HOME | IMC UK | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

Liverpool Indymedia

Government opposed check on HLS

R Moorhouse | 25.07.2015 12:48 | Health | Liverpool | London

The Dept. for Business, Innovation and Skills opposed a background check on animal-testing lab Huntingdon Life Sciences

In the course of contesting a Freedom of Information request about the provision of banking and insurance services to the animal-testing lab Huntingdon Life Sciences (HLS) the Dept. for Business, Innovation and Skills (DBIS) twice expressed its opposition to a background check being done on HLS. DBIS did not want the tribunals hearing the case to find out from the Medicines and Healthcare-products Regulatory Agency if HLS had tested and passed as safe any of the large number of pharmaceuticals that have killed people,e.g.: Propulsid, Baycol, Redux, Vioxx, Primodos/Duogynon, Yaz/Yasmin, Exjade, Lamisil, Zyban. DBIS did not want this information to be included in the tribunals' consideration of the public interest tests to determine whether the answers to these questions should be made public:

For what purpose has the Government facilitated the provision of banking and insurance services to HLS since 2001?

Has HLS received any pay-outs under the terms of the insurance services? if so, what was their monetary value?

The Freedom of Information request for this information was brought by Rhonda Moorhouse from LIverpool in spring 2011.

DBIS expressed its opposition to the background check on HLS in paragraph 56 of its submission to the First-tier Tribunal of 14/3/14:

"The Tribunal is not the appropriate forum to order the collection of a wide-ranging amount of information about HLS and other (sic) pharmaceutical companies from a wide variety of public authorities in order to have a "trial" of the Appellant's concerns over animal rights and adverse drug reactions. The Commissioner was right to (repeatedly) state that he attached "no weight" to these, as well as the Appellant's other, varied allegations against HLS and/or the Government, in deciding whether the specific withheld information should be disclosed."

DBIS repeated its opposition to the check again at the hearing before the Upper Tribunal on 27/3/15 which Judge Gwynneth Knowles QC referred to in paragraph 30 of her written judgement of 9/4/15:

"DBIS submitted that .......the tribunal did not have a wide remit to investigate HLS."

In the three years that the FOI request was before the tribunals between summer 2012 and spring 2015 neither the First-tier Tribunal nor the Upper Tribunal conducted a background check on HLS even though:

1 under Rule 16 (1)(b) of both sets of their respective rules both tribunals had the power to do so on their own initiative or on application from a party;

2 the check was requested numerous times by the Appellant;

3 Section 2 (2)(b) of the Freedom of Information Act requires that ALL the circumstances of the case be included in the public interest tests;

4 one of the exemptions relied on by DBIS was Exemption 38 which refers to the endangerment of the health and safety of individuals.

What did emerge was that public resources are instrumental in the Government's support of HLS. A letter (unsigned) from DBIS to Tony Dixon, senior case officer at the Information Commissioner's Office, dated 24/2/12 contains these passages:

"The Dept. recognises that there is a public interest in the oversight of public spending and that in the present case public money was applied to ensure banking services being provided to HLS by the Bank of England." (paragraph 20)

"In the present case public resources were applied to ensure that insurance services could be available to HLS." (paragraph 32)

"There is a degree of public interest in disclosing this information because there is a degree of public interest in it being known why public resources have been, and are being, devoted to supporting HLS and in turn the UK life sciences industry. There is a genuine policy issue whether such support should be provided in such circumstances." (paragraph 52)

Contact the author of this article on:  huntingdonFOI@yahoo.co.uk

R Moorhouse
- e-mail: huntingdonFOI@yahoo.co.uk

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

[navigation.actions2016]

[navigation.actions2015]

[navigation.actions2014]

NATO 2014

Actions 2013

G8 2013

Actions 2012

Workfare

Actions 2011

2011 Census Resistance
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Occupy Everywhere

Actions 2010

Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands

Actions 2009

COP15 Climate Summit 2009
G20 London Summit
Guantánamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
University Occupations for Gaza

Actions 2008

2008 Days Of Action For Autonomous Spaces
Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco
Climate Camp 2008
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Smash EDO
Stop Sequani Animal Testing
Stop the BNP's Red White and Blue festival

Actions 2007

Climate Camp 2007
DSEi 2007
G8 Germany 2007
Mayday 2007
No Border Camp 2007

Actions 2006

April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
Faslane
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
SOCPA
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006

Actions 2005

DSEi 2005
G8 2005
WTO Hong Kong 2005

Actions 2004

European Social Forum
FBI Server Seizure
May Day 2004
Venezuela

Actions 2003

Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech

Publish Your News


Temporary Scroogle search

-->