"What I am saying is true. The British Establishment is happy to try and ridicule me and I believe many of them are happy that Diana and Dodi were killed

"A Friend shocked me the other day saying he thought Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Fayed had been assassinated. Eh? Yes, he said, it was as clear as day that MI5 or, as it may be, MI6 had been responsible for their deaths. What shocked me most was his judgment that our security forces had been wholly justified in their action. My friend reckoned it was right to prevent a marriage between the Princess and Mr. Fayed, and if this meant they had to be bumped off, so be it. Intelligence agents were in the Hotel."

Ex-MI6 Agent Richard Tomlin-son claims that the MI6 was involved "in the Paris assassination where the Princess of Wales, Diana, was killed".

The Israeli intelligence service MOSSAD has got a free hand to kill whenever, whoever and wherever. Influence of the Israel-lobbies almost anywhere in the world.
"MOSSAD's business is spying and killing. MOSSAD does that in the USA just as freely as in Great Britain, France or Germany.
What would be a motive for the MOSSAD to murder Princess Diana? Well, Israel would have been in trouble if Diana had married Dodi Fayed. Think about it. What if Diana would have visited Palestine as a mother to a half Arabic child and as a wife to an Arab man? Imagine the masses cheering Diana, embracing her as one of theirs. What if the Princess had then hugged a Palestinian child in front of hundreds of TV-cameras? Perhaps a child whose parents were murdered by Israeli death squads! A child whose father might have been shaken to death as a method of Israeli interrogation procedures - shaken until his artery was bursting open. A child whose pregnant mother was beaten to death because a family member of her's was an alleged "terrorist" against Israel. The truth about the Israeli terror regime would have been revealed to the world - thanks to Diana.

Last but not least, the powerful Israel lobby surrounding the British Royals could not tolerate an Arabic influence inside the British Establishment.

is very much a law unto itself, a kind of cult established by the state in the 1920s, which has set itself up as both moral arbiter and definer of the nation, while making sure it competes effectively with OTHER cults, such as the royal family.
Remember, the coronation of Elisabeth Windsor in 1953 was the first experience most British people had of TV. It has been said that the BBC effectively crowned the monarch in that time.
Although an experimental TV network had been running in the 1930s, the goverment closed it down when the unexplored social influence it might have was realised; (Goerge Orwell was working at the BBC in the 1940s and may have been aware of the concerns, using it as an element in 1984)

This is nonsense, the BBC is abjectly pro Royal and right up their arses. But the recent troubles are another nail in their coffin.

As to this Paul Burrell royal butler trial fiasco, it is clear that the police raided him to try to recover some missing documents. Burrell didn't have them, or wouldn't tell them where they were hidden and so they prosecuted him for theft instead, to try to get him to tell.

It was obvious the trial was dodgy from the start, with Public Interest Immunity, the first jury thrown out and then, before Burrell went into the witness box, and before he could say anything about the royals, the establishment pulled the plug on the farce.

This is what it looks like to me. Any other theories?