyops, our Ghost Troop correspondent, GT Kent, has begun to publish articles describing what RTO Trainer and the Signaleer are up to:
http://kentroversypapers.blogspot.com/2006/09/ghost-troop-and-treason-of-rto-trainer.html. Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld and Treason
I request that you report my findings of a Bush Administration attempt to stage the 9/11-V attack to the Joint Chiefs, and to all other echelons and services. There could not be a greater danger to the American People than that which we now face, with a 9/11 Conspiracy now falling apart as more and more people ask questions and the 9/11 commissioners admit that they didn't get straight answers in their investigation.
I have already written and published on the Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld decision, stating that I believe it is a salutary attempt to uphold the constitution. It says that neither the president nor his agents -- or officers in the Armed Services -- are authorized to break the law, whether that means torture in Gitmo or setting up false-flag attacks on the American People. I request that you remind the Pentagon that it serves the Constitution, not the 9/11 Conspiracy, and advise them to read my article explaining how I believe the near future will judge present actions:
Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld: Geneva Conventions now; Nuremberg Principles later
http://www.aljazeerah.info/Opinion%20editorials/2006%20Opinion%20Editorials/July/3%20o/Hamdan%20vs%20Rumsfeld%20Geneva%20Conventions%20now,%20Nuremberg%20Principles%20later%20By%20Captain%20Eric%20H.%20May.htm Respectfully,
Captain Eric H. May, MI/PAO, USA
CO, Ghost Troop, 3/7 Cybercav+
Mission of Conscience / Patriots in Action
FW: RED ALERT: CHICAGO 9/11
(Unclassified, Mission 9/11-V)
Prologue from the Pentagon
SAIG-ASSISTU-IGNET Mailbox wrote:
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Captain May,
Perhaps you have the wrong agency. The Department of the Army is not responsible for addressing criminal matters. I recommend you revaluate your concerns and submit them to one of the agencies responsible for handling issues of this magnitude. I am certain you know who they are. I am sorry we could not be more helpful regarding your efforts.
ASSISTU
Attn: US Army Inspector General
Dear General Green,
Above you see the reply I received from the Department of the Army about the red alert we have issued in the last week to Chicago, Detroit and Houston. In it Army supports my charge that the Bush Administration is preparing to stage another 9/11 around the 5th 9/11 (9/11-V) since the original attack, and encourages me to report it. Having said so much, though, Army says no more, and fails utterly to defend the American People. To complete the proof of a conspiracy of silence, the Army has placed a warning statement, written in red for emphasis, ordering that I am NOT to spread the alert that it has just ordered me to spread:
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: FOUO
INSPECTOR GENERAL SENSITIVE INFORMATION
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachments may contain Inspector General sensitive information, which is protected from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 USC §552. Matters within IG records are often predecisional in nature and do not represent final approved DA policy. Dissemination is prohibited except as authorized under Army Regulation 20-1. Do not release outside of DA channels without prior authorization from The Inspector General. If you are not the intended recipient of this information, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on this information is prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail.
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
[Back to Army Inspector General...]
General Green, what's happening as a 9/11-V attack is being arranged is quite like what happened before the Pearl Harbor attack. Then, as now, the military command shut down, closed its eyes, and allowed the attack to occur. For the full text of the Army reply from which I have extracted above, please refer to:
http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/ghosttroop/message/9175 NASA Treason and Discovery: 7/28/05
NASA's delay in launching the space shuttle Atlantis indicates a delay in the 9/11-V attack. We have been involved in two Houston-area warnings of petrochemical events that coincided with the only two shuttle launches in the last two years. On 7/26/05, NASA launched Discovery, then on 7/28/05 British Petroleum, Texas City, blew up, sending oil prices (and profits) to the highest levels in history before Katrina. This mission coincided with the use of an air-burst nuclear weapon, or a similar weapon, being deployed south of Houston, and is the content of the most listened-to of my interviews as Ghost Troop Commander:
http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/Captain%20May/capt1.htm. Teknosis created an ongoing article from our mission files that showed how the shuttle mission was used to set up a Texas City attack, which would have been the much-promised Al Qaeda nuke attack the media was setting up last summer:
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2005/week30/index.html. In that article you'll find that we were suppressed by the FBI and Secret Service as we tried to alert the American People, much as we are countered by the Signal Corps now. NASA Treason and New Horizons: 1/31/06
NASA's launch of the New Horizons Mission was heavily coded, with a 1/19 launch (9/11 backwards). It is a 9-year mission to the 9th planet, Pluto, named after the Roman god of death:
http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/. After this event we put Texas City under red alert again for another attempt at a false-flag nuke by the Bush Administration, predicting the attempt would be 1/31/06 (1/31 is an anagram of the Madrid 3/11 attack code). The result of our mission was another success -- and mainstream media reported that secret Dept. of Defense nuclear assets were present in the Texas City area. I conducted an interview after we confirmed the nuke attempt, which contains links to the confirmation article in Galveston County Daily News:
http://www.cloakanddagger.de/media/Captain%20May/FEB_2%20BRIEFING.htm NASA Treason and Discovery: 7/2/06
Ghost Troop figured that the next NASA launch of Discovery would also be in concert with an attempt at an attack, and again we were right. The original date for the launch was 7/1. The Exxon Mobil refinery in Baytown, like Texas City, a Houston petro-suburb exploded on 7/2, again resulting in the highest oil prices in history when the markets reopened after the July 4th holiday. In a 6/29/06 interview, I was explicit about the danger ahead, and my prediction was validated by the event:
http://gmpodcasting.net/podcast/siw/index.php?id=66 We note that there is another NASA shuttle launch, Atlantis, set for tomorrow, and believe that it will be used to signal, and possibly assist, with the 9/11-V attack. This is high treason.
Coded Messages for 9/11-V Attack
In the last two weeks, there have been several coded stories that show the Bush Administration is preparing for the 9/11-V attack
8/27: Flight 5191:
http://news.airwise.com/story/view/1156697179.html In this story, from the Sunday before last, an aviation disaster (staged) was reported as a way of conveying code. The flight number says it all: 5191, which is the 5th 9/11, once you unscramble it (5/9/11). This was immediately after both Bush 41 and Bush 43 met in Kennebunkport, and was the "go code" for the 9/11-V attack.
9/3: Iraq War KIA = 9/11 WTC KIA (2749)
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/09/03/death.toll/ In this story, the Pentagon releases the numeric code number that is identical to the 9/11 WTC death count of 2749. The body counts equal, a freak occurrence. Please note the confirmation of the WTC body count via a 2005 article:
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/DDC36FFE-43A3-4E24-B7BC-D93F45B0ED24.htm This was a Pentagon "go code" for the 9/11-V attack. I note here for those who read the Al Qaeda code that the number 2749 has a two-step increase of even numbers as the 1st and 3rd numbers: 2 ... 4; and has a two-step increase of odd numbers as the 2nd and 4th numbers: ... 7 ... 9. This is code.
Signal Corps Treason and RTO Trainer
the pending 9/11-V attack. It has continued to the present, after a week of constant harassment of our cyber-communications.
The Signal Corps magazine Signaleer, led by "RTO Trainer" is attempting to undermine the very code analysis that the Army just recommended I report to other agencies, and we thereby infer that the Signal Corps has the responsibility for enabling the false-flag 9/11-V attack by attacking anyone trying to impede the attack. This is the same code analysis I've just done above on the code numbers of Flight 5191 and the Iraq War / 9/11 WTC body count of 2749.
RTO Trainer has dedicated a week now to attacking our code analysis. Why bother -- unless he's protecting the codes being used to set up the 9/11-V attack?
He show knowledge of several code types, and uses codes in his own writing intended to argue against our decoding. "RTO Trainer" itself is a code name, an anagram for "ANTI-TERROR," when the letters are rearranged. Far from working in an anti-terror capacity to stop harm from befalling the American People, RTO Trainer is working in a pro-terror capacity to set up the 9/11-V attack.
In order to make it clear that I thought this conduct treasonous, I sent a warning to RTO Trainer and his Signal Corps superiors on 9/1/06, which is also part of Ghost Troop archives:
http://ca.groups.yahoo.com/group/ghosttroop/message/9037. You'll find that the message quite specifically warns RTO Trainer, the Signaleer and the Signal Corps that conducting a psyops mission against us as we warned the American People of a coded terror event was treason. In an effort to counterattack the psyops, our Ghost Troop correspondent, GT Kent, has begun to publish articles describing what RTO Trainer and the Signaleer are up to:
http://kentroversypapers.blogspot.com/2006/09/ghost-troop-and-treason-of-rto-trainer.html. Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld and Treason
I request that you report my findings of a Bush Administration attempt to stage the 9/11-V attack to the Joint Chiefs, and to all other echelons and services. There could not be a greater danger to the American People than that which we now face, with a 9/11 Conspiracy now falling apart as more and more people ask questions and the 9/11 commissioners admit that they didn't get straight answers in their investigation.
I have already written and published on the Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld decision, stating that I believe it is a salutary attempt to uphold the constitution. It says that neither the president nor his agents -- or officers in the Armed Services -- are authorized to break the law, whether that means torture in Gitmo or setting up false-flag attacks on the American People. I request that you remind the Pentagon that it serves the Constitution, not the 9/11 Conspiracy, and advise them to read my article explaining how I believe the near future will judge present actions:
Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld: Geneva Conventions now; Nuremberg Principles later
http://www.aljazeerah.info/Opinion%20editorials/2006%20Opinion%20Editorials/July/3%20o/Hamdan%20vs%20Rumsfeld%20Geneva%20Conventions%20now,%20Nuremberg%20Principles%20later%20By%20Captain%20Eric%20H.%20May.htm Respectfully,
Captain Eric H. May, MI/PAO, USA
CO, Ghost Troop, 3/7 Cybercav+
Mission of Conscience / Patriots in Action
Captain Eric H. May
captainmay@prodigy.net www.ghosttroop.net
Houston, Texas
e-mail:
Homepage: