London Bombings Mastermind is MI6 Asset/Lecturer Denounces Critics on 911
911 = PNAC, CIA, Mossad | 10.07.2006 19:57 | Repression | World
The complete inability of the War Criminals to prove their Official 911 Conspiracy Theory, in nearly four years, coupled with the desperate measures being employed to silence critics and skeptics, pretty much proves the case.
All that is missing now are the details.
All that is missing now are the details.
Terror Expert: London Bombings Mastermind is MI6 Asset
Submitted by Rabindranath on July 8, 2006 - 9:15pm. 7/7 bombing | false flag terrorist attacks | MI5 | state terrorism
"This information is startling and again highlights how Al Qaeda exists as an organized body only where the intelligence services have created, funded and employed it."
Group was used by Brits in Kosovo in the late 90s
Infowars | August 2 2005 By Steve Watson
The Dud Bombers of 21/7, the patsies, have all been rounded up along with 18 others currently under questioning, yet the so called "mastermind" is allowed to go free and is protected time and time again by MI5, MI6, FBI and CIA. The same thing happened in 93 with the WTC bombing, 95 with the OKC bombing, 01 with 911 and its happening again, its the same type of operation EVERYTIME.
The July 29 edition of FOX News Channel's Day Side programme revealed that the so called mastermind of the 7/7 London Bombings, Haroon Rashid Aswat, is a British Intelligence Asset. Former Justice Dept. prosecutor and Terror expert John Loftus revealed that the so called Al-Muhajiroun group, based in London had formed during the Kosovo crisis, during which Fundamentalist Muslim Leaders (Or what is now referred to as Al Qaeda) were recruited by MI6 to fight in Kosovo.
Loftus stated that "...back in the late 1990s, the leaders all worked for British intelligence in Kosovo. Believe it or not, British intelligence actually hired some Al-Qaeda guys to help defend the Muslim rights in Albania and in Kosovo. That's when Al-Muhajiroun got started."
We have previously revealed how former MI5 officer David Shayler has alleged, and French intel sources have corroborated, that the MI6 paid a Libyan al-Qa'ida cell £100,000 in 1995 to assassinate colonel Qaddafi. The use of the group that has come to be known as "Al Qaeda" as assets by Intelligence services the world over is well documented.
The London Independent also reported 2 days before the London Bombings how MI5 has previously used so called Al Qaeda operatives as informants, allowing them to be left alone as a trade off.
Former Justice Dept. prosecutor John Loftus on Fox's Day Side
This only came to light when Bisher al-Rawi was captured by the CIA and taken to the detention centre at Guantanamo Bay. The original Independent link has now mysteriously been removed.
John Loftus went on to spell out that British Intelligence and the US dept of Justice had protected Haroon Rashid Aswat: "Back in 1999 he came to America. The Justice Department wanted to indict him in Seattle because him and his buddy were trying to set up a terrorist training school in Oregon... we've just learned that the headquarters of the US Justice Department ordered the Seattle prosecutors not to touch Aswat... , apparently Aswat was working for British intelligence"
Photo
Haroon Aswat, the so called mastermind of the London bombings with Radical cleric Abu Hamza al Masri in a London cab on Jan. 20, 1999.
This information is startling and again highlights how Al Qaeda exists as an organized body only where the intelligence services have created, funded and employed it. Loftus points out that several weeks before the London Bombings, Aswat was again located by the South African Intel agency but again allowed to slip away, this time to London:
"He was a British intelligence plant. So all of a sudden he disappears. He's in South Africa. We think he's dead; we don't know he's down there. Last month the South African Secret Service come across the guy. He's alive...the Brits know that the CIA wants to get a hold of Haroon. So what happens? He takes off again, goes right to London. He isn't arrested when he lands, he isn't arrested when he leaves... He's on the watch list. The only reason he could get away with that was if he was working for British intelligence. He was a wanted man."
Loftus' information is backed up by the New York Times and CNN who reported on this incident also.
We have seen this many times before and have continued to expose this kind of activity. Mr Aswat is not the only "Al Qaeda operative" who has been protected While in the US - the 19 9/11 hijackers and their associate Zaccharias Moussaoui seem to have been as well. FBI Agent Robert Wright blew the whistle on obstruction of counterterrorism investigations targeting Hamas and al-Qaeda before 911. The sabotage by the highest levels in the FBI of Coleen Rowley's desperate attempt to investigate Moussaoui, for instance, is a striking parallel to the "hands-off" order regarding Aswat, and it's far from being the only one. The CIA met with Bin Laden in July 2001 in a Dubai hospital where he was being treated for Kidney problems. They gleaned detailed information regarding possible massive terror attacks on the US, yet Bin Laden was allowed to slip away (either that or he passed away). Bin Laden is or was a known CIA Asset.
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, mysteriously arrested as the alleged mastermind behind the September 11 plot, was granted a visa to enter the US just six weeks before the terrorist attacks in Washington and New York. The American Al Qaeda operative, Iyman Faris, who planned to bring down the Brooklyn Bridge was also revealed to be an FBI operative. We also have several other reports staing how the men used as hijackers on the planes on 911 were monitored before the event and allowed to enter the US. They were even trained at US flight schools.
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
After 911 these so called terrorists have been allowed to go on with business as usual, despite the "war on terror" and in many instances have been protected. It seems that the authorities find it more useful to restrict the liberties of law abiding citizens by introducing draconian restrictive laws such as the Patriot act and Free speech zoning, whilst allowing those they label as terrorists to go undetected.
Haroon Rashid Aswat allegedly left London for Pakistan on July 6, one day before the London bombing. He was then arrested in Pakistan, but released AGAIN within 24 hours. He reportedly traveled to Zimbabwe and then Zambia, where he may have been arrested again (conflicting reports). Why does the so called mastermind of 7/7 keep being released and allowed to slip away? It the same type of operation over and over again.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FULL TRANSCRIPT: The July 29 edition of FOX News Channel's Day Side programme:
MIKE JERRICK [FOX NEWS]: John Loftus is a terrorism expert and a former prosecutor for the Justice Department. John, good to see you again. So real quickly here, have you heard anything about this Osman Hussain who was just picked up in Rome? You know that name at all?
JOHN LOFTUS: Yeah, all these guys should be going back to an organization called Al-Muhajiroun, which means The Emigrants. It was the recruiting arm of Al-Qaeda in London; they specialized in recruiting kids whose families had emigrated to Britain but who had British passports. And they would use them for terrorist work.
JERRICK: So a couple of them now have Somali connections?
LOFTUS: Yeah, it was not unusual. Somalia, Eritrea, the first group of course were primarily Pakistani. But what they had in common was they were all emigrant groups in Britain, recruited by this Al-Muhajiroun group. They were headed by the, Captain Hook, the imam in London the Finsbury Mosque, without the arm. He was the head of that organization. Now his assistant was a guy named Aswat, Haroon Rashid Aswat.
JERRICK: Aswat, who they picked up.
LOFTUS: Right, Aswat is believed to be the mastermind of all the bombings in London.
JERRICK: On 7/7 and 7/21, this is the guy we think.
LOFTUS: This is the guy, and what's really embarrassing is that the entire British police are out chasing him, and one wing of the British government, MI6 or the British Secret Service, has been hiding him. And this has been a real source of contention between the CIA, the Justice Department, and Britain.
JERRICK: MI6 has been hiding him. Are you saying that he has been working for them?
LOFTUS: Oh I'm not saying it. This is what the Muslim sheik said in an interview in a British newspaper back in 2001.
JERRICK: So he's a double agent, or was?
LOFTUS: He's a double agent.
JERRICK: So he's working for the Brits to try to give them information about Al-Qaeda, but in reality he's still an Al-Qaeda operative.
LOFTUS: Yeah. The CIA and the Israelis all accused MI6 of letting all these terrorists live in London not because they're getting Al-Qaeda information, but for appeasement. It was one of those you leave us alone, we leave you alone kind of things.
JERRICK: Well we left him alone too long then.
LOFTUS: Absolutely. Now we knew about this guy Aswat. Back in 1999 he came to America. The Justice Department wanted to indict him in Seattle because him and his buddy were trying to set up a terrorist training school in Oregon.
JERRICK: So they indicted his buddy, right? But why didn't they indict him?
LOFTUS: Well it comes out, we've just learned that the headquarters of the US Justice Department ordered the Seattle prosecutors not to touch Aswat.
JERRICK: Hello? Now hold on, why?
LOFTUS: Well, apparently Aswat was working for British intelligence. Now Aswat's boss, the one-armed Captain Hook, he gets indicted two years later. So the guy above him and below him get indicted, but not Aswat. Now there's a split of opinion within US intelligence. Some people say that the British intelligence fibbed to us. They told us that Aswat was dead, and that's why the New York group dropped the case. That's not what most of the Justice Department thinks. They think that it was just again covering up for this very publicly affiliated guy with Al-Muhajiroun. He was a British intelligence plant. So all of a sudden he disappears. He's in South Africa. We think he's dead; we don't know he's down there. Last month the South African Secret Service come across the guy. He's alive.
JERRICK: Yeah, now the CIA says, oh he's alive. Our CIA says OK let's arrest him. But the Brits say no again?
LOTFUS: The Brits say no. Now at this point, two weeks ago, the Brits know that the CIA wants to get a hold of Haroon. So what happens? He takes off again, goes right to London. He isn't arrested when he lands, he isn't arrested when he leaves.
JERRICK: Even though he's on a watch list.
LOFTUS: He's on the watch list.The only reason he could get away with that was if he was working for British intelligence. He was a wanted man.
JERRICK: And then takes off the day before the bombings, I understand it--
LOFTUS: And goes to Pakistan.
JERRICK: And Pakistan, they jail him.
LOFTUS: The Pakistanis arrest him. They jail him. He's released within 24 hours. Back to Southern Africa, goes to Zimbabwe and is arrested in Zambia. Now the US--
JERRICK: Trying to get across the--
LOFTUS: --we're trying to get our hands on this guy.
JERRICK: John, hang around. I have so many questions now.
LOFTUS: Oh, this is a bad one....
[commercial break]
JERRICK: On the phone with us, Mansoor Ijaz; Mansoor you know very well here at Fox News Channel and Dayside. Mansoor, real quickly here, you spent so much time in London, you're probably not that as impressed as I am about how fast Scotland Yard has worked on this case. So impressive, so successful. Why?
MANSOOR IJAZ: Well there are two things that a lot of domestic intelligence agencies don't around the world. One is an extraordinarily detailed database of information, and that database is buttressed by the fact that they have these photos, the graphic images of the faces of the people that they were looking for. So it saved them a lot of time when they got the forensic evidence, like fingerprints or other things that indicated where they could actually go find these people. Because remember, there was a lot of data left on the stuff these guys left behind from the failed bombing attack, and that's what helped to really unravel the cell. Now--
JERRICK: I guess--go ahead, Mansoor.
IJAZ: Now I think there's one very important thing that I think everybody needs to know. And that is that the cellular structure that this new breed of Al-Qaeda people have is such that there is not a clear indication that they all knew each other as much as it is that they had some sort of central control still sitting outside of the framework. Whether that's in a foreign country or a place that is removed from Britain and other place in Europe, that's what we're still looking for. But it's very clear now that these cellular structures were operating independent of each other, but with knowledge that something else was in fact planned in the pipeline.
JERRICK: Real quick, Mansoor. In that regard, maybe a ringleader could be this Haroon Aswat. What do you know about him?
IJAZ: Well, he's a pretty bad guy, and I think your previous guest gave the best assessment of who he is. He's the right hand man of the Al-Muhajiroun leader in London, and has been organizing and planning for some time. And I don't want to minimize the effect of the arrest in Rome, because what that indicates is that the cellular structure is elsewhere and we all know that Italy is a big target on their list.
JERRICK: OK, speaking of him, back to the comments by our John Loftus a little while ago. A question from the audience for you, John. Go ahead.
AUDIENCE MEMBER: Hi Mr Loftus. I recently read a book by Morris Dees called The Gathering Storm , and it talks about extremist militia groups in the United States and how they might be manipulated by some people's rhetoric, very similar to Aswat in London. What do you think the US is doing to prevent terrorist attacks on our own soil that happen--
JERRICK: You're worried about it here?
AUDIENCE MEMBER: Yes, sir.
LOFTUS: The US government's doing a great job. We arrested the New York branch of Al-Muhajiroun two years ago. We found the subway bombers with the plans to blow up two different subway stations in New York City. The rest of the group is under surveillance. But the US was used by Al-Muhajiroun for training of people to send to Kosovo. What ties all these cells together was, back in the late 1990s, the leaders all worked for British intelligence in Kosovo. Believe it or not, British intelligence actually hired some Al-Qaeda guys to help defend the Muslim rights in Albania and in Kosovo. That's when Al-Muhajiroun got started.
IJAZ: Which is by the way why we know so much about them right now.
LOFTUS: Yes, I'm afraid so. The CIA was funding the operation to defend the Muslims, British intelligence was doing the hiring and recruiting. Now we have a lot of detail on this because Captain Hook, the head of Al-Muhajiroun, he sidekick was Bakri Mohammed, another cleric. And back on October 16, 2001, he gave a detailed interview with al-Sharq al-Aswat, an Arabic newspaper in London, describing the relationship between British intelligence and the operations in Kosovo and Al-Muhajiroun. So that's how we get all these guys connected. It started in Kosovo, Haroon was 31 years old, he came on about 1995.
JERRICK: OK. Here's another question for you.
AUDIENCE MEMBER: Hello, John. With the quid-pro-quo relationship that London obviously had with these terrorists early on, what changed that caused them to all of a sudden get away from the you leave us alone, we'll leave you alone situation?
LOFTUS: The Israelis say that the truce went on for years. Guys from Al-Muhajiroun for example would bring suicide bombers to Israel to blow up Mike's Place. There was a definite link there. And yet the trainer, Sadiki Al Kahn, was able to go back to Britain and not be touched. What the Israelis believe happened is that Usama Bin Laden got desperate, and he said burn all our bridges--let's turn on the British. Break the truce, start the bombs.
JERRICK: Speaking of Usama Bin Laden, Mansoor, real quickly, maybe Scotland Yard and those folks over there, the Brits, should be looking for Usama Bin Laden. They seem to be so successful.
LOFTUS: The British police do a remarkable job.
IJAZ: Well, that's an interesting comment. The fact of the matter is, when you're dealing with it in your own backyard, and you have the computer infrastructure set up in such a way that you can immediately track these kinds of things that are in your backyard, it's a very different game from tracking them on places where we don't even have mountain maps any more of how the whole thing looks. So that's really what the fundamental problem is. If you'll permit me, I just want to, Mike, make one other very quick point.
JERRICK: Mansoor, can you hang over, do you have time hang over for a 30-second break here? John Loftus, got to cut you loose but thanks for the info. Boy, interesting stuff John...
[commercial break]
JERRICK: We have some more information from our Mansoor Ijaz, Fox News Foreign Affairs Analyst. Mansoor, still on the phone with me?
IJAZ: Yeah, I'm here with you Mike.
JERRICK: Talk about your information from British intel.
IJAZ: Well, let's not characterize the sources quite that way, but I've talked to some people who are analyzing what came out of the raids today, and there's a great deal of concern about the fact that there may be in fact a desire of these cells to move beyond transit systems as the target. And what specifically they found was evidence that indicates they're looking at now places where there are large collections of people, where they can actually take shopping bags and other large carrying bags of sorts without raising a lot of suspicion. Obviously shopping malls come immediately to mind, but it's important for everybody to know that London was planning on having a large I think it's a City Fair or something like that, I don't know what exactly it's called. They've now decided to go ahead with that, but it's obviously going to be much more scrutinized than it would have been before. Now London doesn't in general have a lot of large shopping malls, but they do have large concentrations of people in places at certain times during the week, and that's what apparently now has become the target, one of the new targets of these terrorist cells.
JERRICK: So Mansoor, when you hear that we have four for four, or four for five of these 7/21 bombers, nobody should fool themselves. This thing isn't over.
IJAZ: That is precisely the point I wanted to make sure everybody understood--that the authorities, the people that are worried about this and that are analyzing the data out of what they're getting in these raids, are basically saying we may have just hit the tip of the iceberg. This is not over by a long shot.
JERRICK: Mansoor, thank you for making that perfectly clear. Talk to you soon.
RELATED: Explosions In London
Click here to download video & view in external player
Click here for the quicktime version
http://www.infowars.com/articles/London_attack/mastermind_mi6_asset.htm
Lecturer Denounces Critics of 9-11 Teachings
Submitted by Pilgrim on July 10, 2006 - 12:52pm. 911 = PNAC | CIA | Mossad
I think if this action proceeds, Barrett should simply respond with a public challenge, that if an independent inquiry can support the Bush/PNAC Conspiracy Theory - upon which they manipulated and LIED the American public into two unwinnable, illegal wars of choice, from which they've earned fortunes - with the still-missing, compelling evidence which would exist, and be forthcoming, if it were true, then he'll resign voluntarily.
Lecturer denounces critics of his 9-11 teachings
(Actually, they're critics of HIM. They don't actually address his material, except to attach unsupported labels (Disinformation) to it)
'Inside job' theory draws calls for firing, UW probe
By MEGAN TWOHEY
mtwohey@journalsentinel.com
Posted: July 9, 2006
A University of Wisconsin-Madison lecturer who has sparked controversy by teaching that the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks were an inside job lashed out Sunday at public officials who have questioned his right to teach.
I've been teaching for 20 years. I dare say I know more about teaching than the governor of the state.
- Kevin Barrett, a lecturer at the University of Wisconsin in Madison
Quotable
There is no merit to his theory. All you had to have was a TV to know what happened on 9-11.
- Mark Graul,
spokesman for U.S. Rep. Mark Green (R-Wis.)
Recent Coverage
7/8/06: Doyle favors review of UW instructor
7/1/06: Sept. 11 claim stirs UW probe
(Interesting that they plan to probe the professor, but not the allegations or the evidence. Perhaps the hand of Lynne Cheney and "CampusWatch"?)
Speaking at a gathering at UW-Milwaukee, Kevin Barrett took aim at state Rep. Stephen Nass (R-Whitewater), U.S. Rep. Mark Green (R-Wis.) and Gov. Jim Doyle.
Doyle, a Democrat, joined the chorus of critics Friday by questioning whether Barrett has the "capacity to teach students in this state."
"I've been teaching for 20 years," Barrett told a crowd of more than 100, many of them cheering supporters. "I dare say I know more about teaching than the governor of the state."
The public sparring came as UW-Madison concludes a 10-day review of Barrett. The university is expected to announce early this week whether the part-time lecturer will be allowed to teach a class on Islam this fall, and if so, whether he will be able to share his theories on 9-11, as he plans to do.
UW spokesman Dennis Chaptman, who attended Sunday's event, said he was not in a position to comment.
Barrett, a bearded man with unkempt hair (interesting to include such a description ... Isn't there a picture attached to the story?), said in an interview that he had met with Provost Patrick Farrell twice last week. The provost, Barrett said, never suggested that he would be prevented from teaching the fall course titled, "Islam: Religion and Culture," at a salary of $8,247 (And listing the price?).
He said Farrell was open to his including theories that the Bush administration planned the 9-11 attacks for its own benefit in the class. Barrett has discussed these theories in a previous class on folklore.
"Basically, the rules of the university are such that it would be a gross violation of academic freedom to fire me," said Barrett, 47, who earned his PhD in African languages and literature from UW-Madison in 2004. "I don't think they'll stand in the way of my teaching. I think I'll basically be able to stick with the syllabus as it currently stands."
The theories that Barrett plans to include in his upcoming course are espoused by a small but vocal group of academics that includes Steven Jones, a physicist from Brigham Young University; David Ray Griffin, a retired professor from the Claremont School of Theology; and James H. Fetzer, a retired philosophy professor from the University of Minnesota-Duluth (Who recently had his life, and the lives of his children, threatened by Bush/PNAC supporters, after Hard Right websites supporting the criminal Regime asked readers to mine for information on his family).
Fetzer, a burly man with a booming voice, co-chairs a group called 9/11 Scholars for Truth. He outlined the theories at Sunday's gathering, saying:
• Explosives must have been detonated inside the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001, because the impact of the airplanes was not enough to bring down the twin towers.
• That the damage to the Pentagon was such that a smaller military plane, as opposed to a large commercial aircraft, must have flown into the Pentagon, shooting a missile as it went.
• That the debris of the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania was scattered so widely that it must have been shot down.
• That half a dozen of the men who are said to have hijacked the planes are still living in the Middle East.
"It's a myth," Fetzer said of the generally accepted view that Islamic terrorists were behind the attacks. "The American government has been practicing terrorism on its own people."
Barrett told the crowd that the Bush administration orchestrated the attacks to justify invading Iraq. He said the purpose to the war was to take control of oil and other resources in the Middle East.
"The 9-11 images were designed to make us stupid, little children," he said.
Nass has called on UW-Madison's chancellor, John Wiley, to fire Barrett, arguing that it is unacceptable for Barrett to use the university to add credibility to "outlandish claims."
Green, who is running for governor, has said that no public funding should be used to support Barrett's teaching.
Mark Graul, a spokesman for Green, said "that he's being paid to teach this garbage is putting a black eye on the whole state. There is no merit to his theory. All you had to have was a TV to know what happened on 9-11."
(Notice that these hysterical Bush/PNAC-controlled puppets don't actually address the material in question ...)
But many of those who attended Sunday's gathering disagreed.
John Boly, a literature professor at Marquette University, said Barrett should be able to share his theories in the classroom.
Maryann Stubbs, a computer programmer at UW-Madison, agreed. "I think that all viewpoints should be covered," she said.
Rick Goyett, a 21-year-old auto mechanic from Whitefish Bay, was convinced by the presentations.
"All you need is common sense to believe that 9-11 was an inside job," he said.
http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=459505
Scholars for 9/11 Truth under Attack
Member's children threatened by name, teacher's position under assault
Duluth, MN (PRWEB) July 2, 2006 --- The author of an article about the
attack on the World Trade Center has found himself under attack for having
published it in a new on-line publication, Journal of 9/11 Studies.
Entitled "The Flying Elephant", the article discusses evidence that a third
airplane was captured on video at the time of the WTC attack. He has now
received a thinly-veiled threat against his children, who are cited by
name, suggesting it would be a good idea if his article were to simply "go
away".
Scholars for 9/11 Truth is a non-partisan society of experts and scholars
committed to exposing falsehoods and revealing truths about the events of
9/11. The journal, which is archived at journalof911studies.com, is its
latest attempt to create forums for discussion and debate about these
important issues beyond its web site, which is archived at st911.org. The
author, Reynolds Dixon, a writer and Professor of English, former lecturer
and Fellow at Stanford University, has withdrawn from the society.
"Threats of this kind have no place in a democratic nation", said James
H. Fetzer, the founder of S9/11T. "These are the tactics of brown-shirts
and totalitarians who fear the discussion of controversial questions that
threaten the government's control over the governed. This is a despicable
act and we are not going to back down!" He added that the organization
itself will assume responsibility for the study, which Reynolds has
relinquished. "We cannot allow advances in understanding what happened on
9/11 to be suppressed by threats to our members. The stakes are simply
too high."
In Wisconsin, another member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, Kevin Barrett,
who has been active in efforts to inform the American people about
discoveries that have been made by Scholars--including that the Twin
Towers were destroyed, not by the impact of airplanes or the ensuing
fires, but by sophisticated controlled demolition; that Vice President
Dick Cheney gave a "stand down" order to not shoot down the plane
approaching the Pentagon; and that the FBI has now confirmed that it has
"no hard evidence" connecting Osama bin Laden to 9/11--confronts the loss
of his job.
A Wisconsin legislator, Stephen Nass, Republican of Whitewater, has called
for the University of Wisconsin-Madison to immediately fire him from his
teaching position. The UW Office of the Provost has announced that it will
conduct a 10-day review of Barrett's plans for an introductory fall course in
Islam and of his past performance as a teacher at UW-Madison. Provost Patrick
Farrell has endorsed his freedom of speech, but "We have an obligation to insure
that his course content is academically appropriate, of high quality, and that
he is not imposing his views on his students."
Prominent experts and scholars who are members of S9/11T include Steven Jones,
a professor of physics at Brigham Young University; Morgan Reynolds, former
Chief Economist for the Department of Labor in the George W. Bush
administration; Bob Bowman, who directed research on the "Star Wars"
program in both Republican and Democratic administrations; Andreas von
Buelow, the former director of Science and Technology for Germany; and David Ray
Griffin, professor emeritus of theology at the Claremont Graduate School and
author or editor of four books on the events of 9/11.
Concern about academic freedom at UW-Madison extends beyond the Scholars
group. Ron Rattner, an attorney from San Francisco, CA, for example, has
written to Provost Farrell with the observation that, "When teachers are
intimidated against seeking and speaking truth on a campus renowned for
its liberal and progressive traditions, we are in trouble". He added,
"Universities are for inquiries, not inquisitions. UW must operate in the
traditions of La Follette, not McCarthy". Robert La Follette was noted
as a progressive leader, while Joe McCarthy portrayed his opponents as
subversives.
Fetzer observed that the right wing is continuing to attack faculty who
speak out on 9/11. "During an appearance on Hannity & Colmes (June 22,
2006), with Ollie North sitting in for Hannity, I made points about controlled
demolition, the "stand down" order, and the FBI's position," he said,
"but but they were more interested in whether I was discussing these things with
my students than whether they were true." On a subsequent appearance on Laura
Ingraham's program (June 30, 2006), "She had her staff chanting about 'nutty
professors' before I was even introduced. Then, after I made some telling
points at the end of the program, they edited their archived copy and cut it off
after a long harangue attacking me. That is intellectually dishonest."
Many other members of S9/11T, including Morgan Reynolds and David Ray Griffin,
have spoken out in defense of academic freedom and in opposition to censorship
and curtailing research into 9/11. "These nasty threats against the children of
one member and the freedom of speech of another", Fetzer said, "make a sorry
statement about this nation on the eve of the 4th of July." Coincidentally,
Fetzer will appear with Barrett at the Mid-West Social Forum on Sunday, July 9,
2006, from 9-10:30 AM, at the Student Union of UW-Milwaukee, to discuss 9/11.
_____________________
Contact information:
James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.
Founder and Co-Chair
Scholars for 9/11 Truth
http://www.st911.org
(218) 726-7269 (office)
(218) 724-2706 (home)
http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/PressRelease_2Jul2006.html
Submitted by Rabindranath on July 8, 2006 - 9:15pm. 7/7 bombing | false flag terrorist attacks | MI5 | state terrorism
"This information is startling and again highlights how Al Qaeda exists as an organized body only where the intelligence services have created, funded and employed it."
Group was used by Brits in Kosovo in the late 90s
Infowars | August 2 2005 By Steve Watson
The Dud Bombers of 21/7, the patsies, have all been rounded up along with 18 others currently under questioning, yet the so called "mastermind" is allowed to go free and is protected time and time again by MI5, MI6, FBI and CIA. The same thing happened in 93 with the WTC bombing, 95 with the OKC bombing, 01 with 911 and its happening again, its the same type of operation EVERYTIME.
The July 29 edition of FOX News Channel's Day Side programme revealed that the so called mastermind of the 7/7 London Bombings, Haroon Rashid Aswat, is a British Intelligence Asset. Former Justice Dept. prosecutor and Terror expert John Loftus revealed that the so called Al-Muhajiroun group, based in London had formed during the Kosovo crisis, during which Fundamentalist Muslim Leaders (Or what is now referred to as Al Qaeda) were recruited by MI6 to fight in Kosovo.
Loftus stated that "...back in the late 1990s, the leaders all worked for British intelligence in Kosovo. Believe it or not, British intelligence actually hired some Al-Qaeda guys to help defend the Muslim rights in Albania and in Kosovo. That's when Al-Muhajiroun got started."
We have previously revealed how former MI5 officer David Shayler has alleged, and French intel sources have corroborated, that the MI6 paid a Libyan al-Qa'ida cell £100,000 in 1995 to assassinate colonel Qaddafi. The use of the group that has come to be known as "Al Qaeda" as assets by Intelligence services the world over is well documented.
The London Independent also reported 2 days before the London Bombings how MI5 has previously used so called Al Qaeda operatives as informants, allowing them to be left alone as a trade off.
Former Justice Dept. prosecutor John Loftus on Fox's Day Side
This only came to light when Bisher al-Rawi was captured by the CIA and taken to the detention centre at Guantanamo Bay. The original Independent link has now mysteriously been removed.
John Loftus went on to spell out that British Intelligence and the US dept of Justice had protected Haroon Rashid Aswat: "Back in 1999 he came to America. The Justice Department wanted to indict him in Seattle because him and his buddy were trying to set up a terrorist training school in Oregon... we've just learned that the headquarters of the US Justice Department ordered the Seattle prosecutors not to touch Aswat... , apparently Aswat was working for British intelligence"
Photo
Haroon Aswat, the so called mastermind of the London bombings with Radical cleric Abu Hamza al Masri in a London cab on Jan. 20, 1999.
This information is startling and again highlights how Al Qaeda exists as an organized body only where the intelligence services have created, funded and employed it. Loftus points out that several weeks before the London Bombings, Aswat was again located by the South African Intel agency but again allowed to slip away, this time to London:
"He was a British intelligence plant. So all of a sudden he disappears. He's in South Africa. We think he's dead; we don't know he's down there. Last month the South African Secret Service come across the guy. He's alive...the Brits know that the CIA wants to get a hold of Haroon. So what happens? He takes off again, goes right to London. He isn't arrested when he lands, he isn't arrested when he leaves... He's on the watch list. The only reason he could get away with that was if he was working for British intelligence. He was a wanted man."
Loftus' information is backed up by the New York Times and CNN who reported on this incident also.
We have seen this many times before and have continued to expose this kind of activity. Mr Aswat is not the only "Al Qaeda operative" who has been protected While in the US - the 19 9/11 hijackers and their associate Zaccharias Moussaoui seem to have been as well. FBI Agent Robert Wright blew the whistle on obstruction of counterterrorism investigations targeting Hamas and al-Qaeda before 911. The sabotage by the highest levels in the FBI of Coleen Rowley's desperate attempt to investigate Moussaoui, for instance, is a striking parallel to the "hands-off" order regarding Aswat, and it's far from being the only one. The CIA met with Bin Laden in July 2001 in a Dubai hospital where he was being treated for Kidney problems. They gleaned detailed information regarding possible massive terror attacks on the US, yet Bin Laden was allowed to slip away (either that or he passed away). Bin Laden is or was a known CIA Asset.
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, mysteriously arrested as the alleged mastermind behind the September 11 plot, was granted a visa to enter the US just six weeks before the terrorist attacks in Washington and New York. The American Al Qaeda operative, Iyman Faris, who planned to bring down the Brooklyn Bridge was also revealed to be an FBI operative. We also have several other reports staing how the men used as hijackers on the planes on 911 were monitored before the event and allowed to enter the US. They were even trained at US flight schools.
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
After 911 these so called terrorists have been allowed to go on with business as usual, despite the "war on terror" and in many instances have been protected. It seems that the authorities find it more useful to restrict the liberties of law abiding citizens by introducing draconian restrictive laws such as the Patriot act and Free speech zoning, whilst allowing those they label as terrorists to go undetected.
Haroon Rashid Aswat allegedly left London for Pakistan on July 6, one day before the London bombing. He was then arrested in Pakistan, but released AGAIN within 24 hours. He reportedly traveled to Zimbabwe and then Zambia, where he may have been arrested again (conflicting reports). Why does the so called mastermind of 7/7 keep being released and allowed to slip away? It the same type of operation over and over again.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FULL TRANSCRIPT: The July 29 edition of FOX News Channel's Day Side programme:
MIKE JERRICK [FOX NEWS]: John Loftus is a terrorism expert and a former prosecutor for the Justice Department. John, good to see you again. So real quickly here, have you heard anything about this Osman Hussain who was just picked up in Rome? You know that name at all?
JOHN LOFTUS: Yeah, all these guys should be going back to an organization called Al-Muhajiroun, which means The Emigrants. It was the recruiting arm of Al-Qaeda in London; they specialized in recruiting kids whose families had emigrated to Britain but who had British passports. And they would use them for terrorist work.
JERRICK: So a couple of them now have Somali connections?
LOFTUS: Yeah, it was not unusual. Somalia, Eritrea, the first group of course were primarily Pakistani. But what they had in common was they were all emigrant groups in Britain, recruited by this Al-Muhajiroun group. They were headed by the, Captain Hook, the imam in London the Finsbury Mosque, without the arm. He was the head of that organization. Now his assistant was a guy named Aswat, Haroon Rashid Aswat.
JERRICK: Aswat, who they picked up.
LOFTUS: Right, Aswat is believed to be the mastermind of all the bombings in London.
JERRICK: On 7/7 and 7/21, this is the guy we think.
LOFTUS: This is the guy, and what's really embarrassing is that the entire British police are out chasing him, and one wing of the British government, MI6 or the British Secret Service, has been hiding him. And this has been a real source of contention between the CIA, the Justice Department, and Britain.
JERRICK: MI6 has been hiding him. Are you saying that he has been working for them?
LOFTUS: Oh I'm not saying it. This is what the Muslim sheik said in an interview in a British newspaper back in 2001.
JERRICK: So he's a double agent, or was?
LOFTUS: He's a double agent.
JERRICK: So he's working for the Brits to try to give them information about Al-Qaeda, but in reality he's still an Al-Qaeda operative.
LOFTUS: Yeah. The CIA and the Israelis all accused MI6 of letting all these terrorists live in London not because they're getting Al-Qaeda information, but for appeasement. It was one of those you leave us alone, we leave you alone kind of things.
JERRICK: Well we left him alone too long then.
LOFTUS: Absolutely. Now we knew about this guy Aswat. Back in 1999 he came to America. The Justice Department wanted to indict him in Seattle because him and his buddy were trying to set up a terrorist training school in Oregon.
JERRICK: So they indicted his buddy, right? But why didn't they indict him?
LOFTUS: Well it comes out, we've just learned that the headquarters of the US Justice Department ordered the Seattle prosecutors not to touch Aswat.
JERRICK: Hello? Now hold on, why?
LOFTUS: Well, apparently Aswat was working for British intelligence. Now Aswat's boss, the one-armed Captain Hook, he gets indicted two years later. So the guy above him and below him get indicted, but not Aswat. Now there's a split of opinion within US intelligence. Some people say that the British intelligence fibbed to us. They told us that Aswat was dead, and that's why the New York group dropped the case. That's not what most of the Justice Department thinks. They think that it was just again covering up for this very publicly affiliated guy with Al-Muhajiroun. He was a British intelligence plant. So all of a sudden he disappears. He's in South Africa. We think he's dead; we don't know he's down there. Last month the South African Secret Service come across the guy. He's alive.
JERRICK: Yeah, now the CIA says, oh he's alive. Our CIA says OK let's arrest him. But the Brits say no again?
LOTFUS: The Brits say no. Now at this point, two weeks ago, the Brits know that the CIA wants to get a hold of Haroon. So what happens? He takes off again, goes right to London. He isn't arrested when he lands, he isn't arrested when he leaves.
JERRICK: Even though he's on a watch list.
LOFTUS: He's on the watch list.The only reason he could get away with that was if he was working for British intelligence. He was a wanted man.
JERRICK: And then takes off the day before the bombings, I understand it--
LOFTUS: And goes to Pakistan.
JERRICK: And Pakistan, they jail him.
LOFTUS: The Pakistanis arrest him. They jail him. He's released within 24 hours. Back to Southern Africa, goes to Zimbabwe and is arrested in Zambia. Now the US--
JERRICK: Trying to get across the--
LOFTUS: --we're trying to get our hands on this guy.
JERRICK: John, hang around. I have so many questions now.
LOFTUS: Oh, this is a bad one....
[commercial break]
JERRICK: On the phone with us, Mansoor Ijaz; Mansoor you know very well here at Fox News Channel and Dayside. Mansoor, real quickly here, you spent so much time in London, you're probably not that as impressed as I am about how fast Scotland Yard has worked on this case. So impressive, so successful. Why?
MANSOOR IJAZ: Well there are two things that a lot of domestic intelligence agencies don't around the world. One is an extraordinarily detailed database of information, and that database is buttressed by the fact that they have these photos, the graphic images of the faces of the people that they were looking for. So it saved them a lot of time when they got the forensic evidence, like fingerprints or other things that indicated where they could actually go find these people. Because remember, there was a lot of data left on the stuff these guys left behind from the failed bombing attack, and that's what helped to really unravel the cell. Now--
JERRICK: I guess--go ahead, Mansoor.
IJAZ: Now I think there's one very important thing that I think everybody needs to know. And that is that the cellular structure that this new breed of Al-Qaeda people have is such that there is not a clear indication that they all knew each other as much as it is that they had some sort of central control still sitting outside of the framework. Whether that's in a foreign country or a place that is removed from Britain and other place in Europe, that's what we're still looking for. But it's very clear now that these cellular structures were operating independent of each other, but with knowledge that something else was in fact planned in the pipeline.
JERRICK: Real quick, Mansoor. In that regard, maybe a ringleader could be this Haroon Aswat. What do you know about him?
IJAZ: Well, he's a pretty bad guy, and I think your previous guest gave the best assessment of who he is. He's the right hand man of the Al-Muhajiroun leader in London, and has been organizing and planning for some time. And I don't want to minimize the effect of the arrest in Rome, because what that indicates is that the cellular structure is elsewhere and we all know that Italy is a big target on their list.
JERRICK: OK, speaking of him, back to the comments by our John Loftus a little while ago. A question from the audience for you, John. Go ahead.
AUDIENCE MEMBER: Hi Mr Loftus. I recently read a book by Morris Dees called The Gathering Storm , and it talks about extremist militia groups in the United States and how they might be manipulated by some people's rhetoric, very similar to Aswat in London. What do you think the US is doing to prevent terrorist attacks on our own soil that happen--
JERRICK: You're worried about it here?
AUDIENCE MEMBER: Yes, sir.
LOFTUS: The US government's doing a great job. We arrested the New York branch of Al-Muhajiroun two years ago. We found the subway bombers with the plans to blow up two different subway stations in New York City. The rest of the group is under surveillance. But the US was used by Al-Muhajiroun for training of people to send to Kosovo. What ties all these cells together was, back in the late 1990s, the leaders all worked for British intelligence in Kosovo. Believe it or not, British intelligence actually hired some Al-Qaeda guys to help defend the Muslim rights in Albania and in Kosovo. That's when Al-Muhajiroun got started.
IJAZ: Which is by the way why we know so much about them right now.
LOFTUS: Yes, I'm afraid so. The CIA was funding the operation to defend the Muslims, British intelligence was doing the hiring and recruiting. Now we have a lot of detail on this because Captain Hook, the head of Al-Muhajiroun, he sidekick was Bakri Mohammed, another cleric. And back on October 16, 2001, he gave a detailed interview with al-Sharq al-Aswat, an Arabic newspaper in London, describing the relationship between British intelligence and the operations in Kosovo and Al-Muhajiroun. So that's how we get all these guys connected. It started in Kosovo, Haroon was 31 years old, he came on about 1995.
JERRICK: OK. Here's another question for you.
AUDIENCE MEMBER: Hello, John. With the quid-pro-quo relationship that London obviously had with these terrorists early on, what changed that caused them to all of a sudden get away from the you leave us alone, we'll leave you alone situation?
LOFTUS: The Israelis say that the truce went on for years. Guys from Al-Muhajiroun for example would bring suicide bombers to Israel to blow up Mike's Place. There was a definite link there. And yet the trainer, Sadiki Al Kahn, was able to go back to Britain and not be touched. What the Israelis believe happened is that Usama Bin Laden got desperate, and he said burn all our bridges--let's turn on the British. Break the truce, start the bombs.
JERRICK: Speaking of Usama Bin Laden, Mansoor, real quickly, maybe Scotland Yard and those folks over there, the Brits, should be looking for Usama Bin Laden. They seem to be so successful.
LOFTUS: The British police do a remarkable job.
IJAZ: Well, that's an interesting comment. The fact of the matter is, when you're dealing with it in your own backyard, and you have the computer infrastructure set up in such a way that you can immediately track these kinds of things that are in your backyard, it's a very different game from tracking them on places where we don't even have mountain maps any more of how the whole thing looks. So that's really what the fundamental problem is. If you'll permit me, I just want to, Mike, make one other very quick point.
JERRICK: Mansoor, can you hang over, do you have time hang over for a 30-second break here? John Loftus, got to cut you loose but thanks for the info. Boy, interesting stuff John...
[commercial break]
JERRICK: We have some more information from our Mansoor Ijaz, Fox News Foreign Affairs Analyst. Mansoor, still on the phone with me?
IJAZ: Yeah, I'm here with you Mike.
JERRICK: Talk about your information from British intel.
IJAZ: Well, let's not characterize the sources quite that way, but I've talked to some people who are analyzing what came out of the raids today, and there's a great deal of concern about the fact that there may be in fact a desire of these cells to move beyond transit systems as the target. And what specifically they found was evidence that indicates they're looking at now places where there are large collections of people, where they can actually take shopping bags and other large carrying bags of sorts without raising a lot of suspicion. Obviously shopping malls come immediately to mind, but it's important for everybody to know that London was planning on having a large I think it's a City Fair or something like that, I don't know what exactly it's called. They've now decided to go ahead with that, but it's obviously going to be much more scrutinized than it would have been before. Now London doesn't in general have a lot of large shopping malls, but they do have large concentrations of people in places at certain times during the week, and that's what apparently now has become the target, one of the new targets of these terrorist cells.
JERRICK: So Mansoor, when you hear that we have four for four, or four for five of these 7/21 bombers, nobody should fool themselves. This thing isn't over.
IJAZ: That is precisely the point I wanted to make sure everybody understood--that the authorities, the people that are worried about this and that are analyzing the data out of what they're getting in these raids, are basically saying we may have just hit the tip of the iceberg. This is not over by a long shot.
JERRICK: Mansoor, thank you for making that perfectly clear. Talk to you soon.
RELATED: Explosions In London
Click here to download video & view in external player
Click here for the quicktime version
http://www.infowars.com/articles/London_attack/mastermind_mi6_asset.htm Lecturer Denounces Critics of 9-11 Teachings
Submitted by Pilgrim on July 10, 2006 - 12:52pm. 911 = PNAC | CIA | Mossad
I think if this action proceeds, Barrett should simply respond with a public challenge, that if an independent inquiry can support the Bush/PNAC Conspiracy Theory - upon which they manipulated and LIED the American public into two unwinnable, illegal wars of choice, from which they've earned fortunes - with the still-missing, compelling evidence which would exist, and be forthcoming, if it were true, then he'll resign voluntarily.
Lecturer denounces critics of his 9-11 teachings
(Actually, they're critics of HIM. They don't actually address his material, except to attach unsupported labels (Disinformation) to it)
'Inside job' theory draws calls for firing, UW probe
By MEGAN TWOHEY
mtwohey@journalsentinel.com Posted: July 9, 2006
A University of Wisconsin-Madison lecturer who has sparked controversy by teaching that the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks were an inside job lashed out Sunday at public officials who have questioned his right to teach.
I've been teaching for 20 years. I dare say I know more about teaching than the governor of the state.
- Kevin Barrett, a lecturer at the University of Wisconsin in Madison
Quotable
There is no merit to his theory. All you had to have was a TV to know what happened on 9-11.
- Mark Graul,
spokesman for U.S. Rep. Mark Green (R-Wis.)
Recent Coverage
7/8/06: Doyle favors review of UW instructor
7/1/06: Sept. 11 claim stirs UW probe
(Interesting that they plan to probe the professor, but not the allegations or the evidence. Perhaps the hand of Lynne Cheney and "CampusWatch"?)
Speaking at a gathering at UW-Milwaukee, Kevin Barrett took aim at state Rep. Stephen Nass (R-Whitewater), U.S. Rep. Mark Green (R-Wis.) and Gov. Jim Doyle.
Doyle, a Democrat, joined the chorus of critics Friday by questioning whether Barrett has the "capacity to teach students in this state."
"I've been teaching for 20 years," Barrett told a crowd of more than 100, many of them cheering supporters. "I dare say I know more about teaching than the governor of the state."
The public sparring came as UW-Madison concludes a 10-day review of Barrett. The university is expected to announce early this week whether the part-time lecturer will be allowed to teach a class on Islam this fall, and if so, whether he will be able to share his theories on 9-11, as he plans to do.
UW spokesman Dennis Chaptman, who attended Sunday's event, said he was not in a position to comment.
Barrett, a bearded man with unkempt hair (interesting to include such a description ... Isn't there a picture attached to the story?), said in an interview that he had met with Provost Patrick Farrell twice last week. The provost, Barrett said, never suggested that he would be prevented from teaching the fall course titled, "Islam: Religion and Culture," at a salary of $8,247 (And listing the price?).
He said Farrell was open to his including theories that the Bush administration planned the 9-11 attacks for its own benefit in the class. Barrett has discussed these theories in a previous class on folklore.
"Basically, the rules of the university are such that it would be a gross violation of academic freedom to fire me," said Barrett, 47, who earned his PhD in African languages and literature from UW-Madison in 2004. "I don't think they'll stand in the way of my teaching. I think I'll basically be able to stick with the syllabus as it currently stands."
The theories that Barrett plans to include in his upcoming course are espoused by a small but vocal group of academics that includes Steven Jones, a physicist from Brigham Young University; David Ray Griffin, a retired professor from the Claremont School of Theology; and James H. Fetzer, a retired philosophy professor from the University of Minnesota-Duluth (Who recently had his life, and the lives of his children, threatened by Bush/PNAC supporters, after Hard Right websites supporting the criminal Regime asked readers to mine for information on his family).
Fetzer, a burly man with a booming voice, co-chairs a group called 9/11 Scholars for Truth. He outlined the theories at Sunday's gathering, saying:
• Explosives must have been detonated inside the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001, because the impact of the airplanes was not enough to bring down the twin towers.
• That the damage to the Pentagon was such that a smaller military plane, as opposed to a large commercial aircraft, must have flown into the Pentagon, shooting a missile as it went.
• That the debris of the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania was scattered so widely that it must have been shot down.
• That half a dozen of the men who are said to have hijacked the planes are still living in the Middle East.
"It's a myth," Fetzer said of the generally accepted view that Islamic terrorists were behind the attacks. "The American government has been practicing terrorism on its own people."
Barrett told the crowd that the Bush administration orchestrated the attacks to justify invading Iraq. He said the purpose to the war was to take control of oil and other resources in the Middle East.
"The 9-11 images were designed to make us stupid, little children," he said.
Nass has called on UW-Madison's chancellor, John Wiley, to fire Barrett, arguing that it is unacceptable for Barrett to use the university to add credibility to "outlandish claims."
Green, who is running for governor, has said that no public funding should be used to support Barrett's teaching.
Mark Graul, a spokesman for Green, said "that he's being paid to teach this garbage is putting a black eye on the whole state. There is no merit to his theory. All you had to have was a TV to know what happened on 9-11."
(Notice that these hysterical Bush/PNAC-controlled puppets don't actually address the material in question ...)
But many of those who attended Sunday's gathering disagreed.
John Boly, a literature professor at Marquette University, said Barrett should be able to share his theories in the classroom.
Maryann Stubbs, a computer programmer at UW-Madison, agreed. "I think that all viewpoints should be covered," she said.
Rick Goyett, a 21-year-old auto mechanic from Whitefish Bay, was convinced by the presentations.
"All you need is common sense to believe that 9-11 was an inside job," he said.
http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=459505 Scholars for 9/11 Truth under Attack
Member's children threatened by name, teacher's position under assault
Duluth, MN (PRWEB) July 2, 2006 --- The author of an article about the
attack on the World Trade Center has found himself under attack for having
published it in a new on-line publication, Journal of 9/11 Studies.
Entitled "The Flying Elephant", the article discusses evidence that a third
airplane was captured on video at the time of the WTC attack. He has now
received a thinly-veiled threat against his children, who are cited by
name, suggesting it would be a good idea if his article were to simply "go
away".
Scholars for 9/11 Truth is a non-partisan society of experts and scholars
committed to exposing falsehoods and revealing truths about the events of
9/11. The journal, which is archived at journalof911studies.com, is its
latest attempt to create forums for discussion and debate about these
important issues beyond its web site, which is archived at st911.org. The
author, Reynolds Dixon, a writer and Professor of English, former lecturer
and Fellow at Stanford University, has withdrawn from the society.
"Threats of this kind have no place in a democratic nation", said James
H. Fetzer, the founder of S9/11T. "These are the tactics of brown-shirts
and totalitarians who fear the discussion of controversial questions that
threaten the government's control over the governed. This is a despicable
act and we are not going to back down!" He added that the organization
itself will assume responsibility for the study, which Reynolds has
relinquished. "We cannot allow advances in understanding what happened on
9/11 to be suppressed by threats to our members. The stakes are simply
too high."
In Wisconsin, another member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, Kevin Barrett,
who has been active in efforts to inform the American people about
discoveries that have been made by Scholars--including that the Twin
Towers were destroyed, not by the impact of airplanes or the ensuing
fires, but by sophisticated controlled demolition; that Vice President
Dick Cheney gave a "stand down" order to not shoot down the plane
approaching the Pentagon; and that the FBI has now confirmed that it has
"no hard evidence" connecting Osama bin Laden to 9/11--confronts the loss
of his job.
A Wisconsin legislator, Stephen Nass, Republican of Whitewater, has called
for the University of Wisconsin-Madison to immediately fire him from his
teaching position. The UW Office of the Provost has announced that it will
conduct a 10-day review of Barrett's plans for an introductory fall course in
Islam and of his past performance as a teacher at UW-Madison. Provost Patrick
Farrell has endorsed his freedom of speech, but "We have an obligation to insure
that his course content is academically appropriate, of high quality, and that
he is not imposing his views on his students."
Prominent experts and scholars who are members of S9/11T include Steven Jones,
a professor of physics at Brigham Young University; Morgan Reynolds, former
Chief Economist for the Department of Labor in the George W. Bush
administration; Bob Bowman, who directed research on the "Star Wars"
program in both Republican and Democratic administrations; Andreas von
Buelow, the former director of Science and Technology for Germany; and David Ray
Griffin, professor emeritus of theology at the Claremont Graduate School and
author or editor of four books on the events of 9/11.
Concern about academic freedom at UW-Madison extends beyond the Scholars
group. Ron Rattner, an attorney from San Francisco, CA, for example, has
written to Provost Farrell with the observation that, "When teachers are
intimidated against seeking and speaking truth on a campus renowned for
its liberal and progressive traditions, we are in trouble". He added,
"Universities are for inquiries, not inquisitions. UW must operate in the
traditions of La Follette, not McCarthy". Robert La Follette was noted
as a progressive leader, while Joe McCarthy portrayed his opponents as
subversives.
Fetzer observed that the right wing is continuing to attack faculty who
speak out on 9/11. "During an appearance on Hannity & Colmes (June 22,
2006), with Ollie North sitting in for Hannity, I made points about controlled
demolition, the "stand down" order, and the FBI's position," he said,
"but but they were more interested in whether I was discussing these things with
my students than whether they were true." On a subsequent appearance on Laura
Ingraham's program (June 30, 2006), "She had her staff chanting about 'nutty
professors' before I was even introduced. Then, after I made some telling
points at the end of the program, they edited their archived copy and cut it off
after a long harangue attacking me. That is intellectually dishonest."
Many other members of S9/11T, including Morgan Reynolds and David Ray Griffin,
have spoken out in defense of academic freedom and in opposition to censorship
and curtailing research into 9/11. "These nasty threats against the children of
one member and the freedom of speech of another", Fetzer said, "make a sorry
statement about this nation on the eve of the 4th of July." Coincidentally,
Fetzer will appear with Barrett at the Mid-West Social Forum on Sunday, July 9,
2006, from 9-10:30 AM, at the Student Union of UW-Milwaukee, to discuss 9/11.
_____________________
Contact information:
James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.
Founder and Co-Chair
Scholars for 9/11 Truth
http://www.st911.org (218) 726-7269 (office)
(218) 724-2706 (home)
http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/ http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/PressRelease_2Jul2006.html
911 = PNAC, CIA, Mossad
Comments
Display the following 3 comments