Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Chavez &Chavistas Debate G W Bush & Puppets

Economistaz | 01.03.2003 22:40 | Venezuela | Globalisation | World

Debate on economics and the democratic credentials of Hugo Chavez (Lula's Spearpoint)in Venezuela: Neoliberalismo, Libertarianism or Social Democracy and Alternative Participatory Economics. Please join the discussion!

Chavez &Chavistas Debate G W Bush & Puppets
Chavez &Chavistas Debate G W Bush & Puppets


Recently I responded to an attack on Mark Weisbrot in a community forum at the vheadline.com website about Venezuela. The exchange has turned-out quite interesting and I encourage readers to check it out and get involved. We all need more debate and more understanding of the options that are possible.

Select articles on Venezuela by Mark Weisbrot:
 http://zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=11&ItemID=2861

 http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=45&ItemID=2503

Chavez confronts a corrupt, violent and discredited political system that has been determined to destroy the economy in order to regain power. Chavez is the point of departure for the reconstruction of an honest and progressive Venezuelan political class
Chavismo has attempted to democratize power and include everyone in the struggle for a politics of respect, dignity and social rights.

Inclusion of the excluded is much more than symbolic. Neoliberal economics and Corporate Globalization, is based on discipline and the removal of the poor and working populations from any real decision-making. The "inclusion" of the poor and their support of Chavez is frightening to the elite who advocate neoliberal development for Venezuela.

From the Vheadline Community Forum:

"Reverse Logic Supports Ninguno" Posted 2-28-2003 08:48 (By Economistaz (ME!))
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The anti- Weisbrot rant was nicely written and creative. Since the author is obviously a mercenary (with a pen) maybe the Chavistas could hire you with a shack and a notebook as payment. You could dye your skin and walk around the ranchos and the barrios de los ricos and see how you are treated. You might win a pulitzer and get rich enough to make it to Miami where you could compare US racism with Venezuelan. Then with your fat US bank account you might feel drawn back to your homeland to do something for your people instead of just attack people's views.
Maybe you could help clean up Lake Maracaibo in the name of Carmona or Guitsi - or why not help the widows and orphans of your friends in the AD who assasinated hundreds of people during their rein of terror in 1980's and early 90's. Or maybe you are tired of this drift and want to debate economics with me. What would you do that hasn't already been tried and failed. Can I call you Mr. Neoliberalisimo?
Not competent in Economics - let's talk politics. Please define dictatorship, explain how Chavez is a dictator and explain to the Venezuelan people what they did wrong in 1998, 1999, 2000 and twice in 2001 when they voted for Chavez and his programs at percentages among the highest in the history of Latin American elections?
In response "tercervertiente" wrote: How does bringing up the past injustices defend present ones? Just because the past has examples of wrongdoing does not justify wrongdoing in the present. (see his complete response at:  http://vheadline.community.everyone.net/community/scripts/thread.pl)
Economistaz responds: Well what are the current injustices of Chavez? If past injustices by the rightwing AD and Copey are still continuing and likely to get much worse if they ever seize power again, I tnink the contrasts between Chavez's democratic opening to the vast majority versus the record of the other Venezuelan political parties is imporatnat and relevant. The rightwing had 40 years to prove the failure of their economics and their utter lack of concern for the poor (majority) - now it is the left and Chavez's turn.
The alternative to neoliberalism and social democracy proposed by "tercervertiente" is an admirable attempt and worthy of consideration - though he is wrong to say it is not neoliberalism - it is the epitome of a free market: Libertarianism with a carrot thrown to the masses of a welfare safety net. While this proposal is obviously better than the neoliberalism of Reagan-Bush-Cardoso-Menem it turns decisions about what is produced and who produces it over to the multinationals and the bankers of the Imperialists.
First in order to anaylze the costs of this program that he proposes we need to agree on the data and the costs: 25 million people times $1000 a year is $25 billion dollars. Or what are you considering the poverty level? What to you use as the current government budget?
He said: "To cover the costs of such a plan, I would simply get rid of all current government programs, and privatizing all government owned goods and services, which, when I took a look at the government budget, came to a cost of that amount."
So you would get rid of the police, armed forces, the diplomatic corps, all student aid outside of the country, all schools, all environmental regulation and studies, all roads, parks, research, sanitation, water systems, etc.? or what services would you cut and why do you think that the free market would provide these better and cheaper than done currently. Give examples. I would expect that if people had to pay directly for all of these services that the cost of your welfare net would double to 40 or 50 billion a year.
Eliminating government waste and bureacracy is a worthy idea too and Chavez has moved swiftly in this direction. But your program would throw 10's of thousands of middle class people out of work suddenly and unemployment would be a big issue - sure people would not starve because they would get your welfare payment but they would not necessarily become productive or happy!
He wrote: "Indirect advantages include, producers of basic need goods and services having to compete for the attention of the "poor" to get them to purchase from them and not a competitor... milk producers
will try to make milk better and cheaper so that the "poor" (now not poor because of the daily stipend) will want their milk..."

Economistaz responds: I am not sure what you mean here and would love to hear your explanation, but economics does not work that way. Venezuela imports most of its food and without government controls and subsidies much more of the basic goods and all goods would be imported. This would put more people out of work and drastically affect the national economy and increase the costs of your program further!
These are negative not positive side effects. You also apply this to schools and say that people would no longer be poor under your welfare net. These statements don't make sense either. Privatized schools have never benefited the majority or the poor anywhere and transportation costs become a big problem too. If people are receiving income just above the poverty line they are no longer poor? What is your poverty line again? How do you define poor?
In my initial response I wrote: 3) "Please define dictatorship, explain how Chavez is a dictator and explain to the Venezuelan people what they did wrong in 1998, 1999, 2000..
"tercervertiente" wrote: Dictator, according to Webster's Dictionary: "c: one ruling absolutely and often oppressively." From his government's inception, most of what Chavez has wanted done has gotten done, and most of what he has not wanted done has not been done. This can be interpreted as "ruling absolutely". His threat of and use of military to get things done and not done can be interpreted as "oppressively".
Economistaz responds: "Absolutely" is not the same as most - not even close. I think you are also stretching credulity to say that Chavez got most of what he wanted. Did he want 10 billion dollars to leave the country and go to Miami and New York when the rich threw their temper tantrums? Did Chavez want to be kidnapped? Did he want a phony "Bosses" strike that has crippled the economy, the government's budget and cost Venezuela 8-10 billion dollars? Your statement is ridiculous and I could go on for pages about what Chavez did not get...Oppression? I am still waiting to hear what the oppression is. Modest or unfulfilled threats are not oppression.
"tercervertiente" says that what the people did wrong was: A) abstain from voting, and B) not learn about his programs before voting for him... Even today, four years into his mandate, you would be hard pressed trying to describe what his policy truly is."
Economistaz responds: Well to a degree this is always true of all politicians, they have to respond to the situation as it evolves and adjust their programs (strikes, oil price changes, etc.) But you are not being very honest because in general Chavez has done exactly what he said he would do: direct public funding priorities to the poor (Schools, housing, democratic participation, eliminating corruption). Sure he has made a few mistakes and is still searching for the best and cheapest way to accomplish these goals - that is how the world works especially with the rich so hostile and corruption still not completely eliminated.
Worldwide Chavez is recognized as a leader in the development of a new economic program of sustainability, import substitution, environmental sensitivity, indigenous rights, popular participation, education, redirecting the military to productive activities and controlling monopolized industries and media.
The data on voter abstention suggests that Chavez and his programs would have received many more votes if everyone had voted. Most non-voters are the poor and in future elections they will come out to vote now that they see the advantages of Chavez's program and the terrible threats posed by the old political cronies in the AD, Copoey and the CTV.
In response to my statement that Chavez has received voter approvals "at percentages among the highest in the history of Latin American elections?" "tercervertiente" presents data based on percentage of total eligible voters in Venezuela but none for other countries. I stand by my statement and challenge him to present similar data from other countries if he wants to disprove me.
I hope that this discussion continues as I feel it is important and enlightening. But please do not cite "polls" to try and convince people that Chavez is not popular. These polls are not only inherently inaccurate, but in the case of Venezuela it has been proven that the pollsters are part of the opposition coup mongers.
Looking forward to your response - for the people and a future of social justice and sovereignty for all.

For additional understanding of the crisis in Venezuela see:

 http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,857027,00.html Great article on Racist Rage of Caracas Elite
 http://www.vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=2451 – Great article on News media corruption and lies.
 http://www.vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=350 List of US Congressmen and hundreds of groups and individuals supporting democracy and Chavez in Venezuela.

Patrick J. O'Donoghue: Funds slotted to push sustainable development zones
 http://64.4.30.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=0fdb0c77861ae7201a6777d1cec2ac98&lat=1044741440&hm___action=http%3a%2f%2fwww%2evheadline%2ecom%2freadnews%2easp%3fid%3d2490


The government is pushing ahead with its plan to develop special zones of sustainable development. Minister Francisco Natera has announced that the government will invest 25 billion bolivares in reactivating and developing some of the zones in question.
Agriculture & Lands Ministry (MAT) and the Planning & Development (Cordiplan) Ministries will join a coordination plan aimed at generating jobs in the short term. The chosen zones are: South of Lake Maracaibo, Guanarito (Portuguesa), South of Guarico, Puerto Nutrias and Puente Paez in Barinas, and Apure.
The plan is part of the President's electoral manifesto to create an Orinoco-Apure axis development zone that will eventually link Venezuela with other countries via a waterways network.  http://vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=2558

Economistaz
- e-mail: deafwords@hotmail.com
- Homepage: http://vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=2706

Comments

Display the following 2 comments

  1. Blar Blar Blar — Jimmy
  2. I'm really interested. — gary
Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech