Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

PRESS RELEASE: Appeal Court ruling upholds Human Rights & Democracy

Andrew Wood | 25.05.2009 11:17 | Repression | Technology

LONDON: Today, Thursday 21 May 2009, the Court of Appeal found that
the Metropolitan police broke the law in its routine surveillance of people involved
in lawful and peaceful political activity[1]. The legal action arose when staff members from Campaign Against Arms Trade legitimately attended the 2005 Annual General Meeting of
Reed Elsevier, as shareholders, to question the board about its acquisition of
a company which organised armsfairs[2]. The police will now need to ensure
that their surveillance practices and record keeping comply with the court
ruling and human rights legislation.

Press notice by the Claimant/Appellant Andrew Wood.

Web: www.judicialreview.org.uk; Email:  judicialreview@gn.apc.org;

Thursday 21 May 2009

PRESS RELEASE

Appeal court ruling safeguards democracy and human rights

...

The human-rights case is brought by appellant/claimant Andrew Wood from Oxford,
who was the press officer at Campaign Against Arms Trade (a NGO opposing arms
exports) in 2005, and who attended the AGM with other members of staff. The
Appeal Court decided that the claimant was entitled to the protection of the
Article 8 under the The Human Rights Act 1998 which gives a right to respect
for private and family life, and states 'There shall be no interference by a
public authority with the exercise of this right ...'. The police are a public
authority. [3]

The judges decided that although the police photography was undertaken in a
public place, there was a reasonable expectation of privacy and the photography
could not be separated from its use i.e. the creation of a police file. The
judgment relied on the recent ruling of the European Court of Human Rights
regarding the retention of DNA profiles (Marper v UK) and other case law. The
judgment limits the retention of photographs and other information unless there
is a genuine on-going criminal investigation; there was no crime or further
criminal investigation resulting from the AGM of Reed Elsevier in 2005.

The police are reported to have said they will not appeal to the House of Lords
to contest the Court of Appeal ruling.

The Claimant, Andrew Wood said

“The Human Rights Act is part of the essential checks-and-balances which help to
ensure that we can properly participate in a democratic society without
repressive state intervention. It would be a blow for liberty and democracy if,
as some have suggested, it were to be abolished.”[4]

ENDS

CONTACT: Andrew Wood

EDITORS NOTES
The case, Wood (appellant/claimant) vs MPC for the policing of the metropolis
(respondent/ defendant) in the Court of Appeal (ref: 2008/1466) is described in
the court documents at  http://www.judicialreview.org.uk . The judgment will also
be posted at the legal reporting service here:  http://www.bailii.org/

This legal challenge is supported by human-rights groups, Campaign Against Arms
Trade, and the Press & Public Relations Branch of the National Union of
Journalists.

[1] The Appeal Court heard the case on 29 & 30 January 2009, following a
judicial review in the High Court, London in May 2008. The Appeal court judges
were Lord Justice Laws; Lord Justice Dyson and Lord Collins of Mapesbury.The
barrister acting for the claimant was Martin Westgate of Doughty Street
Chambers; The solicitors providing legal assistance were Alex Gask and Corinna
Ferguson.. The court costs for the claimant were met by Legal Aid. The remedy
sort by the claimant included the removal of his photograph from police
storage; no damages were requested.

[2] The legal action arose when the Metropolitan Police openly photographed and
followed members of the public attending the AGM of Reed Elsevier on 27 April
2005 at the Millennium Hotel, Grosvenor Square, London. The company, who
publish academic journals, had purchased Spearhead – a company which organised
arms fairs. Photographs and notes were made of those attending and stored on
police computers even though no one attending was arrested or charged with any
offence, and the AGM ended normally. The surveillance operation was part of
routine intelligence gathering by the police, who didn't claim to know the
claimant's identity prior to the start of its operation. When leaving the
meeting, the claimant and another CAAT staff member was repeatedly photographed
by the police from close-up, stopped, questioned and further followed. Police
accept that they undertook a surveillance operation, tried to obtain the
claimant's name by subterfuge, and stored information – including photographs -
on a computer system even though no illegal activity is alleged; there were no
arrests nor any criminal activity.

[3] The full text of the Article 8 'Right to respect for private and family
life', contained in the Human Rights Act 1998 is :

1. Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home
and his correspondence.

2. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of
this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a
democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the
economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime,
for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and
freedoms of others.


[4] The judgment is 35 pages in length. Two of the judges found for the
claimant. Significantly, all three said that the claimant's rights under
Article 8 of the Human Rights Act 1998 were engaged. The judgment relies on the
law in coming to its conclusion but also makes this observation (paragraph 21 &
22):

'The notion of the personal autonomy of every individual marches with the
presumption of liberty enjoyed in a free polity: a presumption which consists
in the principle that every interference with the freedom of the individual
stands in need of objective justification. Applied to the myriad instances
recognised in the Article 8 jurisprudence, this presumption means that, subject
to the qualifications I shall shortly describe, an individual’s personal
autonomy makes him – should make him – master of all those facts about his own
identity, such as his name, health, sexuality, ethnicity, his own image, of
which the cases speak; and also of the “zone of interaction” (Von Hannover
paragraph 50) between himself and others. He is the presumed owner of these
aspects of his own self; his control of them can only be loosened, abrogated,
if the State shows an objective justification for doing so. This cluster of
values, summarised as the personal autonomy of every individual and taking
concrete form as a presumption against interference with the individual’s
liberty, is a defining characteristic of a free society. We therefore need to
preserve it even in little cases. At the same time it is important that this
core right protected by Article 8, however protean, should not be read so
widely that its claims become unreal and unreasonable. For this purpose I
think there are three safeguards, or qualifications ...'

PICTURE EDITOR NOTES
Photographs from a photo-call on the morning of Thursday 21 May 2009 when the
judgment was handed down are available from David Hoffman. Tel: 0788 1817 751/
020 8981 5041 or email:  photos@hoffmanphotos.com. The photographs show three
members of Campaign Against Arms Trade, including the Claimant/Appellant Andrew
Wood, in front of the Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London displaying a two
meter long section of the Human Rights Act 1998 which describes a right to
respect for private and family life (Article 8).

Andrew Wood
- e-mail: judicialreview@gn.apc.org
- Homepage: http://www.judicialreview.org.uk

Comments

Display the following comment

  1. A few comments — McQn
Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech