The word here is that Australian special investigators found traces of C4 plastic explosives.

Also, in the linked nuke article why on earth is the picture of a micro-nuce called a SADM (saddam) ? Sounds like scare mongoring to me.

As intresting and thought provoking as this speculation is, we must analysise and focus on the sources of info.
For example, I'm not sure how much credance to give some of the evidence emerging from your sources, Hal turner is a bigot, a racist and of very little brain ...

..."Don't expect "fairness" or "balance;" that's not what this show is about. This program focuses on issues, news and opinions that the mainstream will not talk about: Savage black crime; Diseased, uneducated mongrels slithering into the country illegally; Degenerate pervert homos; lying, cheating, whiney jews; and much, much more!"..

See? Quoted directly from the intro to his web page (listed as one of the sources above).

However, I await the results of more prying into this 'convenient' attrocity.

by As If 7:06am Wed Oct 16 '02

FBI are looking for a suspect seen near the club with a white carrier bag containing S4 plastic explosives, which was capable of destroying 500 lives, 100 cars and 47 buildings?

Video clearly shows a rising mushroom cloud over the blast area, with the characteristic airborne flames burning at a sustained interval after the initial blast. This is not achievable with typical explosives because they explode and burn at ground level, rising only as high as the force of the initial blast can carry them, and extinguishing within a second or two.

The Videographer reports a blinding white flash caught everyone's attention, prompting them to turn to the direction of the flash and record the subsequent mushroom cloud! As is common knowledge, only a nuclear explosion yields a blinding white flash and subsequent mushroom cloud with airborne flame.

Soil, air and debris samples have been obtained from VERY near the blast site - without intruding upon police evidence collection procedures or violating any local laws. Those soil samples are already off the island and enroute to a reputable laboratory for confirmation of radioactive - or other- contamination.

The lab is in possession of records which document the radioactive "signatures" of various weapons-grade plutonium, uranium and other fissionable materials produced around the world. This lab will be able to say with certainty if this was a nuclear incident and if so, will be able to cite from which nation the fissionable material likely originated! Test results will be released on The Hal Turner Show web site when they become available.

Warning: Graphic pictures, not for the feint hearted.
 http://www.halturnershow.com/BaliBombBlast.html

www.halturnershow.com/BaliBombBlast.html

this kind of dingbat theorising, which can only serve to discredit a peace movement already failing; not only ineffective, theiyre paranoid nutters too ! Conspracy theory thrives in such circumstances, where the shadowy worlds of espionage and sabotage meet, along with disinformation and genuine confusion; let the dust settle a bit before ranting on like a crackpot !

...not yet, anyway...

Some points to support this guess, not an expert level, but anyway:

Flash, flames and mushroom clouds are produced by almost any explosives, starting with TNT, as long as the blast is big enough. Suggested C4 is more powerful than TNT, so a medium bag might do the task. There are other stuff too; no need to go nuclear yet. The damage was horrible, yes, but seems still achieveable by a "regular" bomb.

On the other hand, if a small nuclear bomb had been used like this, I believe the destruction would've been even larger. Bigger crater, molten stone and steel, nightmarish casualties due the flying debris, smashed windows miles away, unimaginable burns...

I don't recall how small N-bombs there is, but comparing that info with Nagasaki and Hiroshima etc, it should be easy to prove these theories this way or that. To the victims this is of course about 100% irrelevant...

I personally hold no brief for Turner's views which from looking at other parts of the website seem wholly repulsive.
However there's a chance that he could be correct on this one and it's worth bearing in mind. There's no doubt that this kind of action benefits the warmongers like the rise in favour of war on Iraq
 http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,812632,00.html and no doubt far more Australians willing to stand behind the detestable Howard and his pro-Bush stance
My personal favourite theory is the 'Tesla howitzer', employing the same technology that almost certainly demolished the WTC towers.

as predicted here:
 http://www.uk.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=43407&group=webcast
if Blair's mate has his way
sooner than I thought