Skip Navigation | HOME | UK Indymedia | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

West Country Features | UK Features | West Country Newswire | UK Newswire |

Get Sainsbury!

genetix | 15.04.2004 11:56 | Bio-technology

Lord Sainsbury of Turville, unelected minister for trade and industry, on the Sci-Bio Committee, responsible for national bio-tech policy, despite massive interests in the industry.

What a Twat!
What a Twat!


ne reason Bayer shareholders may feel aggrieved by the failure of Chardon LL to achieve profits for them could be the failure of their friends in strategic places to come up with the political goods that would railroad GM crops into a resistant market. A key factor could have been the presence of Lord Sainsbury of Turville, unelected minister for trade and industry, on the Sci-Bio Committee, responsible for national
policy on biotechnology including GM crops and foods. It all began in September 1997 when David Sainsbury gave Labour its biggest ever single donation. On October 3 1997 he was made a life peer by Blair and a year later became Minister for Science. By 2003 he had given over #11 million to the Labour Party.
Well known for his support of GM technology he established and funds the Sainsbury Laboratory at the John Innes Centre in Norwich whose head, Professor Jonathan D. G. Jones FRS, was a signatory of the letter to Tony Blair from 114 scientists deploring the government's lack of support for GM.

This lack of support includes a 300% increase in govenment funding of the Sainsbury Laboratory to #800,000 p.a. via the Biotechnology and Biological Science Research Council, an extra #50m from the DTI to the BBSRC since Sainsbury was Minister, #743,000 from the DTI to Plant Bioscience Ltd (a John Innes Centre offshoot), and 5 scientists on the government's Science Review Panel with direct links to Sainsbury's investment and research empire.

SKEWING SCIENCE
The Science Review Panel assessed the results of the FSTs. A Sunday Times science report claimed that scientific studies authored by researchers with possible conflicts of interest are "fatally flawed". These conflicts go to the heart of government and the process by which it has reviewed the scientific safety of GM technology.

One example can be seen in the paper published by his chum Prof. Perry et
al. on Nature's website. The paper was clearly designed to undermine the
conclusions of the government's Environmental Audit Committee's report published the same
day. It is highly speculative in supporting its claim that there would be a marginal environmental benefit from GM maize. It was so speculative that the Chairman of the Environmental Audit Committee
dismissed it as "neither robust nor particularly credible science".

SKEWING DEMOCRACY
Another glaring conflict of interest concerns his blind trust investments, which would make millions if the FST results had led to the commercial growing of GM crops. Sainsbury's blind trust contains shares from a number of companies, including Diatech Ltd and Innotech Investments, as well as his 13% stake in the J Sainsbury supermarket chain. Between February 1998 and March 1999 Innotech was part of a consortium reported to have invested #8m in Paradigm Genetics, now worth about #3m to Innotech.

In November 1999 Paradigm signed a deal with Monsanto, which is paying it
#30m and up to #9m more in performance bonuses, to work on novel genes.
Paradigm will also get royalties if any of the genes are used in commercial
products. This year Monsanto confirmed it was adding some genes discovered by Paradigm
to its next generation of commercial crops. If such crops are approved in
Europe, Paradigm genes could soon be in food sold in British supermarkets.

In short, Sainsbury heads a government department that gives money to the Sainsbury Laboratory (via the BBSRC) on whose board is the man who runs Diatech, currently held in a blind trust. Mark Seddon, a member of Labour's National Executive Committee, told the BBC, "In any other country I think a government minister donating such vast amounts of money and effectively buying a political party would be seen for
what it is, a form of corruption of the political process."

So, with Sainsbury's influence over the Science Review Panel, his investments in GM development, royalties from their commercial application, and profits from selling GM food in his shop, Bayer's shareholders could be forgiven for thinking their investment was in safe hands.

genetix

Download this article in pdf format >>

Email this article to someone >>

Submit an addition or make a quick comment on this article >>

Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal

West Country Topics

Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
Indymedia
Migration
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

West Country Actions 2007

West Country Actions 2006

April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006

West Country Actions 2005

DSEi 2005
G8 2005
WTO Hong Kong 2005

West Country Actions 2004

European Social Forum
FBI Server Seizure
May Day 2004
Venezuela

West Country Actions 2003

Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003

Languages

english

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech