Skip Nav | Home | Mobile | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Security | Support Us

World

Why Have Enrichment Plants When there are no Reactors?

Nader Bagherzadeh | 27.11.2007 23:30 | Analysis | Anti-militarism | Terror War | World

At a conference in Paris on Thursday, the European Union’s foreign policy chief, Mr. Javier Solana, said Iran’s stated ambitions concerning its enriched uranium output were inconsistent with its acquisition of the civilian nuclear technology that would justify it. He said: “It is a bit like if you were trying to make your own fuel before having purchased a car and learned how to drive,”

Unfortunately, Mr. Solana’s comment is misguided.

At a conference in Paris on Thursday, the European Union’s foreign policy chief, Mr. Javier Solana, said Iran’s stated ambitions concerning its enriched uranium output were inconsistent with its acquisition of the civilian nuclear technology that would justify it [1]. He said: “It is a bit like if you were trying to make your own fuel before having purchased a car and learned how to drive,”

Unfortunately, Mr. Solana’s comment is misguided. One would like to give the benefit of doubt to Mr. Solana that he has not done his homework or does not have the technical background to render such a verdict. Of course, one could also say that he is not being honest about the facts on the ground regarding the Natanz enrichment plant.

The Fuel Enrichment Plant (FEP) at Natanz which is now operating with 3000 centrifuges needs to be expanded to 54,000 centrifuges. Once all the centrifuges are installed, FEP is capable of producing the annual fuel for approximately two 1000 mega watts power plants, each similar in power generation capability to the one being built by Russians in Bushehr. Since Russia has a 10-year contract to supply Bushehr with nuclear fuel, it seems that Mr. Solana is correct to question the need for any enrichment activity at Natanz. Of course, there are plans in place for Iran to make electricity from twenty Bushehr size plants in the next 20 years. Let’s now examine when realistically FEP will be completed at Natanz.

Even if Iran installs 500 centrifuges per month, which is a staggering number given the past history of completion of the existing 3000 centrifuges and lack of key critical parts; it will be several years before FEP is completed. Former U.N. inspector, David Albright, claims that Iran has enough parts for about 5000 more centrifuges [2]. For the sake of argument suppose Mr. Aghazadeh who is the head of Atomic Energy of Iran (AEOI) is correct when he claims that all the 90 critical pieces of a centrifuge are fully manufactured in Iran without any help from the outside black market. With this assumed rate of installation, which amounts to 6000 centrifuges per year, it will take Iran 8.5 years to completely install all the (54,000) centrifuges. If we allocate roughly another 1.5 years for startup, testing, debugging, and fuel collection and storage, it will be ten years before Iran can provide fuel to any Bushehr size power plant. Therefore, any pause in completion of Natanz FEP will have a direct and detrimental impact on the future goals of providing fuel for Iran’s projected or currently under construction plants.

With all due respect, Mr. Solana, next time, please use the following driving example which is a more accurate metaphor: A person while is learning to drive, also is saving money to purchase a car and tries to find a way to run it on the “secure and reliable” source of fuel. Because he does not want to get stranded without any fuel in the middle of the road, on a cold winter day, when it is known that his neighbors are not to be trusted. These neighbors do not have a good track record; they left Ukraine shivering on a cold day of January 2006.



 http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/23/world/middleeast/23nuke.html?ref=world
 http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2007_11/Albright.asp

Nader Bagherzadeh
- Homepage: http://www.campaigniran.org/casmii/index.php?q=node/3426

Comments

Display the following comment

  1. Why make such allegations without evidence? — Oppose Fascism

Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

/regional publish include --> /regional search include -->

World Topics

Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Server Appeal Radio Page Video Page Indymedia Cinema Offline Newsheet

secure Encrypted Page

You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.

If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech