i warn you, most times i rant on about what the bilderbergs are up to, i either get patronised or flamed.

i'm sure its all completely innocent...

so that's it then, it's all quite innocent.
globalisation is errr a long word which we all use to describe the sort of world we don't want to live in.
The mass media and a whole series of instituitions
industrial big shots, and people who are involved with
informatica, and policy making in the UE, just inncoent fun. The leaders of all three main UK parties are on board, the Bildrberg chips are all on Kenneth clarke and as they have already got shot of portillo and as they control most of the media they are likely to do the same to Duncan smith .
Clarke is going to win.

How the fuck anyone can write one liners dismissing Bilderberg is beyond me. saying that Bilderberg is all rather
innocent is like saying that the nazis were rather playfull
well one does doesn't one.

whats your 4 wheeel derangedment !!!!

Sarcasm dear boy, sarcasm.

The bilderbergs are possibly the most powerful group in the world. Chairmen of multinationals, leading polititians from most mainstream parties in the western world, kings and queens from across europe, the list is endless.

But there was a guy on the radio a few weeks ago, speaking about the bilderbergs and about what he'd found and he was ridiculed. Amongst some of the activist community this attitude remains, people just don't want to know and i'm on the verge of joining them, the number of times i've been ridiculed and patronised for bringing the subject up.

There is some very dodgy stuff going on, possibly far worse than what the 'anti-capitalist' movement has already helped to expose. I hope that people won't shy away from the deepest darkest realities of what is really going on.

It's surprising that no one seems to know about Bilderberg.
It is also very strange that any one who mentions the subject gets seriously dissed, not just on this channel.
I saw a mail,not posted by me on indymedia italy, by a certain luther blissett, it listed a series of meetings this year (2001) including Bilderberg, trilateral ect ect
LB made a point of the fact that the anti global possee had not organized demonstrations. The first comment said something very similar to "fucking wanker" ! and nothing else. a whole series of comments followed most suggesting that the author was a fascist,he really got a slagging.
taking into account that the message did not express the authors personal opinion, merely stated facts . The meetings went off and there were no demonstrations . There were a couple of posistive comments, with more info so the message had some good effect. But it's very strange, or is it ?

I wonder if these people are just individual dickheads or
some kind of group who working together,perhaps the intelligence services, seems like a how low can you go situation. I guess they will do anything to keep their globalization / World Dom' plans on the track.

let's see if K. clarke becomes tory leader, as predicted.

LB

It may interest people to know that Blair attended a Bilderberg meeting before becoming PM, presumably to make sure he was with the agenda. In fact, he was asked in the Commons to confirm that he had attended this meeting and answered that no member of the government had attended any such meetings which is disingenuous, to say the least, as himself and Mandelson, (also a Bilderberger attendee), were not in government when they attended. Also, Clinton was present at a Bilderberg meeting before becoming US president. Seems as if it could be, amongst other things, a forum for the elite to co-opt future political leaders to their agenda. Certainly, the secrecy and disinformation about them is cause for concern in itself.

you bet there is a cause for concern, and we are only just scratching the surface.. this is serious jazz !!!

globalisation is not a new idea and the people involved have been pulling the strings from time !!!

I man