Skip Navigation | HOME | UK Indymedia | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us

manchester Indymedia

Identity Cards Bill - a brief guide

Manchester Defy-ID | 14.12.2004 14:20

While the media are merrily focusing on Blunkett’s love affair, ignoring the fact that one of the most draconian changes to happen in British society, ID cards and the ID database, are being foisted upon us. The government is clearly keen to push the ID Cards Bill through Parliament as quickly as possible, with a Second Reading (the first stage of real debate in parliament) likely to happen before Christmas.

From the Defy-ID Newsletter (Winter 04)
 http://www.defy-id.org.uk

Defy-ID is an adhoc network of groups and individuals prepared for active resistance to increasing state surveillance and the introduction of identity or ‘entitlement’ cards in the UK.

Demo & leafleting in Manchester - St Ann's Square, Tuesday 21st December @ 12:30 (by the church)

------------------------------------------

A BRIEF GUIDE TO THE IDENTITY CARDS BILL

The government is clearly keen to push the ID Cards Bill through
Parliament as quickly as possible. On Monday, 29th November, the Bill had its formal First Reading in the House of Commons. It was presented by the Home Secretary at the start of a debate on the Home Affairs portion of the Queen's Speech. Whilst the debate was not specific to identity cards many members did raise the issue. The Identity Cards Bill is likely to get a Second Reading (the first stage of real debate in parliament) before Christmas.

The Identity Cards Bill could alternatively be known as the National Identity Register Bill since it seems to be primarily concerned with the establishment of a national ID database rather than with the issuing of ID cards. Indeed, it will be possible for the government to create an entry for you in the National Identity Register without the issuing of an Identity Card and without your cooperation or knowledge.

David Blunkett recently wrote to a friend (a random unsolicited letter
possibly based on her postcode) to ask her opinion on ID cards. .The
letter, written in an illiberal BNP-esque tone, talked about ID cards as an aid to stopping terrorism, sex offenders, illegal immigrants, organised criminals, benefit cheats and prevent failed asylum seekers using services like the NHS. Crucially, it included the disingenuous information about ID cards that the government is going to be using to market them to the public.

"I want to reassure you" Blunkett offers "that the ID cards will not be used to build up a profile on innocent people or allow your private, personal information to be used without tight safeguards. The ID card will hold only very basic details, such as your name, address, date and place of birth and a finger print or the scan of your eye which securely establishes your unique identity. The ID card will hold just enough information to help us in the fight against crime and no more."

Hmmm. An examination of the bill shows that Blunkett is stretching a point. For example, it won't just include your full name, but all the names by which you have ever been known. Not just your address, but all the addresses you have ever lived at. Not just your finger print or iris scan, but a photo as well. Also, your National Insurance number, immigration number, passport number, driving licence number, and, the number of 'any designated document not covered by the above'. Plus if you want to change any information (for which they will charge you, or fine you if you don't change it) the old information also stays on the card.

The ability to check your identity against your entry in the National
Identity Register will not just be available to the Immigration Service and the Police but also to "providers of public services and private sector organisations" (e.g. employers, banks, credit reference agencies, libraries, dentists, utilities companies, student loans company etc). The ID Card bill includes a power to require 'any person' to provide information which may be required to conduct background checks on people applying for ID cards. So in theory they could force anyone to give information about you. In practice this is likely to be credit reference agencies, inland revenue, and so on (though they make it clear that they won't expect this information for free). The Bill also states that if the info the government receives from this 'person' or organisation differs from their own records, they'll inform that organisation. So if, for example, you are running away from debts and tell the government your address, they can/will tell the credit reference agency who of course will tell the bailiffs.


Not compulsory?!?!

The government believes that the ID card will be necessary to go about
your daily life. One of the justifications they are using for ID cards is that they will make the lives of terrorists harder, and according to the Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) published alongside the bill, terrorists will need an ID card, "to stay in hotels, rent accommodation, hire cars, buy mobile phone, and generally carry out their activities" (p.13). This implies we'll all need ID cards for these purposes. The RIA also mentions that police can do a 'card not present' check. This means that the cops will be carrying the means of taking your biometric information - face, fingerprints or iris - and checking that against the database to establish your identity. No wonder the carrying of the card is not to be compulsory - it is not needed to access the information about you in the Register - only your iris or fingerprints. The Police are already planning to deploy mobile fingerprint readers. The RIA also acknowledges that the Register will be a national fingerprint database that the Police will use to identify suspects in unsolved cases where there are scene of crime fingerprints that have not been identified.

The RIA suggests that when the existing 'chip and pin' cardreaders, that have recently been introduced in Post Office and retailers across the UK, are upgraded in a few years time they could be made compatible with the ID cards.

You will not be required to use a card unless you wish to work, use the banking or health system, travel or receive benefits. As Mr Blunkett advised Parliament: "The issuing of a card does not force anyone to use it, although in terms of drivers or passport users, or if services - whether public or private - required some proof of identity before expenditure was laid out, without proof of identity and therefore entitlement to do it I doubt whether non-use of it would last very long."


Forgot to change your address? - Criminal!!!

It is importan to keep in mind that the card will be buttressed by a vast array of new state powers and criminal penalties. The Bill creates a score of new offences including

- refusal to obey an order to register = £2500
- failure to submit to fingerprinting and biometric scanning = £2500
- failure to provide information demanded by the government = £2500
- failure to attend an interview at a specified place and time = £2500
- failure to notify authorities about a lost, stolen, damaged or defective
card = up to 51 weeks in prison and/or a fine
- failure to renew a card = £1000
- failure to attend subsequent fingerprinting and biometric scanning when
demanded = £1000
- failure to provide subsequent information when demanded = £1000
- failure to attend subsequent interview at specified place and time when
demanded = £1000
- failure to notify authorities of any change in personal circumstances
(including change of address) = £1000
- providing false information = up to 2 years and/or a fine

To add insult to injury, many of the offences set out in the Bill are
civil penalties meaning it's unlikely you'll get legal aid to help
your defence.


Limitless spying opportunities

The Bill sets out a number of purposes for the Card and the Register. Some are more open-ended than others. For example, the card scheme will allow "the provision of a secure and reliable method for registrable facts about such individuals to be ascertained or verified wherever that is necessary in the public interest."

"Public Interest" has a number of dimensions. The Bill defines it as being "in the interests of national security", "for the purposes of the prevention or detection of crime", "for the purposes of the enforcement of immigration controls", "for the purposes of the enforcement of prohibitions on unauthorised working or employment" and "for the purpose of securing the efficient and effective provision of public services."

On the face of it, this definition would imply that the card and the
register would be necessary to seek employment, to gain access to health and other services, and that it would be used by police and immigration officers in the course of their functions. However the words "for the purposes of the prevention or detection of crime" could be connected to financial control and money laundering regulations to provide a means by which the ID system can be used for an almost limitless range of purposes. They could include operating a bank account, using professional services such as a solicitor or accountant, applying for a permit or license, internal travel, buying property, stocks or shares, applying for credit or using large amounts of cash.


Data Sharing and the National Identity Register

The Regulatory Impact Assessment says: "as Government services update
their systems over time they could cross-reference their personal
numbering schemes with the NIRN. This would allow ... citizens to quote just one number in their dealings with different parts of Government". In other words your NIRN will be used to link all of the data in all of the government databases, e.g. NHS medical records. What is more, private companies are also likely to ask for this number which meaning the information that anyone holds on you will all be referenced with the one number, making it very easy to access and link up.


How much will it cost me to be controlled and spied upon?

The government estimated in 2002 that the scheme would cost somewhere in the order of £3.1 billion. When in 2004 the Home Affairs Committee asked the Home Secretary to clarify the exact amount he refused, citing commercial secrecy. By the time the final Bill was published in November 2004 the government acknowledged that the cost of the scheme over ten years would be £5.5 billion. We will pay for this scheme out of our own pockets. An "enhanced" passport, which includes entry on the national register, will cost around £85. An ID card without a passport will cost between £35 and £40. There will be a charge for the renewal or replacement of cards.

You can download and read the Bill and Home Office reports at  http://www.identitycards.gov.uk

Manchester Defy-ID
- e-mail: manchester@defy-id.org.uk
- Homepage: http://www.defy-id.org.uk

Download this article in pdf format >>

Email this article to someone >>

Submit an addition or make a quick comment on this article >>

Comments

Display the following comment

  1. Hi there — james mannell

Publish

Publish your news

Do you need help with publishing?

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

Manchester Topics

Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Manchester Actions 2010

Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands

Manchester Actions 2009

COP15 Climate Summit 2009
G20 London Summit
Guantánamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
University Occupations for Gaza

Manchester Actions 2008

2008 Days Of Action For Autonomous Spaces
Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco
Climate Camp 2008
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Smash EDO
Stop Sequani Animal Testing
Stop the BNP's Red White and Blue festival

Manchester Actions 2007

Climate Camp 2007
DSEi 2007
G8 Germany 2007
Mayday 2007
No Border Camp 2007

Manchester Actions 2006

April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
Faslane
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
SOCPA
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006

Manchester Actions 2005

DSEi 2005
G8 2005
WTO Hong Kong 2005

Manchester Actions 2004

European Social Forum
FBI Server Seizure
May Day 2004
Venezuela

Manchester Actions 2003

Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003

Languages

english

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech