Greenpeace occupy Sizewell B nuclear power station
MarkSharp | 14.10.2002 09:06
MarkSharp
A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.
MarkSharp | 14.10.2002 09:06
MarkSharp
www.indymedia.org
Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video
Africa
Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia
Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela
Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney
South Asia
india
United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester
West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine
Topics
biotech
Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
Comments
Hide the following comment
Greenpeace ignores rads right under our noses
15.10.2002 23:01
By rightly and legitimately linking this Cig Cartel with rads and dioxins, not only are the radiation industries and chlorine industries put on the defensive, the government "regulators" who allowed this mass endangerment and mass poisoning would also be put on the spot, as they should. The sooner the better.
* Dioxins (known human carcinogens AND among the 12 worst Persistent Organic Pollutants) come to unwitting smokers via chlorine bleached cig paper, chlorinated pesticide residues, chlorine contaminated agricultural ingredients and even the industrial cellulose used to make Fake Tobacco, as per many U.S. Patents.
* Radiation (low-level but no less deadly) comes to unwitting smokers via Still Legal use of uranium contaminated phosphate tobacco fertilizers...plus some natural radiation from soils. The thing is...the presence of dioxin SPEEDS UP the cell damage, the cancer, from rads and other natural and industrial carcinogens. This is called The Promoter Effect.
No less than former U.S. Surgeon General C. Everett Koop once warned that these rads cause MOST "smoking related" upper-respiratory cancers. Not "RADIATION-related"? Studies, some reported widely in the Reader's Digest (3/86), put the level up to 95% of such cancers. Funny but...these radioactive tobacco fertilizers are STILL LEGAL.
The issue disappeared. Why? One can only guess that the extensive Radiation Industry didn't like this news. Perhaps it seemed like a good idea at the time to blame rads for the harms of smoking in order to distract from the INEVITABLE and inescapable harms of smoking chlorine by-product, dioxin, to protect the oil, pesticide, paper, etc industries. Well, the rads story faded quickly...to be replaced by the current campaign...to ONLY blame the natural plant, tobacco, for the harms of "smoking". Smoking WHAT? is the question.
So...one might ask why Greenpeace (et al) isn't in Geneva at the Framework Convention on Tobacco [sic] Control (FCTC)to DEMAND that dioxins and radiation in typical cigarette smoke be FRONT AND CENTER of this issue.
The World Health Org. is there...knowing full well the harms of dioxin (procuced by burning man-made chlorine elements) but, oddly, WHO refuses so far to bring their knowledge, sitting right there on their desk, into the "smoking" arena. WHO, and Greenpeace, by ignoring this,
give Great Benefits to the very radiation and chlorine industries that cause so much health and environmental damage throughout the world. They even greatly benefit the Cigarette Manufacturers that they SAY they condemn.
It seems that they are doing JUST what these corporate entities want...namely, moving towards a prohibition of tobacco and smoking so as to put this potentially huge liability situation behind.
How many billions, or trillions, of dollars (or Euros) will this deny to the long-poisoned, deceived public?
See www.ktc.com/~bdrake for a startling intro course (with many links) into the topic of deadly NON-tobacco parts of typical cigs. Greenpeace and the others need to be asked why they ignore this. It's public info, not secret stuff, generally. It only serves the interests of Big Dioxin/Chlorine (incl. Big oil, pharms, plastics,pesticides etc), and Big Rads to omit this. And it tolerates past, present and future mass public endangerment, and corruption of public "regulators"...the ones who let it all happen, after all.
Watchdog