Skip Navigation | HOME | UK Indymedia | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

manchester Indymedia

Closed doors at the Council

The Mule | 06.08.2009 09:06 | Analysis

Parliament has been under attack lately (not literally, unfortunately) for its lack of ‘transparency’. It took a plucky mole to steal the documents, and public spiritedly flog them for £300,000 to the Telegraph to find out how much of our money was being spent on crystal grapefruit bowls and £200 pens (stand up Gorton MP Gerald Kaufman).

Add to that the Conservative Party’s staunch opposition to the Freedom of Information Act, and the government’s refusal to release minutes from cabinet meetings leading up to the Iraq war, and you have an ugly picture of secrecy and deceit.

However, compared to local government, Westminster’s doing great. MPs’ every move is monitored by a gossip hungry press, and NGO’s pour over every policy. Every word uttered in the debating chamber is written down and made publicly available in Hansard, and anyone with a digibox can watch BBC Parliament live.

When it comes to local government though, barely anyone has a clue what’s going on. And we won’t lie, the Mule finds it hard to keep up with events at the Town Hall. The MEN seems keener on cats up trees and the X Factor than holding power to account. The ‘meeting minutes’ buried on the council’s website reveal little of how decisions are made. Councillors won’t even respond to our concerned emails about the ID cards trial.

But there’s always ‘The Leader’s Blog’, where Richard Leese throws down information morsels from the high table. He earnestly reassures us that local councillors aren’t like that Westminster lot, but laments how “us politicians in local government tend to get tarred with the same brush”. He recently described himself as a “great supporter of openness and transparency”, and declares he’s “not giving away secrets” when he tells us the details of council policy, since meetings are open to the public.

Open to the public, eh? Maybe finding out for ourselves what’s really going on requires going to meetings. Hearing that the executive were meeting on 11 March, Mule reporters head to the Town Hall. “Where’s the executive meeting?”, we ask the lady on reception. “Erm, I don’t think that’s open to the public” she says, suspiciously. “Oh yes it is”, we reply. “Oh no it isn’t!”

Persistence gets us to the events desk on the next floor, but they’re saying the same thing, and with even more smug satisfaction. One passing member of staff even stops to say “you can’t go in!”. We eventually persuade the events desk to ‘call somebody’ about it. The result? We can go in! Mule – 1, Officialdom – 0. However, the meeting’s finished now. We’re back at all square.

We decide to try again for the council AGM in May. To make sure, we decide to make sure in advance that we can definitely attend. On the council website section listing meetings, nowhere is it mentioned that the meetings are open to the public. Not anywhere. There is no contact email or number provided to make enquiries about the meetings, so we end up ringing the main switchboard. We’re passed from department to department, eventually having to give up and start the process again. Eventually we reach ‘members services’. They email us back a few hours later to confirm that we can attend.

It’s clear when we arrive that the council’s approach to including the public in meetings is working. In a viewing gallery that holds over 100 people, there are only two other members of the public – at the AGM!

As for the meeting itself, it seems that the council’s strategy is to bore anyone who makes it this far into vowing never to return. A new Lord Mayor (Alison Firth) is being appointed, which means long winded speeches from the leader of the Labour Party and the Lib Dem opposition praising the incumbent (Mavis Smitheman) and the newcomer, followed by prayers (the recession must be worse than expected). Then, three quarters of an hour later, we get down to business.

Time for politics, time for debate! Not so, the minutes for previous meetings are approved with tired groans from the dozens of councillors below. And not one submits a single question to the executive.

We persevere. Fingers crossed for the Executive meeting. This time we go up to the front desk with a copy of the agenda and point to the room number on it. Success – first time and no questions asked! We’re told to go up the lift to the third floor and it’ll be just on the left. We’re a little puzzled when we get in the lift. Buttons to floors one, two, four…huh? Impressive stuff, they’re apparently holding ‘open’ meetings in a non-existent part of the building!

After asking two more confused people we find the room (in a different wing of the building) and creep in late. There are no other members of the public. We don’t blame them. It’s hard to stay awake. This seems to be a problem for a few councillors too.

But on with the politics. Most of the agenda is passed with no debate. One person summarises the issue in council jargon. Then there’s a bit of self-congratulation about what great work the councillors have done, how successful academies and PFI have been…it carries on a bit. Someone might ask a question if we’re lucky. The Leader then asks if the item can be approved. Some silent nodding (I think in approval but maybe it was a heavy one the night before) and we move on.

Due to our lateness we missed the ‘declaration of interests’ at the start. Items 13 and 15 are about the proposed ‘Co-operative Complex’, a new commercial centre in the city. There’s a mass exodus. It seems about half of the thirty or so people have an interest in this project. So many the meeting only has just enough to carry on!

Then it all gets a bit exciting. A couple of Lib Dems challenge The Leader. Maybe Manchester doesn’t need a new commercial sector during a recession? Perhaps social housing should be a priority given the 21,000 on the waiting list? They’re disputing his figures. “Don’t interrupt me!” is the response, “If you want to speak, put your hand up”. Yes, he used to be a school teacher. But another does the same, eek! “You just don’t learn do you? The next time you interrupt me you’re out”. End of discussion. No wonder Sir Richard has the nickname ‘Stalin’ at the council!

That’s enough drama for one meeting. Item 20 is a bit odd though. It just says “Exclusion of the public” on the agenda. We’re not allowed to stay for that – it’s not in the ‘public interest’. If we wanted to appeal, we had to do so 48 hours earlier, not that we even know what it was about. Perhaps it was about inclusivity and openness? There was nothing in the minutes. When The Leader had his little tantrum, he said “We’re not like the House of Commons here”. Too right Sir Richard, there’s nobody watching.

The Mule
- e-mail: editor@themule.info
- Homepage: http://www.themule.info

Download this article in pdf format >>

Email this article to someone >>

Submit an addition or make a quick comment on this article >>

Comments

Hide the following comment

Blame the electorate.

06.08.2009 09:57

The people of Manchester, most of whom are poor and poorly educated compared to the population of the country as a whole, routinely vote in Labour candidtates who treat them with contempt. Big mistake.

Pete


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Manchester Topics

Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Manchester Actions 2010

Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands

Manchester Actions 2009

COP15 Climate Summit 2009
G20 London Summit
Guantánamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
University Occupations for Gaza

Manchester Actions 2008

2008 Days Of Action For Autonomous Spaces
Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco
Climate Camp 2008
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Smash EDO
Stop Sequani Animal Testing
Stop the BNP's Red White and Blue festival

Manchester Actions 2007

Climate Camp 2007
DSEi 2007
G8 Germany 2007
Mayday 2007
No Border Camp 2007

Manchester Actions 2006

April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
Faslane
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
SOCPA
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006

Manchester Actions 2005

DSEi 2005
G8 2005
WTO Hong Kong 2005

Manchester Actions 2004

European Social Forum
FBI Server Seizure
May Day 2004
Venezuela

Manchester Actions 2003

Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003

Languages

english

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech