The future of the East End as a community is under threat from Crossrail plan Bill. The local Tower Hamlets Council has so far been used as tool to suppress the very people in whose name that Coucnil exists.
Tower |Hamlets Council controlling clique has spent public money to perpetrate and to promote Crossrail -hole-backing lies in its propaganda title 'East End Lies' for Crossrail . If the Crossrail Bill is passed, they can do anything to destroy the community.
Make people homeless, drive small shop keepers out of their trade and make the East End a wasteland before Big Business takes over the area.
The Crossrail Bill is now being formally ‘scrutinised’ in relation to the formal petitions lodged by some of the local individuals and organisations to parts of its provisions. One of the petitioners has been the local Tower Hamlets Council.
Its chief employee fronting the Council’s side in all contacts with Crossrail has been Owen Whalley.
He gave verbal clarifications before the House of Commons committee on 7 June 2006. It was clear that he was not disclosing most of the facts of what they talked about with Crossrail .
Yet today’s edition of the Council’s ‘East End life’ [‘dubbed EAST END LIES as examined by the Khoodeelaar! Campaign] paints the Coucnil as having ‘obtained' good deals for the community fromCrossrail and presents Crossrail as not only a 'beneficial' project for the alleged regeneration of the East End but one with which the community is happy!
That pack of lies has been splashed on the front of the ‘east End Lies’ and stuffed on two centre pages.
Most of the people in the Borough are totally unaware of the manifold leis that they have been being told.
Khoodeelaar! Is formally demanding a full space in next edition failing which they ill take the Editor of East End Life to court.
Khoodeelaar! Is also delivering a draft motion for the full Coucnil Meeting scheduled for 21 June 2006 asking all the sitting Councillors to support an unequivocal motion of NO to Crossrail hole Bill.
Tower |Hamlets Council controlling clique has spent public money to perpetrate and to promote Crossrail -hole-backing lies in its propaganda title 'East End Lies' for Crossrail . If the Crossrail Bill is passed, they can do anything to destroy the community.
Make people homeless, drive small shop keepers out of their trade and make the East End a wasteland before Big Business takes over the area.
The Crossrail Bill is now being formally ‘scrutinised’ in relation to the formal petitions lodged by some of the local individuals and organisations to parts of its provisions. One of the petitioners has been the local Tower Hamlets Council.
Its chief employee fronting the Council’s side in all contacts with Crossrail has been Owen Whalley.
He gave verbal clarifications before the House of Commons committee on 7 June 2006. It was clear that he was not disclosing most of the facts of what they talked about with Crossrail .
Yet today’s edition of the Council’s ‘East End life’ [‘dubbed EAST END LIES as examined by the Khoodeelaar! Campaign] paints the Coucnil as having ‘obtained' good deals for the community fromCrossrail and presents Crossrail as not only a 'beneficial' project for the alleged regeneration of the East End but one with which the community is happy!
That pack of lies has been splashed on the front of the ‘east End Lies’ and stuffed on two centre pages.
Most of the people in the Borough are totally unaware of the manifold leis that they have been being told.
Khoodeelaar! Is formally demanding a full space in next edition failing which they ill take the Editor of East End Life to court.
Khoodeelaar! Is also delivering a draft motion for the full Coucnil Meeting scheduled for 21 June 2006 asking all the sitting Councillors to support an unequivocal motion of NO to Crossrail hole Bill.
The Khoodeelaar! camaogn against teh Crssoril hole Bill attacks on the Brick Lane and Whietycahpel Lodnon e1 area is deliebreuing the laterst set odf dem,and on the Tower Hamkest Clcunil to reprsent the communitya by apssing a No to Crssoaril hole Bill motion at teh schedield fuill Couicnil meeting on 21 June 2006
e-mail:
Homepage:
Comments
Display the following 4 comments