Skip Navigation | HOME | UK Indymedia | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

manchester Indymedia

Ebanks goes at last - but costs taxpayers a cool £100,000 plus

Tom | 28.07.2006 00:32 | Anti-racism | Repression | Social Struggles | Birmingham

Senior High Court judges have finally got around to confirming that Sharon Ebanks was elected as the first British National Party councillor on Birmingham City Council by mistake, and ordered her replacement by the real winner of the vote in May, Labour's Catherine Grundy.

(Great article. Look at the comments too.)

The decision, which has long been regarded as a foregone conclusion by people who actually took the time to read the explanation provided by the council's Interim Head of Paid Service, Stephen Hughes (which we reprinted here  http://82.69.12.18/lancasteruafblog/index.php?itemid=276 ), has prompted the BNP's West Midlands organiser, Simon Darby, to declare his 'suspicions' about the overturned result and a claim that Ebanks would, like Arnold Schwarzenegger, be back - though probably not quite so dramatically.

The result of the recount confirmed what Stephen Hughes had already told us - that there had been a miscount on the night and that some of the BNP's votes had been counted twice. The recount, overseen by senior High Court judges, showed that Labour's Ms Grundy won with 1811, while the BNP's Ebanks was second with 1327. Labour's Zoe Hopkins came top of the vote with 1881. Conservative candidate, Mick Hawker, gained 1130 votes.

Sir Albert Bore, the Labour group's leader in Birmingham, said: 'This was the news we were hoping for and expecting. It was clear from the very start that the voters of Kingstanding had voted for two Labour councillors. The judgment simply put things back to the way they should always have been. I know that Catherine will make an excellent councillor for Kingstanding and I look forward to working with her in the Labour group.'

Ms Grundy said: 'I am delighted to have been elected as one of the Labour councillors for Kingstanding. I know that the big issues for the people who I represent are fighting crime and anti-social behaviour, improving local housing and housing repairs, transportation, training and getting people into jobs.'

Although the circumstances regarding the miscount were clear and the council admitted its mistake straight away, Ebanks refused to do the decent thing and stand down. Instead, she chose to pontificate about the extravagance within the local authority, even complaining about the traditional formal dinner held by the council to introduce new councillors to each other, claiming that it was a waste of taxpayers' money  http://82.69.12.18/lancasteruafblog/index.php?itemid=241 . Curious then, that she should throw away around £100,000 of council taxpayers' money on a court case that could only ever go one way and that she knew she would lose. Perhaps she'll pay the councillor's allowance for her short time in office back to the council to offset the amount she's cost them. We reckon it's about £3750 - nowhere near enough but the gesture would no doubt be appreciated by the taxpayer that Ebanks cares about so much.

Fat chance.

In reality, of course, the taxpayer will only pay some of the £100,000 because insurance will cover an element of the costs (something we'd be willing to bet Ebanks neither knew nor cared about), but precisely how much will be borne by the taxpayer is difficult to ascertain at this stage and, even if the insurance was to cover a large proportion of it, there will still be something to pay - not to mention the cost of the time spent by council solicitors, barristers and council officers. Estimates vary but even with the insurance cover, the final cost to the council seems likely to be enormous.

Not that anyone cares, but the BNP also got a £5000 slap on the wrist from the High Court last week too, when a judge effectively fined the party by forcing it to pay the costs after demanding an unnecessary hearing at which it alleged corruption in the voting process - an unfounded and frivolous allegation that the BNP seems to like to throw around whenever things don't go its way. One wonders what its ever-decreasing financial donors think of that ill-judged allegation. In fact, this whole fiasco looks like costing the BNP around £10-15,000, a lot of money for a small party that's already in substantial debt. Perhaps the morally-bankrupt BNP is about to become financially-bankrupt too. We live in hope.

One curious anomaly has emerged from all this. Ebanks has repeatedly claimed that she could find nowhere to hold surgeries, attacking (unnamed) venues that had refused her space. Yet she now claims to have been holding regular surgeries in the ward. No doubt this is just a poor attempt to try to fool the voters into thinking she's been a good ersatz councillor in the couple of months she's nearly been in office, in the hope that a few judicious lies here and there will help her chances in the next local elections.

We sincerely hope that her opposition during the next local election continually and loudly bring up the little matter of the £100,000 that Ebanks and the BNP threw away. It should be a salutary reminder that the BNP cares nothing for the voters despite the lies and bullshit they spout during every election campaign. Ms Grundy however, has been holding surgeries in the ward and also attending meetings despite not being a fully-fledged councillor - showing rather more commitment than Ebanks who, you might recall, sat through the entire first meeting of the council without saying a thing, except for answering her many mobile phones  http://82.69.12.18/lancasteruafblog/index.php?itemid=241 .

Our congratulations to Councillor Catherine Grundy on her belated election.

As an interesting aside, we've found a few choice quotes from Ebanks, made under the name 'Odin's Eye' on the Stormfront nazi forum.

Whither the BNP?
'The point of our existence is to save the White British race, the BNP are the only ones capable of doing so, unless of course the nationalist opposition all get brain transplants. Pigs might fly, preferably over a mosque'

On the 2004 local elections
'I intend to take photos this year of my polling station, complete with paki candidates hassling the electorate.'

On birth control
'And then the Jewish bastards gave us the pill, and abortion...'

On Islam and crime
'Islam, the convicts choice.'

On Islam
'Muslims are filthy disgusting animals that should be cleansed from the face of the earth.'

On Steven Spielberg
'He is a good director when kept away from all things oven.'

On the England football team
'...lets face it, these blacks can earn millions and they dont even have a brain cell between them. Same goes for crap artists, they spout aload of monkey noises down the mic and hey presto they're living in a mansion and teaching White kids to do drugs, shoot guns and treat White women like whores.'

And on watching football rather than distributing BNP leaflets
'Neglecting your country in favour of a freakin shirt that changes each season to give more and more negros, more dosh. Do you ever stop to think about the amount of money you put into foreigners pockets every time you go to a match?'

On rap music
'Rap is a jewish plot to put negros in the high earning bracket, and to actually make them feel like they make some kind of artistic difference to peoples lives. They may gain more credibility if the jew wasn't pulling their strings, but yet again, someone else, even the jew has to give them a foot up. Send em back to the jungle where they belong.'

On Solihull
'We all have our smart areas, but the rest of Solihull is a paki infested dump.'

Tom
- Homepage: http://82.69.12.18/lancasteruafblog/

Download this article in pdf format >>

Email this article to someone >>

Submit an addition or make a quick comment on this article >>

Comments

Hide the following 3 comments

Fiasco

03.08.2006 23:02

The cause of this mess is council incompetence, not the BNP. This is just the latest mess that has happened with elections in Birmingham. If the council had done its job properly the £100,000 could have been spent on council services, not wasted. The BNP is completely innocent with regard to this shameful waste of money - the BNP weren't doing the counting. The council is Labour run. How much more cash is it wasting that we don't know about? Counting a few thousand votes is not a difficult thing to do. Are we expected to believe that the council can carry out complicated tasks like education, housing provision and social work if counting is beyond them?

The council has had two goes at the count. The first was wrong. How do we know the second is correct? Have the council staff been on a numeracy course to learn to count?

Don


birmingham city council is controlled by the tories and liberals

04.08.2006 11:29

and not by labour...

had to intervene


Yes, you are right

04.08.2006 13:29

Labour don't control Birmingham City Council. The BNP certainly don't and can therefore have no responsibility for this disgraceful counting error, which was a huge error for such a small amount of votes to be counted. The £100,000 wasted is entirely the fault of the incompetent staff responsible for the count. Given the recent less than perfect recent history of electoral administration in the Birmingham area it is reasonable for anyone to go to court to challenge any decison of the authorities - why would anyone take an incompetent council's word that a miscount had happened? It might be a good idea to remove all vote counting from Birmingham for a while, and have Birmingham's votes counted in a part of the country where the authorities have shown they can administer elections properly.

Don


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Manchester Topics

Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Manchester Actions 2010

Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands

Manchester Actions 2009

COP15 Climate Summit 2009
G20 London Summit
Guantánamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
University Occupations for Gaza

Manchester Actions 2008

2008 Days Of Action For Autonomous Spaces
Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco
Climate Camp 2008
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Smash EDO
Stop Sequani Animal Testing
Stop the BNP's Red White and Blue festival

Manchester Actions 2007

Climate Camp 2007
DSEi 2007
G8 Germany 2007
Mayday 2007
No Border Camp 2007

Manchester Actions 2006

April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
Faslane
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
SOCPA
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006

Manchester Actions 2005

DSEi 2005
G8 2005
WTO Hong Kong 2005

Manchester Actions 2004

European Social Forum
FBI Server Seizure
May Day 2004
Venezuela

Manchester Actions 2003

Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003

Languages

english

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech