Carbon capture,solving peak water & global dimming
Robin Ludd | 13.06.2007 17:50 | Climate Chaos | Ecology | Technology
Carbon capture seems to happening thats good news,check links & info below, but does this mean we are ok?.Our planet is still massively under strain due to unscientific capitalist undemocratic approach thats dumb& crazy.
Peak water & large scale dam projects in China & other regions are already having bad effects on water supply/ecology more important than oil.EMF,toxic pollution killing us, nanotech & matrix/skynet investment is going ahead v.unsafely, check Nottingham indymedia, corporatewatch & friends of earth australia.
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/nottinghamshire/2007/05/370748.html
GLOBAL DIMMING, so what if this is true as much evidence suggests, how are we going to deal with this?
The Ozone layer has been depleted, & if we get rid of co2 thats making global warming what happens if this is know protecting us from solar rays
"Ozone, while a minority constituent in the earth's atmosphere, is responsible for most of the absorption of UVB radiation."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_depletion#Consequences_of_ozone_depletion
"Ozone in the earth's stratosphere is created by ultraviolet light striking oxygen molecules containing two oxygen atoms (O2), splitting them into individual oxygen atoms (atomic oxygen); the atomic oxygen then combines with unbroken O2 to create ozone"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_layer#Ozone_depletion
http://www.physorg.com/news96732819.html
"The GRT’s demonstration could have far-reaching consequences for the battle to reduce greenhouse gas levels. Unlike other techniques, such as carbon capture and storage from power plants, air extraction would allow reductions to take place irrespective of where carbon emissions occur, enabling active management of global atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. The technology shows, for the first time, that carbon dioxide emissions from vehicles on the streets of Bangkok could be removed from the atmosphere by devices located in Iceland. This could present a solution to three problems that until now have posed intractable obstacles for advocates of greenhouse gas reduction: how to deal with the millions of vehicles that together represent over 20 percent of global CO2 emissions, how to manage the emissions from existing infrastructure, and how to connect the sources of carbon to the sites of carbon disposal."
"Air capture devices are small and require much less land area than the wind mills that would be needed to offset an equal amount of CO2 emission. Indeed, if the CO2 carried by the air streams used to drive wind mills were to be captured, then on an energy equivalent basis, the CO2 capture would reduce emissions hundred times more than a wind mill of equal sweep area. Like wind turbines, the GRT devices would be deployed in coordinated formations, but would extract the air’s carbon dioxide, not its kinetic energy. "
For true revolution & cooperative life
www.iww.org.uk
www.veggies.org.uk
Peak water & large scale dam projects in China & other regions are already having bad effects on water supply/ecology more important than oil.EMF,toxic pollution killing us, nanotech & matrix/skynet investment is going ahead v.unsafely, check Nottingham indymedia, corporatewatch & friends of earth australia.
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/nottinghamshire/2007/05/370748.html GLOBAL DIMMING, so what if this is true as much evidence suggests, how are we going to deal with this?
The Ozone layer has been depleted, & if we get rid of co2 thats making global warming what happens if this is know protecting us from solar rays
"Ozone, while a minority constituent in the earth's atmosphere, is responsible for most of the absorption of UVB radiation."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_depletion#Consequences_of_ozone_depletion "Ozone in the earth's stratosphere is created by ultraviolet light striking oxygen molecules containing two oxygen atoms (O2), splitting them into individual oxygen atoms (atomic oxygen); the atomic oxygen then combines with unbroken O2 to create ozone"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ozone_layer#Ozone_depletion http://www.physorg.com/news96732819.html "The GRT’s demonstration could have far-reaching consequences for the battle to reduce greenhouse gas levels. Unlike other techniques, such as carbon capture and storage from power plants, air extraction would allow reductions to take place irrespective of where carbon emissions occur, enabling active management of global atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. The technology shows, for the first time, that carbon dioxide emissions from vehicles on the streets of Bangkok could be removed from the atmosphere by devices located in Iceland. This could present a solution to three problems that until now have posed intractable obstacles for advocates of greenhouse gas reduction: how to deal with the millions of vehicles that together represent over 20 percent of global CO2 emissions, how to manage the emissions from existing infrastructure, and how to connect the sources of carbon to the sites of carbon disposal."
"Air capture devices are small and require much less land area than the wind mills that would be needed to offset an equal amount of CO2 emission. Indeed, if the CO2 carried by the air streams used to drive wind mills were to be captured, then on an energy equivalent basis, the CO2 capture would reduce emissions hundred times more than a wind mill of equal sweep area. Like wind turbines, the GRT devices would be deployed in coordinated formations, but would extract the air’s carbon dioxide, not its kinetic energy. "
For true revolution & cooperative life
www.iww.org.uk
www.veggies.org.uk
Robin Ludd
e-mail:
sparkeee1@hotmail.com
