Skip Nav | Home | Mobile | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us

World

WTO: 10 years on and none the wiser

Daniel Mittler | 08.03.2005 11:29 | Globalisation | World

The World Trade Organization (WTO) turns 10 this year. It claims to have changed for the better. But the reality looks different. The WTO undermines development and environmental protection, argues Daniel Mittler of Greenpeace International.

WTO: 10 years on and none the wiser


Ten years ago, the World Trade Organization opened its doors on Lake Geneva “to protect and preserve the environment” and to achieve “the optimal use of the world’s resources in accordance with the objectives of sustainable development” . Over the last decade these promises have been broken. Development is everything but sustainable. Particularly in countries that have followed the WTO’s recipe and liberalized extensively, the rich have got richer and the poor have got poorer.

Countries are competing to trade more, production is increasing and the use of natural resources is spiralling upwards. One fifth of global oil consumption is just to move goods around the world and one third of global trade is in like products. Apples are flown from California to Europe, while apples from New Zealand are flown to California.

In 2000 no one was celebrating the WTO’s fifth anniversary. A UN body then declared it a “nightmare for developing countries” and the environmental dangers of the WTO had become well known through trade wars over dolphins and tuna. As a result of the demonstrations in Seattle, public disenchantment with the organization was widespread.

But things are different now, or so the WTO will say. It will no doubt use its anniversary to claim that it has changed for the better. The environment, it will say, is now officially on the agenda and development is the very name of the current “Doha Development Round”. True, the WTO is talking about the environment. But these discussions are going nowhere. The environment was not important enough to be included in the “we will keep talking” deal, that governments reached in Geneva last July. While the environmental state of the planet is deteriorating, WTO diplomats prefer to argue whether or not the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) should be allowed to attend their meetings on the environment.

The WTO is talking about global agreements to protect the environment (known as multilateral environmental agreements, MEAs). But the discussions are ruefully inadequate and so narrow in scope, that there is nothing to be gained for the environment. Over the last three years, governments could not even agree on the nature of the talks.

Meanwhile, the WTO is still used to undermine and “chill” public interest policies. Progressive environmental policies are routinely attacked as “not compatible with the WTO”. The ongoing WTO trade war by USA, Canada and Argentina against the EU’s Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) regulation, for example, is a clear attempt to undermine the “Biosafety Protocol”. The Biosaftey Protocol explicitly allows governments to prohibit GMO imports if they are concerned about impacts on public health. The US is attacking the EU and telling the rest of the world: “Don’t you dare to use the rights that you have under the Biosafety Protocol. If you do, it may cost you dearly at the WTO.” We can only guess how many progressive policies that could protect people’s health and the environment never make it to the statute books due to this WTO threat.

The WTO’s lack of sincerity on the environment is nowhere more plain to see than in its refusal to accept the precautionary principle; a key principle in environmental governance which allows countries to take action to protect the environment even where there is scientific uncertainty. When governments try to apply the precautionary principle and do the right thing, they are told that they might get into trouble with the WTO. For example, the EU’s attempt to regulate chemicals and potentially replace harmful chemicals with available alternatives is under attack by the US and big business as “WTO incompatible”.

On development, things do not look much better. 1.1 billion people now live on less than a dollar a day . True, in 2004 Brazil and India were asked to join the “power club” of countries, which fought over deals behind closed doors in Geneva. But the rest of the world is still excluded and the basis for current trade talks is extremely biased in favour of developed countries. Vague promises to end export subsidies are used by rich country governments to extract further concessions on industrial products, services and environmentally sensitive sectors such as forest products and fisheries from developing countries. Key issues, such as cotton, on which the livelihood of millions depends, have been parked in a working group.

The WTO has failed to deliver its declared aim of sustainable development over the last ten years. Trade liberalization has led to more trade, but not to more equitable trade. The WTO now talks about the environment, but it also continues to pose a danger to precaution and environmental rules.

It is time for a new start in the global trade regime. The Millennium Development Summit in New York this September presents world leaders with an opportunity to take a new direction. Governments should agree a global review of the social and environmental impacts of WTO-driven trade liberalization so far. This review should be the basis for a trade system that puts sustainable development and the environment at its heart – not just into its Preamble.

Happy Birthday, WTO. May you never reach adulthood.


Daniel Mittler is Greenpeace International's Trade Policy Advisor, www.greenpeace.org

Daniel Mittler
- Homepage: http://www.greenpeace.org

Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

/regional publish include --> /regional search include -->

World Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech