Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Farnborough Airport to double the number of flights?

Keith Parkins | 16.07.2009 11:28 | COP15 Climate Summit 2009 | Climate Chaos | Energy Crisis | Globalisation

TAG Aviation has recently submitted a planning application to double the number of flights at Farnborough Airport.

TAG Aviation, after successfully winning at a planning inquiry to double the number of weekend and bank holiday flights, were expected to be gung-ho about further expansion. This has proved to be the case and they have recently submitted plans to double flights at Farnborough Airport.

 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/03/394633.html
 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/10/410009.html

A worrying development is that the local council has recently approved the allocation of £20,000 for legal fees to push the plans through and see off any possible judicial review.

To approve the plans would be to fail to take account of the Climate Change Act which makes it a statutory requirement to reduce carbon emissions by 80% by 2050.

Growth in aviation is the fastest growing source of greenhouse gas emissions.

To approve the plans would make a mockery of the recent government white paper on energy policy and moving towards a low carbon economy. It would drive a coach and horses through the recent G8 proposal to limit average global temperature rise to 2 degrees.

 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8146500.stm
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8146824.stm
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8153006.stm
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8150919.stm
 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8142825.stm

TAG claim carbon offsetting! Planting a tree which takes 60 years or more to reach maturity, does not account for carbon emitted in a six hour transatlantic flight. Who looks after the trees, on whose land is it grown? When the trees die, the carbon is released back into the environment.

 http://www.carbontradewatch.org

Hundreds of trees were destroyed when TAG were first granted planning consent for a business airport!

The failure to address global warming and climate change will lead to catastrophic consequences.

 http://www.onehundredmonths.org/

One of the most ridiculous claims from TAG was their contribution to reducing greenhouse gases by their use of bicycles! If nothing else, it did little for the credibility of the Carbon Trust who were acting for TAG.

 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/10/409836.html?c=on

To approve the plans would be a clear breach of the Rushmoor Local Plan which sets a limit of 25,000 movements.

TAG claim massive benefits to the local economy. This ludicrous claim is backed by the local Member of Parliament Gerald Howarth who when he is not submitting his expense claims is more interested in backing the interests of big business than looking after the interests of his constituents. When TAG applied for a doubling of weekend flights, Howarth told the council to ignore local opposition and back the plans!

 http://cllrclifford.blogspot.com/2009/06/mp-on-tag-airport-application.html
 http://cllrclifford.blogspot.com/2009/06/letter-of-objection-from-some-of-my.html

That the airport has been of no benefit to the local economy can be seen by visiting the towns of Aldershot and Farnborough. The town centres are semi-derelict ghost towns, and that was before the recession hit. Half of Farnborough town centre has been demolished for an unwanted superstore. Aldershot town centre consists of boarded-up shops and if it was not for the ethnic shops, there would be nothing left.

A study by New Economics Foundation and World Development Movement for the claimed economic benefits of aviation shows the figures do not add up when subjected to close scrutiny, and even this study does not take full account of all the economic dis-benefits. [see Plane Truths: Do the economic arguments for aviation growth really fly?]

 http://www.wdm.org.uk/news/planetruths27092008.htm
 http://www.wdm.org.uk/planetruths

To coincide with the UN World Tourism Day (Saturday 27 September 2008), the New Economics Foundation and World Development Movement published a joint report that once and for all demolished the myths that aviation is of benefit to the national economy. Furthermore, it is of detriment to the world's poor.

 http://www.neweconomics.org/gen/aviationfossilfuelledfantasy270908.aspx
 http://www.neweconomics.org/gen/z_sys_publicationdetail.aspx?pid=261

The situation with TAG is far worse than the nef/WDM report suggests due to the low load factors and the inefficient use of this transport mode.

Any economic study of TAG would have to look at all the dis-benefits as well as the exaggerated claimed benefits. No such study has been commissioned.

Another myth that does not withstand close scrutiny is that Farnborough Airport creates jobs. Airports like Heathrow and Gatwick create jobs with their shopping malls (bars, restaurants and shops), check-in, baggage handling, immigration and passport control, customs. These jobs are non-existent at Farnborough. Farnborough is a business airport. Passengers step off their executive jets and into their waiting limos. Nor do passengers spend their money in the local economy. Passengers passing through Farnborough Airport are as likely to visit Farnborough or Aldershot as passengers passing through Gatwick are to visit Croydon.

No study of societal of risk has ever been undertaken. The Public Safety Zone (one in a hundred thousand risk contour) which extends over the built-up area of Farnborough, and within which nothing that exists could be built if it was not already there (because it is not safe), will increase in size.

The aircraft as they come in are brushing the rooftops, leaving little room for error. Crashes occur at the end of runways. At the end of the runway we have residential Farnborough, including schools, a college, and old folk's homes. During the airshow, weight limits are suspended, landing thresholds changed, leading to increased risk to local residents.

Increase in movements would cause the one in ten thousand risk contour to extend beyond the airfield perimeter. The one in ten thousand risk contour must be retained within the airfield perimeter.

The noise footprint will increase.

The noise levels retards the education of local school kids. The noise interferes with local businesses. The noise and stress induced, leads to increase in heart disease. All of which have a quantifiable cost.

The noise model used at Farnborough is inappropriate. It looks at average noise levels when it should be looking at peak noise levels and the frequency of those peaks.

The claim by the Planning Inspector who gave TAG the green light for uncontrolled expansion that the noise from the aircraft is masked by local traffic was to talk arrant nonsense and at the the time this was more than sufficient grounds for a Judicial Review on the grounds that the inspector was incompetent.

Equally nonsensical was the ludicrous claim by TAG that only half a dozen people are effected by the noise!

Currently not all movements at Farnborough Airport are counted. Excluded are helicopters, light aircraft, MOD and diplomatic flights, Farnborough Airshow. Any future revision or variation of the current planning conditions must include all these movements as they all contribute to noise, pollution and risk.

Any legal agreement drawn up with TAG is not worth the paper it is written on as they have it overturned when it suits them. This is what happened to the section 106 agreement limiting weekend flights. A legal agreement they ripped to shreds when it no longer suited them. If nothing else showing that Section 106 legal agreements are worthless pieces of paper. Having overturned one limit, TAG are now seeking to overturn their other limits, in particular the 28,000 upper limit on movements.

TAG are putting corporate greed before the needs of the local community.

Objections lodged to previous applications to expand Farnborough Airport apply even more so now.

 http://www.heureka.clara.net//surrey-hants/tag11rev1.htm

Objections to these pans should be submitted to Keith Holland, Head of Planning (deadline 27 July 2009):

Keith Holland
Head of Planning
Rushmoor
Farnborough Road
Farnborough
Hants
England

 kholland@rushmoor.gov.uk
 keith.holland@rushmoor.gov.uk
 plan@rushmoor.gov.uk

Keith Parkins
- Homepage: http://www.heureka.clara.net/surrey-hants/index.htm

Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

TAG exaggerate jobs created

17.07.2009 12:49

In their economic forecast, TAG have exaggerated the number of jobs created by counting jobs elsewhere.

This is double counting. It would be like a new superstore claiming the jobs at its suppliers, whilst conveniently overlooking the 1100 jobs destroyed in the local economy.

There is no sign of economic trickle down in the nearest town centres of Farnborough and Aldershot where even the charity shops are pulling out. The Red Cross is the latest charity shop to pull out of Farnborough, with head office citing 'Farnborough has no future.'

Very few jobs are created by TAG at Farnborough Airport. These come at a huge environmental cost to the local community.

Reference

Jack Sommers, Rise in jobs lower than suggested: Increase in flights would not bring much employment, Surrey-Hants StarCourier, 16 July 2008

Keith


safety and risk of a crash

17.07.2009 13:03

The pesron who Rushmoor has asked to advice them on safety formely acted on TAG.

At a previous Public Inquiry into home to be built in the flight path, he commented on behalf of TAG: 'crash risk would always be outweighed by the gains of airport expansion'.

 http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2052851_councils_safety_expert_a_former_tag_employee

To date, there has been no assement of societal risk

The 'expert' retained by the council works for ERM. They previously showed a lack of understanding ...

 http://www.heureka.clara.net/surrey-hants/tag1617.htm
 http://www.heureka.clara.net/surrey-hants/tag1617i.htm
 http://www.heureka.clara.net/surrey-hants/tag-erm.htm

and their work had to be looked at again by yet more consultants who did not undersand the issues.

 http://www.heureka.clara.net/surrey-hants/halcrow.htm




Keith


airport objectors 'ignorant'

20.07.2009 13:13

airport objectors 'ignorant'

In 2006, local member of Parliament Gerald Howarth described airport objectors as ignorant! [News Group 16 October 2006]

Does this tag of 'ignorant' equally apply to fellow MPs in neighbouring constituencies who unlike Howarth are actually acting for their constituents and lodging strong objections to TAG's plans for massive expansion at Farnborough Airport?

Caroline Lucas MEP is also objecting. Unlike Howarth, she does actually know what she is talking about.

Does Howarth declare in his Members Interests his use of the TAG facilities?

Keith


Risk contours

20.07.2009 13:14

Risk contours

The 1 in 10,000 risk contour must be retained within the airport boundary. No third party may be subjected to this risk.

Increase in flights will cause the1 in 10,000 risk contour to project beyond the airfield boundary and over Farnborough College of Technology. The 1 in 100,000 risk contour already extends over the college.

Are parents happy to let their offspring be subjected to this risk, to attend a college where their children are not safe, are at risk of being killed?

What are the college authorities doing to mitigate this risk? The college has a statutory obligation to safeguard staff and students. Or is the money the college receives from TAG a sufficient incentive to turn a blind eye?

Coincidence! Andrew Lloyd, Rushmoor chief executive (the planning authority), also sits on the board of Farnborough College of Technology. No conflict of interest there then!

The person engaged by the planning authority had previously acted for TAG at a public inquiry where he claimed the economic benefits outweighed the risk to the local community. How was the contract awarded? Wast the planning authority aware of the bias before awarding the contract? Why was the contract not terminated as soon as the planning authority was made aware of this bias?

Keith


London 2012 Olympics

20.07.2009 13:15

London 2012 Olympics

There are moves afoot to exempt, ie not count, London 2012 Olympics flights through Farnborough Airport.

These are real flights, contribute to TAG's bottom line, and must be counted, as must helicopters, light aircraft, MOD, diplomatic and airshow movements.

Keith


Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech