Send a mailbag to Dr John Reid, leading exponent of Blairite anti-moslem propaganda
On 20 Sept Dr John Reid, British home secretary, addressed a meeting with the moslem community in London. Apart from stating that moslem parents should spy on their children in ultra McCartyism style, the meeting was interupted by two controversal moslem radicals belonging to the al- Mujaharoun and al-Ghurabaa groups, both of which have been proscribed by the Home Office.
These individuals fitted the description of what Dr John Reid is trying to stereotype as dangerous moslem extremists.
These individuals praise 9/11 and the London bombings.
How did these individuals get within slapping distance of Dr John Reid, despite heavy security?
Was this interuption stage-managed by Dr John Reid?
Are these two individuals British intelligent agents or assets, used to demonise the moslem communities?
Send this questions and other to the home secretary at;
John Reid 2 Cullion Way Newarthill ML1 5SF
On 20 Sept Dr John Reid, British home secretary, addressed a meeting with the moslem community in London. Apart from stating that moslem parents should spy on their children in ultra McCartyism style, the meeting was interupted by two controversal moslem radicals belonging to the al- Mujaharoun and al-Ghurabaa groups, both of which have been proscribed by the Home Office.
These individuals fitted the description of what Dr John Reid is trying to stereotype as dangerous moslem extremists.
These individuals praise 9/11 and the London bombings.
How did these individuals get within slapping distance of Dr John Reid, despite heavy security?
Was this interuption stage-managed by Dr John Reid?
Are these two individuals British intelligent agents or assets, used to demonise the moslem communities?
Send this questions and other to the home secretary at;
John Reid 2 Cullion Way Newarthill ML1 5SF
Comments
Hide the following comment
You are right, but the spooks ALWAYS work in obvious ways
24.09.2006 14:22
Take Noam Chomsky in the states. We KNOW he works for the CIA as a 24/7 disruptive agent, motivated entirely by a zionist desire to protect his 'master-race'. There is a sea of proof for this, but the simplest follows the phoney extremist disruption of Reid mentioned above.
Chomsky holds a teaching position at MIT, but publishes endless material apparently attacking the US administration at every moral and political level. At no time does Chomsky's poltical actions impact on his MIT job. Now contrast with 911 truth movement people who also have teaching positions in universities across the US. In no time flat, these people are being pushed out of their jobs for activities outside their employment that are a tiny fraction as (seemingly) bothersome to to US government. Chomsky is MAGICALLY protected against any backlash his political activities might be expected to generate.
In the UK, we have the comparison of the fate of Galloway vs Scargill, for example. WHEN YOU ARE AGAINST THE STATE, AND THE STATE IS POWERFUL, YOU ARE UTTERLY DESTROYED. ANYONE WHO ***APPEARS*** TO BE AGAINST A POWERFUL STATE WHO IS NOT DESTROYED, IN REALITY WORKS FOR THE STATE.
Now this logic defines 'destroyed' according to the possibilities of the time. For instance, at the moment, individual independent commentators can attack the state safely, because as yet there is little the state wants to be seen doing against these people. However, if the state has a means currently available to get at such a person, and doesn't use it, that person is NOT lucky or charmed, merely PROTECTED.
Why are the 'secret services' able to get away with such manipulation. Well, in a nut-shell (and sorry for those that hate to hear me say this) most people are thick. Their desire to have an alpha-male lead them far ourweighs their ability to think. Chomsky, for instance, targets the well understood leftie-pseudo-intellectual. For these people, intellect is measured purely by the books one has on the shelf and coffee table. 'Intelligence' by osmosis, so to speak.
For most people, a density of writing, and the use of big words, and buzz-phrases, equals intelligent writing. This is why the so-called broad-sheets came to adopt their now familiar style. What is interesting about this is that in the GROWN-UP world of thinking, we have a thing called peer-review. Here, science papers are submitted for review, so that they can be torn apart if possible, when mistakes are discovered in the logic. Big words, and dense writing count for NOTHING, only the provable accuracy of what is said.
Now what happens if a monster truly comes to understand the mechanisms of the pseudo-intellectual left? Do you not think, perhaps, that such a monster, after a moments thought, could not plan to use all the weaknesses of the left to destroy it?
Take the protest on Sat. For weeks people were fooled by Blair's agents into thinking they were going on an anti-Blair march. The slogan, "time to go" was carefully crafted by Blair's psychology experts to give that impression. Of course, once the demo is underway, all the news agencies report that the "time to go" theme refers to a concern about "our boys" in Afghanistan and Iraq. The mental weakness of lefties used against them in the clearest example I have seen in my lifetime. While the tens of thousands that marched knew what was in their own minds, the general population got a very different message, one that actually works POSITIVELY for Blair. After all, he claims to care about 'our boys' as well!
I know one thing above all. Blair lives in mortal terror of the 911 truth movement. The greatest effort by his agents here and at similar places is seen in attacking those that would bring Blair's false flag (and thus all the other false flags in recorded recent history) to the attention of the general public. BLAIR NEEDS PASSIVE SUPPORT (active support is obviously very difficult to get at times like these). The 911 truth movement erodes Blair's passive support, which is why Galloway, Livingstone, Benn, and Chomsky will be seen doing everything they can do prevent the 911 truth movement making progress. These servants KNOW how to work best on behalf of their master.
Blair DEMANDS the demonisation of muslims. For this reason, for instance, you will here Galloway refer to muslim extremists more often than Reid. Galloway uses the method of sprinkling a little surface sugar on top of his speeches, while underneath is the constant re-inforcement of Blair's central message.
NONE OF YOU HAVE ANY PROBLEM BELIEVING THAT A GOVERNMENT WILL SPEND HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS BUILDING A WEAPON OF WAR THAT, OFT TIME, SEES NO AGGRESSIVE USE. HOWEVER, WHEN PEOPLE,SUCH AS MYSELF POINT OUT TO YOU THAT RECRUITING AGENTS LIKE CHOMSKY FOR A FRACTION OF THE MONEY, AND A MILLION TIMES MORE UTILITY, WILL HAPPEN ALL THE TIME, YOU FIND ***THIS*** HARD TO BELIEVE?
Politics is the art of the possible. And nothing is more possible for a skilled Human than being a full-time deceiver. The deception is easy to spot if you ONLY consider what the deception needs to achieve. After all, what point creating a deception to no consequence? Blair needs his agents to make a difference. We know what that difference is. Using this knowledge makes spotting Blair's people easy.
So, why don't YOU spot Blair's agents. Simple, because you are too scared to admit to yourself that they exist. Your 'comfort zone' is the very batch of lies that you tell yourself so that you can sleep at night. And the biggest lie you tell yourself is that the 'bad guys' have self-imposed limits that for some peculiar and unsecified reason they always stick to. The last time so many Humans indulged in such self-lies, we earned a little thing called World War 2.
twilight