Skip Nav | Home | Mobile | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us

World

Yes Virginia, there are Monopolies in a ''Free Market''

Washington Post | 25.09.2003 00:35 | Analysis | Globalisation | Technology | World

Bruce Schneier, CTO (Counterpane Internet Security) said the problem with Microsoft is that it is so intent on being dominant that it designs its systems primarily to keep out competitors, not intruders.



Security Report Puts Blame On Microsoft
Washington Post, September 24, 2003

Viruses, worms and other cyber-attacks that are crippling computers with increasing frequency cannot be stopped as long as the software of one company -- Microsoft Corp. -- dominates computing, according to a paper prepared by corporate technology officers and researchers.

"The security situation is deteriorating," says the report, which is to be released today. With Microsoft operating systems used on more than 90 percent of the world's personal computers, the authors write, most computers are vulnerable to attack and networks are easily compromised.

The report, whose authors include prominent critics of Microsoft, comes at a sensitive time for the company. It is under intense criticism for security flaws in its software despite repeated pledges from Chairman Bill Gates and chief executive Steven A. Ballmer to make security the company's top priority.

"No other company in the world is more committed to providing its customers with more secure software than is Microsoft," said Sean Sundwall, a company spokesman. He said he could not comment further until the paper is released.

Since the recent spread of the Sobig, Blaster and Slammer worms, federal and state officials have questioned cybersecurity more critically. Many technology officers for companies and governments are reconsidering whether they should diversify the types of products on their networks.

The paper argues that governments, through their power to decide what software to buy for their systems, should force Microsoft to reveal more of its software code to allow development of better security tools, and to make its software work better with competing products.

Policymakers must "confront the security effects of monopoly and acknowledge that competition policy is entangled with security policy from this point forward," the paper says.

The technology industry generally opposes government regulation and favors allowing the marketplace and technological innovation to create solutions to problems. Under the free-market theory, if a company's products are flawed, consumers will buy others that are superior.

But Microsoft has virtually no competition for PC operating systems, and people who break into computer systems or write worms and viruses are more technologically adept than many software manufacturers.

"I don't hold to the theory that technology always beats policy," said Daniel E. Geer Jr., one of the paper's authors and chief technology officer for AtStake Inc., a business-security firm in Massachusetts.

The report is being released by the Computer and Communications Industry Association, a trade group that is involved in antitrust action against Microsoft in the United States and Europe. Other authors include Charles P. Pleeger of Exodus Communications Inc.; John S. Quarterman, founder of Matrix NetSystems Inc.; Rebecca Bace, chief executive of network security firm Infidel Inc., and Peter Gutmann, a computer science researcher at the University of Auckland in New Zealand.

Geer said the paper grew out of his ideas and discussions among security executives and academics about the increase in security threats and was not instigated by the association.

"Nature does not put up with monocultures" because they are too easy to attack, Geer said. "If everything looks just alike . . . it will promptly be punished."

Another author of the paper, Bruce Schneier, chief technology officer of Counterpane Internet Security Inc., is a longtime Microsoft antagonist who has argued that the company should be held financially liable for its security flaws.

Computer users generally agree to terms that absolve software makers of liability, which Microsoft's critics argue gives the company no incentive to be more vigilant about security.

Schneier said the problem with Microsoft is that it is so intent on being dominant that it designs its systems primarily to keep out competitors, not intruders.

"Their goal is to facilitate lock-in" of Microsoft products, he said.

Washington Post
- Homepage: http://www.bizreport.com/article.php?art_id=5003

Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

/regional publish include --> /regional search include -->

World Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech