HOME | IMC UK | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

SouthCoast Indymedia

Housing should be a right not a privilege

SNOB | 28.10.2011 02:14 | Free Spaces | South Coast

The Squatting Network of Brighton respond to the possible criminalisation of squatting, to be discussed in Parliament on the coming Monday. We're angry and obviously concerned that the government have sneaked this clause into an unrelated bill, and hence wish to inform the masses of this potentially enormous miscarriage of justice. Excuse our formal language but it is our press release!

S.N.O.B. Statement regarding Clarke’s anti-squatting amendment to the Legal Aid Bill

It has been kept noticeably quiet that the government are attempting to pass a bill this coming Monday which will criminalise homelessness and the vulnerably housed by making squatting in the majority of empty buildings a “criminal offence”. In a process which has bypassed democratic process, they are trying to amend the Legal Aid and Sentencing Bill by hiding this clause in an unrelated bill, without allowing any meaningful public debate on the specific proposal. Findings in a recent public consultation on the issue of squatting showed that the vast majority of people were concerned about the negative impacts that criminalizing squatting would have, far from wanting any change in legislation, and this underhand push completely ignores these findings.

The current laws mean that thousands of otherwise homeless people around the country have somewhere to live, however temporary. Despite common misconceptions, often propagated in the media, criminal law already protects home-owners and tenants from people occupying any buildings where people live or intend to live. Thus, property owners are already protected by existing laws from the threat of, for example, people entering their homes while they are on holiday, yet stories of such rare unfortunate occurrences are presented in the media as if this is commonplace and goes unchallenged. The proposed amendment to the Legal Aid bill is clearly not just intended for application in these situations and has implications that go far beyond.

People who squat are looking for shelter and a home, not a criminal record. They are careful to do so in a manner which makes use of unused buildings which have been kept empty for long periods of time, often protecting them from disrepair. Displacing other people from their homes is contradictory to the idea that housing is a basic human right for everyone. Squatted buildings have also been used for community projects, art exhibitions, free libraries and free shops, as well as anti-gentrification campaigns and many other positive community-involving examples. This move by the government is targeted at criminalizing all of this and people's bare survival, further increasing the problems of mass homelessness, streets full of empty properties, and the associated loss of community.

It is vital to note that many people who live in squatted buildings are among the most vulnerable in our society, forced into homelessness by rising house prices, economic uncertainty, and fewer jobs; this proposed act would seriously affect thousands of people, forcing many of them onto the streets, into overflowing prisons, or into an already overstretched housing benefit system.

The current climate of unjust and unnecessary public cuts mostly effects the poorest and most marginalised in our society. Such attacks include cuts to housing benefit, limits on security of tenure in council housing and extension of Thatcher’s “right to buy” policies. Other government cuts and the increasing levels of unemployment are forcing many people across the country into poverty and consequently homelessness.

The government, police and the press try to associate squatting with criminal activity, mindless anti-social behaviour, and “immigrants”, in order to drive a wedge between people who squat and the rest of the society. Such slurs and misinformation must be rejected as they have no place in a democratic society. Criminal behaviour is no more likely to occur in squats than in any other form of housing. The contribution of the squatting movement throughout history has played a significant role in the struggle for better living conditions for the working class as a whole, and has a positive role to play in the future; unfortunately, however positive squatting stories are largely overlooked in the media.

S.N.O.B calls on everybody to consider the rights of people to housing above the greed of property owners and speculators. There are more empty buildings in this country than there are homeless people, and S.N.O.B believes that it is disgraceful that people should be forced to live rough or in hostels when there are so many empty buildings which could be used for housing, but are left rotting. We believe that this amendment should be critically challenged, and the full impacts considered. It is essential that we raise as much awareness as possible about this amendment whilst the government tries to force this bill through quickly and quietly to avoid public debate.

We therefore call upon everyone from all walks of life, including human rights groups, trades unions, students, anti-cuts groups and everyone affected by the recession and austerity measures, to actively oppose the Legal Aid and Sentencing Bill.
Housing should be a right, not a privilege.
Squatters Network of Brighton (and Hove actually)

SNOB
- e-mail: snobaha@gmail.com

Comments

Hide the following 2 comments

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights of 1966

28.10.2011 03:54

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights of 1966, entry into force 1976.

 http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/cescr.htm


Article 11

1. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to an adequate standard of living for himself and his family, including adequate food, clothing and housing, and to the continuous improvement of living conditions.


Furthermore, going backwards in time, a large part of the population were either farm labourers or household servants.

They did not own the space they lived in - but their right to shelter and space as such was not questioned.


Nowadays, when people pass 18 years of age, they enter a juridical vacuum.

They are usually not candidates for buying property, and property owners have never been more than a fraction of the population.

Real estate dealers and land speculators try to prevent cooperative forms of shelter from operating - though they are the only ones which can solve the problem.

grapevine


You meant an "entitlement"?

28.10.2011 11:51

Just saying X has a right to Y doesn't pin upon any particular Z the obligation to provide Y should X lack it. Rights imply negative obligations, forbid any Z from doing anything that deprives X of Y.

Look -- from just a "right" you can perhaps get to SOMEBODY whould provide Z to Y. But you are using more than just that right when you attempt to "pin" that obligation on anybody in particular.

The greedy landlord? Perhaps. But you really need to see that it wasn't the homeless person's right alone taat allowed you to conclude this. You had to be using something along the lines of "more the obligation of somebody better able to support the obligation than myself" (why aren't YOU sharing your domicile with this homeless? Why isn't it YOUR obligation?)

Understand what I am saying here. I am NOT saying that you are wrong in conclusion but that you are taking as true (perhaps justified) things that you are neglecting to claim you are using. Things beyond this person't rights.

MDN


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

-->

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

South Coast [navigation.actions2016]

South Coast [navigation.actions2015]

South Coast [navigation.actions2014]

NATO 2014

South Coast Actions 2013

G8 2013

South Coast Actions 2012

Workfare

South Coast Actions 2011

2011 Census Resistance
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Occupy Everywhere

South Coast Actions 2010

Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands

South Coast Actions 2009

COP15 Climate Summit 2009
G20 London Summit
Guantánamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
University Occupations for Gaza

South Coast Actions 2008

2008 Days Of Action For Autonomous Spaces
Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco
Climate Camp 2008
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Smash EDO
Stop Sequani Animal Testing
Stop the BNP's Red White and Blue festival

South Coast Actions 2007

Climate Camp 2007
DSEi 2007
G8 Germany 2007
Mayday 2007
No Border Camp 2007

South Coast Actions 2006

April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
Faslane
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
SOCPA
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006

South Coast Actions 2005

DSEi 2005
G8 2005
WTO Hong Kong 2005

South Coast Actions 2004

European Social Forum
FBI Server Seizure
May Day 2004
Venezuela

South Coast Actions 2003

Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech