Skip to content or view mobile version

Home | Mobile | Editorial | Mission | Privacy | About | Contact | Help | Security | Support

A network of individuals, independent and alternative media activists and organisations, offering grassroots, non-corporate, non-commercial coverage of important social and political issues.

Aspire Press release

a | 26.11.2002 00:02

A-spire social centre raid - Appeal for witness statments

A-Spire Press Release – Appeals for Witness Statements

On Sunday 24th November at about 3.15am as many as 100 police officers raided the Aspire Building at Buckingham House, Otley road. The raid was undertaken without any warning and was obviously planned well in advance – as indicated by the number of officers involved. In order to gain entry, police used a battering ram on the doors and indiscriminately used pepper spray and threw CS gas canisters inside a building which contained a large number of party goers.

Fortunately no one was injured in the ensuing panic, thanks mainly to the safety procedures put in place by the organisers. Many witnesses report unprovoked brutal violence by the police. No official reason was given for the raid and no warrant was served.

20 people were arrested for public order offences. 16 were released without charge and the remaining four have been charged with affray. It is our opinion, based on witness statements that the circumstances of these arrests are highly questionable.

The building was previously empty and has been squatted. It is being used as a social centre whilst providing a home for a dozen or so homeless people.

The centre has been operating for two weeks offering a wide range of workshops including women’s self defence, horticulture, theatre skills, puppet making.
It has hosted talks and film shows on environmental issues, human rights and international issues such as Argentina and Palestine.

It also features a vegan café a children’s area, an indoor skate ramp and a performance space.

All of this is run by a non-hierarchical collective of volunteers from the local community and all paid for purely from donations.

The social centre has been very popular with hundreds of people taking part in the various activities on a daily basis – thus confirming the need for this form of self organised “free space” and drawing attention to the amount of empty unused property that could be put to much better use.

The Aspire Collective is planning to leave the building on Tuesday 26th November, as agreed by the building owners.

The party was a culmination of several weeks of hard work by all concerned and featured a degree of organisation and concern for the comfort and safety of those attending that would put most city centre nightclubs to shame. There was no trouble at the event and we had received no complaints about noise or disturbance.

Bearing these facts in mind, we find it very difficult to understand the reasons behind the police action. It needlessly endangered hundreds of people who were committing no crime and causing no disturbance in an illegal act of gross irresponsibility. We should also like to stress that squatting is a civil rather than a criminal matter and the case was already being dealt with by the courts.

We would also like to express our amazement that the police felt it necessary to imply so many officers, some drafted in from other towns, to conduct such a large scale operation with no obvious purpose other than to illicit fear and violence on innocent people.

We suspect that the police will claim they were responding to an incident – however the numbers of officers involved and their level of co-ordination clearly indicates that this was planned well in advance.
 info@a-spire.org.uk

a
- Homepage: www.a-spire.org.uk

Comments

Hide the following 9 comments

doesn't make sense

26.11.2002 12:43

what the fuck???

They raided two days before you'd agreed to leave?
Did they bring cameras?
A warrant?
What kind of warrant was it?

The radical dairy got raided 'for drugs' a few weeks before Mayday (though the only person in possession refused a caution and they didn't push it - money well spent there).

But the @spire raid, apart from having no good reason, seems not even to have an ulterior motive. I'd like to find out what this was about (as well as the senior officer's name on the warrant) before doing a solidarity action.

DT


incurring the wrath of power

26.11.2002 15:28


It seems obvious to me that it was a pre planned attack.
The amount of officers was entirely ridiculous, as are Police claims of violence towards them from the party goers.
I believe the order for such an attack came from the council, or very high up in West Yorkshire Police, in complicity with the authorities.
Why?
Here are my reasons:
A-spire have done this before, and with not an insignificant degree of success.
It is my opinion that the council want this stopped, as its success makes it an embarrassment.
An awful lot of money has been put into the gentrification of Leeds, in the hope people smarten up, and go into town and spend money.
The Local council want to promote Leeds as a "New" "Trendy" "Up and coming" city.
Headingley itself has a lot of relatively up market property, and it would not be unreasonable to assume the council want it to stay that way.
It could be argued a popular squatted venue could threaten this.
Basically due to its success, and possible a certain degree of notoriety, what A-spire organise doesn't fall in line with local authorities plans for the future of the city.
That is why such unwarranted force was used in the illegal attack.
The attack was a warning to a-spire and sympathisers, that what they were doing (regardless of the ethic and moral sensibilities) is not welcome, and to pack it in.
Maybe I'm talking crap, over reacting, or have a bit of an over active imagination.
I do think people who were actually there to experience the level of the over reaction of the hundred or so officers involved, and the questioning looks on some of their faces as they saw what they were stopping, as if they themselves had been duped and hyped up into expecting riot situation, or at least a higher level of disorder than was present, also raises important questions.
I somehow doubt they will be answered though.

random


To be fair...

26.11.2002 15:28

...most of us were comitting one crime or another - ilegal drugs, an unlicensed bar, CJA laws etc.
The issue as I see it is not that the police behaved ilegaly, irresponsibly or out of character - the police often behave like this.
The police exist in oposition to everything we try to build, it is not surprising that they attacked us, but it is to our credit that we defended ourselves, looked after each other and got all the people and soundsystems out. Well done everyone!

B


incurring the wrath of power

26.11.2002 15:30


It seems obvious to me that it was a pre planned attack.
The amount of officers was entirely ridiculous, as are Police claims of violence towards them from the party goers.
I believe the order for such an attack came from the council, or very high up in West Yorkshire Police, in complicity with the authorities.
Why?
Here are my reasons:
A-spire have done this before, and with not an insignificant degree of success.
It is my opinion that the council want this stopped, as its success makes it an embarrassment.
An awful lot of money has been put into the gentrification of Leeds, in the hope people smarten up, and go into town and spend money.
The Local council want to promote Leeds as a "New" "Trendy" "Up and coming" city.
Headingley itself has a lot of relatively up market property, and it would not be unreasonable to assume the council want it to stay that way.
It could be argued a popular squatted venue could threaten this.
Basically due to its success, and possible a certain degree of notoriety, what A-spire organise doesn't fall in line with local authorities plans for the future of the city.
That is why such unwarranted force was used in the illegal attack.
The attack was a warning to a-spire and sympathisers, that what they were doing (regardless of the ethic and moral sensibilities) is not welcome, and to pack it in.
Maybe I'm talking crap, over reacting, or have a bit of an over active imagination.
I do think people who were actually there to experience the level of the over reaction of the hundred or so officers involved, and the questioning looks on some of their faces as they saw what they were stopping, as if they themselves had been duped and hyped up into expecting riot situation, or at least a higher level of disorder than was present, also raises important questions.
I somehow doubt they will be answered though.

random


selling university places

27.11.2002 18:43

IT WAS BECAUSE IT WAS IN HEADINGLEY. THIS WAS POLITICALLY MOTIVATED. THEY CAN'T HAVE A BUNCH OF ANARCHISTS ORGANISING SOCIAL CENTRES AND PARTIES (FUCKING GOOD ONES AT THAT) IN THE MIDDLE OF STUDENT LAND. GOD FORBID. NOT TO NTION THE BUINESS INTERESTS OF THE PETIT BOURGEOUISE MAFIA THAT RUN HEADINGLEYS' INCREASINGLY BORING AND UNIFORM NIGHT SPOTS. IMAGINE IF THE STUDENTS DECIDED THAT IT WAS POSSIBLE TO ORGANISE YOUR OWN ENTERTAINMENT FOR FREE WELL THAT WOULD FUCK A FEW THINGS UP. LEEDS 'BOOM' IS BASED ON STUDENT DEBT SELLING UNIVERSITY PLACES IS A VERY SERIOUS BUISINESS. IF YOUR ACTIVITIES ARE PERCEIVED TO POSE A THREAT TO THE FINELY BALANCED ECONOMIC AGENDA THAT HAS LED TO THE GENTRIFICATION OF SOME PARTS PF LEEDS AND THE GHETTOISATION OF OTHERS THEN YOU WILL BE DEALT WITH FIRMLY. THAT IS WHY THEY DON'T GIVE A FUCK IF YOU HAVE YOUR SOCIAL CENTRE IN LITTLE LONDON BUT DO IF YOU HAVE IT IN HEADINGLEY. T

rudeboy


Over-Conspiratorialising Police Raids?

28.11.2002 15:03

Friends

I get the impression that you are over-estimating both the intelligence and the sophisticated far-sighted psycho-political-economic analysis of the local municipal and police authorities in relation to the raid.

Do you really believe that they believe that occasional, short-term social squats threaten the capital accumulation process in Headingley?

There is definitely a political message here: they are warning us not to take over council property! There may have been collusion in an attempt to scare the shit out of the Aspire movement. I personally believe that the political motivations stem from the political activities of those who are connected directly with Aspire, and the alternative left people who support and attend.

If you look at who visits and used the social centre, you will find the rainbow spectrum of the local radical and alternative community. How many of us will have been involved in the anti-war demo in Leeds on the 31st October? How many hunt-sabbers were there? How many people who regularly block the base? etc etc

The police may have been settling old scores, scaring us in order to make us think twice about frequently stepping outside of the law.

But I don't think it is because bar-owners worried about their future profit-rates...none of us surely go to there bland establishments anway!

If Aspire would like any solidarity support, please don't hesitate and post a message here.

SH

Stu H


Well, Stu

29.11.2002 19:14

I expect Bobby on the beat is as befuddled by the mysteries of capital accumulation as anyone else. However, those who direct his actions do so at the behest of others who are more or less directly engaged in the accumulation capital.

The latter do have sophisticated analyses, probably more sophisticated than yours and mine and rudeboy's combined. Wherever one looks, from Leeds to Lahore, from Bogata to Bayern, it is apparent that their analyses recommend total exclusion of competition, indeed, of hope as well.

To insist upon their stupidity is to invite bewildered defeat at every turn, and despair. Never, until we admit their competence, will we be motivated to organize to defeat them, and to survive defeat by them.

Bill


told not to bother.......

05.12.2002 15:21

At the begining of summer and free outdoor party season the police informed would be party organisers that the Leeds area now had an attitude of "zero tolerance" to free parties this year. I have spoken to the police on numerous occassions in the past about parties and Ive never heard them use this particular term before when talking about them. It seems to me to be a continuation of this strategy and that they've been waiting for just the right moment to enforce their "new" directive.

Conspiracies aside I just think they dont like it up 'em!

B

bwtz


this world...

01.01.2003 23:41

I hate this world sometimes. I heard about this by word of mouth from someone who was there and then found the story here on the web.

I end up feeling like I can't trust any of the stories coming out of these situations, even what comes out of a mate's mouth in the pub (as it doesn't quite tally with your article)...I don't want to see things polarise into people having to take either explicitly radical poses or accepting the pabulum we'd get through conventional reporting.

Argh. Serious police-induced headache, and that's just from reading and hearing about it. I only hope nobody who was there got serious police-induced aches of a more lasting, physical nature.

Besides


Upcoming Coverage
View and post events
Upcoming Events UK
24th October, London: 2015 London Anarchist Bookfair
2nd - 8th November: Wrexham, Wales, UK & Everywhere: Week of Action Against the North Wales Prison & the Prison Industrial Complex. Cymraeg: Wythnos o Weithredu yn Erbyn Carchar Gogledd Cymru

Ongoing UK
Every Tuesday 6pm-8pm, Yorkshire: Demo/vigil at NSA/NRO Menwith Hill US Spy Base More info: CAAB.

Every Tuesday, UK & worldwide: Counter Terror Tuesdays. Call the US Embassy nearest to you to protest Obama's Terror Tuesdays. More info here

Every day, London: Vigil for Julian Assange outside Ecuadorian Embassy

Parliament Sq Protest: see topic page
Ongoing Global
Rossport, Ireland: see topic page
Israel-Palestine: Israel Indymedia | Palestine Indymedia
Oaxaca: Chiapas Indymedia
Regions
All Regions
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other Local IMCs
Bristol/South West
Nottingham
Scotland
Social Media
You can follow @ukindymedia on indy.im and Twitter. We are working on a Twitter policy. We do not use Facebook, and advise you not to either.
Support Us
We need help paying the bills for hosting this site, please consider supporting us financially.
Other Media Projects
Schnews
Dissident Island Radio
Corporate Watch
Media Lens
VisionOnTV
Earth First! Action Update
Earth First! Action Reports
Topics
All Topics
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Major Reports
NATO 2014
G8 2013
Workfare
2011 Census Resistance
Occupy Everywhere
August Riots
Dale Farm
J30 Strike
Flotilla to Gaza
Mayday 2010
Tar Sands
G20 London Summit
University Occupations for Gaza
Guantanamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
Carmel Agrexco
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Stop Sequani
Stop RWB
Climate Camp 2008
Oaxaca Uprising
Rossport Solidarity
Smash EDO
SOCPA
Past Major Reports
Encrypted Page
You are viewing this page using an encrypted connection. If you bookmark this page or send its address in an email you might want to use the un-encrypted address of this page.
If you recieved a warning about an untrusted root certificate please install the CAcert root certificate, for more information see the security page.

Global IMC Network


www.indymedia.org

Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa

Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela

Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india


United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester

West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine

Topics
biotech

Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech