Skip Nav | Home | Mobile | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us

World

IDF More Dangerous Than Ever: Dramatic Increase In House Demolitions

Ha'Aretz | 18.06.2006 21:52 | Repression | World

Israel "new" Government continues Zionism's long tradition of Ethnic Cleansing.

Eight months after High Court bans use of 'neighbor procedure,' Arabs are more at risk than before
Huge rise in number of houses IDF is razing during arrest ops
By Amos Harel

When the High Court of Justice decided to ban the use of any form of the "neighbor procedure" eight months ago, in which Palestinian civilians were forced to enter homes of barricaded fugitives, senior Israel Defense Forces officers warned that this would likely endanger soldiers' lives.

A Haaretz inquiry has shown that since the court's decision, the new arrest procedures are not any more dangerous to soldiers, but that is because the IDF is using more aggressive tactics during the actual operations. It turns out that the end result of the decision is different from the original intention: both the army and human rights groups, who closely follow developments in the territories, agree that the risk to the lives of Palestinian civilians is greater today. Furthermore, the new procedures result in more extensive damage to Palestinian homes in the territories.
Advertisement

In early October 2005, the High Court justices accepted the petition of human rights organizations against the "neighbor procedure." This tactic, employed hundreds of times in the territories during the first intifada, involved forcing the Palestinian neighbors of wanted militants to enter the homes of the barricaded fugitives in an effort to convince them to surrender, and consequently, also bring out information for the army on the conditions inside the home.

This forcing of Palestinian civilians to act as "agents" for the IDF drew intense public criticism, especially when a Palestinian from a village in the northern West Bank was shot and killed by his barricaded neighbor during the application of the "neighbor procedure."

Early warning

The IDF then employed a more complicated version of this tactic, called "early warning procedure," in which the neighbor could not be forced to enter the house in question unless it was done with his consent, and similarly the neighbor could not be forced to wear an army bullet-proof vest and helmet.

To the chagrin of the IDF the justices shot this procedure down as well.

Senior General Staff officers tried to convince the court of the necessity of the tactic, and even Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz volunteered to testify before the court. The justices were not impressed.

The current tactic is called "outstretched arm." This allows the army to use an interlocutor, someone who normally lives in the house, and only if they are still in the house at the time the soldiers arrive. In most cases the fugitives allow the civilians inside to exit the house, and in that case the army can ask a family member to use a bullhorn to call out to the fugitive to surrender, so long as this is done at a safe distance.

So, does the use of the new procedure endanger soldiers' lives?

"No, because they take no chances," says a senior IDF officer serving in the West Bank. "Not one of us will send a soldier to check a home in which it is known that a living, armed fugitive is barricaded, before we have carried out very aggressive action."

The operation is as follows: If the fugitive refuses to exit, warning shots are fired around the house and then at points in the home that appear suspicious. If the fugitive continues to refuse to surrender, a bulldozer is brought in and begins to pound the walls of the house. The final stage is for the bulldozer to raze the home with everyone in it. Only then are troops sent in to search for survivors.

Quick escalation results

In the army they complain that the outright ban on any form of the "neighbor procedure" diminishes the tactical options of the officers. "The result is that very quickly we escalate in means, in other words, we use the bulldozers," one officer says.

"More homes are damaged. In some of the cases the damage is not total because after a number of bulldozer blows, the fugitive realizes that he has no way out and opts to surrender," the officer added.

Data from the human rights group B'Tselem appears to confirm this trend.

More important, however, is whether the new procedures have made it safer for Palestinian civilians. In one incident, a 43-year old woman was killed when shots fired at a home of a fugitive strayed into her home. The soldiers say that the conditions at the site made accurate shooting difficult. An internal probe concluded that the soldiers violated safety regulations, but no Military Police investigation was initiated.

In the IDF they know that they have lost the battle over the "neighbor procedure." But in conversations with Haaretz the officers maintain that the court's decision reflects a certain dislocation from the operational realities in the territories, and that the moral argument accepted by the court has resulted in graver danger to the lives of Palestinian civilians and their property.

But there are those at the General Staff who say that "over and over [Supreme Court President] Aharon Barak has saved us from ourselves. Against rampant terrorism there were times when we lost our sense of judgment and brought excessive means to bear. The High Court, by intervening in matters such as the route of the separation fence and the neighbor procedure, brought us back to a rational state, even if the officers in the field may not like it."

 http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/726988.html

Ha'Aretz

Comments

Hide the following comment

Indymedia UK bans comments for saying the same as this jewish newspaper

19.06.2006 17:55

It is ironic that jewish newspapers cover Israeli CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY in a vastly more complete and uncensored way than ANY comment permitted by Blair's 'fingermen' that daily censor Indymedia UK.

Those of you that are foolish enough to think that Indymedia UK is not simply a New Reich front (as a consequence of those New Reich agents that find it all to easy to dominate editorial policy), should ask yourselves why this site encourages terms like 'muslim terrorists' and 'infected by islam' (YES, YOU READ CORRECTLY, THE NEW REICH CENSORS OF INDYMEDIA UK ALLOWED A NAZI-IDENTICAL RACIST ATTACK AGAINST IRAN TO USE THE PHRASE ***INFECTED BY ISLAM*** BECAUSE THE ARTICLE WAS BY ONE OF BLAIR'S OWN BLACK PROPAGANDA GROUPS ACTING TO SUPPORT BLAIR'S COMING WAR WITH IRAN), while at the same time automatically banning any article/comment that uses the word JEWISH in the same context.

This is even more sickening, since those that run Israel themselves state that Israel is THE jewish state, and every act of mass murder is carried out in the name of jews (not zionists, not Israelis). Of course, this is NOT the same as saying that Israel has the right to speak on behalf of all jews- it most certainly does not. However, it illustrates that 'jewish terrorist' and 'jewish extremist' MUST BE ALLOWED by any non-racist site that allows the use of similar terms refering to muslims.

INDYMEDIA UK, HOWEVER, IN COMMON WITH ALL MEDIA SITES THAT ACTIVELY SUPPORT THE AIMS OF BLAIR AND HIS ALLIES, APPLIES THE WORST OF RACIST CENSORSHIP.

It is utterly impossible to find any excuse that allows the phrase 'muslim terrorist' but bans the phrase 'jewish terrorist'. IMPOSSIBLE. But this is the racist situation on Indymedia UK.

George Orwell was all too familiar with this tactic (well, given his background, he would be) when he invented the concept of 'newspeak'- the elimination of ideas by the state by eliminating the words that expressed those ideas. You see the method in action in Communist China, where the Internet is censored by idea, so that a new generation of Chinese won't even know that certain concepts are missing from their mental development.

Indymedia UK underlies its racist policy on the editorial page, with the racist term 'anti-semitism', a phrase predicated on the idea of a 'race' (there are NO Human races, the pseudo-scientific lie that pushes this ultimate evil concept was invented by jewish so-called scientists early in the 19th century in the US in order to justify 'black' slavery), and hence the idea of a 'master-race'.

Indymedia UK SHOULD have said "no racist comments against muslims, jews, blacks etc". It doesn't take a genious to understand why this was NOT the form of wording used.

Blair has so far murdered millions of muslims, just for being muslims, during his sanctions and invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. There are clear groups of people that desire and aid in any way possible such acts of genocide, and they include Israel and all those that fund and support the existence of that foul evil racist nation. Those that actively censor comments such as mine, do so in the active support of such genocide, and in the name of Israel. In the 1930's they would have been doing the same such censorship in support of the ambitions of nazi Germany, and in the name of Adolf Hitler.

REMEMBER, FOR THOSE THAT PREY UPON HUMANITY, THE NAMES CHANGE, BUT THE EVIL STAYS EXACTLY THE SAME.

twilight


Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

/regional publish include --> /regional search include -->

World Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech