HOME | IMC UK | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

SouthCoast Indymedia

Sussex Uni Students Challenge Uni and Home Office over Animal Experiments

Violence Free Science | 06.02.2008 22:40 | Animal Liberation | Health | South Coast

Sussex Uni....? The one that got exposed recently for doing the most stupid experiments by BUAV. The new campaign (by VFS) has released a document that challenges the ridiculous experiments, whilst also well establishing a variety of charities funding the tests...whilst not forgetting GlaxoSmithKline's aid in the torture - as per usual.



6th February 2008 | PRESS RELEASE: Sussex University Students Challenge


University and Home Office over Animal Experiments
Wednesday 6th February 2008
For immediate release
For more information or further comment please contact:
Naomi Scott,  violencefreescience@yahoo.com
07521 722 857


Sussex University Students Challenge University and Home Office over Animal Experiments

In the first case of its kind at the University of Sussex, a detailed examination and report into live experiments on animals has taken place and is now available in the public domain. Sussex University – Challenged, an 18-page report compiled by students and several scientific professionals, is available online to download by clicking on the link below:

 http://www.violencefreescience.org/main/SussexUniversityChallenged01.pdf
[PDF document - approx 10min download time].

After months of extensive research using over 50 of Sussex University’s research papers, six were selected for detailed examination by Molecular Biochemist Colleen McDuling BSc(Hons) MSc(Med.Sc.), with kind assistance from Senior Research Scientist Jonathan Balcombe PhD.

The experiments, all of which took place within the past few years, have thrown into light the questionable validity of using animals in these procedures. In addition, it is questionable whether the Home Office should have even issued licenses for such experiments when alternative methods were quite clearly available and more reliable to use.

As the report clearly demonstrates, use of animals was not required in each case; there were other scientific methods that could have been used, all of which are explained in detail within the document. In fact, the report goes on to point out that the use of animals in these experiments was actually detrimental to the accumulation of relevant scientific data, having only produced somewhat unsteady evaluations that can only be loosely applied to the species that were involved in the experiment. Furthermore, as outlined in more detail later, the licenses for animal-based studies can only be issued by the Home Office on the basis that no alternatives could’ve been used – something which is clearly not the case in these examples.

While the University continues to maintain that these procedures “cannot be done without the use of live animals”, this small selection of exemplary papers proves otherwise. In one example, the University’s testing of alcohol withdrawal on animals proved to entirely pointless and misleading, especially considering “other technology, such as PET scans and Functional MRI could be used to monitor brain activity” [1].

Other experiments were equally bizarre, ranging from force-feeing rats to the point of obesity [2] and inserting electrodes into the brains of baby wild caught bats [3]. This is all despite having access to a vast number of local resources, where human volunteers studies could’ve taken place in an environment that is both relevant and useful to the study. Again, these experiments had much more reliable alternatives which should have been used, such as those previously mentioned. Yet licenses were still granted by the Home Office for these experiments, and lavish research grants issued from drug multinationals and so-called research “charities” – at the cost of the British Taxpayer.

As a result of these findings, students and scientists are also challenging the Home Office to justify why project licenses have been issued for the University to carry out such experiments. It is a legal requirement that alternatives should be used when available – and alternatives were indeed available for the tests. Therefore the relevant licenses for such experiments should not have been issued in the first place.

Within the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, section 2.3 of Chapter two details that “regulated procedures can only be authorised and performed if there are no scientifically suitable alternatives”. Furthermore, the Act goes on to specify, “authorities cannot be granted when appropriate replacement, reduction and refinement alternatives are reasonably and practicably available” (section 2.45).

As demonstrated in Sussex University – Challenged, there were alternative non-animal experimental methods available that could have been used in place of live animals. There were indeed “scientifically suitable alternatives” and alternatives were indeed “practically available”. This is not only apparent for the six papers examined in detail, but for all those looked at.

Students and scientists are now openly challenging both University and Home Office officials to justify why such licenses were issued to experiment on live animals when it was so clearly not required, and why such experiments are still taking place despite the large availability to use more reliable scientific methods.


ENDS


References
[1] McDuling, C (2008), Sussex University – Challenged, page 4.

[2] The cannabinoid CB1 receptor inverse agonist, rimonabant, modifies body weight and adiponectin function in diet-induced obese rats as a consequence of reduced food intake; Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behaviour; 84: 353-359

[3] The development of a single frequency place in the mammalian cochlea: the cochlear resonance in the mustached bat Pteronotus parnellii; The Journal of Neuroscience 23(34):10971-10981

Violence Free Science
- Homepage: http://www.violencefreescience.org

Comments

Display the following 2 comments

  1. Well done — simon g
  2. Fantastic! — -

Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

-->

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

South Coast [navigation.actions2016]

South Coast [navigation.actions2015]

South Coast [navigation.actions2014]

NATO 2014

South Coast Actions 2013

G8 2013

South Coast Actions 2012

Workfare

South Coast Actions 2011

2011 Census Resistance
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Occupy Everywhere

South Coast Actions 2010

Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands

South Coast Actions 2009

COP15 Climate Summit 2009
G20 London Summit
Guantánamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
University Occupations for Gaza

South Coast Actions 2008

2008 Days Of Action For Autonomous Spaces
Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco
Climate Camp 2008
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Smash EDO
Stop Sequani Animal Testing
Stop the BNP's Red White and Blue festival

South Coast Actions 2007

Climate Camp 2007
DSEi 2007
G8 Germany 2007
Mayday 2007
No Border Camp 2007

South Coast Actions 2006

April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
Faslane
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
SOCPA
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006

South Coast Actions 2005

DSEi 2005
G8 2005
WTO Hong Kong 2005

South Coast Actions 2004

European Social Forum
FBI Server Seizure
May Day 2004
Venezuela

South Coast Actions 2003

Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech