Skip Nav | Home | Mobile | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us

World

Beijing's Errant Children

Strategic Forecasting, Inc. | 15.04.2004 19:10 | Anti-militarism | Social Struggles | World

Now that Hong Kong is anxious for self-rule and Taiwan is serious about nationhood, China is awakening from a dream of a peaceful reunification with its democratic territories -- another round of terror is likely.


Summary

The facade of China's "one country, two systems" formula abruptly crumbled when Beijing announced it would assert its authority regarding when, how -- and even if -- Hong Kong can implement democratic reforms. The failure to maintain a long-standing political compromise is sending bad signals to Taiwan at an inopportune time.

Analysis

The Standing Committee of China's National People's Congress (NPC) announced April 6 that it will have final say over how Hong Kong's next leaders are elected. The decision by China's parliament effectively marks the death of Beijing's "one country, two systems" formula for its recovered territories.

The formula -- a tacit agreement, really -- stated that there is one Chinese nation, but multiple political systems. In effect, it granted autonomy to the former European colonies of Hong Kong and Macao in exchange for allegiance. The purpose of this live-and- let-live system was to ease the transition from colonial rule for the two territories, and also make the peaceful reunification of Taiwan with the mainland appear an attractive and viable offer for the wayward island.

Hong Kong, however, is anxious to run its own house -- something Beijing just won't let happen. At the same time, with each passing presidential election, Taiwan is placing higher value on gaining sovereignty. Hong Kong's fear of falling under Chinese jurisdiction and Taiwan's persistent pursuit of nationhood are forcing Beijing to awaken from its dream of a peaceful reunification with its territories.

A delegation of top Chinese government officials led by Qiao Xiaoyang, deputy secretary-general of the Standing Committee, arrived in Hong Kong on April 7 to meet with Special Administrative Region (SAR) leaders and try to allay concerns that Beijing plans to quash democratic reforms in the former British colony. The efforts are not likely to succeed. The delegation was met with small demonstrations by pro-democracy activists, cries of injustice from local lawmakers and scathing editorials in a handful of Hong Kong newspapers deriding Beijing's attempt to undermine the SAR's autonomy. The activists are planning another demonstration in Hong Kong on April 11, estimating as many as 10,000 people will attend.

The Chinese government's reassertion of legal authority over Hong Kong is not surprising. China's constitution and Hong Kong's Basic Law (or mini-constitution) both state that the NPC has final say about the SAR's laws. Until now, Beijing has opted for light-handed control, preferring instead to work through its handpicked chief executive, Tung Chee-Hwa. That has all changed now.

The first major blow to the arrangement occurred July 1, 2003, when up to a half-million Hong Kong residents protested the proposed Article 23 as an addition to the Basic Law. Protesters feared the package of anti-subversion regulations would stifle civil liberties in the territory. The demonstration was as much a protest against Tung's rule as it was a rejection of the proposed legislation.

The second blow came a few months later when the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment of Hong Kong (DAB) -- the Beijing- backed political party in the region -- suffered a stinging loss at the hands of the Democratic Party in district council elections. The November 2003 low-level elections resulted in a record turnout and proved that if Hong Kong residents had their way, Tung and other Beijing-backed politicians would be sent packing.

In the months since, pro-democracy advocates have pressured Tung to introduce reforms to allow the direct election of the SAR's next chief executive in 2007 and Legislative Council members in 2008. The Chinese government has made it perfectly clear that any election-reform decision would come directly from Beijing -- although it hasn't gone so far as to completely reject the idea.

The NPC has left itself room to maneuver by not definitively ruling out the possibility of desired reforms, stating only that if and when they happen, they would be on Beijing's terms. The Chinese government will allow direct elections in Hong Kong only when it is sure the majority of elected candidates will follow its orders; while that remains in doubt, Beijing will not take the risk.

The "one country, two systems" idea has always been an illusion. Beijing and Hong Kong favor opposite sides of the equation, and no amount of spin will change that. The notion that this forced wedding eventually would lead to marital bliss is over. Hong Kong is testing its bounds, and Beijing is reining it in tightly, preferring to err on the side of caution rather than lose control of the SAR.

From its perspective, the Chinese government had little choice but to take a heavier hand in the SAR's affairs; Tung is no longer effective, and opposition in Hong Kong is growing bolder. Unfortunately for Beijing, it sends the wrong message across the Taiwan Strait just when it is hoping to arrest Taipei's creeping independence campaign.

Before the failed assassination attempt against Taiwanese President Chen Shui-Bian, the ensuing mystery behind the shooting and the controversy over the election results, the most salient issue in the presidential race was the status of the island's sovereignty. Taiwan's third free election since the end of martial law capped a disturbing trend for China.

Taiwan's first election in 1996 incensed Beijing simply by occurring -- because a democratically elected government that gained international credibility would be much more difficult to assimilate in the future.

The 2000 election was a further blow: The Communist Party's archrival -- the Nationalist Party (KMT) -- lost to Chen, a Taiwan native whose Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has no historical claim on the mainland. The victory of the indigenous Taiwanese political party undermines the agreement between the Communist Party and KMT that there is only one China -- and Taiwan is part of it. Even more dangerous for Beijing is that Chen made it clear that he sees Taiwan as independent from China.

The most recent presidential election, which included a plebiscite on the island's security measures and relations with the mainland, proved to be the zenith of Taiwan's independence movement. Chen's victory in 2000 can be written off as something of a fluke. He won the race with only 39 percent of the vote, while candidates Lien Chan and James Soong -- whose parties formed the opposition Pan Blue Alliance for the 2004 election -- split the remaining votes, 23 percent and 37 percent respectively.

In the March 20 election, Chen and his pro-independence platform secured about 50 percent of the vote. If the present trend continues, the majority of Taiwanese voters could become decidedly pro-independent, and future elections could become a contest between candidates trying to demonstrate who is more anti-Beijing.

The present set of circumstances bodes ill for Beijing's attempts to placate its returned territory and woo back its estranged province. Hong Kong, on the other hand, is discovering just who is lord and who is vassal under the "one country, two systems" formula -- while Taiwan is watching with growing apprehension over the prospect of falling under a similar set of rules.

Now that Beijing's charm offensive is over, it has less incentive to practice restraint -- should either Hong Kong demonstrators or Taiwanese "rebels" try to push too far. China could easily decide that it is better to be feared than to be respected.

.................................................................

Decision-makers around the world rely on Stratfor for daily intelligence briefs and in-depth analyses and forecasts on a wide range of international security, political and economic affairs -- Stratfor was rated by Time as the "Best Intelligence Website" in 2003 -- Barron's has called Stratfor a "quasi-CIA".

Strategic Forecasting, Inc.
- e-mail: analysis@stratfor.com
- Homepage: http://www.stratfor.com/

Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

/regional publish include --> /regional search include -->

World Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech