Skip Nav | Home | Mobile | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us

World

Multinational protest in Brussels against doubled nuclear spending

Diet Simon, drawing on a media release by Bundesweites Bündnis gegen EURATOM | 25.03.2007 09:10 | Anti-militarism | Ecology | World

The European Union will spend 2,751 million euros on nuclear activities in its research funding from this year until 2013 although at least two member countries, Germany and Sweden, have pledged to drop nuclear power production and another, Austria, has banned it.

The nuclear spending in the 7th research programme is double the 1,352 million euros in the previous research budget.

Protesters from Germany, The Netherlands and Russia heard at a demonstration in Brussels, the seat of the EU, that the billions would be better spent on climate protection, energy saving programmes and renewable energies.

The demonstrators went to Brussels last Friday to protest against the 50th anniversary on Sunday of the open-ended EURATOM treaty, which regulates nuclear cooperation between the 27 member countries.

“Stop EURATOM!” they demanded outside the landmark Atomium building
(photos at www.tobias-pflueger.de/EURATOM/).

EURATOM is one of the founding treaties of the European Union. It defines its purpose as promoting, coordinating and controlling the nuclear research and atomic power generating industries of the member countries.

"We demand an end to the anachronistic EURATOM treaty! No more EU funding of atomic energy!” said Markus Pflüger of the southwest German anti-atomic initiatives, one of the organisers of the Brussels protest.

Especially now that Germany had the EU presidency and was to host the G8 summit in June it should be urging a really ecological energy turnaround and be opposing resource wars for energy security, said Pflüger, a Member of the European Parliament in Brussels.

After the action at the Atomium the activists supported the handover of 663,000 signatures of individual Europeans and more than 750 organisations demanding that the European Commission put an end to nuclear power production (see www.foeeurope.org).

Earlier, in the European Parliament, the nuclear opponents attended a hearing about EURATOM.

"The spending on promoting atomic power is immense. In the 7th Research Framework Programme fusion energy research will receive 1,947 million euros, nuclear fission and radiation protection 287 million euros,” explained Ursula Schoenberger of a group opposing permanent dumping of weak and medium-active nuclear waste in a former iron mine, Schacht Konrad, near Salzgitter in north Germany.

“The nuclear sector of the joint research centre will be furnished with 517 million, making altogether 2,751 million euros, which is double of the current EURATOM funding of 1,352 million euros in the sixth framework programme,” she said.

Schoenberger’s scientific study is fundamentally critical of EURATOM.

“It has to be publicly scandalised at last that through EURATOM billions of tax revenue are undemocratically moved past the European Parliament to be spent on promoting atomic technology against the declared will of the majority of European men and women.

“All countries that want to leave atomic energy, first and foremost Germany, must get out of the treaty at last.

“Instead, billions could be spent on climate protection, energy saving programmes and renewable energies.” (Link to the study, which is in German: www.tobias-pflueger.de/EURATOM/.)

The leftwing Member of the European Parliament, Tobias Pflüger (GUE/NGL group), who commissioned the study, showed the connection between the neo-liberal EU constitutional treaty agreement including militarisation and the EURATOM treaty.

The 36th protocol amending the treaty establishing the European atomic energy community, gazetted 16 December 2004, refers to the “necessity that the provisions of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community should continue to have full legal effect”.

“That is a scandal, because with the acceptance of the constitutional agreement the EURATOM treaty would be doubly secured, once in the original as a treaty in its own right and secondly in the constitutional treaty. That’s another reason to oppose this EU constitutional agreement,” argued the MEP.

Francis Althoff of the group opposing nuclear dumping at the village of Gorleben in north Germany, the Bürgerinitiative Umweltschutz Lüchow- Dannenberg, criticised the suggestion of central “European” final storage of waste.

“There is no safe final storing. Instead of pumping millions into what have been proved to be unsuitable sites like Gorleben in Germany or Bure in France, the nuclear exit is overdue,” Althoff said.

Vladimir Slivyak of Ecodefense Moscow demanded an end to the transportation of nuclear waste from Gronau in Germany to Russia.

“This is irresponsible exportation of problems and risks,” said Matthias Eickhoff of the activist group Aktionsbündnis Münsterland gegen Atomanlagen.

He criticised uranium enrichment at the Gronau plant, owned by German nuclear power producers and Dutch and British interests running similar plants in those countries, calling it the start of the atomic spiral in Europe.

“That’s why we concentrate our resistance on uranium transports,” Eickhoff said. He called for participation in a protest on 12 May at the German-French border railway station Perl-Apach.

At the protest action on Friday near the Atomium ( http://www.atomium.be/HTMLsite/dyn/eindex.html) the activists were costumed as atomic death and referred to the victims of the Hiroshima bombing, the Chernobyl meltdown, uranium mining and the worldwide radiation pollution.

“Fifty years of atomic energy promotion, billions in subsidies for research and expansion of an uncontrollable risky technology are enough! Uranium is finite, its mining damaging to humans and the environment, its transportation dangerous and there is no solution for atomic waste – as well as the daily remaining risk and nuclear weapons danger,” added Dietmar Siefert of an anti-nuclear group in Celle, not far from Gorleben, the Celler Antiatominitiative.

Photos of the action and hearing are freely available at  http://www.tobias-pflueger.de/EURATOM/. Contacts for more information: Markus Pflueger, Stop Bure Gruppe Trier: 0049-1727379388  mail@markus-pflueger.de or Francis Althoff, Buergerinitiative Umweltschutz Luechow Dannenberg: 0049- 5841-4684  BI-Presse@t-online.de.

Diet Simon, drawing on a media release by Bundesweites Bündnis gegen EURATOM
- e-mail: in the article
- Homepage: http://in the article

Comments

Display the following comment

  1. Other reports on Brussels action — Diet Simon

Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

/regional publish include --> /regional search include -->

World Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech