HOME | IMC UK | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

Oxford Indymedia

Carbon Offset Companies targeted by Climate Camp Activists

Forward | 20.08.2007 08:23 | Climate Camp 2007 | Climate Chaos | Oxford

Activists from the Camp for Climate Action have simultaneously targeted the offices of two separate carbon offset companies. The protestors are dressed as red herrings in order to highlight that carbon offset schemes are a dangerous distraction from taking effective climate action.

This morning, the offices of two high profile carbon offset companies in different cities – the Carbon Neutral Company in London and Climate Care in Oxford - have been disrupted.

The protestors are colourfully dressed as red herrings to symbolise the fact that carbon offset schemes are corrupting the climate change debate, taking attention away from effective responses to the threat of climate change and conning the general public. Their aim is to disrupt the day-to-day running of the offices and to raise awarness about the ineffectiveness of carbon-offset schemes – especially among well meaning office staff who may not realize the damage their work is doing to the fight to prevent runaway global warming.

Carbon offsetting doesn’t work because:

We cannot know what emissions have been avoided as a result of renewable energy projects – any hypotheses are guesswork. Therefore we cannot possibly calculate how much it would cost us to buy those savings – offset companies are selling us nothing but hot air.

Many schemes for ‘neutralising’ our emissions – such as tree planting – have been completely discredited, being scientifically illiterate and based on invented savings and . Yet companies such as Climate Care and Carbon Neutral continue to use them.

Real offsets would have to save the same amount of carbon within the same time frame as it is released. Trees are assumed by the offset companies themselves to take at least 99 years to absorb the carbon emitted in a 2 hour flight. Even if it did work, it would be like filling a bathtub with a bucket while trying to empty it with a thimble; the bath will soon overflow.

Most techno-fix offset schemes are based in the developing world. Even if every poor nation on the planet went carbon-free today, industrialised nations would still have to slash our carbon emissions if we are to have any hope of preventing catastrophic climate change. Emissions from developing nations are not the problem.

“Carbon offset companies are selling well-intentioned consumers a dangerous peace of mind by pretending that they can make emissions disappear” said Theo Middleton, one of the activists in the Climate Care office. “Climate Care and BA have teamed up to offer fliers a false opportunity to buy their way out of their responsibility to the climate.”

“Carbon offsets are ineffective, based on dubious science and lead people to believe they
are helping when they are not – the concept and the practice are a con,” said Sophie Nathan, who is taking part in the Carbon Neutral Company invasion. “Real climate action involves taking direct responsibility for personal emissions levels as well as engaging in
political organisation for wider change.”

Notes for Editors

Carbon offset companies have been on the receiving end of a great deal of negative publicity in the last year. This is the second time in 2007 that the Carbon Neutral Company has had its offices occupied by environmental activists.Both companies were also negatively portrayed in a recent Channel 4 documentary on the offsets industry
and in a report put out earlier in the year by the Amsterdam-based think tank, the Transnational Institute. New Internationalist magazine focused on the debate in July last year, exposing ineffective and damaging offset methods for fighting climate change.

This is big business - British Airways reported a £620m pre-tax profit for the year ending March 2006, a 20 per cent increase on the previous year, despite the increase in fuel costs during the period, and its short haul service moved into profit for the first time in a decade. This was a period of expansion and profitability as much for Climate Care as it was for British Airways. In July 2006, Climate Care’s David Wellington wrote that “in the past 10 to 12 months we have seen a 10-fold increase in sales,” and that 85 per cent of this growth was in “online sales for offsetting flight emissions”.

i
see  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6382253.stm

ii
see
 http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/dispatches/the+great+green+smokescreen/589267

iii
“BA Profits Up by 20%,” 24 May 2006, from the Business Travel
Europe website

iv
E Addkey, “Boom in Green Holidays as Ethical Travel Takes Off,”
The Guardian, 17 July 2006

Forward

Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

Woops! Wrong target.

20.08.2007 12:26

Up until now I have been a vocal supporter of the protests at Heathrow and around the country. My girlfriend is at the camp now (and, by the way, has told me of the violent and unprovoked action by the police yesterday which is shameful.)

Carbon offsetting if done right and, importantly, seen as just one tool amongst many (and not *the* answer to all our problems) DOES make a difference and does help to put a brake on carbon emission increases. Climate Care is one of the better companys that do this. Most of their projects all aim to bring sustainable technologies to people that benefit from them most and improve their communities at the same time. They don't do much tree planting as you seem to imply.

Look at one of these projects and tell me what is wrong:
 http://www.climatecare.org/projects/technologies/bioenergy/

I disagree that the amount of CO2 reduction these projects bring is not measurable. They are eminently measurable. If you replace a gas-stove with a bio-brick burner you can say with great confidence what the CO2 savings are.

This article is inacurate, and by discouraging people from using offsets, is just throwing the baby out with the bathwater. I do agree that offsetting shouldn't be used an an excuse not to change the way we live, so we should be encouraging people to lower their energy usage AND offsetting what they can't.

Wrong target. I can think of a thousand that would have been better.

Bik

Bik


Well done red herrings!

20.08.2007 19:33

You have to look at the clients these companies work with. Climate Care helps British Airways to "offset" CO2 emissions from its flights:
 http://www.climatecare.org/business/case_studies/british-airways/

and it helps BP to "offset" in some upspecified way (no further details on the website).

I'm sure you're right. I'm sure some offsetting projects make an immediate positive difference to the lives of disadvantaged people in developing countries. Giving a poor family a solar cooker, for example, is going to be a superb thing to do if it saves women or kids having to waste hours and risk their lives collecting so much wood fuel. But that doesn't mean it makes any difference to climate change. It doesn't really matter what end result the offsetting has if it's helping to greenwash the more broadly destructive activities of these companies or perpetuate business-as-usual. It's not actually leading to a net reduction in the damage these companies are doing. That's why it's a red herring.

Do we honestly think for one moment that BP is offsetting for anything other than greenwash reasons?

If you do, refresh your memory of this nice little story from The Guardian in Dec 2005:

"Seen those BP ads on TV and in the press? Impressed that the oil giant is getting the message on climate change? Think again. BP is also running a big advertising campaign in the US to coincide with the Montreal climate talks. Both versions have the same graphics, the same nifty tune, the same style. But whereas we Brits are told to "work out your carbon footprint - it's a start", the American consumer is told: "We're investing $15bn in finding new oil and gas in the Gulf of Mexico - it's a start."

John Vidal, Guardian, Dec 7, 2005.
 http://society.guardian.co.uk/societyguardian/story/0,7843,1659447,00.html

Chris W.

chrisw


Publish your news
-->

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Oxford Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech