HOME | IMC UK | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

SouthCoast Indymedia

John Catt’s Judicial Review of ACPO and the Met on 9th February 2012

for John Catt | 18.02.2012 12:53 | Smash EDO | Policing | Repression | Terror War | South Coast

A diverse range of ‘domestic extremists’, including comedian Mark Thomas, braved the cold on 9th February to greet and support John Catt at the start of his epic legal challenge against ACPO and the Met and their secret domestic extremist database. The Aldermaston Women’s Group brought a large banner bearing the words “Domestic Extremists At Work” which took pride of place over the railings of the Royal Courts of Justice. The air was brimming with excitement and some extremely domesticated “grime-busters”, with cleaning materials to the fore, soon set about giving the fatigued looking Royal Courts of Justice a deep clean and a breath of fresh air!

No police cameras or evidence gatherers were anywhere on the radar.

It took about 15 minutes to penetrate one’s way through the maze of corridors to find the courtroom
where journalists sat eagerly awaiting the opening of the case which was ‘hot’ news that day.

Campaign groups monitoring the hearing included the Campaign Against the Arms Trade and FIT Watch.

Mr. Justice Irwin and Lord Justice Gross heard the case. It opened with the latter declaring that he had in the past presided over the High Court civil injunction brought by EDO MBM against peace activists in Brighton, and checked that John Catt had not been one of the named defendants.

John Catt’s QC, was Tim Owen and Jeremy Johnson QC represented ACPO and the Met.

The following are some of the issues raised, but are on no account exhaustive.

The case opened with Tim Owen asking whether Article 8 (right to private life) of the European Convention on Human Rights was engaged and whether the data stored about John was necessary and proportionate to the achievement of any legitimate aim. He expressed surprise that the police were saying that Article 8 was not engaged and relied on the recent landmark case of Woods to support his position. In Wood, the Court of Appeal held that the photographing by the police of an individual going about his lawful business in the streets of London was a sufficient intrusion by the state into the individual’s personal space to engage Article 8(1), even though this occurred in a public place and the photograph was never in fact placed on a database.

Tim Owen submitted that if Article 8 was not found to be engaged, he would preserve his right to argue that John Catt’s data could still qualify as sensitive personal data under the Data Protection Act 1998.

Jeremy Johnson on the other hand, argued that Article 8 does not protect privacy but the right of respect for privacy; it does not protect trivial matters; and that if there is any Article 8 infringement, it is only on the margins of it. “Where you engage in a public activity (demonstration) you do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy”, he said. Some of the cases he relied on were Friedl v Austria (1995) and X v UK (Application no. 5877/72).

Jeremy Johnson said that John Catt associates closely with violent members of Smash EDO and knowledge of this association is of intelligence value.

Tim Owen challenged why the same criteria the police had used to remove a photograph of John Catt from the database could not equally apply to the written data stored about him and said that this was inconsistent and irrational. The police criteria for having done so was that he had not organised or been involved in any actions which resulted in arrests since the photograph was taken; has no recorded convictions and; no longer appears to be involved in the co-ordination of Smash EDO events or actions.

Tim Owen maintained that at the heart of the police’s justification for keeping data on John was that they need it to identify people associated with criminal activity whether as offenders or witnesses. He pointed out how the data held about him fell into neither category.

Concerns as to the lack of evidence to explain how the database operates, how raw data is dealt with, how material is obtained and, whether it is searchable and capable of being deleted, were raised by Tim Owen. In answer to the police’s assertion that it would be impractical to remove John’s data from the database, he said that having “hoovered up” all this information, to claim its removal was impractical was no defence.

The lack of democratic accountability and governance of the National Public Intelligence Order Unit (NPOIU) and its database were dealt a double blow in the hearing. Firstly, the recent report on the NPOIU’s police spies, by the official policing inspectorate’s Sir Denis O’Connor, which made the aforesaid observations, was relied on. Secondly, reliance was also placed on comments made by former Metropolitan Police Assistant Commissioner for Specialist Operations, John Yates, who had accepted that there had been a “lack of tripartite statutory governance of the NPOIU”, at a Metropolitan Police Authority meeting on 27th January 2011, when he was chair of ACPO Terrorism and Allied Matters (TAM). In January 2011, the Metropolitan Police took over control of the NPOIU. Until then, it had been operated by ACPO, a private limited and, largely unaccountable company.

Tim Owen pointed out how between March 2005 to October 2009, of the 104 files disclosed to John about his political activities during this period, 66 related to him and of those about 15% were of demonstrations other than those against EDO. “Having got onto the radar, he’s now someone who is logged and recorded wherever he goes”, he said.

He emphasised that none of the database entries linked John to any criminal activity and expressed dismay that they went as far back as March 2005. Of the 262 activists the police claim are associated with Smash EDO, he said that they had failed to produce any evidence that he is one of them.

He said that the database “intimidates lawful protesters and exerts a chilling effect on their legitimate activities”.

By the end of the hearing, the enormity of the legal challenge was clearly felt.

The judges reserved judgment. Their ruling should be out in the next few weeks.

Don’t forget, for £10, if you think you’ve been labelled a ‘domestic extremist’, you can also make a subject access request under the Data Protection Act to the Met, and find out what information the State is holding about you on its secret database.

for John Catt

Comments

Hide the following 4 comments

Thanks

18.02.2012 17:51

Thanks for the report-back. The only person I know that handed over £10 only got one photo from the fuckers. Seems like a bad deal to me.

anon


Sample DPA letter

18.02.2012 17:59

only send this if you know you are on their database, no point giving cops name and address, otherwise. Actually an NHS card is ok to send as proof of who you are, as they prefer an original document.

Data Protection Officer
Organisation's address
Department Address
Post code

[Insert date]

Dear [Enter name],

I am writing to request all the information to which I am entitled to under section 7(1) of the Data Protection Act 1998. In order to assist you with this request, I am outlining some of the areas and occasions on which your organisation may have compiled information on me. As you will understand, this may not be a definitive list of such occasions.

[Give a description of how you have come into contact with the organisation - the more specific, the better]

I would be interested in any discussion or opinions expressed within your organisation of my person, reputation, character, history or behaviour, actual or perceived.

I should make it clear that this request should also cover all or any other information you may hold. I hope that you will be able to comprehensively search all your records. The definition of "personal data" under the Act covers both facts and opinions about myself as an individual, as well as information regarding the intentions of your organisation towards myself as an individual.

This request should therefore cover any internal external memos, emails, faxes and any other correspondence or readily accessible data held on computer by your organisation, which could be classified as 'personal data' under the 1998 Data Protection Act. This covers both manual and electronic data.

I enclose a photocopy of [proof of your address, such as gas/electricity/telephone bill] as confirmation of the above being my home address. I have also enclosed a photocopy of my passport [or similar, such as driving licence] and a recent photograph of myself to aid your identification.

I understand that under the act, I should be entitled to a response within 40 days. I would be grateful if you could confirm in writing that you have received this request. I look forward to hearing from you in the near future.

Yours,

[Enter name]

dunnit


I violently object to that statement!

18.02.2012 18:37

Jeremy Johnson said that John Catt associates closely with violent members of Smash EDO and knowledge of this association is of intelligence value.

Who are these 'violent' peace warriors?

The pig Johnson should not be allowed to make such an uncontested statement without citation.

violent


ok

18.02.2012 18:38

Cheers for the advice.

anon


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

-->

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

South Coast [navigation.actions2016]

South Coast [navigation.actions2015]

South Coast [navigation.actions2014]

NATO 2014

South Coast Actions 2013

G8 2013

South Coast Actions 2012

Workfare

South Coast Actions 2011

2011 Census Resistance
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Occupy Everywhere

South Coast Actions 2010

Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands

South Coast Actions 2009

COP15 Climate Summit 2009
G20 London Summit
Guantánamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
University Occupations for Gaza

South Coast Actions 2008

2008 Days Of Action For Autonomous Spaces
Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco
Climate Camp 2008
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Smash EDO
Stop Sequani Animal Testing
Stop the BNP's Red White and Blue festival

South Coast Actions 2007

Climate Camp 2007
DSEi 2007
G8 Germany 2007
Mayday 2007
No Border Camp 2007

South Coast Actions 2006

April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
Faslane
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
SOCPA
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006

South Coast Actions 2005

DSEi 2005
G8 2005
WTO Hong Kong 2005

South Coast Actions 2004

European Social Forum
FBI Server Seizure
May Day 2004
Venezuela

South Coast Actions 2003

Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech