Nottinghamshire Indymedia

Events

Startpage

> UK Indymedia
> Global Indymedia

> Guidelines
> Chatroom
> About Us
> Security

> Projects
> On Ya Mobile
> Local Weather

Support Us

We are an all volunteer collective and receive no regular funding. Please consider donating.


Local Events

This events wire is no longer being updated. Please use the new site to publicise events.

More local events on Veggies/Sumac Diary


Freedom of Information

Search archives

Topics

Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista

Kollektives

Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World

Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland

IMCs


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech

Justice vs Revenge: the failure of the CJS

Dean Southall | 16.11.2005 11:10 | Analysis | Repression

Last week the driver of a bus which killed 5 people from Nottingham and Leicester was sentenced to 5 years in prison. The driver was quilty of no more than being human and the judge's verdict fails leaves us all vulnerable.

Sea Lane Ingoldmells
Sea Lane Ingoldmells

Bus pedals
Bus pedals


Last week a Lincolnshire bus driver was sentenced to five years imprisonment for causing death by dangerous driving. It had been a busy bank holiday weekend in the seaside town of Ingoldmells when shortly after 5pm on Sunday the 11th of April 2004 a bus pulled away from the bus stop to head up Sea Lane. Shortly after starting to pull away the bus suddenly accelerated rapidly and continued to do so as it drove over a pedestrian crossing, narrowly missing several people who were on the crossing. Shortly after this it swerved to the left to avoid a stationary car and mounted the pavement. Five people from Nottingham and Leicester, including a small child, who were on the pavement at the time were tragically killed when the bus collided with them. The bus finally came to halt some distance further down the road.

For anybody who has not had direct experience of such a horrendous event it is impossible to truly understand the horror and grief felt by the families of those who were killed on that day.

Unfortunately the English criminal justice system failed to help the families understand what had lead to these deaths, something that may help them in their grief. Nor, importantly, did it do what it should have done to help prevent further accidents of this type. This is because the judge ruled that the scientific explanation of the cause of the accident was inadmissible in court and could not be put to a jury.

So what is this scientific explanation for these ‘unintended acceleration accidents’, which have been known of in the fields of road safety and human psychology since at least the 1970s? The first point to make is that they are not due to a fault with the vehicle. The reason the vehicle initially accelerates very fast is that the driver, needing to make a rapid application of the foot brake, actually presses the accelerator pdal instead. This is due to a foot aiming bias at the time the foot movement is initiated which in turn can be caused by upper body twist such as looking over the shoulder to operate hand controls, check the road is clear when pulling out or attending to passengers who have boarded the bus. The accelerator and brake pedals in buses can be very similar in shape, height and angle so the only way of distinguishing them is by their position and the foot aiming bias effectively eliminates this cue.

When the driver then presses down hard on the (accelerator) pedal, believing he is applying the brakes the bus suddenly and unexpectedly accelerates forward. This is startling to the driver, and the immediate risks of collision with other vehicles and pedestrians can evoke the panic state of ‘hypervigilance’. In this state the individual’s focus of attention is narrowed and his ability to process information and make decisions can be disrupted. The driver’s attention may be so focussed on the scene through the windscreen and steering the vehicle to avoid collisions that he is unable to detect his foot is on the wrong pedal or to plan and undertake any other action to bring the vehicle to a halt in the time available. Indeed drivers typically continue to insist, when interviewed after the accident, that their foot was on the brake pedal and that the vehicle simply ‘surged’.

There is only space here for this very brief summary of the cause of such accidents (a fuller account is given by the paper by Schmidt, who developed the explanation). It is however based on a review of extensive laboratory and real life research involving typical people, and scientific understanding of the manner in which the brain controls limb movement. The implications of this explanation are that, in the right circumstances, anybody driving an automatic vehicle, such as a bus, could experience this type of accident. It does not imply any failure on the part of the driver. It should also be noted that no other scientific explanation of these accidents has been proposed.

However, in English law, there are only a finite set of defences to the charge of causing death by dangerous driving and in this case the judge ruled that this explanation did not fall within any of them and therefore could not be put to a jury. At this point the driver had not option but to plead guilty. The judges’ opinion, rather than a jury, informed by objective scientific evidence, had therefore decided this case.

In passing sentence the judge stated “It is difficult to imagine a more serious single example of your dangerous driving…..” I would suggest the judge has a look at some of the many previous accidents I have had to investigate, including the similar fatal case in Sunderland in 1998.

Finding the driver wholly and solely guilty severely reduces the incentive for measures to be found to prevent future accidents of this type (e.g. modifications to vehicles, driver training) and does nothing to improve public safety.

The severe penalty imposed by the judge on the driver will cannot deter other drivers from committing this crime: they do not do it deliberately or due to lack of care, or under the influence of fatigue, drink or drugs etc.

So, other than reacting with pious retribution, just how has the justice system served the people in this case? I sit here with a feeling of foreboding, as I did after the Sunderland accident, waiting to hear of the next fatal unintended acceleration accident, which the criminal justice system could have helped avoid. Meanwhile a bus driver, guilty of no more than being human, must endure a five-year prison sentence on top of the lifetime of anguish from the horror he experienced on that dreadful day.





Reference
Schmidt, R. A. Unintended acceleration: Human performance considerations. In Peacock B and Karwowski W (Eds) Automotive Ergonomics. Taylor and Francis 1993.

Dean Southall

Download this article in pdf format >>
Email this article to someone >>
Submit an addition or make a quick comment on this article >>

Comments

Display the following 6 comments

  1. Unintended acceleration — Melvyn Danielson
  2. Design flaws and responsibility — Roger S
  3. Brake vs Accelerator — Melvyn Danielson
  4. Some additional info — Dean
  5. Brake vs Accelerator — Mel Danielson
  6. Human error - how do you overcome this? — Vince Thompson