Watch Rense.com for breakthrough 9/11 discussion on Thur. the 29th
Bob Nichols | 29.06.2006 17:19 | Anti-militarism
"9/11 Cough - More Than Just Asthma" Indeed.
Moret will discuss the presence of uranium at the WTC on 9/11/01 after the demolition of the Trade Towers and Building No 7.
Moret just confirmed the show for the 29th in California.
Regards,
Bob Nichols
Project Censored Award Winner
Correspondent, San Francisco Bay View newspaper
Bob Nichols
Comments
Hide the following 10 comments
Lizard-Man unmasked ?
29.06.2006 18:01
Rense still hosting all that Nazi stuff ? Doesn't that give you a clue about his mentality ? What a fucking idiot that man is, and what an interesting mindset you must be to quote him here. You are a faker, a racist and a moron and I can tell that from one post.
Hey, since this is a British site, if you are going to quote nutters as authorities, why not quote the homegrown psychos ? More David Ickes, that's what I say.
Dan
Dupe repost of dodgy loon tosh!
29.06.2006 19:56
Ug!
Why some want you to forget Blair's last major false flag, 911.
30.06.2006 01:12
FALSE FLAGS are planned and put into operation for one main reason- in order to massively accelerate the ability to use overwhelming military force. The US has the power, but rarely the political circumstances that allow it to use the degree of force that it feels would be effective.
The first Gulf War created the model for the military actions that 911 was designed to make possible for the second Gulf War, when Saddam had forgot to give the US a convenient excuse. The US in coalition with other major partners, and the US able to strike as hard as it likes from day one.
A FALSE FLAG is the cheapest military weapon, given its effectiveness, that can ever be used. However, unlike a bomb or a bullet, false flags are NOT easy options, and suffer from the need to maintain the official cover story for as long as the political regime that used it exists. The protection of one major false flag from the attention of those that are aware of this kind of military strategy seriously complicates the use of other major false flags in the immediate future.
How long does any monster waging AGGRESSIVE WAR seek excuses for their wars, before the monster decides that they can drop the pretence, and just go with "might is right"? Easy answer- consult some history books.
Blair probably needs one more major false flag for his ultimate rule breaking war with Iran. This is why his New Reich trolls, as found above, will scream ever louder "IGNORE EVERYTHING THAT BLAIR'S ENEMIES SAY ABOUT 911". They will give this excuse, and that excuse, but all that matters to them is the message "IGNORE 911".
They are buying Blair the little more time and space they think he needs. Read today's psy-op stories in Blair's mass media, and you will see a report from Blair's people themselves STATING THAT IRAN IS PLANNING TERRORIST ATTACKS WITHIN THE UK. Blair's prefered false flag plan is an 'assassination' attempt against Blair that leaves him (of course) unharmed, but wipes out a large number of us. This is suppose to both make us ready for war against Iran, and put us on the same victimhood side as Blair. The very fact that people like myself talk about Blair's potential plans makes them harder to carry out, since false flags require prior secrecy and suprise if at all possible. However, if Blair decides that he can bounce into action quickly enough of such an event, this won't really deter him.
WHY? Because today, Blair says that it doesnt matter how 'we' (scumbag actually always speaks on behalf of 'us') got into Iraq, what matters is we are there. The same stunt will be pulled with Iran. Once Blair's war starts, his goons will say that only stupid people insist on endlessly going on about the circumstances that started it, and anyway, everyone must get behind our 'boys'.
When Blair has it known that he is a 'target', and Blair has it known that Iran is "planning terror strikes in the UK", he is preparing the media explanations that will be given to explain the circumstances of the atrocity that in reality Blair himself is planning. In the game of PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS, things must never happen "out of the blue". The man in the street MUST say, when reading the newspaper lies afterwards, "yes, we were warned that the bad guys were going to do something like this".
Blair's goons will say, ignore this person if he cannot ACCURATELY and TO THE DAY predict the events of Blair's next false flag. However, all people like myself have to go on is the information that Blair has his people disseminate in all the media outlets that his people have access to. Memes and other information make it clear to 100% certainty that Blair is going to war with Iran. The initial issues of such a war are understandable from current legal and geopolitical analysis. The obstacles that Blair must clear in order to wage this war are also easy to identify. The means by which these obstacles will be cleared I do not know, but I know the method used for Afghanistan and Iraq, and a method proved successful once will ALWAYS be at the top of the list the next time.
Therefore, it is of no suprise that Blair is always laying down the groundwork for another false flag. Given how few times the actual use of this tactic will work, and the risk of spoiling the method by using it for trivial reasons, it can be guessed that it is vastly easy to plan, but very hard to justify execution. And those that plan a crime will always be paranoid about it going wrong, even when analysis shows this to be most unlikely.
Blair's biggest fear will be the wildcards of world events. If he doesn't act soon, the Iranians may be able to activate some distraction plan with the US, like the current stuff with N. Korea (remember that your common racist redneck in Bush's powerbase 'knows' that the North Koreans are far smarter and more dangerous "devils" than those "lazy ill-educated religious nutcases" of Iran). N Korea is happy to bait the US, having vast experience of this tactic. The US finds it near impossible to give powerful propaganda attention to two regimes at the same time.
We are told that the current stage of diplomatic time is ending soon for Iran, but Iran knows this game all too well, and can easily produce a next stage, and then a next. Knowing this, and knowing that Blair's war is a certainty, you can understand that something has to give. Maybe some of you think that Blair will simple continue with the strategy of building more and more anti Iran rhetoric, but this is unlikely, given that public fatigue will set in as soon as it becomes apparent to even the stupidest that Iran never does anything bad in the way most people would care about.
One way or another, the Iran war ***WILL*** need an excuse. Those that commented above do not want you anticipating that excuse.
twilight
Funny
30.06.2006 03:45
911 = PNAC, CIA, Mossad
Don't flatter yourself.
30.06.2006 10:44
Just fuck off somewhere more appropriate.
Plant
yeah what ever next
30.06.2006 16:59
which promptly collapse into their own foot print, they'll be telling us next that the world is run by a masonic cabal of bankers who have supposedly controlled the world from time and now aided and abetted by their mates in the big pharmacuetical and petro chemical companies they have just about achieved world domination. Only one small problem in doing so they destroyed the planet .. oh well there is still time to play at being activists, save the whale and jolly hockey sticks !!!!
LSDick
care in the community
30.06.2006 19:56
Away back to dense.com with it's nazi propaganda you bunch of fakers.
Danny
Tsk!
30.06.2006 21:31
Your comments about the global power structure revel you for the juvenile you are- it's been this way for long before you were born.
Go play with yer pseudoactivist mates on the motorway and do us all a favour.
All u have to offer to IMUK is unsubstantiated shite and NO ACTION.
That makes you an INactivist.
Speaks volumes.
Take your head out Alex Jones' arse and do something REAL.
Linda LePlant
I'm just a bigging myself up activist
01.07.2006 09:42
lot's of assumptions and plenty of statements based on the way of the world, official version thhat is.
1) I do not care for alex jones or his arse for that matter, his position is certainly not mine.
2) david icke writes very interesting books, most of the content are basic historical facts with a lavish new age cream topping and some serious ego bullshit. the lizards were a late insertion to his book "the biggest secret"
probably from more secret form(s) of the CIA. I do not trust Icke and do not know why he writes his books.
3) my activist activities range from , anti incineration, anti hunting / cruelty to animals, monitoring one of the largest chemcial companies. I am also into the links between organized crime / freemasonry / politcal institutions which when looked at on a world wide level brings one into the conspiracy theory net.
4) my experiences with greenpiss and the world wildlife fraud have spawned a very ironic Kill the whales T shirt
5) as the waters become muddier it will be difficult to see anything let alone the whole truth and nothing but the truth as it seems that most people are willing to accept the official version anyway I wonder will it make any difference.
6) example dan brown writes a bullshit book about some well forged historical events. the church doesn't like what he writes and commissions 16 books to counter his so called Da Vinci code.
I wonder where you will find the truth about Leonardo da Vinci . Vinci a little village 40k west of florence.
7) you see cara linda the situation is a lot more complicated than that no doubt you are also of the "left"
and hate the dirty bastards of the right .. the BNP and all that thang ..
as you so rightly say this whole left and right thing was around long before i was born, saints and sinners.
my favourite conspiracy theorists is Lee scratch Perry who says "open your eyes and you will see"
in one of my all time favourite tracks .. bank to bank ..
ps T shirts €10 to "real activists" ooops I hit the wrong image and it's not the hard rock radical chic version
LSDick
Rense breakthrough on anti-christ & armageddon
01.07.2006 14:27
Really, anyone who believes the credibility of Rense.com should run for the hills and prepare for the rapture.
Abu Abbas Dies In US Custody - Is He Mabus Of Prophecy?
http://www.rense.com/general50/abbas.htm
Is Bush Mabus? http://www.rense.com/general21/mabus.htm
Is Saddam ? http://www.rense.com/general35/proh.htm
Nostradamus Prophecies And WTC - Separating False From Real
http://www.rense.com/general14/nostradamus.htm
Comparing Apocalypses - All Roads Seem To Point To Catastrophe
http://www.rense.com/general30/compare.htm
Nostradamus And WWIII
http://www.rense.com/general19/nostr.htm
'Axis Of Evil' And The Terror Triumvirate Foreseen By Nostradamus
http://www.rense.com/general19/axis.htm
DO ALIEN POWERS EXIST?
http://www.rense.com/ufo/siberiaevac.htm
Omen Update - Nostradamus' Comet
http://www.rense.com/general35/omen.htm
Nostradamus And The Planned War Upon Iraq
http://www.rense.com/general34/plannd.htm
Russia, Fatima, Abortion, Children, Terror & the Future
http://www.rense.com/general57/rusfar.htm
The California Earthquake - Coming May 10th 2001 ?
http://www.rense.com/general9/may.htm
Danny