HOME | IMC UK | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

SouthCoast Indymedia

Brighton Council's Use of the Housing Act (2006)To Drive Out Squatters

Doug Brewer | 17.11.2007 01:07 | Free Spaces | Social Struggles | South Coast

BHCC use the new housing laws to attack the homeless

When the 2006 Housing Act came into force some people welcomed its empowerment of Councils to take control of any properties that had been left empty by private landlords for more than six months. The measure appears on the surface to have an air of sociaist land redistribution, making use of wasted or hoarded resources for the benefit of those more in need.

Under the law local authorities have the power to hand over such properties to council housing departments or registered social landlords to provide living units for those in need of low cost housing.

Brighton and Hove's housing shortage is well known, so the prospect of any increase in the supply of social housing is obviously to be welcomed.

However this week Emma Kumar, the council's Empty Properties Officer revealed in a meeting with Brighton residents that the implementation of the policy in Brighton has not been for the benefit of the homeless of Brighton, but rather for the benefit of the housing market, and the continuing gentrification of the city.

All that the policy has done she explained, is force owners into putting these empty properties into the housing market, rather than leaving them to the direct action housing of local squatters.

Ms Kumar said that although the council have approached numerous owners about their empty properties, none of these properties have ever been taken over for social housing in the city. The actual purpose of the legislation turns out (surprise surprise) to be to keep the housing market afloat with more houses for sale, and concurrently to reduce the available options for the homeless in Brighton.

The city already operates a policy of refusal to serve any homeless person without a 'local connection' of at least six months . Homeless people without this qualification are left to squat or sleep rough where ever they can find a warm space, and if discovered are given bus fares to repatriate to their previous living areas.

With the restrictions of squattable houses, the homeless of Brighton are being driven out of town, while those who make millions from the city's over inflated housing market are raking in even more money for nothing.

Doug Brewer
- e-mail: brwr_dg@yahoo.com

Comments

Hide the following 3 comments

agree and disagree

18.11.2007 16:27

I agree that the council has this in mind. However there are also numerous properties that are not used for any purpose at all (e.g. units above many shops), houses that are boarded up (and therefore not squattable) and falling to ruin. By forcing owners to do something about these properties the cost of housing in general can be reduced...at least thats what the theory is.

I wouldn't be surprised however, if the council uses the legislation as a weapon against long-term squats - it is bound to, given its commitment to turning the city into one big starbucks cafe.

So its not a big conspiracy, more a tool for something else being used as a weapon by some other BHCC employees against squatters. If someone can get FOI about the council doing this specifically then I think it would be a very interesting story indeed.

BHCC employee


unsquatable

19.11.2007 20:27

Dear BHCC employee

I think you'll find that even boarded up properties and ones above shops are squatable, just a little more tricky that those without these obstacles.





person-unknown


in that case

20.11.2007 11:32

If all boarded up properties are easily accessible, then I can see no reason why there aren't more squats! And the Council will have its work cut out!!! There are loads of properties...indeed there was the old Sainsbury's on London Road, and there are loads of places just down from that same road towards the Pavillon.

I think you will agree that certain properties are not really habitable - or it is preferable to sofa surf.

Again, if someone can name actual people/teams at the council involved in the alleged use of the legislation specifically against squatters then FOI requests can be made by interested parties....or sympathetic people in the right departments might search hard-drives should they feel the inclination etc etc (not me as I do not deal with this area).

BHCC Employee


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

-->

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

South Coast [navigation.actions2016]

South Coast [navigation.actions2015]

South Coast [navigation.actions2014]

NATO 2014

South Coast Actions 2013

G8 2013

South Coast Actions 2012

Workfare

South Coast Actions 2011

2011 Census Resistance
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Occupy Everywhere

South Coast Actions 2010

Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands

South Coast Actions 2009

COP15 Climate Summit 2009
G20 London Summit
Guantánamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
University Occupations for Gaza

South Coast Actions 2008

2008 Days Of Action For Autonomous Spaces
Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco
Climate Camp 2008
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Smash EDO
Stop Sequani Animal Testing
Stop the BNP's Red White and Blue festival

South Coast Actions 2007

Climate Camp 2007
DSEi 2007
G8 Germany 2007
Mayday 2007
No Border Camp 2007

South Coast Actions 2006

April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
Faslane
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
SOCPA
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006

South Coast Actions 2005

DSEi 2005
G8 2005
WTO Hong Kong 2005

South Coast Actions 2004

European Social Forum
FBI Server Seizure
May Day 2004
Venezuela

South Coast Actions 2003

Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech