HOME | IMC UK | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

SouthCoast Indymedia

First Arrest Made To Enforce EDO Injunction. DEMO TODAY!

Andrew Beckett | 15.06.2005 22:36 | Anti-militarism | Repression | London | South Coast

After police failed in court today to hold onto conditions that would exclude demonstrators arrested at the May 31st Big Demo from going to protest outside the EDO Arms factory in Brighton, they have now for the first time, used powers under the controversial EDO Interim Injunction to arrest a protestor for breach of its conditions.



Press Release

22:30 pm 15th June 2005
For Immediate Release


FIRST ARREST MADE TO ENFORCE ARMS DEALER'S INJUNCTION


Sussex Police made their first arrest for a breach of the interim injunction inside arms dealers EDO MBM's controversial “exclusion zone” at approximately 4.30 yesterday (June 15th). One man was arrested for allegedley breaching the injunction on a technicality during one of the regular weekly demonstrations.


Police have confirmed that he will be held in custody overnight and brought before Brighton Magistrates in the morning (Thursday June 16th).


There will be a supporters demonstration outside the court at 10.00am

.........................................................
Notes for Journalists.

Brighton&Hove is a UN Peace Messenger City.

The Injunction referred to was served under the1997 Protection from Harassment Act (originally designed to protect people from stalkers) and is the first
of its kind directed at activists outside of the animal rights movement. Crucially it is a civil injunction but carries criminal penalties. It affects anyone deemed to be a protestor.

Initially EDO MBM requested a large “exclusion zone” comprising the whole of Home Farm Industrial Estate. They and Sussex police also wanted to limit demonstrations to two and a half hours, with less than ten people who had to be silent. Judge Gross refused to impose these conditions at the initial hearing.

In his summing up he said, “The right to freedom of
expression is jealously guarded in English law” and consequently refused to impose the requested limits on size, timing or noise made at demonstrations.
EDO MBM Technologies Ltd are the sole UK subsidiary of huge U.S arms conglomerate EDO Corp, which was recently named No. 10 in the Forbes list of 100 fastest growing companies. They supply bomb release mechanisms to the US and UK armed forces amongst others. They supply crucial components for Raytheon’s Paveway IV guided bomb system, widely used in the “Shock and Awe” campaign in Iraq.

EDO also recently withdrew a threatened libel action against Indymedia over being named as “warmongers”.

Lawson-Cruttenden & Co, a solicitors firm working for EDO have been instrumental in developing the Protection of Harassment Act 1997 from a measure designed to safeguard individuals to a corporate charter to make inconvenient protest illegal. They have pioneered to use of injunctions to create large “exclusion zones”. They have secured numerous injunctions against
anti-vivisection and anti-GM protestors.

Campaign against EDO MBM. People involved in the anti-EDO campaign include, but are not limited to: local residents, the Brighton Quakers, peace activists, anti-capitalists, Palestine Solidarity groups, human rights groups, trade unionists, academics and students.
The campaign started in August 2004 with a peace camp.

It’s avowed aim is to expose EDO MBM and their complicity in war crimes and to remove them from Brighton.

_____________________________________




Andrew Beckett
- e-mail: smashedopress@yahoo.co.uk
- Homepage: http://smashedo.org.uk

Comments

Hide the following 3 comments

What Is The High Court Injunction About?

15.06.2005 23:39

EDO brought this interim injunction under Section 3 of the Protection from
Harassment Act 1997 . This enables an individual to bring a civil
action in respect of an actual or anticipated course of conduct causing
harassment to another person.

EDO brought this interim injunction under Section 3 of the Act, because breach of an injunction passed under the Act is punishable by up to 5 years imprisonment. This makes it an "arrestable offence', which confers considerable powers of arrest and search on the police.

For more on "arrestable offences" see:  http://www.freebeagles.org/articles/Legal_Booklet_4/lb4-11.html

With most civil injunctions, it is the Claimant's job to enforce it. If
someone breaches the injunction, the Claimant has to go back to court to
apply for committal proceedings against the Defendant, in order to have the
Defendant punished for contempt. The Courts will only punish a Defendant for
contempt, however, if the breach is sufficiently clear and serious.

In the cases of harassment injunctions, the Claimant has the option of enforcing it
by contempt proceedings. But the police can also take action for breach.

This enables the police to threaten, bully and arrest protestors for the
most trivial of breaches, which would never ordinarily be punished for
contempt.

The police use the injunctions as a tool for arrest, search and general
harassment rather than for actual prosecution.

Since April 2003 there have been 19 Harrasment Act injunctions brought against animal rights protestors. Only a handful of prosecutions have been brought for breach of an injunction, and there hasnot been a single conviction.

brief


.

16.06.2005 19:40

There need to be more demo's. If enough people turn up, they're not going to arrest them all. The more people join in, the more the protest affirms its legitimacy. Get pensioners and families and all sorts of people involved. Have a massive great demo and dare the police to arrest everyone.

.


Protest

17.06.2005 11:01

If we want more people at the protests lets wait till after countdown has finished so the rest of the student scum can come up and waste their time insted of studying for those very important media studies degrees.

Protester


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

-->

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

South Coast [navigation.actions2016]

South Coast [navigation.actions2015]

South Coast [navigation.actions2014]

NATO 2014

South Coast Actions 2013

G8 2013

South Coast Actions 2012

Workfare

South Coast Actions 2011

2011 Census Resistance
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Occupy Everywhere

South Coast Actions 2010

Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands

South Coast Actions 2009

COP15 Climate Summit 2009
G20 London Summit
Guantánamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
University Occupations for Gaza

South Coast Actions 2008

2008 Days Of Action For Autonomous Spaces
Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco
Climate Camp 2008
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Smash EDO
Stop Sequani Animal Testing
Stop the BNP's Red White and Blue festival

South Coast Actions 2007

Climate Camp 2007
DSEi 2007
G8 Germany 2007
Mayday 2007
No Border Camp 2007

South Coast Actions 2006

April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
Faslane
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
SOCPA
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006

South Coast Actions 2005

DSEi 2005
G8 2005
WTO Hong Kong 2005

South Coast Actions 2004

European Social Forum
FBI Server Seizure
May Day 2004
Venezuela

South Coast Actions 2003

Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech