UNMOVIC Baath Operating Agency Commanding 9-11 -- Concealing WMD
David Hawkins | 04.06.2003 08:18
From:
David Hawkins, Forensic economics and data fusion
Research links below -- references on request
Text of open email for urgent attention:
George W. Bush, President of the United States of America,
Tom Flanagan, Office, Canada Official Opposition Party
James Rawlinson, British Consul-General, Vancouver,
Kevin Lamb, Australia Honorary Consul, Vancouver,
Joe Clark, M.P., Former prime minister of Canada,
Tony OBrien, New Zealand Consul, Vancouver
UNMOVIC Baath Operating Agency Commanding 9-11 -- Concealing WMD
On the morning of September 11, 2001, a mission control team inside the United Nations headquarters in New York, used standard USAF instrument approach procedures to steer four hijacked jets precisely into the heart of America.
The UN team a.k.a a special operating agency was created by Saddam Husseins half brother and ex-Baath Party intelligence boss, Barzan al-Tikriti, to run surveillance and sabotage attacks on America from inside the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) in New York.
The radical-lefts strategy of attacking America by corrupting the United Nations, was conceived in Geneva in 1989 through a joint venture between the Baathist al-Tikriti families in Iraq and the Liberal Chretien-Desmarais families of Canada.
In 1988, Barzan al-Tikriti became Iraqs delegate to the UN Human Rights Commission in Geneva and took responsibility for Baath party finances abroad.
In 1988, the extended business family of France Chretien-Desmarais, daughter of Canadas present Liberal prime minister, Jean Chretien, was preparing to take control of Pargesa (Paribas Geneve S.A.), the UNs discreet bank for dictators.
Pargesa is the private wealth-management arm of French-controlled Paribas, operator of the worlds most powerful kick-back and money-laundering network and the corrupting custodian of an escrow account in New York which has now received $64 billion of Iraqi oil revenues under the UNs oil-for-food programme.
In 2001, the big question for the joint-venture families, however, remained. How could they meet the conditions laid down by Baath party leaders before Pargesa investments in the worlds fourth largest oil company, TotalFinaElf, could benefit from expanded oil production at the Majnoon field, near the Iranian border?
Saddam Hussein and his Baath cronies had attached three conditions to this immensely-lucrative concession. (He made a similar deal with the Russians).
1. UN sanctions on Iraqi oil exports must be lifted.
2. The UN Security Council must stop any invasion of Iraq by America.
3. Iraqs weapons of mass destruction must be concealed outside the country
Barzan al-Tikriti met the last condition by ordering the UNMOVIC surveillance and sabotage team in New York to transfer Iraqs WMD to Canada.
To satisfy Saddam, the Chretien-Desmarais families gave UNMOVIC access to the Canadian Forces electronic warfare and electronic intelligence facilities, as mounted on Bombardiers combat support jets by Thales and Dassault of France.
Excluding an anthrax shipment found accidentally by the police in Brazil, the UNMOVIC mission controllers avoided interception of WMD shipments through the dual use of Canadian frigates, HMCS Iroquois and HMCS Halifax.
The other conditions were not met. The French, Canadians and Russians lost their oil concessions. The UN Security Council failed to block the invasion by the American-led coalition of the willing.
The rest is history, including the absence of WMD inside Iraq.
What is not yet history, is the probable deployment of Iraqs WMD in Canada by Parisien Research Corporation of Ottawa, a special operating agency concealed inside the alternative service delivery arm of the department of national defence.
Chronology on request, one quote below:
May 2003: Baath leaders took $2 to 3 billion in bribes and kickbacks from the U.N. oil-for-food program. Benon Sevan, UN undersecretary-general who oversees the oil-for-food program, "Everybody knew it, and those who were in a position to do something about it, were not doing anything", "I have no power", "We don't do that [i.e. scrutinize]. I'm sorry.
David Hawkins
e-mail:
david@eazeway.org
Homepage:
http://www.eazeway.org
Comments
Display the following 3 comments