Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

New world trade by 2005 - big deal

Daniel Brett | 15.11.2001 21:07

Thus far, developed countries have been able to push forth their agenda successfully by giving out very nominal concessions, says Rinku Pegu - and things are not going to get much better

A new world trade deal by year 2005 - that's what the World Trade Organisation (WTO) has collectively agreed upon through its ministerial meetings of 142 countries in Doha. So the question is: what will India gain from this new trade deal? Or, more precisely, will India be able to increase its share of world trade? (Currently, India's share of the world trade is less than one per cent.).

To begin with, India's agenda at Doha, which is largely reflective of that of the developing countries, was two-pronged. One was to get the implementation of benefits promised during the previous Uruguay going; the second was ensuring no new issues. Now, blocking a new round is also on the agenda.

But, according to B K Keayla, secretary general, Centre for Study of Global Trade, on both these accounts India has failed miserably. There is no commitment by the rich countries that developing countries will have greater access to their textiles and garments markets. Nor is there an initiative to show that the mantra of antidumping is not conjured up at will to keep the goods of developing countries at bay.

Commenting on the fate of the second priority on India's agenda, W R Vardarajan, secretary of the Centre for Indian Trade Union (CITU), said, "We have certainly given much more, and what has been offered (in return) is almost negligible. Gauged from this angle, the Doha round of ministerial talks has been a definite setback for the developing countries."

We will also find that the very reasons for which the Seattle talks had broken down two years ago have now all been sanctioned. In the essence, developed countries have been able to push forth their agenda successfully by giving out very nominal concessions. In fact, Professor Noam Chomsky, philosopher and peace activist, stated that it was precisely to prevent a repeat of the opposition that rocked the Seattle talks that Doha, the capital of Qatar, where dissent is unknown, was chosen as the venue.

That there was a decisive victory for the rich countries is proved by the fact that the Doha round has decided that controversial issues previously not included within the WTO would now become part of trade negotiations. The critical inclusions are environment, investment and competition. It is a development that the developing countries are suspicious of: they consider the inclusion of such non-trade issues as nothing but a ploy to deny the Third World countries their legitimate right to trade.

Elaborating on this aspect, Jayati Ghosh, economist at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi, says, "Once investments become part of the WTO, the government will have no control over the FDI (foreign direct investment) flows inside the country. In such a scenario, 'hot' money flowing in and creating a situation like that of the East Asian crisis of 1997 cannot be ruled out."

This is not the only worrying part. According to Ghosh, the independent measure that Malaysia took to handle the currency crisis at that time - basically blocking foreign account convertibility - will not be available to governments once investment becomes part of trade negotiations.

How is the Indian industry responding to this mess at Doha? T G Keshwani, corporate consultant of the PHD Chamber of Commerce, has no doubt that if the proposed issues of investments and competition get endorsed as part of trade negotiations, then Indian domestic industry would undoubtedly be hurt. Keshwani is of the view that unless and until India achieves a level playing field with the rich countries in terms of infrastructure (roads, power, transport), Indian companies can never compete with multinational corporations (MNCs). The fact is that because of the natural advantage in good infrastructure, the MNC's enjoy cost effectiveness, something that Indian companies cannot keep pace with under the prevailing domestic conditions.

Even when it comes to agriculture, where some concession is made, there is no guarantee that the European Union (EU) will oblige as required. The critical question, Keayla says, is: how much is the EU willing to cut its subsidies? It seems a tough task, given that EU farmers form an important constituency with their hugely vocal money power.

The only redeeming feature from a Third World perspective is that patents have been waived for medicines required in national emergencies. But, then, the critical question here, according to Vardarajan, is precisely who will decide if there is an emergency. There have been instances when in spite of millions suffering from AIDS, the South African government was prevented from declaring an emergency, under pressure from giant pharmaceutical MNCs. This disposition was overturned when four people died of anthrax in the United States and the whole nation was declared under emergency.

Ghosh, however, feels that if another development at Doha is to be considered - the inclusion of China as a member of the WTO - then there is a chance of a fair future for developing countries in global trading. If, as expected, China throws its weight behind the common agenda of developing countries, the balance of power could shift in our favour. In real terms, it could mean that controversial issues such as competition and investments might be negotiated in fair terms favourable to southern nations.

Daniel Brett
- e-mail: dan@danielbrett.co.uk
- Homepage: http://www.tehelka.com/channels/currentaffairs/2001/nov/15/ca111501doha.htm

Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech