Skip Navigation | HOME | UK Indymedia | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

manchester Indymedia

“Fake” Spodden Valley asbestos websites exposed…

Jason Addy | 13.04.2005 21:53 | Ecology | Health | Technology | World

The Save Spodden Valley campaign may have discovered a sinister move by developers of the former asbestos factory site in the Spodden Valley, Rochdale:



Following Countryside Properties appearances in national satirical magazine Private Eye, it appears that the building company have scored yet another public relations ‘home goal’ in their bid to build 600+ houses and a children’s nursery on the site of the Turners asbestos factory:

The company prides itself on its "ethical, social and environmental policies” yet is to be reported to internet watchdogs that monitor domain names for fraudulent or misleading use:

Not content with buying interests in asbestos factory sites, Countryside Properties have now bought up many internet domain names including combinations of the words “save” “spodden” and “valley”.

Save Spodden Valley, the long established community campaign’s website is www.Spodden-Valley.co.uk and its main email address is  SaveSpoddenValley@hotmail.com. The genuine website for the campaign has much information about the history of the controversial factory site, contaminated land, the destruction of woodland habitats and the plans to build hundreds of homes on the world’s first, then largest, asbestos textile factory.

Many are concerned that the bulk purchase of these domain names may be a cynical move that could be the start of a ‘dirty tricks’ campaign by the building company.

The misleading web addresses go directly to the front page of Countryside Properties corporate website.

Local resident Dave Phillips was saddened by this latest move apparently by Countryside Properties:

“as a father of 5 month old and 5 year old daughters I am very concerned about what Countryside Properties appear to be doing instead of addressing our community’s real and legitimate concerns about health”.

“Don’t the directors and managers of Countryside Properties have children? Is really this the work of an ethical company?”

“It is odd that once on the Countryside Properties website there is no information about asbestos and the Spodden Valley- what have they got to hide?”

Critics of this latest move are concerned that the “fake” web addresses may be used to misinform genuine research into asbestos, contamination and recent events in the Spodden Valley.
www.Spodden-Valley.co.uk has received messages of support from all over the world. Its web and email addresses have been printed in thousands of leaflets, posters and letters. The campaign has been reported in the regional and national media including television news reports, the BBC news website and 2 reports on BBC Radio 4’s You and Yours programme.

Campaign co-ordinator Jason Addy was philosophical about the “fake” website addresses:

“Countryside Properties now have 3 public relation firms working for them to promote the former asbestos factory site”.

“It may be that Countryside Properties’ directors do not know about these tactics and would be appalled at this tarnishing of their company’s reputation”.

“Countryside Properties employ a web design firm called CD9 Design Ltd. We will be asking that the domain names be transferred to the Save Spodden Valley campaign, their rightful recipient. Creating ‘bogus’ weblinks doesn’t look good for Countryside Properties. We have been told that it is the sort of scam usually conducted by pornographers, gangsters and con-artists and certainly not by reputable national building companies. This may be a mistake made by an over-eager web-designer that could be resolved amicably”.

“Imitation may be the best form of flattery and it indicates a bit of desperation by their “PR” people. Asbestos is an issue for medical doctors not ‘spin’ doctors”.

“After they have made their apologies, perhaps Countryside Properties could make a donation to an asbestos-cancer charity or put some money aside to repair the woodlands destroyed in the Spodden Valley”.

“Countryside Properties have now admitted being involved with the asbestos factory site for over a year-before the woodlands were destroyed in May 2004- it is about time Countryside Properties had real information about asbestos on a real Countryside Properties website”.

”As a community campaign, we have very little funds and we make the most of what we have to keep our community safe. When faced with a development that could potentially disturb tens of thousands of tonnes of asbestos waste, buying up domain names seems very petty when there is so much to do.”

“All we want is to have all the facts about the site out in the open. We are grateful for the passionate support of communities throughout the world who do not want to our town’s younger generations to suffer any risk of a continued legacy of asbestos poisoning”.

“We ask Countryside Properties again to repair the damage-
to the Spodden Valley and its woodlands… and to their own corporate reputation”.

“A first step would be to remove the bogus weblinks that use a long-established campaign’s name. Save Spodden Valley would be happy to put a link on its website to Countryside Properties website if they have facts to share with everybody. Surely a responsible company has nothing to hide?”

Jason Addy
- e-mail: savespoddenvalley@hotmail.com
- Homepage: http://www.Spodden-Valley.co.uk

Download this article in pdf format >>

Email this article to someone >>

Submit an addition or make a quick comment on this article >>

Comments

Hide the following 6 comments

why worry -

14.04.2005 17:33

anyone looking for the campaign site on the internet will realise what's happened when they see the building company site - right?

The building co is only really in the wrong if it sets up bogus sites purporting to be part of the campaign or slagging you off

And if they ever get as far as building it might be difficult to sell when people show up at the showhome in protective suits! (cheap and easy to obtain - check anti-GMO campaigns).

bobby


Corporate Muppets!

14.04.2005 20:38

I see one of the domain names they have snatched is www.savespoddenvalley.co.uk

I've read about them in the latest edition of Private Eye too. Sounds like a company witha few problems as well as dodgy ethics!

Smurf


suited and booted!

14.04.2005 20:54


How about protests in suits like this Bobby?

Jason
- Homepage: http://www.Spodden-Valley.co.uk


Here is some of the stuff we are concerned about...

14.04.2005 20:59


There is a lot more to see on our "real" website.

Perhaps that is why they want to divert people away from it?

Jason
mail e-mail: SaveSpoddenValley@hotmail.com
- Homepage: http://www.Spodden-Valley.co.uk


It's in the bag!!!

14.04.2005 21:09


These photos where taken AFTER Mr Ian Simpson, director of Countryside Properties went on national radio (BBC Radio 4's You and Yours programme) and said that local people were wrong to say that asbestos was exposed in the Spodden Valley's woodland.


In the Environmental Statement submitted with the developers' Planning Application- this is what they concluded (at para 5.30) (note the full-stop at the end of the sentence)...


"Of particular note is the abscence of any asbestos contamination"


what do you think?

Jason
mail e-mail: savespoddenvalley@hotmail.com
- Homepage: http://www.Spodden-Valley.co.uk


Holy Shite !

14.04.2005 22:32

What are these developers thinking of?

Why isn't this national news yet?

Is Countryside Properties the company that has the strapline
"thinking beyond today" in its logo?

...looks like they'll have to be "thinking towards the next 50 years" if locals breathe the asbestos in. don't these tools know how dangerous asbestos is?


Danny Holmann.


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Manchester Topics

Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Manchester Actions 2010

Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands

Manchester Actions 2009

COP15 Climate Summit 2009
G20 London Summit
Guantánamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
University Occupations for Gaza

Manchester Actions 2008

2008 Days Of Action For Autonomous Spaces
Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco
Climate Camp 2008
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Smash EDO
Stop Sequani Animal Testing
Stop the BNP's Red White and Blue festival

Manchester Actions 2007

Climate Camp 2007
DSEi 2007
G8 Germany 2007
Mayday 2007
No Border Camp 2007

Manchester Actions 2006

April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
Faslane
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
SOCPA
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006

Manchester Actions 2005

DSEi 2005
G8 2005
WTO Hong Kong 2005

Manchester Actions 2004

European Social Forum
FBI Server Seizure
May Day 2004
Venezuela

Manchester Actions 2003

Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003

Languages

english

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech