HOME | IMC UK | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

Oxford Indymedia

Oxford free education demo report

a participant | 26.11.2003 15:07 | Education | Oxford

This afternoon a group of between 30 and 70 students held banners, chanted and sung on the steps of the Clarendon Building against top-up fees and for free education for all. Many of them then went on to briefly block traffic on Broad Street with a sitdown protest.

There was a large mainstream media presence; it was almost impossible not to get
asked for a quote. Chants included: 'What do we want? FREE EDUCATION!
When do we want it? NOW!', along with some bizarre songs about Blair being
a tory bastard :) Probably exactly the same ones as you'd hear on an NUS
demo.

After a bit of singing and chanting, someone gave us a quick 'reminder of why
we're here'. Some more chanting, then another person announced that as we'd
been ignored so far, we were going to 'take things a bit further' and block the
road, 'in good order' (!) - for 'about 30min, or until the police get pissed off' (!!).

So we took the protest into the road. Between a third and two thirds of the crowd
had left by this point, but there were still plenty to block it. Slips of paper were
handed out saying that the police 'had to give two warnings' before they could
arrest for obstruction of the highway (not true).

It would have been more accurate to say that the police almost always give
a warning, and even after this warning people are usually removed from the
road the first time rather than arrested, and are usually arrested only after going
back into the road several times. There is no guarantee of a warning, but it helps
them to secure a conviction if they give one, and they almost always do.

After what seemed like only 5 minutes, somebody with a Loud Voice who seemed
to be In Charge told us we were going to finish the blockade. I went along with
this (in retrospect I really should have made a fuss and called for a group decision).

There was some milling around, and more scavenging for soundbites by the
media. I asked one of the others what they thought about it, and she said she
would have liked to stay in the road longer, since people seemed up for it (I'm
only quoting roughly from memory here).

The last few people left said they were going 'to block Wadham'. I was unsure
about whether Wadham was actually pro-fees or not and decided to call it a day.


My Thoughts
-----------

THE PROBLEMS

+lack of numbers

Somebody mentioned a lack of publicity as perhaps causing this, but I think there a
bigger problem of student apathy, even on issues that directly affect us. The best way
to overcome this is by inspiring, creative action. Which today didn't really feel
like, for me at least.

+media spectacle vs dialogue

As anyone who has ever been to an OUSU protest will agree, they are very
much targeted at the media present, rather than passers-by. The whole thing
was too much of a photo-op. By allowing the media to position us neatly on the
steps, we separated ourselves from the public and turned ourselves into a
bizarre spectactle, rather than something real that people can engage with.

This means that almost all of the message is filtered through the mainstream media;
we are relying on them to make our point for us, and we have to trust them to get
it right. When we talk to people face to face, on the other hand, not only is it
direct, unmediated contact, but, at an individual level it makes more of an impact
than somebody picking up a paper and reading about something that apparently
happened somewhere.

But, sadly, there was no attempt to dialogue or engage with the public, and
no leaflets were provided to help us do so. Leaflets would also have been
handy to give to blocked drivers to explain why we were taking the action
of blocking the road.

My suggestion would be: make talking to people a priority, media coverage an
unexpected bonus. Never let the media direct what you do or how you do it.

+Broad St as a target

Blocking Broad St seemed like a strange target. I would have prefer to have a
more obvious target eg the offices of Chancellor Wotsisface who's just come out
in favour of fees, or maybe one of the banks that profit so much from student debt?
If our intention was disruption, Longwall St would have been more effective.

+undemocratic decision making

There was no collective discussion or decision making about how long to stay in
the road, or whether to move on to another target, etc. This was one of the worst
things about the action, because with such a smallish number of people it would
have been so easy to have a quick discussion and reach some agreement.


HOPE FOR THE FUTURE

+new militancy?

If this signals a new readiness by the OUSU crowd to using civil disobedience
and similar methods, that can only be a good thing. The government can easily
ignore any number people politely standing in front of cameras with banners.

But they can't ignore effective or inspiring action, which is what is really badly
needed now against top-up fees. Looking at the faces of those sitting on the road today,
I got the sense of some surprisingly determined and up-for-it people. It seems like
some of the militancy of the student anti-war and activist groups has leaked through
to OUSU (albeit in a strange form). So there is definitely the hope of better actions
to come.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

a participant

Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

Oxbridge Style Roadblock

26.11.2003 21:43

This seems to me like the classic tale of people who go to Oxbridge. They end up thinking they are more important than they really are. Take Tony Blair for an example; acts like President, but is merely Prime Minister (the latter word referring to a sort of servant). So basically the lack of demoncracy just sounds typical of the usual Oxbridge Output. My apologies to Cambridge, who at least produced a few specialist fellows, like a small group of 4 friends... I digress. Anyhow, I hope this works. Onwards to the Student Victory...

I propose a new idea, instead of road block, how about a higher-ed themed set of roadworks. Any group of drunk students can be tasked with collecting signs and cones, and sober students can modify the signs. Think of the signs on the placards at this years NUS demo. Then we can fill the area inside the cones with students, and presto, a road block with spice.

And on a side note, the song referred to is sung to the tune of London Bridge is Falling Down and has the following words:

Education is a right,
is a right, is a right,
Education is a right,
Not a privelige.

Tony Blair is a right,
is a right, is a right,
Tony Blair is a right,
Tory Bastard!

(The latter verse being more popular than the former, obviously!)

Rebel W


song

26.11.2003 22:11

yes, and then extra verses, inserting names of various other tory bastards :)

me again


Good analysis

27.11.2003 04:09

Agree with your analysis. I recognise the style.

P


Make a difference...

30.11.2003 19:47

Agree that this wasn't the best demo that's ever happened. That it took about four times longer to plan the demo than it did to actually demonstrate is definitely not a good thing.
By the way, all the decisions surrounding the demo were made at the OUSU Finance and Funding meetings, which happen at 5pm in the OUSU building on Tuesdays. If you want better demos, I suggest you should come along.
And just for info, the shout of "let's go block Wadham" was another part of the day's activities - blocking the entrances to various colleges and asking anyone who wanted to get through for £30,000, just to illustrate the point...

Caz


well

01.12.2003 13:16

I think it's fair enough that some decisions were made beforehand in the meetings, but a decision like how long to stay in the road should (and can) be made on the ground by the people on the action.

me again


Publish your news
-->

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Oxford Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech