Skip Navigation | HOME | UK Indymedia | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

West Country Features | UK Features | West Country Newswire | UK Newswire |

Why did the chicken cross the road?

Babs | 08.05.2002 16:26 | Ecology | Free Spaces | Health | Technology

On Tuesday 7th, people dressed as chickens took to the fields to demonstrate their concerns about the safety of GMO's. The free ranging chicks decended on one of the trial sites that has recently been planted with the GM maize variety known as Chardon LL (or T25).

Why did the chicken cross the road?
Why did the chicken cross the road?


Chicken Action Report - 7th May On Tuesday 7th, people dressed as chickens took to the fields to demonstrate their concerns about the safety of GMO's and to take direct (if some what symbolic) action to remove the just a little of that threat from the countryside. These free ranging chicks descended on one of the recently planted farmscale trial sites near Littlemoor. Seeds were plucked from the ground and bagged up to send to Aventis, the multinational biotech company responsible for the mutant maize.    In a theatrical 'die-in', the unfortunate chickens then fell to the ground to represent the results of an experiment in which twice as many chickens died when fed the GM maize as those that were feed on conventional maize. The results of this two year old experiment have recently re-emerged as a result of a public hearing into the commercialisation of the Aventis' GM maize variety Chardon LL (T25) - a fodder maize intended as a cattle feed that has been genetically modified to be resistant to Aventis' own herbicide (Glufosinate). Chardon LL is the only GM variety currently going through the approval process for commercialisation in the UK. If given the go-ahead, this GM maize could, within a just a couple of years, be growing on a massive scale all over the UK and Europe despite the wish of the public who want GM crops banned.    Police arrived late and found the chickens enjoying a more palatable picnic of organic salad and pakoras. The farmer Charles Foot turned up to speak the police and it is also reported that the land owner Mike Jones also appeared but stayed in the background. One police officer informed the chickens that they might fall foul of the law and seemed somewhat confused when the gathered flock fell about in laughter. Threats of arrest for Agrevated Tresspass were ignored (such charges would be tottally inabrobriate and would never stick) and the chickens proceded at their own pace. There were no arrests and a small but symbolic area of Dorset was decontaminated of GM maize. No doubt it will not be the last such decontamination in the area. Last year, all five farmscale trials were damaged or destroyed before harvest. (see also - Where's Swampy?)

Babs
- e-mail: thecastle@sayhi.to
- Homepage: www.sayhi.to/thecastle

Download this article in pdf format >>

Email this article to someone >>

Submit an addition or make a quick comment on this article >>

Comments

Hide the following 12 comments

Photos from chicken action

08.05.2002 16:43

Photos from chicken action
Photos from chicken action

Falling foul of the law?

Neil
mail e-mail: thecastle@sayhi.to
- Homepage: http://www.sayhi.to/thecastle


Photos from chicken action

08.05.2002 16:43

Photos from chicken action
Photos from chicken action

Falling foul of the law?

Neil
mail e-mail: thecastle@sayhi.to
- Homepage: http://www.sayhi.to/thecastle


Photos from chicken action

08.05.2002 16:43

Photos from chicken action
Photos from chicken action

Falling foul of the law?

Neil
mail e-mail: thecastle@sayhi.to
- Homepage: http://www.sayhi.to/thecastle


Photos from chicken action

08.05.2002 16:44

Photos from chicken action
Photos from chicken action

Falling foul of the law?

Neil
mail e-mail: thecastle@sayhi.to
- Homepage: http://www.sayhi.to/thecastle


Photos from chicken action

08.05.2002 16:44

Photos from chicken action
Photos from chicken action

Falling foul of the law?

Neil
mail e-mail: thecastle@sayhi.to
- Homepage: http://www.sayhi.to/thecastle


Photos from chicken action

08.05.2002 16:44

Photos from chicken action
Photos from chicken action

Falling foul of the law?

Neil
mail e-mail: thecastle@sayhi.to
- Homepage: http://www.sayhi.to/thecastle


Criminal Damage

13.05.2002 01:38

The people involved in this sort of activity should be arrested for criminal damage and prosecuted.

Personally, I choose to avoid all the organic foods and favour genetically engineered foods. Its only those blind or ignorant to science that are anti GM.

Why eat something natural when we can take something inferior and create something superior through manipoulation of the genetics. We have the ability to evolve ourselves and our environment now through genetic engineering and so we should.

Mike
mail e-mail: mjpann@essex.ac.uk


CRAP SCIENCE - Diktat over Choice

13.05.2002 20:07

A rounded society will allow me the opportunity to decide and choose for myself what I eat. A civilised society will then ensure that as many interest groups as possible will have the opportunity to realise the choices they've made.

The problem with GM foods and technology is that the essential scientific research and tests, to determine what effect the GM organism will or may have upon the environment that grows the food I want to eat, is not being carried out in hermetically sealed labs, but in the open environment!!

This is crap science. Crap scientists and crap 'environmentalists' that espouse this method of research are the new eco-dictators... along with Criminal Damage Mike.

Chris Roadbuster
mail e-mail: truefood@gn.apc.org


GM crops are safe - don't damage them.

19.05.2002 09:02

Dear All,

There is really no need to damage these crops, they are safe. I would be very interested to hear of the paper or publication quoted in the earlier article, which alledges that chickens fed the produce had a higher mortailty rate...higher than what though, how high, and was it statistically significant...such as 499 chickens died in on group, and 498 in the other?!!! Give us the numbers...and source of info. The green lobby is derided among scientists and public alike for plucking figures and statements which are unsupportable and unsupported out of the air.

There is NO evidence of a GM crop being grown anywhere having done any harm to any human or animal. If safety is the issue, please concentrate on the withdrawl of dangerous pesticides and herbicides being planned by the EU. Reducing certain petrochemcial input in agriculture and elsewhere (around cities, railways, near waterways) might actually reduce the risk of harm - whereas GM crops do no harm and glyphosate is relatively harmless.

Remember Silent Spring, and read it if you haven't - jump off the bandwagon, fuckers, the reality is that it is harder to stop REAL damage such as petrochemical pollution -

A concerned environmental scientist

Dr Jon


Science - wot science?

20.05.2002 02:01

You can state they are safe. There is no evidence that that is true.

If the read the text above you would see that it quite clearly states that TWICE as many birds died - not an extra one in 400 as you suggest might be the case.

The Chicken Action at Littlemoor aimed to demonstrate that no resonable tests have been done on the safety of GM crops. While clearly the results of the chicken test don't prove anything, the fact that no repeat of the trials was undertaken when an otherwise disturbing result seem to be reached shows how dangerous it is to trust the industry to monitor its own products.

In a climate where there is simply no funding or political will to carry out indepentent investigations into this totally new technology why should we expect to find evidence of damage. If you don't look you don't find.

It's funny you should have mentioned Silent Spring - perhaps you should read it again (evidence of you reading ability doesn't seem to impresive so far). Silent Spring esposes a deeper understanding of ecology and our place within it. GM certainly would not fit into her vision.

Evidence from north american farmers shows that single applications of glyphosate to GM crops is virtually unheard of. The vast majority of farmers are finding they must use multiple applications and often mixing in other chemicals. The GM promise of reduced pesticide and herbicide use is a sham and a lie.

(BTW - Dr Jon, is the biotech lobby paying you to monitor these websites and make your snide comments?)

Anyway, heres some stuff about the chicken study....

Ten male broiler birds out of 140 (7.14%) who were fed the GM maize in a small trial died compared to five (3.57%) who died after eating conventional maize.

This, they said, suggested "either a fault in the study or a real direct effect of diet and should act
as a spur for further investigation".

The Aventis study stated that the level of deaths was "normal for this fast growing strain of bird"
and gave a normal mortality rate in broiler chickens of this age at "between 5 and 8%".

But a source in the British poultry industry said yesterday this range of deaths was abnormal - "4% is the average. Anything over 5% and you have got a problem".

[See  http://members.tripod.com/~ngin/JM060.htm for original article]

And from elsewhere...

Proponents argue that GM technology could produce cheaper, more nutritious food that requires less weedkiller and pesticide. It could also grow food in colder or drier climates. Consumers, environmentalists and some scientists worry about risks to human health and the environment. They fear that GM crops could cause toxic or allergenic effects to humans. They are also concerned about large scale elimination of indigenous agricultural and natural species.

In the case of Chardon LL, Orskov is one such skeptic. He has been awarded the Order of the British Empire and is an expert on nutrition in the group of animals known as ruminants which includes cows. Orskov has published four books and is the author or co-author of more than 500 scientific publications.

"The scientific case put forward for this GM maize is not adequate," said Orskov, yesterday. "If the GM maize was approved for commercial growing in the UK then people would be justified in turning their back on consuming milk derived from it. As a scientist I wouldn't drink milk from cows fed GM maize with the present state of knowledge."

Orskov's criticism was shared by Dr. Vyvyan Howard, head of the Foetal and Infant Toxico-Pathology Group at the University of Liverpool. "My interpretation is that this GM maize has not been tested thoroughly," said Dr. Howard.

Howard and Orskov's main criticism of safety data presented by Aventis is that the firm has not tested Chardon LL on cattle, even though it is intended for their use. Instead, rats and chickens were fed a protein from oilseed rape - the same protein found in Chardon LL, according to Aventis.

Orskov was quick to point out that chickens and rats have one stomach, whereas ruminants such as cows have four. "The scientific case put forward for this GM maize is not adequate," said Orskov. "Chemical analyses of the kind reported cannot identity potential problems. We need to carry out proper, long term tests both on the effect of the maize silage for the microbes in the stomach of the ruminants which digest the feed and on the host animals. This has not been done."

Orskov warned Aventis and the government that the UK public could turn their backs on milk and switch to other foods. "This would have a disastrous effect on our dairy industry," he said. "Aventis needs to pay attention to this."

[original articles  http://members.tripod.com/~ngin/2b.htm]

Farmer Sue Tickle


Unorthodox source; interesting angle though!

26.05.2002 16:15

This isn't scientific or anything, but it was something I read in "Psychic News" (!) from 25 March 2000. It's not a publication I often read but I think they have a regular little column where they put questions to a "spirit panel" of deceased people. I make no claims at all for the validity of this as a source... but I did value the angle these few little paragraphs gave on the whole matter of GM foods:

****************
A communication from the spirit realms in answer to particular questions

"Are genetically modified foods safe for humans?"

They are as safe as any other comestibles. They are to be compared with the difference between bread which is white in colour and the bread which appears brown made from unadulterated flours generally named wholemeal.

Genetically modified food is interfered with by scientific process from seed to fruition, and thereafter, as is quite usual now. This process however denies the spirit of the force of creation and could therefore by definition be deemed lifeless, as we know we literally are what we eat, so if we were to ingest only such processed substances so our energies would dwindle accordingly.

This does not just apply to the human race. Where animals and birds have been fed with inappropriately processed feed stuffs, the consequences are only now becoming apparent to those who hvae had the responsibility of so feeding them. There is sufficient land in the world to grow plenteous crops in a natural way that pays due regard to that creative life force and good spirit. The motive as usual is greed and not a desire to forward the development of the world and its inhabitants. The debate will continue to rage on the earth plane and argument will rage until the awful consequences are generally known. There is a danger of rendering life sterile in every department and this we can only counsel against. It is the responsibility of every thinking being to work this one out for themselves, and to examine all scientific data appertaining thereto, and to bring their findings and knowledge to notice and attention of their fellows. Meanwhile, those who are aware must be sure to feed and water themselves and their animals and birds and fish only naturally produced goods. We must all pray for enlightenment to dawn before it is too late to redress the balance of life. God bless and keep you safe from all harm."
--p.3, Psychic News, 25 March 2000.
******************

Hedgehog_XX
mail e-mail: hedgehog_xx@hotmail.com


hmm

15.06.2002 23:32

I can only praise the chickens :) The secrecy and furtive nature of the introduction of GM crops leaves the general public vulnerable and uninformed. At least through stunts like this people can be reminded of the menace they are facing, the deviousness of the multinationals and goverments and a couple of those abominations to nature wiped out in the bargain.

Perhaps indeed there is nothing wrong with these crops, and that my paranoia is backward. But what these trials in essence are doing is removing my right to chose. Dr john I do find meddling with nature unsettling especially when the aim is so obviously for profit. However it is the nature of the technology being forced unseen upon us that i object to most strongly.

shelf
mail e-mail: little_nyx@hotmail.com


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal

West Country Topics

Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
Indymedia
Migration
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

West Country Actions 2007

West Country Actions 2006

April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006

West Country Actions 2005

DSEi 2005
G8 2005
WTO Hong Kong 2005

West Country Actions 2004

European Social Forum
FBI Server Seizure
May Day 2004
Venezuela

West Country Actions 2003

Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003

Languages

english

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech