Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Sell out of Farnborough town centre

Keith Parkins | 05.06.2004 13:32 | Analysis | Social Struggles

Wednesday evening 2 June 2004, the people of Farnborough were sold out to a Kuwaiti-financed property company by the people who allegedly are elected to represent their interests. No small wonder few people these days take the trouble to vote.


Farnborough town centre is owned lock stock and barrel by Kuwaiti-financed property company KPI. They have owned the town centre for well over 5 years, and in that time laid waste to the town centre, reducing it to a ghost town. Two ugly blocks have been erected, one with 28 squatly flats above shops. The units have only been filled by moving around the few remaining retailers in the town, at least one set of units was let at peppercorn rents as the only way of filling them. KPI now wish to demolish the northern half of the town centre, plus a group of 28 maisonettes to make way for a car park for a superstore. Outline planing was granted for this a couple of years ago, but Rushmoor were forced to reconsider the application by means of a Judicial Review.

Rushmoor planning committee were told, the application, which was back before them, was back due to a High Court ruling. The judge had given leave for a judicial review on planning consent previously unlawfully granted by the chairman and head of planning granting outline planning permission in secret behind closed doors. The council were given a choice: either quash the planning consent and start again or be subject to a judicial review of their previous decision. The judge made it clear he did not wish to see them back before him. Following a great deal of bravado where Rushmoor claimed they had won the case, they humiliatingly bowed to the inevitable and quashed the previously granted consent.

Prior to the meeting, Rushmoor received a letter from Richard Button solicitors. This forced the planning officials to modify their recommendations. The letter was not circulated. A summary of the key points of the letter was flashed on a screen. The summary was not circulated.

 http://www.richardbuxton.co.uk

It was claimed a satisfactory retail impact assessment had been carried out. No details were provided, not even a one page summary. The survey, I learnt after the meeting, was carried out by KPI (the developer) or their agents.

It was claimed by at least two councillors, including Paul Taylor and Roland Dibbs, that at least 99.5% of Farnborough residents wanted the redevelopment, and it was strongly implied, but not stated, that it was only a handful of troublemakers who were holding up the redevelopment, ie destruction, of Farnborough town centre. They had made similar statements in a Tory pre-election leaflet, prejuducng their opinions at the committee.

I am told Pat Devereux, committee vice-chairman, had put out a similar Tory pre-election leaflet, welcoming the town centre redevelopment. I accept my comments are hearsay, but if such a leaflet was circulated, then Pat Devereux prejudiced her position on the committee and should have left the room. No interest was declared. She spoke in favour of the application and voted for the application.

From conversation with local residents and the few remaining retailers, there is strong local opposition to the proposed the town centre redevelopment, but following several years of laying waste to the town centre by the developers, it is recognised that some form of redevelopmentt is now desperately needed, although whether it will bring back to the town shoppers and retailers remains to be seen.

It was claimed that the the human rights of the residents of Firgrove Court were not affected, those whose home are earmarked for demolition for a supermarket. At no time were the human right affected explicitly mentioned nor how they were to be addressed. Two councillors, Roland Dibbs and Neville Dewey dismissed the human rights issue as 'a red herring', the sole discussion of human rights.

Firgrove Court tenants are not the only ones at risk of losing their homes. Tenants who live in the flats above the shops due for demolition are also at risk of being made homeless. They did not even merit a mention, let alone their human rights be discussed.

It was admitted that the percentage of 'affordable housing' was not being met, but this was a case of juggling the figures. One councillor said this was okay as it was very expensive real estate.

At the beginning of the meeting, three councillors declared they had a vested interest through their links with Pavilion, but did not state what these links were. All three, Sue Dibble, Charlie Fraser-Fleming and Roger Kimber, are board members of Pavilion! Pavilion is the Housing Association which owns Firgrove Court and is selling the land to KPI and doing KPI's dirty work for them by kicking out their tenants. Not a single councillor left the room. All three voted in favour of the redevelopment, at least two spoke in favour of the redevelopment.

When it was suggested that some of the Firgrove tenants could be made homeless, Pavilion board member Sue Dibble viciously denounced such a suggestion, stating it would make a bad headline in the local press.

Some of the Firgrove tenants are 'secure' tenants, thus have minimal level of security. Others have no security at all. These latter tenants were some time ago given Notice to Quit.

Chairman Eddie Poole was unfit to chair the meeting due to past vicious attacks he has made on objectors in the local press. He did not leave the room. He spoke in favour of the redevelopment saying he wanted it to go ahead as soon as possible. He voted for the KPI plans.

The redevelopment includes leisure facilities. As a local taxi driver, Poole is a direct financial beneficiary were the redevelopment to go ahead. Poole did not declare this interest, nor that he is already under investigation by the Standards Board for England for England for his previous crass comments.

Another councillor, Paul Taylor, declared an interest. Although he did not declare all his interests: manages a shop in the town centre, trustee of same shop, KPI tenant. He did not leave the room. He spoke in favour of the town centre redevelopment and voted for it.

Paul Taylor made the point he would at some point like to see evidence of consultation. It was admitted that no consultation had taken place for this resubmitted application. The public are of the view that no consultation has ever taken place.

My own detailed opposition to these plans was mentioned and summarized in a single paragraph of a handful of lines.

 http://www.heureka.clara.net/surrey-hants/kpi.htm

The committee voted in favour of the application with one abstention.

Following the letter from Richard Buxton solicitors, Rushmoor were forced to hastily re-write their resolution. A Section 106 planning agreement is be drawn up which prevents the demolition of Firgrove Court unless alternative accommodation is offered. But the wording is so weak, that it affords little protection to the Firgrove tenants.

The modified resolution was placed before the committee that evening. No one had had the opportunity to see it before or comment on it.

No similar protection is on offer for the tenants in the flats above the shops or for the few remaining retailers.

KPI in the meantime have submitted a completely new application, which makes the entire exercise somewhat pointless.

There are expected to be further legal challenges.

For the last five years, Rushmoor councillors have stood idly by as KPI have laid waste to the town centre. Wednesday night they gave that destruction their official blessing.

Rushmoor must be one of the few councils that presides over the destruction of its own town centre.

Apart from the developers and the local press, I was the only one who troubled to attend the committee. One reason why councillors get away with so much. No one demands accountability. And this a mere eight days before local elections.

A report is to be filed with the Standards Board for England seeking immediate suspension of all councillors who pushed through this planning application even though they had vested interests and/or had prejudiced the application by their previous comments or like the chairman with his vicious attack on objectors demonstrated himself to be unfit to be on the committee. The report calls for the immediate suspension of named councillors pending a detailed investigation.

Committee chairman Eddie Poole is a candidate in the forthcoming local elections (10 June 2004). Described by a local Tory as a 'loose cannon' and following his crass comments in the local press, Poole was deselected from a safe Tory seat which he has held for many years. Poole was offered a safe Labour seat! One of the candidates in the seat, and likely to win, is local campaigner Peter Sandy, who has done much to highlight the ill treatment of Pavilion tenants and lack of repairs. Poole seems to be ever more desperate. He has put out a leaflet describing Peter Sandy as a 'bully boy', for acting for tenants against Pavilion. A formal complaint has already been lodged with the Returning Officer. It will be poetic justice if Peter Sandy wins the seat and Poole comes a poor third. Already under pressure from regulators, Pavilion chief executive Mervyn Jones is expected to resign should Peter Sandy be elected.

The chairing of the committee by Poole left much to be desired. During the discussion of an application to erect a mobile phone mast, he tried to silence a councillor who was attempting to cite government guidance that would have strengthened the case to reject the application. On another item on the agenda, he told the committee how to vote and called for a vote to be taken before there had been any discussion.

A few weeks before the planning committee met, KPI were forced into a humiliating out-of-court settlement. KPI were forced to pay compensation and cover all legal costs for the nuisance and aggravation they had caused during their construction of new retail units on the old Post Office site. They were also forced to recognise the rights of a residential tenant, that until then, they had refused to recognise. Rushmoor turned a convenient blind eye to the number of planning infringements that took place during construction, many of which took place daily. No enforcement action was ever taken, or even contemplated, by Rushmoor.

Ref

Farnborough town centre, BVEJ newsletter, January 2004

Keith Parkins, Town & Out II, Corporate Watch, 14 January 2004

Simon Coughlin, Delays annoy councillors, Farnborough News, 6 February 2004

Simon Coughlin, Town plans forced back, Farnborough News, 20 February 2004

Council wins court case on Farnborough town centre, press release, Rushmoor Borough Council, 17 February 2004

Keith Parkins, Trashing of Farnborough Town Centre, Indymedia UK, 11 November 2002

Keith Parkins, Trashing of Farnborough Town Centre, Indymedia UK, 14 November 2002

Keith Parkins, Farnborough didn't need KPI scheme, letters, Farnborough News, 5 September 2003

Keith Parkins, Farnborough town centre, Indymedia UK, 8 September 2003

Keith Parkins, Farnborough town centre – compulsory purchase orders, 16 October 2003

Keith Parkins, Farnborough town centre judicial review, press release, 18 February 2004

Keith Parkins, Farnborough town centre judicial review, Indymedia UK, 18 February 2004

Keith Parkins, Objectors should be listened to, letters, Farnborough News, 20 February 2004

Keith Parkins
- Homepage: http://www.heureka.clara.net/surrey-hants/kpi.htm

Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech